Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Asian L12 Lecture Notes
Asian L12 Lecture Notes
Lesson 12:
Comparative Analysis of
Industrial Relations Systems in Asia
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Learning Outcomes
2
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Unit 1
Review of
the Asian and Western
Industrial Relations Systems
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
7
Center for People’s Media. (2017) Unions, Make it Possible! [Video file]. Retrieved Dec 13, 2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQg5rLNFo7c
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
7
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Quiz
The British, the Dutch, the French, the American, and the Portuguese
were the colonial ‘master’ of many Asian states.
Can you name those states that were once ruled by these colonialists?
7
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
8
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Unit 2
Comparative Analysis of
Trade Unions in Asia
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
14
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
15
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
16
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Case: Indonesia
• Democratic reforms following the Asian Financial Crisis allowed for
unions to grow
• With Act No. 21 (2000) on Trade Unions allowing trade unions to be set
up with a minimum of 10 members, multiple unions have formed within
an enterprise
• This fragmentation of enterprise unions allows employers to decline
collective bargaining requests due to a lack of representativeness
• Additionally, the in-fighting among the unions undermines their already
weak influence
19
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Case: Japan
• Japanese trade unions are highly decentralised with over 95% of
the unions being enterprise-based
• The enterprise unions directly negotiate with their management,
without the influence of national level federation unions,
government or political parties
• There is hardly any occurrence of multiple unions i.e.,
fragmentation, within an enterprise
20
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
a) Singapore
b) China
c) Japan
d) Korea
21
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Unit 3
Comparative Analysis of
Employers’ Associations
in Asia
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Case: Japan
Case: Korea
Case: China
Case: Vietnam
24
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Case: Singapore
25
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Case: Japan
• Nippon Keidanren (Japan Business Federation) is the
employers’ association at the national level
• It offers guidelines and recommendations for employers to
undertake collective bargaining in their own enterprise unions
• They do not directly participate in the collective bargaining
process in an enterprise
26
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
27
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Case: China
• The national level employers’ association is the China Enterprise Confederation
(CEC), established by the State Trade and Economic Commission (STEC) and
acts as the representative of all enterprises in IR matters
• Due to China’s vast size, the CEC faces the challenge of ensuring coverage of
the whole country
• As collective bargaining and negotiation often takes place at the regional/
sectoral/ enterprise levels, local business associations are gradually developing
their IR capacities and are more well received by employers
• Gongshanglian (All China Federation of Industry and Commerce) is a member of
the CEC
• It is increasingly active and is more accepted by local private businesses
28
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
29
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Unit 4
Comparative Analysis of
Collective Bargaining Process
in Asia
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Enterprise-based Bargaining
In Asia, decentralised enterprise-based bargaining has
become the dominant form of collective bargaining:
• The employers have widely accepted this approach
e.g., Japan, Korea, Singapore, Malaysia
• Governments are also promoting enterprise-based
bargaining e.g., Singapore, Malaysia
31
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Enterprise-based Bargaining
Case: Indonesia
32
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Enterprise-based Bargaining
Enterprise-based bargaining
Cases: Singapore and Malaysia
• The governments play a key role in shaping the enterprise-
based collective bargaining, structure and/or process
• To prevent disturbances in the workplace and the economy, the
governments have imposed some measures:
• Removal of managerial prerogatives from collective
bargaining process
• Legislative and administrative interventions
• Highly-regulated procedures for legal strike actions
33
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Enterprise-based Bargaining
Enterprise-based bargaining
Case: Indonesia
• High union fragmentation leads to multiple (and competing)
unions in an enterprise
Activity 4:
Enterprise-based collective bargaining
a) Japan
b) Korea
35
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Unit 5
Comparative Analysis of
Tripartite Initiatives
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Tripartite Initiatives
Some economies have experimented with tripartite
dialogue or bargaining mechanisms
Before the 2000s, economies such as Korea and
Indonesia did not have a tripartite body
However, the Asian financial crisis and economic
recessions exerted the pressure for these
governments to begin the tripartite ‘experiment’
Unlike Singapore, these tripartite bodies mainly
functioned as consultation mechanisms for resolving
conflicting interests
37
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Tripartite Initiatives
Case: Japan
Case: Korea
Case: China
38
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Tripartite Initiatives
Tripartite-based bargaining
Case: Singapore
• Singapore stands out as a champion of tripartism in Asia
• The IR actors continue to be actively involved in tripartite
dialogue as a joint-decision and joint-implementation mechanism
to deal with a wide range of policy issues:
Examples:
• National Wages Council (NWC)
• Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment
Practices (TAFEP)
• Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM)
• Singapore Tripartism Forum (STF)
• Various tripartite workgroups
39
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Tripartite Initiatives
Tripartite-based bargaining
Case: Japan
• There is no active national tripartite dialogue mechanism for
dealing with labour issues as government intervention is low
• However, there are some tripartite efforts:
• Social Security Council
• Labour Policy Council
• Central Minimum Wage Council
• Joint governance bodies for social insurance system
• In these tripartite councils, the government only facilitates
between the participants and the public (e.g., academics) are
often involved with workers’ and employers’ representatives
40
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Tripartite Initiatives
Tripartite-based bargaining
Case: Korea
• The Korea Tripartite Commission (now known as ESDC) was set
up during the Asian Financial Crisis to:
• identify ways to overcome the economic crisis
• build a consensus on labour market and IR reforms
• The 3 IR actors signed an agreement in 1998 to reform the IR
framework:
• legalising teachers’ unions
• abolishing the ban on third party intervention
• expanding the unemployment benefit scheme
• In return, the regulations on layoffs and flexibility were relaxed
• However, after the financial crisis, the tripartite dialogue lost
momentum as the unions withdrew their support 41
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Collective Bargaining –
Tripartite Initiatives
Tripartite-based bargaining
Case: China
• National Tripartite Consultation Conference (NTCC)) was held in 2001
as an experiment to promote tripartite-style collective bargaining in the
workplace
• These was a response to the increase in labour disputes since the late
1990s, which threatened labour relations and social stability
• The following parties participated:
• the All China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU)
• the China Enterprise Confederation (CEC)
• the Ministry of Labour and Social Security (MOLSS) (supported by
the ruling Communist party)
• This experiment was later spread to the provincial, city and district
levels, where Tripartite Consultation Committees (TCC) were set up
42
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
43
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Conclusion
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Conclusion
Conclusion
In Asia (e.g., China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam),
collective bargaining frameworks are still evolving
Decentralised enterprise-based bargaining continues
to be the dominant form of collective bargaining
However, enterprise unionism has flaws e.g.,
Fragmentation of trade unions in Indonesia
Management’s influence on their own enterprise
unions.
Due to these flaws, some economies have witnessed
the collective bargaining process shifting from the
enterprise to the regional/ industrial level; e.g., Korea
46
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Conclusion
To understand the different types of IR systems in
Asia, it is important to consider the political factors.
• Some countries like Korea and Indonesia have
begun to experiment with tripartite consultation in
the midst of democratisation
• Communist ideology is also prevalent in the IR
systems of China and Vietnam
47
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
Concept Diagram
This model presents the possible aspects for IR systems to be compared
Market
Emplo Techno
Past yment logy Future
Economic
National
Organis
Industry
ational Parties
Education
Salamon, M. (2000). Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Edinburg Gate, Prentice Hall, p.41.
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
References
Book Resources
• Benson, J. and Zhu, Y. (2008). Trade Unions in Asia. An Economic and Sociological
analysis. 1st edn. Routledge.
• Kurvilla, S. and Erickson, C.L. (2002) Change and Transformation in Asian Industrial
Relations. 1st edn. Cornell University, ILR School & Blackwell Publishing.
• Kuruvilla, S. and Venkataratnam, C.S. (1996) Economic development and industrial
relations: the case of South and Southeast Asia, Industrial Relations Journal, 27:1
• Silva, S.R. de (2015) Elements in the Shaping of Asian Industrial Relations. 1st edn.
International Labour Office & ACT/EMP Publications.
• Salamon, M. (2000). Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Edinburg Gate,
Prentice Hall.
• Bingham, C. (2016) Employment Relations. SAGE Publication.
49
OFFICIAL (CLOSED) \ NON-SENSITIVE
References
YouTube Resources
• Center for People’s Media. (2017) Unions, Make it Possible! [Video file].
Retrieved Dec 13, 2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQg5rLNFo7c
• Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. (2018) Challenges for Trade Unions in Asia. [Video
file]. Retrieved Dec 13, 2020 from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYYI9XIBdjs
50