This document discusses the differences between Eastern and Western perspectives of self-concept. The Eastern perspective sees the self as interdependent and focuses on belonging to social groups, respecting authority, and maintaining social harmony. The Western perspective views the self as independent and prioritizes individualism, social equality, and directly addressing problems. Collectivism is also contrasted with individualism, where collectivism emphasizes group goals over individual goals.
This document discusses the differences between Eastern and Western perspectives of self-concept. The Eastern perspective sees the self as interdependent and focuses on belonging to social groups, respecting authority, and maintaining social harmony. The Western perspective views the self as independent and prioritizes individualism, social equality, and directly addressing problems. Collectivism is also contrasted with individualism, where collectivism emphasizes group goals over individual goals.
This document discusses the differences between Eastern and Western perspectives of self-concept. The Eastern perspective sees the self as interdependent and focuses on belonging to social groups, respecting authority, and maintaining social harmony. The Western perspective views the self as independent and prioritizes individualism, social equality, and directly addressing problems. Collectivism is also contrasted with individualism, where collectivism emphasizes group goals over individual goals.
We can distinguish culture where we belong based on what country we are living since then we build our consciousness. Indeed, it is one of the major aspect contributing of building our concept of self. It is divided into two the Eastern and Western perspective. Eastern self concept build with the different religious aspect in which we build our beliefs and values or morals as a person while in western self concept is categorized by contemporary discussion by Frank Johnson in terms of analytical, monotheistic, individualistic and materialistic in which really focuses on mind setting and being subjective. Moreover, in eastern culture we are interdependence that we should listen to our authority but in western the social and cognitive skills must be integrated to build dependent self. In the same manner, east has a high power that eastern people show respect to everyone most especially on the person that is elder on them, hence in western individual should earn their respect even the older one and it is obviously contrasting to each culture. Furthermore, east establish social relationship as formal and hierarchical in such people must feel comfortable and know their position with in structure as they call ate and kuya but in western they promote equality and social ranking is minimized due to they think they are equal in all matters. In connection to that, eastern portray their self as they think before sharing or saying something for them to not hurt someones feelings yet in western they are more on talking, expressing immediately as they without thinking others feelings because they are saying just like no filter at all. Yet, in eastern they are puzzled on what we should say or expressing our opinions at the same time eastern culture we don’t face our problems directly until we face it in worst situation while western fix their problems directly as they could fix everything. Therefore, we eastern and western culture have obvious differences in all aspects of seeing and conceptualizing the self. Collectivism vs. Individualism In this lesson Mr. Ludwig von Mises has a great role as he contributed great idea how to present collectivism versus individualism idea. For many times everybody is having a hard time and continuously debating of the said topic. The collectivist position is that the goals of many is more important to the goals of those individual while individualist see it as individual are more important than to those collect and vice-versa. Indeed, methodologically individual only acts and take action out distinguishing his/her existence as individual. in result, he/she is can choose their own goals and act accordingly. In contrast, collectivism give more importance on the goals of many as they believe it is superior than being individual but there is social hierarchy that who is in the highest power uses his/her own goal and see it as the goal of many were in fact it is for his/her own good. Hence, Neitzsche is not agree on the idea of collectivism as he emphasize collectivist people are unable to create their own goals and meaning of life. Therefore, collectivism and individualism is everyone’s choice with in their selves even they belong to a certain group but he/she value individuality rather than collectivism jut to fed his/her goals. Then, it is bad to hear that but it really exist, in such it is important to know where we belong and not be blind of reality. Collectivism and Individualism by Michael Hogan Ph. D. Many author trying and keeping on comparing this collectivism and individualism differ to each other, of how this emphasize in different countries where we belong. Indeed, in this topic the author for me focuses more on explaining collectivism impacted people negatively that in result to collectivist people loss their individuality and fully embracing ones individuality or rejecting the lure of collection. More likely, collectivist values have negative effects on being creative thinking in groups yet need to follow crowd because we believed we are part of the many so we need to go with the flow what is the many doing and practicing. Indeed, we adopt the group norms while reinforcing a conformity particular on our ideas or solution but we are changing our beliefs or behavior in order for us to fit in, and by the means of group pressure. In conclusion, we the collectivist culture forgot to express our selves that sometimes we tend to be manipulated in our behavior and action by our group just to fit in but for me it’s okay sometimes to take our actions differently and not adjusting for others for us to learn something from our own and sometimes to be independent, stand with our choice and face the consequences on our own. Philosophies of self: East-West Distinction West people give more value on developing their unique self by having the essence, identity and importantly differentiate self endlessly. While, eastern people have flexible self yet oriented more to duty than to rights because eastern people give more value on attachment to others, our inter relationship with the people with in our community. Therefore, western people are more prone to depression as they could only rely on their selves and anxious to share something with his/her co-western people while eastern people are being deprive of their rights, right to express their selves because they are afraid to be different.