FLEKS

CANVAS GUIDE

www.fleksmodel.com
contact@fleksmodel.com
Hélio Costa
Copyright

©2020 Hélio Rodrigues Costa. Offered for license under Atttribution-NonCommercial-

NoDerivatives 4.0 International of Creative Commons. You can freely access and read
the license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. By utilizing the
FLEKS Guide, you acknowledge and agree with the terms of the license.

All rights reserved

It is allowed to use and share, since the credits are given to the author. It is not allowed
any change to the models or commercial use, without author’s allowance.
SWOT ANALYSIS CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa

COMBINE STREGNTHS COMBINE STREGNTHS

AND THREATS TO PLACE YOUR STRENGTHS AND OPPORTUNITIES TO
IDENTIFY INITIATIVES IDENTIFY INITIATIVES

PLACE YOUR MISSION

PLACE YOUR AND GOALS PLACE YOUR
THREATS OPPORTUNITIES

COMBINE WEAKNESSES COMBINE WEAKNESSES

AND THREATS TO PLACE YOUR AND OPPORTUNITIES TO
IDENTIFY INITIATIVES WEAKNESSES IDENTIFY INITIATIVES
 NEED ANALYSIS CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa

STAKEHOLDERS
(The main stakeholders)

PROBLEM
OR
OPPORTUNITY
CAUSES EFFECTS
OR
(The causes or group of causes that led to the (The expected effects that can be observed due
problem, opportunity or threat) THREAT to the problem, opportunity or threat )

OBJECTIVE DATA
(Relevant quantitative data or facts)
SOLUTION BOARD CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa

WHAT IT WHAT IT
DOES DOESN´T DO BENEFITS

STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES CHALLENGES

RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY WHAT IS

NEEDED NEEDED MISSING
 VALUE MAP CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa

MAIN CAUSE / EFFECT FUNCITIONALITY VALUE VALUE

STAKEHOLDERS TREATED DELIVERED CREATED MEASURE
 BUSINESS CASE CANVAS
Helio R. Costa

INITIATIVE NAME

NEED GOALS SCOPE TIME COST

SOLUTION VALUE QUALITY RISKS RESOURCES

STAKEHOLDERS CONSTRAINTS ASSUMPTIONS

 ITERATION PLANNING CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa

ITERATION VALUE

ACCEPTANCE CONSTRAINTS
CRITERIA ASSUMPTIONS
ITERATION BACKLOG

RESPONSIBILITIES

IMPEDIMENTS RISKS SPIKES

IMPROVEMENTS ATTENTION POINTS

VALUE PRIORITIZATION CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa

+
BACKLOG

Is it worth
Highly
spending the Recommended
resources?

BENEFITS

Not Is it worth
Recommended spending the
resources?

-
+ TOTAL COST -
 RETROSPECTIVE CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa

WHAT WENT WHAT WENT WHT MUST BE WHAT MUST BE COMMITMENTS

WELL WRONG CHANGED MAINTAINED ASSUMED
RISK CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa
 STAKEHOLDERS CANVAS
By Helio R. Costa
THE HIGHER THE PIA NUMBER THE MORE IMPORTANT IS THE STAKHOLDER. THE GOAL IS TO MINIMIZE THE PIA NUMBER AFTER ACTIONS

STAKEHOLDER NAME HR MANAGER STAKEHOLDER NAME STAKEHOLDER NAME POWER (P)

Power to make decisions and

INITIAL PIA , A =4 impact the project
P= 5, I= 3 INITIAL PIA INITIAL PIA
ASSESSMENT
(sum of PIA values) 12 Explain the
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 1 – VERY LOW
hy
MANAGEMENT reasons w MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT 2 – LOW
are
resources
for
ACTIONS important
t
ACTIONS ACTIONS 3 – MODERATE
FINAL PIA the projec
ASSESSMENT P= 5, I= 2,
A =2 FINAL PIA FINAL PIA 4 – HIGH
9 ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 5 – VERY HIGHT
(sum of PIA values)

STAKEHOLDER NAME STAKEHOLDER NAME STAKEHOLDER NAME STAKEHOLDER NAME IMPACT (I)

The ammount of impact on

stakeholder´s life
INITIAL PIA INITIAL PIA INITIAL PIA INITIAL PIA
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 1 – VERY LOW
MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT 2 – LOW
ACTIONS ACTIONS ACTIONS ACTIONS 3 – MODERATE
FINAL PIA FINAL PIA FINAL PIA FINAL PIA 4 – HIGH
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 5 – VERY HIGHT

STAKEHOLDER NAME STAKEHOLDER NAME STAKEHOLDER NAME STAKEHOLDER NAME ATTITUDE (A)

The stakeholder atitude towards

INITIAL PIA INITIAL PIA INITIAL PIA INITIAL PIA the project
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
1 – SUPPORTER
MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT 2 – FACILITATOR
ACTIONS ACTIONS ACTIONS ACTIONS 3 – NEUTRAL
FINAL PIA FINAL PIA FINAL PIA FINAL PIA 4 – BLOCKER
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 5 – OPPONENT