Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 3
Group 3
Members:
Blanca, Azalea Shelley
Bongcasan, Justine Marie
Buntag, Jemar Balsomo
Buquiran, Mary Joy Morales
Cajulao, Lera Jean Salveron
Production Theory Learning Outcomes:
▪ Labor
refers to human effort
▪ Capital
refers to machinery, equipment, and factories
▪ Land
refers to resources taken from the earth
▪ Entrepreneurial skills
refers to skills related to innovation and risk evaluation
4
Variable and Fixed Inputs
5
Short run and Long run Production
6
Defining the Production
Function: What Goes in
Must Come Out
Production
function
specifies the relationship
that exists between
inputs and outputs for
a given technology.
8
q= f (x1 , x2 , … , xn)
X1 through Xn represents the various inputs in
9
If you only have two inputs in the production process:
q= f ( L, K )
L -represents for labor
K -represents for capital
q= 2L + 5K
A linear relationship between both labor and output
and capital and output.
10
Cobb-Douglas Function
-this commonly used production function.
-it assumes some degree of substitutability between
inputs, but not perfect substitutability.
q= 4L0.5K0.5
11
Using Single Input
Production Functions
Single Input
Production Functions
▪ one variable input
▪ all other inputs in the
production process are
fixed inputs.
▪ you can’t change the
quantity of the fixed
inputs.
13
14
Distinguishing between average product and marginal
product
▪ Total product
refers to the entire quantity of output produced from a given set of
inputs.
15
Distinguishing between average product and marginal
product
▪ Average product
refers to the output per unit of input.
Example:
16
Distinguishing between average product and marginal
product
▪ Marginal product
it is the change in total product that occurs when one additional
unit of a variable input is employed.
Example:
-The marginal product of the 100th acre of
land is 102 bushels of corn.
-The total product of 99 acres is 11,255
bushels and total product for 100 acres is
11,357 bushels.
-The difference or change between the two
is 11,357-11,255 or 102 bushels of corn.
17
Diminishing returns
18
Making Production More
Realistic with Multiple
Input Production Function
▪ Although single-input functions are useful in illustrating
many concept, usually they're too simplistic to represent
a firms production decision. Therefore, it is useful for
you to understand the firms employment decision when
the quantities employed of two or
more inputs are changed. In short you are dealing
with two more variableinputs
20
▪ Consider the production function q = f(L,K), which
indicates the quantity of output produced is a function
of the quantities of labor, L, and capital, K, employed.
The specific form of this function may be the following
Cobb-Douglas function.
21
Production Isoquants
22
Defining isocost curves: All input combinations cost
the same
▪ illustrates all possible combinations of two inputs that
result in the same level of total cost. The isocost curve
is presented as an equation
24
Defining isocost curves: All input combinations cost
the same
Example:
Assume your total cost is $4,000 a day, and labor costs $20
per hour, and capital costs $5 per machine-hour. Given this
information, your isocost curve equation is
25
This are some of the possible combinations of
labor and capital that you can employ for a total
cost of 4000.
Labor Capital
50 600
100 400
150 200
26
1st Combination
C= 4,000 PL = 20 L = 50 PK = 5 K= 600
C = (Pₗ X L) + (Pₖ X K)
4,000 = (20 X 50) + (5 X 600)
4,000 = 1,000 + 3,000
27
2nd Combination
C = 4,000 PL = 20 L = 100 PK = 5 K =400
C = (Pₗ X L) + (Pₖ X K)
4,000 = (20 X 100) + (5 X 400)
4,000 = 2,000 + 2,000
28
3rd Combination
C = 4,000 PL = 20 L = 150 PK = 5 K = 200
C = (Pₗ X L) + (Pₖ X K)
4,000 = (20 x 150) + (5 x 200)
4,000 = 3,000 + 1,000
4,000 = 4,000
29
Figure 6-3:
An isocost curve showing
possible combinations of
labor and capital you can
employ for $4,000.
30
Shift in Isocost Line
31
Change in total outlay to be
made by the firm
- When the firm decides to
increase or decrease the total
money to be spent
on purchase of inputs while
prices of the inputs remain the
same.
32
Change in Price of a factor-
input
- When price of-factor input
changes the isocost line
swings or rotates.
The direction in which the
isocost line will swing depends
upon the factor whose price
has changed.
33
Figure 6-4:
Lower input price on the
horizontal axis.
34
Lower input price on the
horizontal axis
▪ If the input in the horizontal axis
becomes cheaper , the isocost curve
rotates out on that axis.
35
Figure 6-5:
Lower input price on the
vertical axis
36
Lower input price on the
vertical axis
▪ If the input on the vertical axis
becomes cheaper , the isocost curve
rotates
37
Making the most with the least: Cost minimization
38
Figure 6-6:
Cost-minimizing input
combination.
39
40
▪ Economists call the preceding
concept the least cost criterion, and
it’s an application of
the equimarginal principle. To produce
goods with the lowest possible
production cost, you equate
the marginal product per dollar spent.
41
Figure 6-6:
Isoquant Curve Cost-minimizing
input combination
42
Recognizing That More
Isn't Always Better with
Long-Run Returns to Scale
Returns to scale
45
3 Kinds of
Returns to
scale:
▪ Increasing returns to scale
▪ Decreasing returns to scale
▪ Constant returns to scale
46
➢ Increasing returns to scale
Indicate that doubling the quantity employed of all inputs results in the quantity of
output produced more than doubling. Increasing returns to scale can be caused by
greater specialization within your company, or perhaps doubling your inputs allows
you to build one large factory that’s more efficient than two small factories. This is
shown in the following example.
The table shows that the input is increasing by 100%, on the other hand the output is
increased by 150%.
47
Causes of Increasing Returns to scale
48
➢ Decreasing returns to scale
Indicate that doubling the quantity employed of all inputs results in the quantity of
output produced less than doubling. Decreasing returns to scale may result from the
fact that larger business enterprises are harder to coordinate than smaller
businesses. The following example will explain decreasing returns to scale.
This shows that inputs increased to 100% but the increase output is only 50%.
49
Causes of Decreasing Returns to scale
50
➢ Constant returns to scale
Indicate that doubling the quantity employed of all inputs results in output also
doubling. In the case of constant returns to scale, increasing and decreasing returns
to scale essentially offset each other.
Similarly, chain of dry cleaners can increase its volume of service by increasing its
number of outlets (with designated number of workers per outlets). This can be
explained in the following example.
51
Causes of Constant Returns to scale
52
“ Diminishing marginal
returns vs. returns to scale
Diminishing marginal returns primarily looks at changes in
variable inputs and is therefore a short-term metric. Variable
inputs are easier to change in a short time horizon when
compared to fixed inputs. As such, returns to scale is a measure
focused on changing fixed inputs and is therefore a long-term
metric.
53
Determining Output
Elasticity
Output Elasticity
55
Output Elasticity
If you increase the quantity employed of both labor and capital by one
percent, then
56
Output Elasticity
Graham, R. (2013). Managerial Economics for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
https://wikieducator.org/Returns_to_Scale?fbclid=IwAR0EBSxvXw-lFZfl-
avQp1o6pZdIQJEVB7g4bxepT0Sg64t2VkvPp5wyI9w
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/033015/whats-difference-
between-diminishing-marginal-returns-and-returns-scale.asp
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-
XzlKjl_ISHOwgJVeRUY7rxhS4QyFFTc/view?fbclid=IwAR2fIiYmRmAiXbr_GgPjT4
RI9hDDF6dhInm84gmj4RhES8s-XCUdwCYFJ_g
THANK YOU VERY
MUCH!
59