Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment of Nematicidal Potential of Cannabis Sativa and Azadirachta Indica in The Management of Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne Javanica) On Peach
Assessment of Nematicidal Potential of Cannabis Sativa and Azadirachta Indica in The Management of Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne Javanica) On Peach
As many antagonistic plants are being continuously explored for their nematicidal potential against nematodes, therefore, in
the present study two antagonistic plants viz. Cannabis sativa and Azadirachta indica at different doses viz. 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10,
12.5 and 15 g per kg of the soil were evaluated against Meloidogyne javanica on peach with the objective to curtail reliance
on hazardous chemicals. Soil amendments of both the plants significantly reduced number of galls, eggmasses and eggs per
eggmass on peach, root, soil, and total populations and reproduction factor of the nematode. Both the plants caused statistically
similar reductions in these parameters at all the concentrations with few exceptions. However, the reductions caused by C.
sativa were comparatively more than those by A. indica. The maximum reductions were observed at a dose of 15 g per kg of
soil while the reductions were found to be the minimum with the lowest dose of 2.5 g per kg of soil. Similarly, the per cent
reductions over control caused by both the plants were found to be dose dependent. As the concentration of the plant material
increased, there was a corresponding decrease in the values of these parameters and the relationships were found to be inversely
proportional. It is concluded from the present study that incorporation of C. sativa and A. indica in the soil as organic
amendments can work very well as nematicides and can be successfully used for controlling root-knot nematodes replacing
traditional chemical treatments and avoiding environmental pollution.
Keywords: Cannabis sativa; Azadirachta indica; Prunus persica; reproduction factor; root-knot nematode.
INTRODUCTION al., 2020; Tariq-Khan et al., 2017, 2020; Ahmed et al., 2021).
These nematodes have been reported to incur about $173
Peaches are among the most popular fruits in the world due to billion yield losses annually on different agricultural crops.
pleasant taste, nutritional richness and good medicinal values. Root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne are the most
Peach fruits are rich in ascorbic acid, carotenoids (provitamin damaging and ranked the first among the phytopathogenic
A), phenolic compounds and are an excellent source of nematodes (Termorshuizen et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2016;
antioxidants (Tomas-Barberan et al., 2001; Byrne, 2002). Gamalero and Glick, 2020).
Peach is the second largest stone fruit after apricots among Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) have been found
stone fruits of Pakistan. In Pakistan, peaches were seriously infecting peaches and have become a severe issue
fundamentally developed in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, for majority of peach growers and nurserymen in many
Baluchistan and some low chill areas of Pothwar zone of regions having tropical and Mediterranean climates
Punjab. It has been cultivated on an area of 14700 hectares (Lamberti, 1979). Root-knot nematodes have been found
with 55800 tons of production (FAO, 2017). prevalent in temperate, tropical, and equatorial regions of the
The lucrative production of peaches and nectarines has been world (Moens et al., 2009; Nyczepir, 2011; Kayani and
threatened for many years by a number of diseases like peach Mukhtar, 2018; Mukhtar and Kayani, 2019, 2020). Root-knot
leaf curl, peach tree short life (PTSL) and nematodes. nematodes cause reduction in fruit production of many
Phytopathogenic nematodes have economic significance in economically important species of Prunus including Prunus
agriculture sector and are directly and indirectly associated persica. Among different species of root-knot nematodes,
with crop damages leading to yield losses in various Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica are the most common
vegetables, fruits and crops (Bogner et al., 2017; Asghar et in peach and plum orchards (Nyczepir and Becker, 1998). The
Saeed, M., T. Mukhtar, M.I. Haq and M.A. Khan.2021. Assessment of nematicidal potential of Cannabis sativa and Azadirachta indica in the management of
root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) on peach. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 58:1555-1561.
[Received 20 Oct 2020; Accepted 25 Nov 2021; Published 30 Nov 2021]
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Saeed, Mukhtar, Haq & Khan
occurrence of M. incognita and M. javanica was recorded in rinsed on 38 μm sieve to wash off residues of the bleach and
95 and 5% of sampled peach orchards respectively in South back washed in a beaker. The eggs were then placed on
Carolina (Nyczepir et al., 1997). extraction trays for emergence of second stage juveniles. The
The characteristic underground symptoms caused by root- freshly hatched (24-48 hours old) juveniles thus obtained
knot nematodes are the formation of galls on roots and the were used in the evaluation of antagonistic plants in pot
stunting of aboveground parts of 1 to 2 years old peach trees. experiments.
Defoliation at early stages, unthrifty tree growth, reduction in Effect of C. sativa and A. indica amendments against M.
biomass and fruit yield are among the other aboveground javanica: The leaves of C. sativa and A. indica were washed
symptoms. The nematodes cause occasional death of infected under tap water, dried under shade and powderized. The
trees (Nyczepir et al., 1993; Nyczepir and Thomas, 2009). powderized leaves of both the test plants were then mixed
The aboveground symptoms become more prominent in with the formalin sterilized soil at the rates of 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5,
sandy soils especially under drought conditions. 10, 12.5 and 15 g per kg of the soil. Five kilograms of the soils
For the control of root-knot nematodes, several strategies are amended with different concentrations of dried leaves of both
being followed (Kayani et al., 2018; Mukhtar, 2018; Hussain the plants were transferred to 30-cm-diameter pots along with
et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2019; Mukhtar and Hussain, 2019) 2 g of urea. Un-amended pots served as checks. The pots were
but the use of chemical nematicides is very common among irrigated to facilitate decomposition of plant materials. Two
growers as other nematode management strategies have weeks after amendments, one healthy peach plant cv. ‘Early
certain limitations. However, the use of nematicides is often Grand’ one year old was transplanted in each pot.
associated with health hazards and environmental pollution. The plants were left for 15 days to establish roots in the soil.
Due to broad spectrum activities of most the pernicious The well-established peach plantlets were then inoculated
chemical nematicides, beneficial soil microbes are badly with 5000 freshly hatched (24-48 hours of age) second stage
affected resulting in a rapid resurgence of soil-dwelling juveniles of M. javanica 15 days after their transplantation.
phytopathogens (Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2010; Watson et al., There were five replications for each treatment. The pots were
2017). Therefore, development of new, safer, ecofriendly organized following completely randomized design in the
nematicidal chemicals for the management of root-knot glasshouse at 25°C ± 2 for seven weeks. The pots were
nematodes is essential. Recently, numerous antagonistic irrigated when required. After specified period, the plants
plants and biocontrol agents have been evaluated as viable were carefully removed, the roots were excised from the
alternatives to chemical nematicidal compounds to manage shoots, carefully washed under tap water and blotted dry. The
root-knot nematodes (Hussain et al., 2011; Nazir et al., 2019; data were recorded regarding number of galls, eggmasses,
Azeem et al., 2021; Mukhtar et al., 2021). Several eggs per eggmass, root, soil and total populations and
antagonistic and medicinal plants have been found to possess reproduction factor of the nematode.
nematicidal and nematostatic activities against root-knot The percent reductions in these variables were calculated over
nematodes (Termorshuizen et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2019. control as mentioned below.
Ntalli et al., 2020; D’Addabbo and Avato, 2021). % reduction over control
As many antagonistic plants are being continuously explored uninoculated − inoculated
for their nematicidal potential against nematodes, therefore, = × 100
uninoculated
in the present study two antagonistic plants viz. Cannabis
sativa and Azadirachta indica at different doses were Statistical analysis: All the data were subjected to Analysis
evaluated against Meloidogyne javanica on peach with the of Variance (ANOVA) using Statistix 8.1 package. The
objective to curtail reliance on hazardous chemicals. means were compared by Tukey Honestly Significant
Difference Test HSD at 0.05%. Standard errors of means were
MATERIALS AND METHODS calculated in Microsoft Excel 2007.
1556
Potential of C. sativa and A. indica in the management of root-knot nematode
of soil while the reductions were found to be the minimum Effect of A. indica and C. sativa on reproduction factor of
with the lowest dose of 2.5 g per kg of soil (Table 1). The M. javanica: Incorporation of A. indica and C. sativa in the
reductions in these parameters were recorded to be dose soil at all concentrations resulted in significant reductions in
dependent. As the concentration of the plant material reproduction factor (Figure 7). Reductions were found to be
increased, there was a corresponding decrease in the values of the maximum at an application rate of 15 g per kg of soil
these parameters. The relationships have been shown with amounting to 48.58 and 52.72% for A. indica and C. sativa
regression equations in Table 4. respectively (Table 3). Reproduction factors were also found
Effect of A. indica and C. sativa on populations of M. to be indirectly proportional to the doses of the amendments.
javanica: Effect of A. indica and C. sativa amendments in soil With an increase in the concentration of the plant material,
caused significant reductions in root, soil, and total there was an increase in the reproduction factors and these
populations of the nematode as evident by the analyses of relationships have been shown by regression equations given
variance of these parameters. However, there were no in Table 4.
significant differences between A. indica and C. sativa in
causing reductions in these parameters with few exceptions.
The reductions caused by C. sativa were comparatively more
than those by A. indica (Figures 4, 5 and 6). Similarly, the %
reductions over control caused by both the plants were found
to be dose dependent. The maximum reductions in these
populations of the nematode in case of both the plants were
caused at the maximum applied dose of 15 g per kg of soil
while the minimum dose of 2.5 g caused the minimum
reductions (Table 2). It was found that with an increase in the
dose of the plant material, there was a corresponding decrease
in the populations and the relationships were found to be
inversely proportional as shown by regression equations Figure 1. Effects of A. indica and C. sativa on number of
(Table 4). galls by M. javanica on peach
Table 1. Effects of A. indica and C. sativa in reductions in number of galls, eggmasses and eggs/eggmass produced
by M. javanica
Treatments % decrease over control in
No. of galls No. of eggmasses No. of eggs/eggmass
A. indica C. sativa A. indica C. sativa A. indica C. sativa
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.5 6.80 7.77 8.02 10.16 4.55 9.09
5 8.74 10.68 10.16 14.44 6.82 10.61
7.5 13.59 16.50 13.37 19.79 11.36 15.15
10 25.24 32.04 29.41 36.90 15.91 20.45
12.5 40.78 42.72 41.18 48.66 18.94 21.97
15 54.37 57.28 59.36 63.64 28.03 30.30
Rugby 77.67 77.67 79.68 79.68 31.06 31.06
Table 2. Effects of A. indica and C. sativa in reductions in soil, root and total populations of M. javanica
Treatments % decrease over control in
Root population Soil population Total population
A. indica C. sativa A. indica C. sativa A. indica C. sativa
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.5 3.67 5.90 2.82 3.58 3.64 5.82
5 6.42 8.81 4.45 6.19 6.35 8.71
7.5 11.08 15.73 7.38 8.69 10.95 15.48
10 19.58 23.73 11.18 15.64 19.28 23.44
12.5 36.31 40.95 19.54 23.78 35.71 40.33
15 49.04 53.18 36.26 40.50 48.58 52.72
Rugby 73.27 73.27 53.20 53.20 72.54 72.54
1557
Saeed, Mukhtar, Haq & Khan
Figure 2. Effects of A. indica and C. sativa on number of Figure 5. Effects of A. indica and C. sativa on soil
eggmasses by M. javanica on peach population of M. javanica
Figure 3. Effects of A. indica and C. sativa on number of Figure 6. Effects of A. indica and C. sativa on total
eggs/eggmasses by M. javanica on peach population of M. javanica
Table 4. Regression equations and R2 values regarding different parameters of nematode infestations
Parameter A. indica C. sativa
Regression Equation R2 Regression Equation R2
No. of galls -25.13x + 225.46 0.9724 -23.91x + 208.32 0.9542
No. of eggmasses -22.74x + 203.57 0.9769 -23.55x + 198.46 0.9462
Eggs/eggmass -10.98x + 275.89 0.9723 -11.36x + 272.86 0.9610
Soil population -6465.10x + 53584 0.9619 -6264.40x + 49879 0.9342
Root population -193.33x + 1954.5 0.8798 196.33x + 1828.5 0.8692
Total population -6658.40x + 55538 0.9613 -6460.70x + 51707 0.9333
Reproduction factor -1.34x + 11.108 0.9613 -1.29x + 10.341 0.9333
1558
Potential of C. sativa and A. indica in the management of root-knot nematode
1559
Saeed, Mukhtar, Haq & Khan
Botanicals present some advantages over synthetic pesticides, Byrne, D.H. 2002. Peach breeding trends. Acta Hortic.
such as: they can provide novel compounds that pests are not 592:49-59.
yet able to inactivate; they are less concentrated and thus Chaudhary, S., R.K. Kanwar, A. Sehgal, D.M. Cahill, C.J.
potentially less toxic than pure compounds; they biodegrade Barrow, R. Sehgal and J.R. Kanwar. 2017. Progress on
rapidly, and may possess multiple modes of action making Azadirachta indica based biopesticides in replacing
possible a wide spectrum of use while retaining a selective synthetic toxic pesticides. Front. Plant Sci. 8:610.
action within each pest class, and they are derived from Chitwood, D.J. 2002. Phytochemicals based strategies for
renewable resources. nematode control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40:221-249.
It is concluded from the present study that incorporation of C. D’Addabbo, T. and P. Avato. 2021. Chemical composition
sativa and A. indica in the soil as organic amendments can and nematicidal properties of sixteen essential oils-a
work very well as nematicides and can be successfully used review. Plants 10:1368.
for controlling root-knot nematodes replacing traditional FAO. 2017. Biannual report on global food markets. Food and
chemical treatments and avoiding environmental pollution. Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Gamalero, E. and B.R. Glick. 2020. The use of plant growth-
Authors Contributions Statement: MS, TM and MIH promoting bacteria to prevent nematode damage to
designed the study, MS executed experimental work, plants. Biology. 9:381.
recorded and compiled data, TM, MAK analyzed the data, Hussain, M.A., T. Mukhtar and M.Z. Kayani. 2011. Efficacy
MS and TM prepared the manuscript, TM supervised the evaluation of Azadirachta indica, Calotropis procera,
experimental work and all the authors edited the manuscript. Datura stramonium and Tagetes erecta against root-knot
nematodes Meloidogyne incognita. Pak. J. Bot. 43:197-
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there is no 204.
conflict of interest of any type. Hussain, M.A. and T. Mukhtar. 2019. Root-knot nematodes
infecting okra in major vegetable growing districts of
Acknowledgments: We highly acknowledge late Prof. Dr. Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool. 51:1137-1143.
Nadeem Akthar Abbasi and also assistance and cooperation Javed, N., S.R. Gowen, M. Inam-ul-Haq, K. Abdullah and F.
rendered by the local peach farmers in the Pothowar region is Shahina. 2007. Systemic and persistent effect of neem
gratefully acknowledged. (Azadirachta indica) formulations against root-knot
nematodes, Meloidogyne javanica and their storage life.
REFERENCES Crop Prot. 26:911-916.
Javed, N., S.R. Gowen, S.A. El-Hassan, M. Inam-ul-Haq, F.
Ahmed, M.H., M. Ashfaq, T. Mukhtar and M.A. Khan. 2021. Shahina and B. Pembroke. 2008. Efficacy of neem
Categorization of available cucumber genotypes against (Azadirachta indica) formulations on biology of root-
Zucchini yellow mosaic virus and root-knot nematode knot nematodes (Meloidogyne javanica) on tomato. Crop
(Meloidogyne incognita). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 25:955-961. Prot. 27:36-43.
Akhtar, H., S. Anita and S.P. Kumar. 2005. Studies on the Kayani, M.Z., T. Mukhtar and M.A. Hussain. 2012.
management of root knot nematode, Meloidogyne Evaluation of nematicidal effects of Cannabis sativa L.
incognita-wilt fungus, Fusarium oxysporum disease and Zanthoxylum alatum Roxb. against root-knot
complex of green gram, Vigna radiata cv ML-1108. J. nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita. Crop Prot. 39:52-56.
Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 6:736-742. Kayani, M.Z. and T. Mukhtar. 2018. Reproductivity of
Asghar, A., T. Mukhtar, M.U. Raja and A. Gulzar. 2020. Meloidogyne incognita on fifteen cucumber cultivars.
Interaction between Meloidogyne javanica and Ralstonia Pak. J. Zool. 50:1717-1722.
solanacearum in chili. Pakistan J. Zool. 52:1525-1530. Kayani, M.Z., T. Mukhtar and M.A. Hussain. 2018.
Azeem, W., T. Mukhtar and T. Hamid. 2021. Evaluation of Interaction between nematode inoculum density and
Trichoderma harzianum and Azadirachta indica in the plant age on growth and yield of cucumber and
management of Meloidogyne incognita in Tomato. reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita. Pakistan J. Zool.
Pakistan J. Zool. 53:119-125. 50:897-902.
Bharadwaj, A. and S. Sharma. 2007. Effect of some plant Khan, M.T.A., T. Mukhtar and M. Saeed. 2019. Resistance or
extracts on the hatch of Meloidogyne incognita eggs. Int. susceptibility of eight aubergine cultivars to Meloidogyne
J. Bot. 3:312-316. javanica. Pakistan J. Zool. 51:2187-2192.
Bogner, C.W., R.S. Kamdem, G. Sichtermann, C. Matthäus, Kim, T.Y., J.Y. Jang, S.J. Jeon, H.W. Lee, C.H. Bae, J.H.
D. Hölscher, J. Popp, P.P. Florian, M.W. Grundler and Yeo, H.B. Lee, I.S. Kim, H.W. Park and J.C. Kim. 2016.
A. Schouten. 2017. Bioactive secondary metabolites with Nematicidal activity of kojic acid produced by
multiple activities from a fungal endophyte. Microb. Aspergillus oryzae against Meloidogyne incognita. J.
Biotechnol. 10:175-188. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26:1383-1391.
1560
Potential of C. sativa and A. indica in the management of root-knot nematode
Lamberti, F. 1979. Economic importance of Meloidogyne Nyczepir, A.P. and S.H. Thomas. 2009. Current and Future
spp. in subtropical and Mediterranean climates. Root- Management Strategies in Intensive Crop Production
knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.): systematic, biology Systems. Root-knot Nematodes: 412.
and control. F. Lamberti and C. Taylor. New York, Nyczepir, A.P., M.B. Riley and R.R. Sharpe. 1993. Dynamics
Academic Press: 342-357. of concomitant populations of Meloidogyne incognita
McPartland, J.M. 1997. Cannabis as repellent and pesticide. and Criconemella xenoplax on peach. J. Nematol.
J. Int. Hemp Associ. 4:87-92. 25:659-665.
Moens, M., R.N. Perry and J.L. Starr. 2009. Meloidogyne Nyczepir, A.P., B.W. Wood and G.L. Reighard. 1997. Impact
species-a diverse group of novel and important plant of Meloidogyne incognita on the incidence of peach tree
parasites. Root-knot nematodes. 1:483. short life in the presence of Criconemella xenoplax. J.
Mukhtar, T. 2018. Management of root-knot nematode, Nematol. 29:725.
Meloidogyne incognita, in tomato with two Trichoderma Oka, Y., N. Tkachi, S. Shuker and U. Yerumiyahu. 2007.
species. Pakistan J. Zool. 50:1589-1592. Enhanced nematicidal activity of organic and inorganic
Mukhtar, T. and M.A. Hussain. 2019. Pathogenic potential of ammonia-releasing amendments by Azadirachta Indica
Javanese root-knot nematode on susceptible and resistant extracts. J. Nematol. 39:9-16.
okra cultivars. Pakistan J. Zool. 51:1891-1897. Sánchez-Moreno, S., L. Jiménez, J. Alonso-Prados and J.
Mukhtar, T. and M.Z. Kayani. 2019. Growth and yield García-Baudín. 2010. Nematodes as indicators of
responses of fifteen cucumber cultivars to root-knot fumigant effects on soil food webs in strawberry crops in
nematode (Meloidogyne incognita). Acta Sci. Pol. Southern Spain. Ecol. Indic. 10:148-156.
Hortorum Cultus. 18:45-52. Tariq-Khan, M., A. Munir, T. Mukhtar, J. Hallmann and H.
Mukhtar, T. and M.Z. Kayani. 2020. Comparison of the Heuer. 2017. Distribution of root-knot nematode species
damaging effects of Meloidogyne incognita on a resistant and their virulence on vegetables in northern temperate
and susceptible cultivar of cucumber. Bragantia 79:83-93. agro-ecosystems of the Pakistani-administered territories
Mukhtar, T., M.Z. Kayani and M.A. Hussain. 2013. of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. J. Plant Dis. Prot.124:201-
Nematicidal activities of Cannabis sativa L. and 212.
Zanthoxylum alatum Roxb. against Meloidogyne Tariq-Khan, M., T. Mukhtar, A. Munir, J. Hallmann and H.
incognita. Ind. Crops Prod. 42:447-453. Heuer. 2020. Comprehensive report on the prevalence of
Mukhtar, T., M. Tariq-Khan and M.N. Aslam. 2021. root-knot nematodes in the Poonch division of Azad
Bioefficacy of Trichoderma species against Javanese Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. J. Phytopathol. 168: 322-
root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica in green 336.
gram. Gesunde Pflanzen 73:265-272. Termorshuizen, A., G. Korthals and T. Thoden. 2011.
Nazir, K., T. Mukhtar and H. Javed. 2019. In vitro Organic amendments and their influences on plant-
effectiveness of silver nanoparticles against root-knot parasitic and free-living nematodes: a promising method
nematode (Meloidogyne incognita). Pakistan J. Zool. for nematode management. J. Nematol. 13:133-153.
51:2077-2083. Tomas-Barberan, F.A., M.I. Gil, P. Cremin, A.L. Waterhouse,
Ntalli, N., Z. Adamski, M. Doula and N. Monokrousos. 2020. B. Hess-Pierce and A.A. Kader. 2001. HPLC–DAD–
Nematicidal amendments and soil remediation. Plants ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines,
9:429. peaches, and plums. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:4748-4760.
Ntalli, N.G., U. Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, I.O. Giannakou and Turner, C. E., M.A. Elsohly and E.G. Boeren 1980.
D.A. Prophetou-Athanasiadou. 2009. Efficacy Constituents of Cannabis sativa L. XVII. A review of the
evaluation of a neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) natural constituents. J. Nat. Prod. 43:169-234.
formulation against root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne Watson, T.T., L.M. Nelson, D. Neilsen, G.H. Neilsen and
incognita. Crop Prot. 28:489-494. T.A. Forge. 2017. Soil amendments influence
Nyczepir, A.P. 2011. Host suitability of an endophyte- Pratylenchus penetrans populations, beneficial
friendly tall fescue grass to Mesocriconema xenoplax and rhizosphere microorganisms, and growth of newly
Pratylenchus vulnus. Nematropica.41:45-51. planted sweet cherry. Appl. Soil Ecol. 117:212-220.
Nyczepir, A.P. and J.O. Becker. 1998. Fruit and Citrus Trees.
In Plant and Nematode Interactions: Am Soc Agron.,
36:637-684.
1561