Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wiley, Society For Research in Child Development Child Development
Wiley, Society For Research in Child Development Child Development
Wiley, Society For Research in Child Development Child Development
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1127480?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Wiley, Society for Research in Child Development are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Child Development
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
PRESTIMULUS ACTIVITY LEVEL AND
RESPONSIVITY IN THE NEONATE
This study was supported in part by the Duke University Center for the Study of
Aging and Human Development, grant no. HD-00668 of the NIH, and by research train-
ing grant no. T01-HD-00164-03 of the NICHHD. Author Lamper's address: Center for
the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham,
North Carolina 27705.
[Child Development, 1971, 42, 465-473. ? 1971 by the Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
All rights reserved.]
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CHILD DEVELOPMENT
METHOD
466
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CELIA LAMPER AND CARL EISDORFER
RESULTS
0 ..... No response.
1..... Questionable response, questionable change in ongoing activity.
S .... . Movement of a part, that is, hand, foot, single segment, eyes, mouth, change of
respirations.
3..... Movement of whole limbs or head, characteristically smooth.
4 ..... Major flexion or extension of limbs, characteristically jerky or agitated.
5..... Major flexion of limbs and trunk, writhing or startle-like movement.
6..... Marked tension, rigidity, trunk arching, tense and forceful crying.
467
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CHILD DEVELOPMENT
468
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CELIA LAMPER AND CARL EISDORFER
TABLE 1
and soft tone (i = 2.62) following in that order. At 5 sec after stimula-
tion, cold was still associated with the highest level of activity (i = 3.91),
touch remained second (i = 3.12), soft (i = 2.63) and loud tones
(i = 2.59) reversing their previous positions but the two not differing
significantly.
According to the ANOVA, prestimulus state had affected distribu-
tion of ranks only in stimulus conditions where the elicited response was
of comparatively mild intensity.
Additional coefficients of concordance were computed to determine
whether statistical consistency varied with day of testing, type of stim-
ulus, and prestimulus state. The data were analyzed in three groupings:
(a) total sample of 40 Ss, (b) Ss in state 2 (irregular sleep), and (c) com-
bining Ss, in states 3 and 4. State 1 (regular sleep) was not analyzed be-
cause the number of Ss in this category was quite small. Categories 3 and
4 were combined because neither was represented with sufficient fre-
quency to be handled separately. Results are presented in table 2.
Pooled response data for the four stimuli handled separately for
each of the 3 days, for the total group of Ss, revealed significant con-
cordance at stimulus and 5-sec periods in every instance except Day 2 at
stimulus period. The two subsamples, on the other hand, demonstrated
consistent responses to the four stimulus categories only on Day 2.
To compare day-to-day stability of response to each type of stim-
ulus, response data for stimulus presentations on each day were summed
and compared with that value on each of the other days. The tests were
computed for each of the stimuli at both stimulus and 5-sec periods for
the total group of 40 Ss and the two subsamples as described above.
For the total group, only cold, stimulus period, evoked consistent
responses on separate days. Analysis of the subsamples revealed signifi-
cant day-to-day consistency in response to cold and touch among infants
in category 2; Ss in categories 3 and 4 demonstrated no day-to-day con-
sistency.
469
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CHILD DEVELOPMENT
TABLE 2
x2, df = S3 X2, df = 25 s, df = 6
"*p <.05 * p <.05 *p < .05
"** p < .005
x2, df = s9 x2, df = 25 s, df = 7
* p < .05 * p < .05
Three findings emerged from these analyses. First, when the effects
of state were minimal (by ANOVA, Day 2), individual infants within
subsamples defined by state gave responses of similar relative intensity
to the four classes of stimuli, that is, those who responded intensely to
mild stimuli also responded intensely to more compelling stimuli.
Second, a significant interaction effect appeared. The more intense
stimuli, cold and touch, evoked consistent day-to-day responses among
infants in state 2 (irregular sleep); Ss in states 3 and 4 demonstrated no
concordance.
Finally, the ANOVA data suggest the presence of a statistical arti-
fact. In neither analysis across stimuli nor across days did the two sub-
samples demonstrate the pattern of concordance seen in the total sample
of 40 Ss. Therefore, the statistical effect for the total sample may well be
a function of combining the response data of a large number of Ss in
differing prestimulus activity states and a variety of stimulus conditions.
While category 1 was excluded from the analyses of subsamples, the
number of Ss involved was small, and it seems doubtful that this group
could account for such a marked discrepancy. Conceivably, pooled data
470
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CELIA LAMPER AND CARL EISDORFER
lend more power to the ranks, thereby inflating the coefficient of con-
cordance and giving apparent justification to conclusions of day-to-day
consistency which cannot be supported by closer examination.
The absence of state dependence on Day 2 suggests that the nature
of the states may undergo evolution or change with postnatal age. Since
the experimental conditions remained constant, variations in distribution
of ranks according to prestimulus state on successive days would reveal
a changing organization of the response characteristics of the state. Since
state relatedness was demonstrated in only five conditions, these analyses
were limited to the relationship of state to the responses to soft and loud
tones on Days 1 and 3.
Using the Mann-Whitney U test, multiple contrasts between re-
sponse ratings in differing prestimulus-state categories were employed
within the five conditions that had yielded significant results in the
ANOVA (table 1).
For Day 1, in the 5-sec period, category 1 (regular sleep) differed
significantly from categories 2 and 3 but not from 4. No differences were
seen among categories 2, 3, and 4. On Day 3, category 2 (irregular sleep)
differed significantly from 3 and 4. These relationships are presented in
table 3.
TABLE 3
S3 4
STATE L S L S L S
1 ........ * * * * N.S. *
2........ ... ... N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S.
3 ........ ... ... ... ... N.S. N.S.
4 . .. .. .. . . . . .. .
B. DAY 3
23 4
* p <.05.
471
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CHILD DEVELOPMENT
The evidence suggests then, that even within the first few days of
life, the interaction of prestimulus states with stimuli changes with post-
natal age. On the first postnatal day, the more active behavioral states
(2, 3, 4) constitute essentially one broad activity level yielding responses
of similar intensity to different stimuli. On the second day, state had no
statistically significant effect. On the third day, the responses in two
conditions suggest the beginning of differentiation of state 3 from state
4. The response characteristics of each state, which doubtless are affected
by the birth process, apparently stabilize and become more clearly de-
fined with increasing postnatal age.
DISCUSSION
472
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CELIA LAMPER AND CARL EISDORFER
state for testing or that stimuli must always be intense or tactile in this
age group. The range of stimuli tested here was limited. Irregular sleep
was the predominant state in this age group and was represented in
greater proportion of the observations than the other categories. Regular
sleep (1) and irregular sleep (2) were mutually exclusive categories, while
3 and 4 were broader and were combinations of more than one state.
Alert states, within category 3, may, for example, be ideal for some types
of testing. The data could be assumed to best describe the response char-
acteristics of categories 1 and 2.
The data give limited insight into progressive behavioral organiza-
tion with postnatal age. On Day 1, states were polarized with deep sleep
constituting a distinct state and the entire continuum from irregular
sleep to active crying making up one amorphous category with similar
responses. On Day 2, response was statistically independent of state. By
Day 3, differences between 2, irregular sleep, and 4, waking activity and
crying appeared. Unfortunately, regular sleep, 1, did not occur frequently
enough to permit rank order tests. Consequently, the characteristics of
regular sleep cannot be extended beyond Day 1. By Day 3, extremes
of sleep and wakefulness biased results, but changes from irregular sleep
to drowsiness did not.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
This content downloaded from 142.66.3.42 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:40:52 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms