In this day and age, it is believed that property is sometimes much more worthy and

essential than morality. Some people think social status and fortune should be a person’s
worth measurement but not personal values such as kindness. In my view, I advocate
with the idea that those values have been underrated

On the one hand, there is a common fallacy that fortune and social position can rate the
worthy of a person. It means that only when people strive for their goals which shows
hard-working and determination that they can be successful. However, I strongly disagree
with this idea. While the achievements can show the attitude towards work career, it
means nothing in displaying morality. Novak Djokovic, for example, is a well-known
tennis player for his talent and respectable life career for tennis. However, he received
bad reputation for not following Covid-19 restrictions in which imposing his power upon
the health safety rules during the outbreak.

On the other, I would contend that the most intrinsic values like kindness, trust or honor
which are considered to be obsolete and out-dated should be the core to judge a person.
What I mean is that people who own these personalities have the strength to help people
overcome struggles or spread love to others so that they should be valued higher. People
working in charity organizations, for instance, devoted their life to work with low
payments should be rewarded as their contribution to enhance the living standards of the
poor. They not only

In conclusion, the worth of a person should not be decided through social position or
material possessions but the intrinsic values like good personalities.