NATIONAL LAW INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY,

BHOPAL 

 
 

Project Report On- 

CASE ANALYSIS OF

ATLAS CYCLE INDUTRIES LTD AND OTHERS V. STATES OF

HARYANA  
 
 

 
 

  Submitted To:                                                                                  Submitted By:

  Mrs. Sushma Sharma                                                           Anna Glory Toppo

  Proff. (Administrative Law)                                                2008 B.A.LL.B. 46

                                             
 
 
 CONTENTS 
 

1. Acknowledgment
2. Research methodology
3. Statement of Problem
4. Introduction
5. Facts of the case
6. Issue raised
7. Argument advance
8. Judgement
9. Case refered
10. Concrete finding
11. Critical analysis
12. Bibliography
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 
I, Anna Glory Toppo, 2006 B.A.LL.B. 46, acknowledge the fact that the text
reported in the project is the outcome of my own efforts and no part of this
report has been copied in any unauthorized manner and no part in it has been
incorporated without due acknowledgment.  

Name: Anna Glory Toppo

Signature:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 

a. Objectives:
1. To understand the moot question of the case.
2. To analyse the case and critically comment.
3. To then understand the application of the concept of accuser’s right to
silence.
4. To study the application of the provision regarding the approval by
both the Houses of Prliment
b. Hypothesis:
1. How far the history behind the case is clear?
2. Impracticality of knowing all the existing laws leading to delegated
legislation and approval by Parliment
c. Data Collection:
1. Library sources including books
2. Internet sources – Case Laws
3. Case studies – Atlas Cycle v. State of Haryana

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM 

This project undertakes to conduct an in-depth analysis of Atas Cycle

Industries Ltd and Others v. State of Haryana. This is done with the help of the
relevant law applicable as well as charting the practical scenario with the help
of recent takeovers in the country.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 LIST OF CASES

Cases Referred:  


State of U.P. v. Manbodhan Lal Srivastava, 1958 SCR 533, AIR 1957 SC 912;
 Bailey v. Williamson, 1873 LR VIII QB 118;

 Starey v. Graham (1899) 1 QB 406;

 D.K. Krishnan v. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Chittoor,: AIR

1956 Andhra 129;

 State v. Karna, 1973 24 RLW 487;

 Mathura Prasad Yadava v. Inspector- General, Rly. Protection Force,

Railway Board, New Delhi, (1974) 19 MPLJ 373

 Jan Mohammad Noor Mohammad Bagban v. State of Gujarat (1966) 1 SCR

505, 521 : AIR 1966 SC 385,

 Hukam Chand v. Union of India (1966) 1 SCR 505,

 Krishna Khanna v. State of Punjab, AIR 1958 Punj 32;

 BIBIOGRAPHY
SITE
 www.manupatracom
 http://www.indianexpress.com/story/930.html
BOOKS
 All India Reporters
 Criminal Law Journals
 Hand-Out material