A WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
1 ISSUE 3 MAY 7, 2011
YOU DECIDE!
ANOThER SIDE OF THE STORY
Osama bin Laden’s
Death a Political
Ploy
May 1 2011, around 10p.m. CST, Obama announced the
death of Osama bin Laden as a result of an operation the
Commander-In-Chief ordered. Obama declared, “Justice has
been done” and called the killing “the most significant
achievement to date” in the war with al Qeada.
Since the tragedy of September 11, 2001, bin Laden has
been public enemy number one and a supposedly “ten-
year-long-manhunt” came to an end Sunday May 1, 2011.
However, much of the American public seems to be
ignorant of bin Laden having kidney disease and reportedly
passing away shortly after 9/11
December 26, 2001, Fox News reported that the Afghan
Taliban officially declared bin Laden dead the previous
month. Fox News’ report was based on a Pakistan Observer
story which had reported of the terrorist’s death and his
burial within 24 hours in an unmarked grave.
According to an article from The Corbett Report, bin Laden
has been pronounced dead nine times including the Fox
News report, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid reporting
of being told that in 2005, bin Laden may have been killed
in a Pakistan earthquake that same year, and Obama’s
announcement Sunday night.
Steve R. Pieczenik, a former Council on Foreign Relations
member and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State to Henry
Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Shultz, and James Baker
revealed to the Alex Jones Show in April 2002 that bin
Laden had been dead for months, according to an
infowars.com report.
VOL.
The Infowars.com report also mentions Pieczenik having
worked directly with bin Laden in the late 70’s and early
80’s when the U.S. funded the terrorist in an effort to run
out the Russians from Afghanistan.
Pieczenik told Alex Jones that the war in Afghanistan, which
ensued after 9/11, was contrived “with the agreement of
the bin Laden family, knowing full well that he would die”.
“And I think that Musharraf, the President of Pakistan,
spilled the beans by accident three months ago when he
said that Bin Laden was dead because his kidney dialysis
machines were destroyed in East Afghanistan.”
In August 2002 Paul Joseph Watson reported for
prisonplanet.com of Alex Jones being told, from a high level
source inside the Bush administration, that bin Laden had
died of natural causes; and the bin Laden family handed
over the body to the CIA. “They’re gonna roll him out right
before the election, that he’s on ice right now,” said Jones
quoting the republican.
May 3, 2011, Piezcenik returned to the Alex Jones Show to
reconfirm his statements concerning the death of bin Laden
in the 2002 interview. “As a physician I had known that the
CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the
intelligence roster that he had marfan syndrome,” Piezcenik
told Jones.
Mafran syndrome is a genetic disease with no known
permanent cure. The disease drastically shortens the
lifespan of those who suffer from the syndrome.
With nine pronouncements of bin Laden’s death, neither
one of the reports can be confirmed. Although the Obama
administration claims to have a 99.9% DNA match of bin
Laden’s corpse, the body was buried at sea within 12 hours
of the assassination. The swift riddance of the body brings
into the question the authenticity of the terrorist’s death
executed by Navy Seals.
The Obama administration claims that the quick burial of
bin Laden’s body was carried out with respects to Islamic
law; however, according to The Laura Ingram Show, Laura
1|Page
told her audience that Islamic law forbids a corpse to be
buried in salt water.
The news of the death of Osama bin Laden brings closure to
many who lost loved ones in the World Trade Center
attacks, however, seems to have taken away attention from
the major issues which plague our nation at this very
moment. With Obama having the lowest approval rating of
any U.S. president, our dollar losing its status as the world
reserve currency, and the illegal war in Libya, it would seem
convenient for the Obama administration to distract us
from these issues and boast of the killing of the world’s
most wanted under his watch. Not to mention the fact that
Obama is facing reelection for 2012. Yes sir, how
convenient.
With 9/11 being the darkest day in American history,
Obama has capitalized on the “killing” of bin Laden under
his administration which may catapult him into a second
term after his destruction of our great nation.
But now with bin Laden’s death, we are now being warned
of retaliation of Islamic radicals against the U.S.; and with
what this article entails, this may set up the stage for yet
another false flag attack against America.
Truth be told, it frightens me of the future following bin
Laden’s death under the Obama administration. As of now,
we do not know of what is to come from Osama’s death,
but it would seem that more of our liberties will be stripped
from us, all in the name of security. The police state will
more than likely increase and we will gladly oblige for our
safety.
search out
the truth!
Excerpt from Department of Homeland Security
Statement from Press Secretary Matt Chandler
“DHS issued an intelligence message May 5 to its federal,
state, local and tribal partners about potential Al-Qa'ida
contemplation in February 2010 of plots against the U.S. rail
sector. For the same reason, the Transportation Security
Administration will issue a bulletin to rail sector
stakeholders. We have no information of any imminent
terrorist threat to the U.S. rail sector, but wanted to make our
partners aware of the alleged plotting; it is unclear if any
further planning has been conducted since February of last
year.
We want to stress that this alleged Al Qa’ida plotting is
based on initial reporting, which is often misleading or
inaccurate and subject to change. We remain at a heightened
state of vigilance, but do not intend to issue an NTAS alert at
this time. We will issue alerts only when we have specific or
credible information to convey to the American public. Our
security posture, which always includes a number of
measures both seen and unseen, will continue to respond
appropriately to protect the American people from an
evolving threat picture both in the coming days and beyond.
Since Sunday, DHS and its partners have taken a number of
actions, including but not limited to: reviewing protective
measures for all potential terrorist targets, including critical
infrastructure and transportation systems across the country;
deploying additional officers to non-secured areas at our
nation’s airports; and identifying any new targeting rules
that should be instituted to strengthen the ways we assess the
risk of both passengers and cargo coming to the United
States.”
To The Reader
Thank you again for reading YOU DECIDE! where you will
find certain truths not readily made available to the people.
Here every honest effort is put forth to gather such
information and present it in a manner for you to make
your own decision and not take my word for it. I implore
you to contribute to YOU DECIDE! through tips, ideas,
comments, and even criticism.
Mando Conde
Contact Info: you.decide27@gmail.com
2|Page
 Farenthold also voted yes on the abolishing of federal
Blake Farenthold financing of Presidential elections.

As a freshman Congressman, Farenthold has been doing

Our Congressman at Work quite well as far as his voting record and meeting with his
constituents, however, there are a few things which
concern me about our newly elected Congressman.
Last November citizens of
District 27 indicated the First is his vote on House Amendment 92 which would
need for change by electing prohibit the use of federal funds for NASCAR sponsorship.
Republican Blake Farenthold Although the amendment was rejected by the House,
rather than incumbent Farenthold voted against this amendment. How can
Solomon Ortiz. someone who sees the need to cut wasteful government
spending want to use our tax dollars to support a sport
Farenthold initiated an which does nothing for this country but distract the people
aggressive campaign from issues which really matter?
promising change and to
fulfill his obligations, as a Farenthold’s vote against Amendment 92 seems to
Congressman, for the contradict his pledge to use his position on the House
betterment of the district. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to
Image: USACEpublicaffairs As a Tea Party candidate, investigate cases of waste and abuse of federal funds.
Farenthold saw the need
to cut government Farenthold’s vote to extend certain provisions of the
spending and remove federal regulations which have been PATRIOT Act raises another concern for me as a citizen. One
killing many jobs. extension would grant the FBI the authority to obtain
wiretaps from the secret intelligence court, known as the
While campaigning for the 27th district seat Farenthold sent Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, without
three requests to the office of Ortiz challenging the identifying the target or what method of communication
incumbent to debates which would have taken place in would be tapped.
Kingsville, Brownsville, and Corpus Christi. Ortiz never
responded even though one request was sent as certified Another provision would allow, through FISA, for the FBI to
mail. With no response, Farenthold took action and claimed obtain library, banking, and medicalrecords of citizens
September 13-19, 2010 as “Chicken Week” urging without any confirmed connections to terrorism or
supporters of Ortiz to contact him to ask that he stop being espionage.
a chicken and agree to a debate. Along with “Chicken
Farenthold’s statements, regarding the extensions,
Week” Farenthold also sent 400 rubber chickens to Ortiz’s
conveyed concerns of finding a balance between civil
offices and launched the website: www.
liberties and keeping Americans safe, and ensured his
ortizisachicken.com.
aggressive attempt to preserve our liberties before any long
These actions and ideals exhibit the strengths of a leader. term extensions are voted on.
They reveal the perseverance and commitment to the truth.
There may exist a balance between liberty and safety,
These are the some of the reasons why the residents in
however, Benjamin Franklin outlined it best by declaring
District 27 proudly elected Farenthold as our Congressman.
that anyone who wishes to give up security for liberty
Since taking office Farenthold has kept his word by voting deserves and will have neither.
yes to repealing Obama care, repealing the Form 1099
Farenthold is one of the few freshmen in the House who
Provision in the Health Care Law, and prohibiting federal
sits on three committees. Along with the Government
funding for Planned Parenthood and National Public Radio.
Oversight and Reform Committee, the Transportation and
3|Page
Infrastructure Committee, Farenthold holds a sit on the
Committee on Homeland Security
In early February 2011, Farenthold addressed Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, during a Homeland
Security Committee Homeland Threat Outlook hearing,
regarding border security, drug related violence in Mexico
crossing our southern border, and the TSA.
When Napolitano minimized the amount of violence
seething into the U.S. from Mexico, I was proud to see our
Congressman respectfully disagree. The southern border of
our District is out-lined by the Rio Grande River, therefore,
Farenthold knows full well of the violence crossing our
border. However, I was rather disgusted when Farenthold
spoke of the TSA.
Farenthold informed Napolitano of his 21 year-old
daughter’s encounter with the TSA. Farenthold referred to
his daughter’s pat-down, after her “misfortunate false
positive” body scan, as “a sexual assault in most states”
rather than claiming the TSA’s actions for what they are:
Crimes.
Our Congressman seemed to encourage TSA’s “Trusted
Traveler” program; where travelers register for the program
and pay user fees to avoid the invasive and unconstitutional
searches when he stated:
“A trusted traveler program would seem
like it would pay for itself by user fees to
alleviate that burden on the people who
chose to take advantage of it.”
Apparently Farenthold believes we must pay for our
liberties and self-respect; all in the name of safety. Has our
Congressman forgotten of the right, declared through
the Constitution, protecting us from unwarranted and
illegal searches?
Another factor which I take issue with Congressman
Farenthold is his apparent loss of conviction and criticism
which carried him into office.
During Farentholds campaign he condemned Ortiz’s
shortcomings as a Congressman, yet in a KIII interview with
Joe Gazin, Farenthold appeared to defend Ortiz by saying
the incumbent started off with good intentions as a blue
dog Democrat but spent too much time on trips which
ended in him losing touch with South Texas.
When Obama decided, on be-half of the United Nations, to
initiate a No-Fly Zone (a deliberate and unlawful act of war)
in Libya, Farenthold only had the following to say:
“Only Congress can declare war. While
President Obama can engage in military
operations, he must first inform Congress
and seek the advice and consent of those
who were sent to Washington, D.C. to
serve the American public.”
“I urge the President to work with
Congress before furthering military
operations abroad.”
I urge the President? I want a leader who demands justice
and the adherence to our Constitution, rather than act as if
he is filling out a suggestion card for his employer.
4|Page
Well Mr. Farenthold we are your employer and through the
power delegated to you by us, we demand that you
maintain your convictions and convey the agenda of
freedom and prosperity, which were endowed to us by our
Creator to live as sovereign individuals, to Washington.

5|Page