Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Frozen Foods and Opportunity Costs
Frozen Foods and Opportunity Costs
(See David M.Cutler, Edward L. Glaeser, and Jesse M. Shapiro, ”Why Have Americans
Become More Obese?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 2003, 93–118.)
In 2007, $27 billion of frozen foods were sold in U.S. grocery stores, one
quarter of it in the form of frozen dinners and entrees. In the mid-1950s, sales of
frozen foods amounted to only $1 billion, a tiny fraction of the overall grocery store
sales. One industry observer attributes this growth to the fact that frozen food tastes
much better than it did in the past. Can you think of anything else that might be
occurring?
The growth of the frozen dinner entrée market in the last 50 years is a good
example of the role of opportunity costs in our lives. One of the most significant
social changes in the U.S. economy in this period has been the increased participation
of women in the labor force. In 1950, only 24 percent of married women worked; by
2000, that fraction had risen to 61 percent.
When both husbands and wives work, the opportunity cost of time for
housework—including making meals— goes up. This tells us that making a home-
cooked meal became more expensive in the last 50 years. A natural result is to shift
people toward labor-saving ways to make meals. Frozen foods are an obvious
solution to the problem of increased opportunity costs.
The growth of the two-worker family has stimulated many entrepreneurs to search
for labor-saving solutions to family tasks.
The public policy students among you might be interested to know that some
researchers attribute part of the growth in obesity in the United States to the lower
opportunity costs of making meals associated with the growth of the markets for
frozen foods and the microwave.
Problem: