Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student'S Guide To The Celf - 4
Student'S Guide To The Celf - 4
STUDENT'S
GUIDE
TO
THE
CELF
-‐
4
An
introduction
to
the
nearly
deceased
assessment
by
JustAnotherSpeechie
Disclaimer: This information is not intended to replace the CELF-4 manual, but is hopefully
accurate enough to give you a head's start. Please refer to the CELF-4 manual if any
discrepancies exist.
This manual is not intended to replace the manual, but to serve as "essential" side
notes.
• Find out as much as possible about the student being assessed, including
reason for referral
• Work out the chronological age before the session and complete the
details at the top of the form. This ensures that the appropriate subtests
are completed
• How long the session will go for, or how many activities will be
completed.
• To decrease anxiety, tell them upfront that they are not expected to
answer every question correctly, but they are expected to provide their
best answer.
• Let them know that for some questions you are allowed to repeat back,
others you are not
• That for many questions you are unable to tell them the answer.
Ask the student if they have any questions before the assessment starts.
• The parent may want to sit next to the student or behind the student.
Ensure that the parent can see the stimulus questions.
• Tell the parents that they too have a job in the assessment session. That
they are expected to provide emotional support for the student. They are
to watch the answers closely, so they can give feedback as to whether
their child responded in a way they expected. This part is essential in the
build up to delivering the results, and can prevent any disagreements.
• Ask parents to refrain from providing the answer, and that you aren't
allowed to give the answer either.
• How their children generally present today that might affect the
assessment results. Observations to note include energy levels, general
health and any behavioral observations (e.g., anxiety about the
assessment).
Which
subtests
should
I
administer?
In an ideal word, you would only test using the subtests that correlate to the
presenting problem, and only screen for areas in which the students displays high
risk-factors of delay. This minimizes the amount of assessment that the child
needs to sit through, whilst gaining information about their language skills.
In the real world, the subtests that are administered should be guided by:
• If time is limited, it is strongly recommended that you not give into the
temptation of only administering the subtests for the CLI. If you have
such limited time, you should administer a different screening
assessment.
The following three subtests will be outlined for the Expressive Language Index:
The order of administration does not matter. For children who are more
introverted, or need to warm up, a receptive language subtest may be an easy
way to start the assessment.
For students who have difficulty in answering questions from stories and receive
a score within the normal range for the Sentence Structure subtest, the
Understanding Spoken Paragraphs subtest may be worth administering.
Given that our results always need to be linked back to the presenting problem,
the following should be noted when understanding the RLI:
• The RLI taken without the ELI does not test for auditory memory without
visual support. The Working Memory subtests need to be administered
to screen for this skill.
We will now outline the subtests involved in the Receptive Language Index.
The results from this assessment can identify specific concepts that the student
needs extra attention.
Score this subtest as you go, circling one (1) for correct and zero (0) for incorrect.
Once you past question __, look for seven (7) consecutive incorrect responses (O)
before discontinuing the test.
Ensure your student understands that they need to wait for "Go" before
responding to the question. If they are unable to wait despite repeated
teaching attempts, then administer the subtest anyway to gain
information. Whilst each violation of not waiting for "Go" is marked as
incorrect, it will be worth noting whether the student is able to answer
the question correctly or not. Note in the report these behavioural
observations.
Sometimes a student will sit there for 10-15 seconds before answering a
question. It makes for a very long assessment! I am generally upfront
with the student: I ask them if they need time to think, of which I
reassure them that I will wait for as long as it takes (sigh!), or if they don't
know they can either tell me or guess.
This is tricky to start with: You read them a nice long instruction and the
student answers so quickly you can miss their response! In order to
minimise this issue, I like to look up as I am reading the last few words.
There is also a separate stimulus card that allows you to sit next the
student so you can see them pointing. I personally sit at the corner of the
table with the student to the left of me (so I can write on the right side).
If this happens, try going back to the question at the end of the
assessment, tell the student that you missed an answer.
• Convert the score into a standardised score using the tables at the back
of the manual
o Attention skills (e.g., could they last through the whole subtest)
• Maximum number of steps (e.g., 3-steps: Point the shoe, the ball and the
house)
The most important information in the assessment is how it links back to the
presenting problem. For example,
"Annie scored an 8 in this subtest which indicates that her skills in understanding
a range of concepts and following instructions with visual support is within the
average range. Annie understood the following concepts:
This subtest looks at a student's ability to make connections between words. The
stronger the connections, the more easily it is to access and retrieve that word.
Additionally, as we learn new words we relate them to our existing vocabulary.
Therefore the stronger the existing vocabulary, the more connections we can
make and the easier it is to learn the new word.
Mark the pictures that the student points to on the score sheet. Circle one (1) or
zero (0) for correct and incorrect responses respectively.
You can also ask the student to explain the answer (e.g., How do ___ and ___ go
together?).
If the student obtains five (5) consecutive answers incorrect in the receptive
language score, discontinue the assessment.
Sometimes students will not look at all the answers before they answer.
Therefore you may see a cluster of answers where the pairs are the same. If you
observe this during the assessment, have a look at their eyes and you can
generally get a good indications as to whether they are scanning the whole page.
When students provide odd-ball answers, there are sometimes correct reasons as
to why the answer is correct (in their mind!). For example, the dog and frog go
together because they both end in "og". The answer isn't incorrect, it just isn't the
answer that is the most obvious semantic answer. This still indicates a weakness
in their ability to make connections between words. In such instances, their
answer is still incorrect and marked zero (0).
Sometimes it is also worth providing a few specific examples of words that the
student was able to answer correctly.
Administer all the items, no matter how many questions are incorrect.
We might joke about this at university, but school aged children also do the same!
The student might not be scanning for all the pictures, and similarly to Word
Classes - Receptive subtest, be answering impulsively.
Requesting repetition
• Word Structure
• Recalling Sentences
• Formulating Sentences
For the really young students (e.g., 5;0-5;6), the Formulating Sentences subtest
can be quite tricky. Students do not need to score all that well in order to obtain a
score that is within the average range. Consequently, there is little sensitivity at
the lower end of the scale.
Narrative development
The CELF-4 limits expressive language to the sentence level. There is no room for
children to further show their skills in narrative development, which is essential
for story telling.
Sometimes the student doesn't understand that they need to complete the
stimulus question in the same way you completed the model.
As part of the expressive language index, the Recalling Sentences subtest can
provide indicators of a student's sentence structure, grammar skills and
vocabulary. This is due to the observation that we do not generally repeat what
we do not have already in our language system. For example, if I were to say,
"There's a dog and a cat!" to a 2 year old, they might only repeat "dog, cat" as
they might not have articles or conjunctions in their vocabulary. Similarly, this
occurs with sentence structures as well.
In some cases, students may not replicate accurately because the language is in
their system, but because of either 1) echolalia or 2) phenomenal auditory
memory skills.
I would say that the moment I dread the most about this assessment is the
"talker", the one that tells you a story for each picture. Yes, it's great expressive
language (maybe not pragmatics though!), but it can be hard and time consuming
to score. Sometimes you can hint to the student that you only need one
sentence. Mark only the sentences that contain the word, and use the sentence
with the greatest score. A mention about their pragmatics may be worthwhile.
It always amazes me the number of words that are used to describe this subtest
to the student, given that many of our students have language delays. If your
student has trouble understanding the subtest, sometimes I will say "Tell me a
story about this picture using the word ___". Note this in the qualitative section of
the assessment.
Ensure that you include whether the results are representative of the student's
normal language skills, and if not, why not. Add some practical recommendations
for the teachers and parents.