Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steeley Associates Versus Concord Falls: (1) Request The Permit
Steeley Associates Versus Concord Falls: (1) Request The Permit
Steeley Associates Versus Concord Falls: (1) Request The Permit
1,767,000
permit rejected (.90)
construct low-density
office building
4 5
1,630,000 970,000
1,930,000
solutions to EV(noDES):
#9 650,000 = (1,200,000*.50) + (100,000*.50)
#8 700,000 = (900,000*.50) + (500,000*.50)
#7 700,000 maximum between #8 & #9
#6 1,930,000 = (4,000,000 * .4) + ([-200,000] * .1) + (700,000 * .5)
#5 970,000 = (1,300,000*.7) + (200,000 *.3)
#4 1,630,000 maximum of #5, #6 & #7
note: #6 = 1,930,000 - 300,000 (for the legal cost)
#3 970,000 = (1,300,000*.7) + (200,000*.3)
#2 1,767,000 = (3,000,000*.1) + (1,630,000*.9)
#1 1,767,000 maximum of #2, #3 and 900,000
Decision:
Based on the decision tree analysis above, the best alternative will have a payoff of $1,767,000.
Given this scenario, the team suggests that Steeley requests for a permit. If the permit is granted, Steeley should proceed with the
In case the request for permit is reject, Steeley is advised to sue the town.
If they win the case, Steeley should proceed in contructing the high-density apartment but if they lose the case, Steeley should opt
$700,000
$200,000
970,000 no future growth (.30)