Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tall Buildings Assignment 2
Tall Buildings Assignment 2
Tall Buildings Assignment 2
MURTHAL (SONEPAT)
Department of Architecture
Assignment No. 2
Elevators using hoist ropes, however, could only function effectively in low-rise buildings and this
limitation encouraged the introduction of the hydraulic elevator in 1870, even though early models
contained dangerous design flaws. By 1876 these problems had been resolved, providing a solution
for servicing the early skyscrapers. Now, about ventilation: in the 1850s, a system using low-pressure
steam and steam-operated fans came up. These were adopted in the construction of the later
skyscrapers. Many US buildings were lit by gas but this carried safety risks and was difficult to install
in taller buildings. As an alternative, electric lights were installed from 1878 onwards, powered by
basement generators. Improvements in iron piping permitted running hot and cold water and
sanitation facilities to be installed throughout taller buildings for the first time.
Significant economic growth after the Civil War and increasingly intensive use of urban land
encouraged the development of taller buildings beginning in the 1870s. Chicago initially led the way
in skyscraper design, with many constructed in the center of the financial district during the late 1880s
and early 1890s. Sometimes termed the products of the Chicago school of architecture, these
skyscrapers attempted to balance aesthetic concerns with practical commercial design, producing
large, square palazzo-styled buildings hosting shops and restaurants on the ground level and
containing rentable offices on the upper floors.
Tall buildings fit in well where business and organizational structures are geared to large-quantity
operations; where building materials are plentiful; and where there is an adequate force of skilled
labour. The economic viability of building tall is ultimately a matter of location and local conditions.
It can be the lowest-cost solution in a developed country in a location with other high-rises where the
needed infrastructure and urban services are in place. The impact of tall buildings on property values
varies. In some places, because of newly generated traffic and crowding, property values in nearby
neighbourhoods may diminish.
01.5 Pruitt-Igoe Event
The demolition of the Pruitt-Igoe housing project in St. Louis in 1972 has been ingrained in the minds
of a generation of planners and architects. The demolition occurred in response to strong residential
dissatisfaction and high levels of criminal activity. To many people, tall buildings became
synonymous with cheaply built, poorly maintained, blocks of apartments or offices detached from the
ground plane which did not meet the needs of their users.
Most high-rise apartments are located near the centre of the city, which may provide a better commute
to work. High-rise apartment complexes have more rooms available, allowing for more variety and
leasing options. Families where the life style includes intensive use of private open spaces (walled
courtyard), public open areas around a tall building are not a satisfactory substitute and they lack the
sense of home ownership. Families of any economic class with small children and elders are
concerned about losing eye contact with them while at play and strolls. Occupant dissatisfaction
relating to noise levels, lack of accessibility to people with disabilities.
01.6 Economics
Can support the upward increase of the cost of urban land in cases where the land value is low, high
rises can contribute to higher cost per dwelling unit. Initial costs, maintenance costs and operation
costs are higher proving the high rises out of the economic rage. Also lower construction time for low
rise as compared to longer times for tall buildings result in high interest costs.
01.7 Transportation
If provision is not made in the master plan or existing development does not allow for expansion,
large amount of traffic generated by tall buildings can overtax public transportation systems and
create extensive automobile traffic.
01.8 Services
High domestic water consumption, Wastage of usable floor area in services like lifts etc. Wastage of
usable floor area in services like lifts etc.
Q.2 Discuss with proper diagram Rigid Frame, Flat plate, Core system,
Shear wall system, Shear frame system.
02.1 There are many type of rigid frame structural system depending upon various
factors
01 Braced Frame structural system
• Braced frames are cantilevered vertical trusses resisting laterals loads primarily
diagonal members that together with the girders, form the “web” of the vertical truss,
with the columns acting as the “chords’’.
• Bracing members eliminate bending in beams and columns.
• This system consists of slabs (flat or plate) connected to columns (without the use of
beams).
• flat plate is a two-way reinforced concrete framing system utilizing a slab of uniform
thickness, the simplest of structural shapes.
• The flat slab is a two-way reinforced structural system that includes either drop panels
or column capitals at columns to resist heavier loads and thus permit longer spans.
• Lateral resistance depends on the flexural stiffness of the components and their
connections, with the slab corresponding to the girder of the rigid frame.
• Suitable for building up to 25 stories.
02.4 Core system
Rectangular box-shaped cores around stairs, elevators, and other shafts are one of the most regularly
used forms of shear walls, which also makes an efficient use of vertical enclosures that are required
around the cores.
This system works quite well for commercial buildings, where maximum flexibility in layout is
required, so that the open spaces can be divided by movable partitions. Other than the functional
advantages, the structural benefits of this system is that being spatial, the walls around the core are
capable of resisting all types of loads – vertical forces, shear forces, and bending moments in all
directions, as well as torsion - especially when adequate stiffness and strength are provided between
flanges of open sections (Taranath, 1988).
In other words, shear cores may be considered as members that resist lateral loads in a way similar to
massive beams cantilevering out of the foundation; thus the shear and bending stresses observed in a
core are analogous to those of a box girder.
Unlike conventional beams, the core has to carry 3 a significant amount of axial load (gravity load of
the structure), which induces compressive forces and as a result, the shear capacity of the structure is
increased and the structure may not need to be designed for tensile stresses, especially in case of
heavy concrete cores.
Figure 1 illustrates the response of a central core system to gravity and wind loads. The gravity loads
increase progressively from almost zero at the top to maximum at the base, while the moment
response due to lateral load is similar to that of a cantilever beam subjected to uniformly distributed
load with maximum moment at the fixed end. To be more specific, this response of a core to lateral
loading depends upon its shape, the degree of homogeneity and rigidity, amount of continuity
provided by the spandrels, and the direction of the load (Schueller, 1986).
There is no restriction regarding the shape and location of the core within the building form. To a
large extent, the shape of the core is regulated by the elevator and stair layout. Variations in layout 4
of shear walls could occur from a single rectangular box core to a complicated arrangement of
multiple shear walls.
The core can be located at the middle, at the perimeter, or even at the external part of the building,
leaving the arrangement to be either symmetrical or asymmetrical.
Unless the other vertical structural elements within the building consists of relatively closely spaced
columns and deep spandrel, it is more than likely that the stiffness of the core will overwhelm that of
other vertical elements; therefore it is justifiable to ignore the resistance of other vertical elements and
design the core system for the entire lateral load (Schueller, 1986).
*****