Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Afe2015no66p137 144
Afe2015no66p137 144
Afe2015no66p137 144
net/publication/322644119
Combustion heat and calorific value of the mix of sawdust and cones of
common pine (Pinus sylvestris L.).
CITATIONS READS
5 1,193
1 author:
Arkadiusz Gendek
Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW
52 PUBLICATIONS 316 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Arkadiusz Gendek on 22 January 2018.
Abstract: Combustion heat and calorific value biomass; it is estimated that it represents
of the mix of sawdust and cones of common pine about 80% of consumption [Gajewski
(Pinus sylvestris L.). The research conducted was
aimed at specification of the combustion heat and 2010, Flakowicz 2011]. As the wood-
calorific value for the mix of sawdust and crushed -working industry plants are the natural
cones. The research material consisted of saw- source of solid biomass in various forms,
dust obtained from processing of pine wood and
they may, like forests, generate supply
crushed common pine cones, obtained from the
husking mill after the seed husking process. The on the market of wood biomass. Apart
measurements and calculations were conducted from these plants and forests, a large
in accordance with PN-ISO 1928:2002 and PN- part of biomass for energy production
-ISO 1928:2002 standards. The obtained calorific
value results range between 17.98 (±0.63) MJ·kg–1
purposes comes from plantations, which
for pure pine sawdust and 18.32 (±0.34) MJ·kg–1 are popular not only in Poland, but also
for crushed pine cones and are within the limits abroad [Heneman and Červinka 2007].
quoted in literature. It can be stated, however, that Depending on the type of production ac-
an addition of pine cones up to 50% of share to
sawdust does not result in significant increasing
tivity of enterprises associated with the
of the mix calorific value. Nevertheless, there is woodworking sector, the structure of by-
a statistically significant difference between the -products resulting from wood process-
calorific value of the sawdust mix with the addi- ing varies. These may be pieces (e.g.
tion of pine cones up to 30% of share in relation to
calorific value of pines only. Further research as- edgings) or crushed bits of varying size
sociated with adding of cones to sawdust of other (chips, sawdust, shavings, wood dust)
species may indicate, which mix will give posi- [Komorowicz et al. 2009].
tive effects in terms of energy efficiency, mani- Sawdust is produced mainly by saw-
fested by reduction of initial moisture content of
the mix and increasing of its calorific value mills and plywood production plants. In
the structure of wood byproducts from
Key words: forest biomass, combustion heat, the woodworking sector, in year 2010, it
calorific value
constituted about 25 and 4%, respective-
ly [Ratajczak et al. 2011, Szostak 2013].
INTRODUCTION According to Szostak et al. [2015], the
In the opinion of specialists, wood bio- calculated supply of wood byproducts
mass is dominant among the sources from sawmills in 2010 amounted to 2.32
of energy in Poland, classified as solid million m3. According to Ratajczak et
138 A. Gendek
al. [2012], own consumption for power briquettes, which will exert positive
generation purposes in the sawmill in- impact on improvement of the condi-
dustry amounted to 930 thousand m3, tions of combustion in furnaces [Polak
while about 1.39 million m3 could have 2008]. The best effects will be achieved
been sold to customers outside the sec- with a great difference in calorific value
tor. Sawdust is thus a serious source of between a cone and sawdust of the
biomass for energy production purposes proper kind.
and a popular material for production of The objective of research undertaken
pellet as a refined fuel. was to specify the combustion heat and
Apart from sawdust, cones of forest to determine the calorific value of pine
trees are also a good material for energy sawdust as the main, widely available
production. In seed production, several type of biomass, and crushed cones of
dozen tons of cones are sold to husk- common pine (Pinus silvestris) and
ing plants each year; after husking, the to determine whether addition of pine
cones are treated as waste. Due to low cones will exert positive impact on calo-
humidity (about 7–8%), these cones can rific value of such material.
be used for heating of husking cabinets
or for production of refined fuel in form MATERIAL AND METHODOS
of pellets or briquettes. The cones can be The research material consisted of pure
used mainly on the local market, as the sawdust and crushed pine cones and
main problem is their seasonal availabil- their mix in an appropriate proportion,
ity in the mast years and in the growing where the base consisted of sawdust,
months, as well as their mass and low while the cones were an addition. Saw-
bulk density [Aniszewska 2013, Anisze- dust was obtained from a company deal-
wska and Gendek 2014]. Their advan- ing with wood processing. Pine cones
tages, however, include low moisture were obtained from a husking plant after
content, which does not require addition- the seed husking process. Prior to prepa-
al energy expenditures for drying of the ration of mix, the cones were crushed in
material [Gendek and Głowacki 2010, a hammer crusher with a sieve with mesh
Zawistowski et al. 2010, Głowacki and size of 6 mm. The test samples were pre-
Gendek 2011, Aniszewska 2013]. pared by making and marking the mix of
During production of refined fuel, ad- sawdust (T) and crushed cones (S) in the
dition of crushed pine cones to sawdust proportions presented in Table 1.
may thus reduce the moisture content in The samples prepared in this manner
the material, which exerts negative im- were dried for 24 h in the temperature
pact e.g. on storage of wood products of 104 ±1°C, until achieving dry sub-
[Barwicki and Gach 2010], and it may stance. A laboratory drier SLW 115 TOP
increase the calorific value of pellet or was used.
Combustion heat and calorific value of the mix of sawdust... 139
TABLE 2. Combustion heat and calorific value of the mix of pine sawdust and cones [Statistica 12]
Standard error
Coefficient of
Additional of
Designation
Confidence
Confidence
Maximum
cones [%]
Minimum
Skewness
deviation
+95.00%
–95.00%
Standard
variation
Variance
Kurtosis
Average
Comparing the results obtained with the basis of skewness (Table 2), it can
research studies conducted by other au- be stated that in three cases, that is, in
thors, it can be noted that the calculated samples with addition of cone of 10,
average calorific value of sawdust and 50 and 100% the distribution is skewed
cones is within the limits or similar to negatively, while in the remaining cases
calorific value of pine wood quoted in it is skewed positively. The results that
literature – 16–19 MJ·kg–1 [Monkiele- are closest to normal distribution have
wicz and Pflaum 1967, Krzysik 1974, been obtained for a mix containing 50%
Rembowski 2007, Björn et al. 2012, of sawdust and cones.
Głodek 2010] and to the calorific value Considering on the basis of kurto-
of pine cones – 18.11 (±0.36) MJ·kg–1 sis (Table 2) the concentration of the
[Aniszewska and Gendek 2014]. obtained calorific value results around
Analyzing distribution of the results the average value, it can be stated that
obtained for calorific value and compar- the highest concentration was obtained
ing it with the normal distribution, on for the material consisting in 100% of
Combustion heat and calorific value of the mix of sawdust... 141
crushed cones and for material with the tained results of calorific value of indi-
cone share amounting to 40%. In the vidual mixes of sawdust and cones, at
remaining five cases, where kurtosis the significance level of α = 0.05, Lev-
was negative, the spread of results was ene and Brown-Forsythe homogeneity of
greater and more extreme results could variance tests were conducted (Table 3),
be observed in the set of data. which showed that there are differences
The impact of addition of crushed between the average values.
sawdust on calorific value of the mix In order to specify, which mix groups
has been presented by a figure. Initially, differ at a statistically significant level,
adding of crushed cones to pine saw- a multiple comparison test NIR was
dust does not result in increasing of the conducted (Table 4). On the basis of
calorific value. Until the share of cones the results obtained, it can be stated that
in the mix exceeds the level of 0–30%, adding of crushed cones to pine sawdust
the average calorific value of the mix until their share reaches 50% and a slight
remains similar. A gradual increase in increasing of the calorific value from the
the calorific value is observed when the level of 17.98 (±0.63) to 18.21 (±0.35)
share of cones is increased to the level of MJ·kg–1 did not indicate a statistically
40% and more. significant difference of the results, and
In order to find out whether signifi- thus the values can be considered to be
cant differences occur between the ob- homogeneous.
18,6
18,5
18,4
18,3
Calorific value [MJ·kg–1]
18,2
18,1
18,0
17,9
17,8
17,7
17,6
0 10 20 30 40 50 100
FIGURE. A chart of interaction between the calorific value of the mix – average values and confidence
intervals (±95.00%)
142 A. Gendek
TABLE 3. Levene and Brown-Forsythe homogeneity of variance tests for calorific value of mixes (dif-
ferences are significant for p <0.05)
SS df MS SS df MS
Test type F p
effect error
Levene 0.9450 6 0.1575 8.8392 133 0.0665 2.3697 0.0331
Brown-Forsythe 0.9393 6 0.1566 9.3286 133 0.0701 2.2320 0.0438
TABLE 4. A multiple comparison test NIR for calorific value of mixes (the differences are significant
for p <0.05)
Mix T100S0 T90S10 T80S20 T70S30 T60S40 T50S50 T0S100
T100S0 – 0.9469 0.9972 0.7311 0.2873 0.0995 0.0176
T90S10 0.9469 – 0.9497 0.7817 0.3184 0.1138 0.0209
T80S20 0.9972 0.9497 – 0.7337 0.2889 0.1003 0.0178
T70S30 0.7311 0.7817 0.7337 – 0.4704 0.1910 0.0414
T60S40 0.2873 0.3184 0.2889 0.4704 – 0.5560 0.1840
T50S50 0.0995 0.1138 0.1003 0.1910 0.5560 – 0.4576
T0S100 0.0176 0.0209 0.0178 0.0414 0.1840 0.4576 –
Statistical analyses have shown, (±0.34) MJ·kg–1 for crushed pine cones.
however, that the average calorific val- Research was conducted using sawdust
ue of cones without additions (18.21 and cones of the same species (common
±0.34 MJ·kg–1) is statistically signifi- pine), and their calorific value differed
cantly different from calorific value slightly, that is, by 1.98%; however, the
of sawdust without additions and of difference was statistically significant.
sawdust with the addition of up to 30% The obtained results of calorific
cones. Increasing of the share of cones value of sawdust, cones of the com-
in the mix to 40 and 50% resulted in the mon pine and their mixes are within the
calorific value of such mix 18.13 (±0.47) range quoted in literature on the subject
and 18.21 (±0.35) MJ·kg–1 – which is not (16–19 MJ·kg–1).
statistically significantly different from On the basis of the results obtained, it
can be said that addition of cones to pine
the calorific value of pine cones of 18.32
sawdust up to 50% of share does not
(±0.34) MJ·kg–1.
lead to a significant increase in the calo-
rific value of the mix. However, there is
CONCLUSIONS
a statistically significant difference in cal-
Calorific value of the examined ma- orific value of the sawdust mix with the
terial ranged between 17.98 (±0.63) addition of cones up to 30% of share in
MJ·kg–1 for pure pine sawdust and 18.32 relation to the calorific value of cones.
Combustion heat and calorific value of the mix of sawdust... 143
Due to the fact that the quantity of lania Biomasy. Agencja Rynku Energii S.A.,
cones used for husking on the national Bełchatów.
FONT R., CONESA J.A., MOLTÓ J., MUŇOZ
scale, which can be potentially used for M. 2009: Kinetics of pyrolysis and combus-
energy production, is rather small (about tion of pine needles and cones. Journal of
30 Mg per year per husking mill), to Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 85, 1–2:
276–286.
enhance the energy efficiency, they can
GAJEWSKI R. 2010: Biomasa podstawą zielonej
be mixed for combustion with pine saw- energii. Polska Energia 7.
dust. GENDEK A., GŁOWACKI Sz. 2010: Suszenie
The research conducted was focused biomasy drzewnej jako etap w jej przygo-
towaniu do energetycznego wykorzystania.
on one species. Further research on ad- Ogólnopolska Konferencja Naukowa „Ba-
dition of crushed cones to sawdust of dania eksploatacyjne Maszyn Leśnych”,
other species of trees or other forms of 28.09.2010, Warszawa: 77–84.
biomass of varying origin may indicate GENDEK A., ZYCHOWICZ W. 2014: Investi-
gations on the calorific value of forest chips.
whether this material will give a posi- Annals of Warsaw University of Life Scien-
tive effect by enhancing the quality of ces – SGGW, Agriculture 63: 65–72.
the mix for combustion (lower moisture GŁODEK E. 2010: Spalanie i współspalanie bio-
masy. Przewodnik. Opole, Instytut Ceramiki
content, higher calorific value) or for i Materiałów budowlanych. Retrieved from
production of refined fuel (cones used as http://www.oze.opole.pl/zalacznik.php?i-
a binding agent for pellet production). d=364&element=470 (access 11.03.2015).
GŁOWACKI SZ., GENDEK A. 2011: Applica-
tion of forced dryling methods in preparation
REFERENCES of forest chips for energy purposes. Annals of
ANISZEWSKA M. 2013: Zmiany wilgotności Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW,
i temperatury wewnątrz szyszek sosny zwy- Agriculture 58: 29–34.
czajnej (Pinus sylvestris L.) łuszczonych HENEMAN P., ČERVINKA J. 2007: Energy
dwuetapowo. Leśne Prace Badawcze 74 (3): crops and bioenergetics in the Czech Repub-
205–214. lic. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sci-
ANISZEWSKA M., GENDEK A. 2014: Com- ences – SGGW, Agriculture 51: 73–78.
parison of heat of combustion and calorific KRZYSIK F. 1974: Nauka o drewnie. PWN,
value of the cones and wood of selected for- Warszawa.
est trees species. Forest Research Papers 75 KOMOROWICZ M., WRÓBLEWSKA H., PAW-
(3): 231–236. ŁOWSKI J. 2009: Skład chemiczny i właści-
BARWICKI J., GACH S. 2010: Some aspects of wości energetyczne biomasy z wybranych su-
biomass utilization concerning energy short- rowców odnawialnych. Ochrona Środowiska
age. Annals of Warsaw University of Life i Zasobów Naturalnych 40: 402–410.
Sciences – SGGW, Agriculture 56: 39–44. MONKIELEWICZ L., PFLAUM H. 1967: Użyt-
BJÖRN G., GEBAUER K., BARKOWSKI R., kowanie lasu. PWRiL, Warszawa.
ROSENTHAL M., BUES C.T. 2012: Calo- PN-EN 13183-1. Wilgotność sztuki tarcicy.
rific value of selected wood species and wood Część 1. Oznaczanie wilgotności metodą su-
products. European Journal of Wood and szarkowo-wagową. PKN, Warszawa.
Wood Products 70: 755–757. PN-ISO1928:2002. Paliwa stałe. Oznaczanie cie-
FLAKOWICZ M. 2011: Zużycie biomesy w ener- pła spalania metodą spalania w bombie kalo-
getyce. Stan obecny i perspektywy. Materiały rymetrycznej i obliczanie wartości opałowej.
na Forum Technologii w Energetyce – Spa- PKN, Warszawa.
144 A. Gendek
POLAK M., NEUBERGER P., SOUCEK J. 2008: ZAWISTOWSKI P., ARABAS J., GŁOWA-
Experimental verifying of mathematic model CKI Sz. 2010. Modeling of wood biomass
for biomass combustion. Annals of Warsaw drying process with the use of neural nets.
University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Agri- Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sci-
culture 52: 89–93. ences – SGGW, Agriculture 55: 39–45.
RATAJCZAK E., SZOSTAK A., BIDZIŃSKA
G., HERBEĆ M. 2011: Analiza rynku bio- Streszczenie: Ciepło spalania i wartość opałowa
masy drzewnej na cele energetyczne w Polsce. mieszanki trocin i szyszek sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus
Etap 2. Potencjalna podaż biomasy drzewnej sylvestris L.). Przeprowadzone badania miały na
w kierunkach jej energetycznego wykorzysta- celu określenie wartości ciepła spalania i wartości
nia i przewidywany popyt na nośniki energii opałowej dla mieszanki trocin i rozdrobnionych
z biomasy drzewnej w Polsce do 2015 roku. szyszek. Materiał badawczy stanowiły trociny
Instytut Technologii Drewna, Poznań. pozyskane w wyniku przerobu drewna sosnowe-
RATAJCZAK E., SZOSTAK A., BIDZIŃSKA G., go oraz rozdrobnione szyszki sosny zwyczajnej
HERBEĆ M. 2012: Demand for wood bio- pozyskane w wyłuszczarni po procesie pozyska-
mass for energy purposes in Poland by 2015. nia nasion. Otrzymane wyniki wartości opało-
Drewno. Prace naukowe. Doniesienia. Komu- wej zawierają się w granicach od 17,98 (±0,63)
nikaty 187.
MJ·kg–1 dla czystych trocin sosnowych do 18,32
REMBOWSKI Ł. 2007: Wartość opałowa drew-
(±0,34) MJ·kg–1 dla rozdrobnionych szyszek
na. Agroenergetyka.pl. Retrieved from http://
sosnowych i mieszczą się w granicach podawa-
agroenergetyka.pl/?a=article&id=146 (access
nych w literaturze. Można jednak stwierdzić, że
8.04.2015).
domieszka szyszek do trocin sosnowych w zakre-
SKRIFVARS B., BACKMAN R., HUPA M.,
sie do 50% udziału nie zwiększa istotnie wartości
SFIRIS G., ABYHAMMAR T., LYNGFELT
opałowej mieszanki. Istnieje jednak statystycznie
A. 1998: Ash behavior in a CFB boiler during
combustion of coal, peat or wood. Fuel 77, istotna różnica w wartości opałowej mieszan-
1/2: 65–70. ki trocin z dodatkiem szyszek do 30% udziału
Statistica (data analysis software system), version w stosunku do wartości opałowej samych szy-
12. Available at www.statsoft.com. szek. Prowadzenie dalszych badań związanych
ŚWIECA G. 2007: Zawartość wodoru w różnych z dodawaniem szyszek do trocin innych gatun-
rodzajach biomasy. Zabrze, Instytut Chemicz- ków może wskazać, która mieszanka będzie da-
ny Przeróbki Węgla. Retrieved from www. wała korzystne efekty energetyczne.
ichpw.zabrze.pl/cms.php?getfile=607 (access
12.05.2015). MS received August 2015
SZOSTAK A. 2013: Drzewne produkty uboczne
źródłem biomasy drzewnej do celów ener-
getycznych. Biomasa leśna na cele energe- Author’s address:
tyczne. Red. P. Gołos, A. Kaliszewski (Eds). Arkadiusz Gendek
Wyd. IBL. Str 77–83 Wydział Inżynierii Produkcji SGGW
WERTHER J., SAENGER M., HARTGE E., Katedra Maszyn Rolniczych i Leśnych
OGADA T., SIAGI Z. 2000: Combustion of 02-787 Warszawa, ul. Nowoursynowska 164
agricultural residues. Progress in Energy and Poland
Combustion Science 26: 1–27. e-mail: arkadiusz_gendek@sggw.pl