Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engineering Materials MAK - 224E: Prof. Dr. Ersan Üstündağ
Engineering Materials MAK - 224E: Prof. Dr. Ersan Üstündağ
ENGINEERING MATERIALS
MAK - 224E
2 12.10.2021 Tuesday 11:30 – 13:30 D353 Notes HW1 Tensile behavior of materials
11 21.12.2021 Tuesday 11:30 – 13:30 D353 Notes Steels and coding, cast irons
12 28.12.2021 Tuesday 11:30 – 13:30 D353 Notes Nonferrous metals and alloys
1
10/5/2021
Textbook
• Prerequisite: MAK 213
• Textbooks:
– Donald R. ASKELAND, “The Science and Engineering of Materials”, 3rd ed.,
PWS Pub. Co., 1994.
– Course Handout Materials.
• Other References:
– W.F. Smith, “Principles of Materials Science and Engineering”, 2nd ed.,
McGraw Hill, New York, 1990.
– J.F. Shackelford, “Introduction to Materials Science for Engineers”, 3rd ed.,
McMillan Pub. Co., 1992.
– W.D. Callister, Materials Science and Engineering-An Introduction, John
Wiley & Sons, 2000.
Requirements to take
the Final Exam: - A minimum attendance of 70% for lectures, and
- A minimum score of 40/100 in the midterm exams.
2
10/5/2021
Engineering
Materials
Materials Science
3
10/5/2021
4
7
8
© 2003 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™
© 2003 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™
10/5/2021
Classification of Materials
10
5
10/5/2021
Polymeric Materials
• Most of them consist of organic long molecules.
• Carbon (C) is essential in all molecules.
• Structure is non-crystalline but some of them contain mixtures of
crystalline and non-crystalline regions.
• Strength and ductility vary due to structure of molecular chains.
• Poor conduction of heat and electricity (good insulation).
• Low densities.
• Low softening or decomposition temperatures.
11
Polymeric Materials
• Thermoplastics
– ABS
– Nylon
– PVC
• Thermosets
– Epoxy
– Polyester
• Elastomers
– Rubber
12
6
10/5/2021
Ceramic Materials
• Inorganic materials.
• Consist of metallic and nonmetallic elements.
• Ionic and/or covalent bonding.
• Crystalline / glassy / both structures.
• High hardness.
• High elevated temperature strength.
• Low ductility and toughness.
13
Ceramic Materials
• Chemical stability against the effects of environment
• Poor conduction of heat and electricity
• Good wear and heat resistance
14
7
10/5/2021
Ceramic Materials
• Main classes:
– Traditional: silica, porcelain
– Refractories: silica brick
– Glasses
– Abrasives: alumina, silicon carbide
– Advanced engineering ceramics: partially stabilized
zirconia
15
Composite Materials
16
8
10/5/2021
Composite Materials
• Reinforcement types:
– Fiber
– Particle
– Lamellar
• Matrix types:
– Polymeric
– Metallic
• Important composites:
– Glass fiber reinforced
plastics
– Carbon fiber reinforced
aluminum
– Thoria dispersed Nickel
17
18
9
10/5/2021
MECHANICAL FAILURE
19
MECHANICAL FAILURE
20
10
10/5/2021
MECHANICAL FAILURE
• The usual causes for failure are:
– Improper materials selection and processing
– Inadequate design
– Misuse
• Cost of failure
– 1000 Billions of $ or YTL annually
– Loss of human life!
21
MECHANICAL FAILURE
ISSUES TO ADDRESS...
• How do we estimate the stress to fracture?
• How is fracture resistance quantified; how do different
material classes compare?
• How do flaws in a material initiate failure?
• How do loading rate, loading history, and temperature
affect the failure stress?
22
1
11
10/5/2021
23
24
12
10/5/2021
25
Variation in
loading condition / material property
(Character of variation)
Standard Deviation
Low High
26
13
10/5/2021
27
28
14
10/5/2021
29
30
15
10/5/2021
1.5
1.0 r/h
0 0.5 1.0
sharper fillet radius
31
Failure of Materials
32
16
10/5/2021
33
34
17
10/5/2021
Failure of Materials
Failure: losing the ability of functional performance of a
component or a system.
Types of Failure
Excessive elastic Elastic Modulus determines the limit
Geometrical deformation displacement
failure of
- size changing
component
(shape, size and Plastic Yield Strength, Creep Strength determines the shape
tolerance deformation and size changing
change)
Wear Hardness İs related with tolerance
Corrosion Chemical potential (Surface Attacks)
Erosion Hardness
Rupture Ultimate Strength, Creep Strength determines the
Breaking of Fast Fracture Fracture Toughness maximum loading limit
components in design
Fatigue Fatigue Strength
35
36
18
10/5/2021
Fracture of Materials
37
– Ductile fracture
– Brittle fracture
– Fatigue fracture
– Creep and stress rupture fracture
– Stress corrosion fracture
38
19
10/5/2021
smaller toughness-
unreinforced
polymers
Fracture Mechanisms
• Brittle fracture
• Ductile fracture
– Little or no
– Occurs with
plastic plastic
deformation deformation
– Catastrophic
cup-and-cone fracture 40
brittle fracture
Adapted from Fig. 8.3, Callister 7e.
20
10/5/2021
• Brittle failure:
--many pieces
--small deformation
Figures from V.J. Colangelo and F.A.
Heiser, Analysis of Metallurgical Failures
(2nd ed.), Fig. 4.1(a) and (b), p. 66 John
Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1987. Used with
permission.
42
21
10/5/2021
43
44
22
10/5/2021
(c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning™ is a trademark used
Plastic deformation-necking
herein under license.
When a ductile material is pulled in a tensile test, necking begins and voids form –
starting near the center of the bar – by nucleation at grain boundaries or inclusions. As
deformation continues a 45° shear lip may form, producing a final cup-and-cone
fracture.
45
• Resulting 50
50mm
mm
fracture
surfaces
(steel)
100 mm
particles From V.J. Colangelo and F.A. Heiser, Fracture surface of tire cord wire
serve as void Analysis of Metallurgical Failures (2nd loaded in tension. Courtesy of F.
ed.), Fig. 11.28, p. 294, John Wiley and Roehrig, CC Technologies, Dublin,
nucleation Sons, Inc., 1987. (Orig. source: P. OH. Used with permission.
sites. Thornton, J. Mater. Sci., Vol. 6, 1971, pp. 46
347-56.)
23
10/5/2021
48
24
10/5/2021
49
Cleavage planes in
brittle fracture:
Transgranular
50
25
10/5/2021
e
TS
smaller
sy
e
52
26
10/5/2021
27
10/5/2021
Design Strategy:
Stay Above The DBTT!
• Pre-WWII: The Titanic • WWII: Liberty ships
55
If the component has preexisting cracks, stress rises at crack tips and
causes crack propagation.
Crack propagation rate reaches the velocity of sound in the material.
• Much lower fracture strength is explained by the effect of stress
concentration at microscopic flaws. The applied stress is amplified at the
tips of micro cracks, voids, notches, surface scratches, corners, etc. that
are called stress concentrators raisers.
• The magnitude of this amplification depends on micro crack
orientations, geometry and dimensions.
56
28
10/5/2021
2a
rt
29
10/5/2021
EVIDENCE of FRACTURE
Crack propagation perpendicular to the direction of applied stress, during
each cycle.
Macro evidence: Beach marks (can be seen by naked eye)
Micro evidence: Striations (requires electron microscopes such as SEM)
Final fracture (results from overloading due to insufficient remaining cross
section to carry the applied load) generally in ductile mode.
59
EVIDENCE of FRACTURE
Surface intrusions and extrusions:
Fatigue crack nucleation sites
Beach Marks
Crack
Propagation
Lines
Striations
Crack nucleation site
60
30
10/5/2021
Originated by:
1. Thermally induced plastic deformation = Grain
boundary sliding
2. Void formation: at medium stresses, void formation in
grains or grain boundaries.
3. Coalescence of voids that cause failure.
61
62
31
10/5/2021
63
Fracture in Non-Metallic
Materials
a. Ceramics
b. Polymers
c. Composites
64
32
10/5/2021
FRACTURE IN POLYMERS:
Ductile fracture:
Thermoplastics working above Tg temperature.
Brittle fracture:
Thermoplastics working below Tg temperature.
Thermosets
65
FRACTURE IN CERAMICS:
Ceramics – brittle materials, no plastic deformation
since no movable dislocations, only a few slip
planes and the necessity for charge balance.
Fracture always brittle in cleavage type cracks.
66
33
10/5/2021
FRACTURE in Composites:
Elastic deformation on fibers but maybe plastic deformation in matrix.
Weak bonding between matrix and fibers or between layers.
Sometimes, week bonding desirable in ceramic matrix composites for
bridging or pulling out.
67
SUMMARY
• Engineering materials don't reach theoretical strength.
• Flaws produce stress concentrations that cause
premature failure.
• Sharp corners produce large stress concentrations
and premature failure.
68
34
10/5/2021
SUMMARY
Failure type depends on T and stress:
- For non-cyclic s and T < 0.4Tm, failure stress decreases with:
• increased maximum flaw size,
• decreased T,
• increased rate of loading.
- For cyclic s:
• cycles to fail decreases as Ds increases.
69
SUMMARY
70
35