Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Most Dangerous Woman in Britain - Lawyer Shami Chakrabarti - Archives - IFEX
The Most Dangerous Woman in Britain - Lawyer Shami Chakrabarti - Archives - IFEX
We use both persistent and session cookies on our website to be sure promotions are not re-displayed to users who have already
seen them. We also use cookies set by a third party analytics service to measure traffic and collect statistics about users’ devices
and browsers.
More information
Continue
Share this
4 minute read
Shami Chakrabarti speaks at an event on antisemitism within the Labour party, in London, Britain, 30 June 2016,
REUTERS/Peter Nicholls/Files
From post-9-11 attacks on civil liberties to the high profile Leveson Inquiry,
Chakrabarti has been a key player in some of the UK's most important
human rights and free expression debates of the last 15 years.
For a certain reactionary section of the British tabloid press, there is little more infuriating than a
‘do-gooder’ . A person who regularly sends them into fits of outrage is Shami Chakrabarti,
former director of the leading human rights NGO Liberty , and, according to The Sun, “the most
dangerous woman in Britain.”
Chakrabarti is one of the UK’s best known lawyers. Her high profile is due partly to her regular
media appearances, but mainly it’s because she’s been a key player in some of the UK’s most
important human rights and free expression debates of the last 15 years. These include debates
on freedom of information , government surveillance and press regulation .
Born in London to Indian immigrants, Chakrabarti famously credits her father with stirring her
early interest in human rights. As a 12-year-old, she argued with him that Peter Sutcliffe (the
infamous Yorkshire Ripper) should receive the death penalty for his crimes; however, her father,
explaining to her the immorality of taking another person’s life, succeeded in changing her mind.
Chakrabarti went on to study law and eventually qualified as a barrister.
Her first job was at the Home Office where she worked on the Human Rights Act under the
then Home Secretary Jack Straw. In 2001, after five years’ service – and by then disillusioned with
the bureaucracy that is integral to working in the civil service – she left and joined Liberty as its in-
house lawyer. The following day, 9/11 happened.
It’s widely recognised that the 2001 terrorist attacks on the US radically shifted the balance
between security and rights around the world, with rights very much suffering as a result: much of
Liberty’s work post-9/11 was in response to this new world order. As Chakrabarti said in 2013 , “It
was very obvious what the priorities were going to be – we were going to have to respond to all
these terrible short-sighted policies that were adopted in the name of freedom but that were
about diminishing freedom and actually quite counterproductive to fighting terrorism.”
Chakrabarti was appointed director of Liberty in 2003 and quickly emerged as an important voice
of protest alongside a varied collection of lawyers, journalists and politicians who were alarmed by
the then Labour government’s attempts to introduce legislation which was detrimental to civil
liberties, such as compulsory ID cards , 90 days’ detention without trial , restrictions on
public protest and the new offence of ‘glorifying terrorism’ .
Perhaps Chakrabarti’s most high-profile role has been as advisor to the Leveson Inquiry from
2011-2012 – another flashpoint for tensions between freedom of expression and other rights.
Announced in 2011 by the then British Prime Minister David Cameron, this inquiry was intended to
examine the culture and ethics of the UK newspaper industry following the News International
phone-hacking scandal . Previous investigations had revealed that various British newspapers
published by Rupert Murdoch’s News International had engaged in illegal activities, including
police bribery and hacking the phones of celebrities and the victims of crime. High-profile
journalists and police officers had been forced to resign; the News of the World’s managing editor,
Andy Coulson, would eventually be jailed.
The ugly underbelly of the UK press had been exposed, and the task of the Leveson Inquiry was
to look into how this behaviour could be prevented from reoccurring in the future.
The inquiry made a series of recommendations for regulation of the press. These
recommendations – which included the creation of a new, independent, press regulatory body
and “exemplary damages” for actions such as breach of privacy, libel and slander – met with a
mixed response from press and politicians.
However, the real division was sown by Prime Minister Cameron, who, instead of implementing
Leveson’s recommendations, proposed the creation of a press watchdog backed by a royal
charter (effectively meaning that it would be state-approved).
Journalists and free expression advocates, including Index on Censorship , rejected the idea
outright as a threat to an independent press.
Chakrabarti also went public, fiercely criticising Cameron for his inaction over Leveson and
describing his proposal as “constitutionally inappropriate, undemocratic, opaque and in no way
fit for this purpose.”
Another high profile role came when Chakrabarti left Liberty in 2016 and was asked to chair an
inquiry into a handful of incidents involving anti-Semitism in the Labour Party. She concluded
that anti-Semitism and racism did exist within the Labour Party membership, but to no greater
extent than it existed in other British institutions .
Chakrabarti has received numerous honours for her work and was listed as one of the “100
Makers of the 21st Century” by The Sunday Times in 2014.
Share this
Tep Vanny
United Kingdom
Pinar Selek
United Kingdom
Get the latest free expression news delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign up now
Toronto, ON
CANADA
M6E 3S0
Contact us
Articles
IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content
has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact media@ifex.org to request permission to reproduce or
republish in whole or in part content from this site.