1

MHJG050011612012

     R.C.S.485/2012
             Avadabai Sonawane
                                                                                                Vs
                                                                                   Ishwar Narwale­1.
ORDER BELOW EXH. NO.59 IN R.C.S. NO. 485/2012 
[CNR NO. MHJG­0500­1161­2012]

Perused the application filed by Defendant No. 3 for getting
permission to file his written statement on record. It is contended by the
defendant no. 3 that, this court has pleased to pass order on his previous
adjournment application and granted him liberty him to file his written
statement   on   record.   On   his   last   application   Court   has   rejected   his
adjournment application. Defendant No. 3 is appeared before the court
on   05/08/2019   thereafter   he   is   seeking   permission   for   filling   written
statement on record after limitation. Lastly, he requested to permit him
to file written statement. 

2) This application has strongly resisted by the plaintiff by filling
his   say   on   same   page.   It   is   stated   that,   application   is   false.   On
02/08/2019  suit summon is served on defendant no. 3. Thereafter, from
02/08/2019   till   filing   this   application   90   days   time   has   been   lapsed.
Application   is   filed   by   defendant   no.   3   beyond   limitation.   Lastly,   he
requested to reject the application. 

Dattatray
Bhagwan 3) Perused the application and say. Heard Ld., advocate for both
Sathe
Digitally signed by
Dattatray Bhagwan
Sathe
sides. It reveals from record that suit summon is served on 02/08/2019.
Date: 2021.02.18
16:23:45 +0530
 2

Thereafter,   on   05/08/2019   defendant   no.   3   appeared   through   the

advocate,   thereafter,   he   has   sought   adjournment   to   file   written
statement. The defendant no. 3 ought to have filed his written statement
within 1 month from the service of summon. Thereafter, he has sought
adjournment   on   05/08/2019,   13/08/2019,   11/09/201,   01/10/2019.
10/10/2019,   24/10/2019,   21/10/2019,   05/12/2019   &   18/02/2019.
Already,   90   days   time   has   been   lapsed.   The   defendant   no.   3   has   not
mentioned any reason in his application. The present suit has been filed
by   plaintiff   for   cancellation   of   sale   deed,   declaration   and   perpetual
injunction   against   the   defendants.   The   dispute   between   parties   is   in
respect   of   immovable   property.   On   18/02/2019   application   for
adjournment filed by defendant no. 3 has been rejected by this court.
There   is   no   written   statement   order   against   the   defendant   No.   3   is
passed.   There   is   no   progress   after   the   filling   present   application.
Therefore, it is necessary to give an opportunity to defendant no. 3 to
contest the suit on merit. Inconvenience is being caused to the plaintiffs
can be compensated by imposing cost upon the defendant no. 3. Hence, I
pass the following order :­
ORDER
1. Application is allowed subject to cost Rs. 1,000/­ to the paid by the 
defendant no. 3 to the plaintiffs. 
2. Written Statement of Defendant no. 3 is accepted. 
Digitally signed
by Dattatray
Dattatray Bhagwan Sathe
Bhagwan Date:
2021.02.18
Sathe 16:23:55
+0530

Date : 16/02/2021        (D.B.Sathe) 
Place : Jalgaon. 6th Jt. C.J.J.D., Jalgaon.