Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LiS Brewster
LiS Brewster
Abstract
The pure rotational spectrum of LiS
X2 Pi has been recorded in the v 0 and v 1 states in the region 130±540
GHz using millimeter/sub-millimeter direct absorption methods. This radical was synthesized from lithium vapor and
CS2 in a DC discharge. Transitions arising from the two orbit components were measured, both which exhibited
lambda-doubling and, for the X 1=2 ladder, hyper®ne interactions. Rotational, lambda-doubling, and hyper®ne
parameters have subsequently been determined. These data prove unambiguously that the ground state of LiS is 2 Pi
and suggest that the A2 R state lies 4300 cm 1 higher in energy. The bonding in this radical appears to be pre-
dominantly ionic. Ó 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
b
2.5 3.5 f 4 5 132 017.458 )0.160 135 072.592 )0.017 ± ±
2.5 3.5 f 3 4 ± 135 073.530 0.197 ± ±
2.5 3.5 f 2 3 ± 135 073.876c 0.175 ± ±
M.A. Brewster, L.M. Ziurys / Chemical Physics Letters 349 (2001) 249±256
2.5 3.5 f 1 2 ± 135 073.876c 0.164 ± ±
2.5 3.5 e 4 5 132 015.776b 0.192 130 203.366 )0.062 ± ±
2.5 3.5 e 3 4 ± 130 204.165c 0.377 ± ±
2.5 3.5 e 2 3 ± 130 204.165c 0.055 ± ±
2.5 3.5 e 1 2 ± 130 204.165c )0.229 ± ±
3.5 4.5 f 5 6 169 724.380b )0.057 172 954.484 )0.020 ± ±
3.5 4.5 f 4 5 ± 172 954.955 0.056 ± ±
3.5 4.5 f 3 4 ± 172 955.173c 0.062 ± ±
3.5 4.5 f 2 3 ± 172 955.173c 0.033 ± ±
3.5 4.5 e 5 6 169 721.147b 0.098 168 088.874 0.078 ± ±
3.5 4.5 e 4 5 ± 168 089.273c 0.290 ± ±
3.5 4.5 e 3 4 ± 168 089.273c 0.098 ± ±
3.5 4.5 e 2 3 ± 168 089.273c )0.096 ± ±
b
5.5 6.5 f 245 107.485 0.028 248 685.234 0.015 ± ±
b
5.5 6.5 e 245 100.373 0.022 243 828.882 )0.002 ± ±
b
6.5 7.5 f 282 779.366 0.006 286 529.426 )0.025 ± ±
b
6.5 7.5 e 282 769.888 )0.005 281 679.080 )0.023 ± ±
b
7.5 8.5 f 320 435.329 0.001 324 356.743 )0.046 ± ±
b
7.5 8.5 e 320 423.146 )0.022 319 513.274 0.009 ± ±
b
8.5 9.5 f 358 073.178 )0.035 362 164.999 )0.032 ± ±
b
8.5 9.5 e 358 058.025 )0.003 357 329.151 )0.021 ± ±
b
9.5 10.5 f 395 690.866 0.000 399 951.941 )0.040 391 439.150 0.038 ±
b
9.5 10.5 e 395 672.283 )0.046 395 124.590 )0.035 391 420.950 0.013 390 820.585 0.006
b
10.5 11.5 f ± 437 715.408 )0.032 428 630.017 0.006 ±
b
10.5 11.5 e ± ± 428 608.196 )0.027 428 185.187 )0.004
b
11.5 12.5 f 470 856.876 )0.007 475 453.219 0.007 465 796.520 )0.014 470 354.374 0.003
b
11.5 12.5 e 470 830.649 )0.015 470 645.365 )0.010 465 770.796 )0.019 465 525.114 )0.013
b
12.5 13.5 f 508 400.979 0.029 513 163.161 0.059 502 936.521 )0.027 507 656.253 )0.004
b
12.5 13.5 e 508 370.429 0.022 508 366.301 0.024 502 906.573 )0.007 502 838.220 0.016
b
13.5 14.5 f ± ± 540 047.926 0.010 544 928.253 0.002
b
13.5 14.5 e ± ± 540 013.414 0.030 540 122.233 )0.065
a
In MHz.
b
Blend of all hf components.
c
Blended lines.
251
252 M.A. Brewster, L.M. Ziurys / Chemical Physics Letters 349 (2001) 249±256
508.4 GHz. The doublets, labeled by the parity Hence, all four hf parameters (a, b, c, and d) could
designation e and f, are separated in this transition not be independently determined. Because there
by about 30 MHz. Also present in the spectrum is was a noticeable dierence between the hyper®ne
the e component of the X 1=2 sub-level; its splittings in the e and f parity components in the
matching doublets lies 5 GHz higher in fre- X 1=2 ladder, the d constant could be estab-
quency. The X 3=2 lines are clearly stronger in lished. Also, the a parameter appeared necessary
intensity than the X 1=2 feature, evidence for a for a reasonable ®t. A signi®cant correlation, on
2
Pi ground state. the other hand, was found between b and c, and
In Fig. 2, a low frequency transition consequently in the ®nal ®t, only the value
b c
J 5=2 ! 7=2 in both X ladders is shown at 132 could be determined. The v 0 transition fre-
GHz
X 3=2 and at 130±135 GHz
X 1=2. quencies were ®t as one data set, even though the
Both lambda-doublets in the X 1=2 sub-level hf splittings were collapsed for levels with
(lower panel) are additionally split into two fea- J > 11=2, and for all X 3=2 transitions. Parity
tures because of lithium hyper®ne interactions. was chosen to match that of KS [18], which con-
One feature is attributable to the F 4 ! 5 sequently made the hf constant d positive.
transition, and the other is a blend of the The spectroscopic constants resulting from this
F 3 ! 4, 2 ! 3, and 1 ! 2 lines. One of these analysis are presented in Table 2 for both the v 0
components
F 3 ! 4 appears as a shoulder on and v 1 vibrational states of LiS
X2 Pi , as well
the left side of the f parity line, making it broader as the individual rms of the data ®ts. As shown in
by about 300 kHz than the expected linewidth. The the table, all constants are well determined and the
positions and relative intensities of the four hf rms of the ®ts are well below the estimated ex-
components that compose the e and f transitions perimental uncertainty of 100 kHz. The residuals
are indicated beneath the respective spectrum. At are given in Table 1. (Those listed for the transi-
higher frequencies, these two features merge to- tions where the hyper®ne splitting was totally
gether and eventually form a single line. In the collapsed are an average over the four individual
X 3=2 spectrum (top panel) there is little evi- residuals given for each hf component.) As is evi-
dence of hf splittings in the closely spaced lambda- dent in the table, centrifugal distortion corrections
doublets. were found necessary for the spin±orbit constant
The data were analyzed using a standard and lambda-doubling parameter p.
Hund's case (a) Hamiltonian consisting of mole- Because two vibrational states were in-
cular frame rotation, spin±orbit interaction, vestigated, equilibrium rotational constants could
lambda-doubling, and hyper®ne coupling, includ- be derived. These values are presented in Table 3.
ing centrifugal distortion corrections [21]:
H^eff H^rot H^so H^LD H^hf :
1
Table 2
The v 0 and v 1 data sets were ®t sepa- Spectroscopic constants for LiS (X2 Pi )a
rately. Because there had been no previous spec- Parameter v0 v1
troscopic studies of LiS, an estimate of the
A )8 222 000 (90 000) )8 185 000 (81 000)
spin±orbit constant A was not available for the AD )2.69 (94) )2.17 (83)
data ®t. Consequently, that of NaS was used as an BV 18 906.2805 (31) 18 702.7044 (37)
initial value ()8000 GHz [17]). The spin±orbit DV 0.090507 (12) 0.089923 (10)
constant was allowed to vary in the ®t and a rea- p 4 860.84 (27) 4 883.68 (35)
q )6.73 (20) )6.58 (17)
sonably de®ned value was obtained.
pD )0.08569 (52) )0.08910 (57)
Analysis of the hyper®ne interaction in the a 3.92 (69) ±
v 0 state proved somewhat problematic because bc )7.7 (1.4) ±
it was observed only in one X ladder, and, even in d 3.6 (2.1) ±
this sub-level, it was not completely resolved. (No rms of ®t 0.086 0.016
hf splittings were recorded for the v 1 state.) a
In MHz; errors are 3r.
254 M.A. Brewster, L.M. Ziurys / Chemical Physics Letters 349 (2001) 249±256
Table 4
Lowest-lying 2 R energies for alkali sul®des and oxidesa
Molecule ER EP (experimental)b ER EP (theory) Reference
LiS 4268 4970c , 5088d [11,19]
NaS 3342 4046d [17,11]
KS 1900 1834d [18,11]
LiO 2565 2400e [14,12]
NaO 2050 1902e [15,12]
KO 200 )46e [16,12]
a
In cm 1 .
b
Derived assuming pure precession hypothesis (see text).
c
QCISD (T)/6-311+G (2df) calculation.
d
SDCI calculation.
e
MRCI calculation.
M.A. Brewster, L.M. Ziurys / Chemical Physics Letters 349 (2001) 249±256 255
ER EP 3342 and 1900 cm 1 , respectively, also with the 7 Li nuclear spin
I 3=2 and hence is a
reasonably close to ab initio predictions (see Table measure of the electron density near the lithium
4). In contrast, the energies of the R state for LiO nucleus. The Fermi contact term in fact traces the
and NaO are 2565 and 2050 cm 1 , based on pure electron density at the nucleus. Consequently, the
precession [14,15], and that of KO is 200 cm 1 magnitude of hyper®ne constants will indicate
[16]. Again, these values are close to those calcu- the degree of deviation from the Li S structure,
lated theoretically, though there is disagreement in where the unpaired electron lies exclusively on the
the case of KO concerning which state actually lies sulfur atom. The hyper®ne constants established
lowest [12]. (Theory predicts the 2 R state to be for LiS in fact are quite small in value, with the
lower by 46 cm 1 .) In general, the R±P separation Fermi contact term near zero. (The parameter
is about a factor of two larger in the sul®des than
b c 7:7 (1.4) MHz.) In contrast, the
in the oxides. atomic Fermi contact term for 7 Li is 409 MHz, a
Another isovalent molecule that presumably considerably larger number [24]. Hence, there is
could have either a 2 Pi or 2 R ground state, de- little electron density at the lithium nucleus.
pending on its electron con®guration, is the SH Furthermore, the Fermi contact term has been
radical. Like the lighter alkali halides, SH has been measured in SH to be (bF 73:5 MHz [25]. In
found to have a 2 Pi ground state, but its ®rst ex- this molecule, the nuclear spin arises from the
cited state
A2 R lies 31 000 cm 1 higher in hydrogen atom (I 1=2). The electron density is
energy [19]. This energy is considerably larger than clearly greater on the hydrogen nucleus in SH
for any of the alkali sul®des or oxides. SH is cer- than on lithium in SLi. (Both hydrogen and li-
tainly a very covalent molecule, and therefore, the thium have comparable magnetic moments so a
R±P separation may indirectly indicate the degree direct comparison can be made.) The unpaired
of covalent character. Covalent bonding is favored electron is thus shared more evenly in SH than
in the 2 Pi : 1r2 p3 con®guration as opposed to the LiS, and thus the bonding is more covalent in the
2
R : p4 r1 con®guration because an electron pair in hydride.
a sigma orbital can be shared between the two
atoms in the P case, but only a single electron in
the R case [7]. This property is also apparent in the 5. Conclusion
alkali species. Based on electronegativity argu-
ments, the alkali oxides must be fairly ionic and Measurements of the pure rotational spectrum
hence their R±P energy separation is relatively of LiS have demonstrated that this species has a
2
small. Because sulfur is less electronegative, the Pi ground state, as do NaS, KS, and SH. Analysis
sul®des have more covalent character than the of the lambda-doubling interactions suggests that
oxides, and the R±P energy separation is sig- the A2 R state in this radical lies 4300 cm 1
ni®cantly larger. above ground state. Although this energy separa-
Despite having more covalent character than tion suggests that the bonding in LiS is more
lithium oxide, LiS is still partly an ionic covalent in character than in LiO, this molecule is
molecule. Evidence for ionicity lies in the spin± still very ionic. Evidence for this ionicity is found
orbit constant for LiS, which is in the spin±orbit constant, which is similar to that
A 8222 GHz. This constant is fairly close in of S , and in the small values of the lithium hy-
value to that of S (3p5 ): f 9773 GHz [23]. per®ne parameters. Observation of the v 0 and
Therefore, the resonance structure Li S must v 1 states of LiS has allowed for calculation of
contribute substantially to the bonding in this equilibrium constants re and xe , which are in good
molecule. agreement with ab initio calculations. These mea-
A further comparison of ionic vs. covalent surements have demonstrated that, though alkali
character can be made by examining the hy- sul®des and oxides are isovalent, there are notice-
per®ne constants derived for LiS. This interaction able dierences in their bonding and electronic
arises from the unpaired electron spin coupling structure.
256 M.A. Brewster, L.M. Ziurys / Chemical Physics Letters 349 (2001) 249±256