The Beijing Rules is the resolution of the United Nations General Assembly regarding

to the treatment of the juvenile prisoners and offenders in the nations. Moreover, this
Rules were implemented to strengthen the juvenile justice system across the whole
world. Furthermore, its include the “ the principle of proportionality”, this principle is
the mechanism to curb punitive sanctions. However it cause punitive sanctions or
simply means imposed to punish in past contempt of court or rather without lawful
authority. Nevertheless this principle of proportionality is used as a criteria of fairness
and justice in the process by which courts interpret and before apply legislation.
Additionally, indeed to assist in discerning between the imposing a corrective
measure on severity of the nature of prohibited act within criminal law, or in simply
means the punishment of an offenders or young offenders should fit the crime he/she
committed.

1. Yes?, it seems to me this article are talking about the e status of implementation of
RA 9433 or Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 in the various sectors namely:
police, city social welfare and development and family court as well as the problems
encountered by the three sectors given.Moreover, the studies found that relationship
between the status of implementation of RA 9344 and the problems encountered in
the different sectors has been said. Additionally, the findings the study identified
inputs for possible amendments of policies that govern RA 9344 towards a more
efficient and effective implementation. These intervention programs such as child
management training and rehabilitative program of continuous education for juvenile
offender and provision of additional facilities to support rehabilitation medium
manned by competent staff and establishment of rehabilitation centers in each
province manned by competent staff and equipped with necessary facilities. As far as
I can tell, the implementation of R.A. 9344 is effective however, it has problem
encountered by different sectors for the first instance police encountered in the
process of implementation are insufficient knowledge of the child and lack of
cooperation among parents of the child in conflict with the law. Moreover, this studies
I’ve read that amended the act and lowering the age from 15 to 9 years old stressing
out a criminal syndicates specially for those dealing a drugs and robbery, were taking
advantage of juvenile delinquency laws by using children to carry out their dirty work
which is true. As far as I'm concerned the implementation of R.A. 9344 will held in
the life of young offender and will exempt them from the criminal liability. To sum up
im agreed on the findings of DR. Freddy E. Bilog.

2. As I see it, Young Offenders and Child in Conflict with the law are now facing in
the different countries and were growing until now. So that’s why he make some
findings about the implementation of R.A. 9344 which the different sectors namely:
police; city social welfare and development and family court has faced or encountered
problems just like in police such as insufficient knowledge of the child and lack of
cooperation among parents of the child in conflict with the law as well as the City
Social Welfare and Development major problems encountered are lack of interest and
sense of responsibility of parents of the child. Family Court foremost problems
encountered are lack of budget for proper implementation, and lack of proper
facilities/equipment and financial resources. Exemption of youth offenders from
criminal responsibility has resulted to an increased volume of crimes by youthful
offenders.. So far,his findings is proven that the implementation of R.A. 9344 will be
effective in different aspect.

Based on the models you enumerated in the first activity relate it to our present
juvenile justice system?

Answer: As far as I can tell, our present juvenile justice system it seems to me just
like in the “welfare model”, because it adopts positivist approach that is based on the
assumption that juvenile wrong doing is the product of social or even environmental
factors and the young offender should not be held individually responsible. Moreover,
this welfare model is aim or purpose to provide appropriate treatment for offenders
rather than offenses or punishment. In the first instance we have many programs
which aim for the needs ang the best interest of the children.

Explain the data provided. Give your justifications.

Answer: As far as I can tell, the data provided are the number cases of involving
children in conflict with the law (CICL), as I see it that from 2014 the case are over
14,993 it almost 15 thousands and from 2015 its only 11,616 then in 2016 is 11,643
which increase slightly then 2017 it goes down from 10,388 which decrease
nevertheless in 2018 it goes up to 11,229 which increase in last year which 2017.
These data provided it show the curve of the children in conflict with the law in the
Philippines. While in the other data provided it about 5 region that has high
participation of children in conflict with the law from the year of 2018 the more
participation of CICL is the Ilocos Regions which has 1,657 then Cagayan Valley is
over 1,166 and about Eastern Visayas has 1,210 then Central Visayas is over 1,210
lastly is Calabarzon which has 800 of participation of CICL. I can say that this the the
data provided in the year of 2018 only.