Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. Initiatives On Universalisation of Elementary Education in Karnataka With Special Reference To Concerns of Quality and Equity.
Study of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. Initiatives On Universalisation of Elementary Education in Karnataka With Special Reference To Concerns of Quality and Equity.
SITA SEKHAR l
l MEENA NAIR l
K.PRABHAKAR l
PRARTHANA RAO
STUDY OF SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN
INITIATIVES ON UNIVERSALISATION OF
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION IN KARNATAKA WITH
SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CONCERNS OF QUALITY
AND EQUITY
SITA SEKHAR l
l MEENA NAIR l
K.PRABHAKAR l
PRARTHANA RAO
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 9912
Bommasandra Industrial Estate Post
Bangalore 562 106
© 2009 Public Affairs Centre
Printed at:
images print services
Bangalore
Ph: 98452 24979
Study of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Initiatives on Universalisation of Elementary education in Karnataka with
special reference to concerns of Quality and Equity
C ONTENTS
A TABLES iv
B ABBREVIATIONS v
C ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii
D EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix
Strengths, Weaknesses and Suggestions for Improvement
Summary of Case Study Findings
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.0 Background 1
1.1 Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan 1
1.2 Objectives of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan 2
1.3 SSA in Karnataka 2
1.4 Need for the Study 2
1.5 Objectives of the study 3
1.6 Methodology 4
1.7 Structure of the Report 8
Field Work Snapshots 9
ANNEXURE 68
TABLES
TABLE TITLE PG.NO
NO.
1.1 EDUCATION STATISTICS OF KARNATAKA 2007 - 08 2
2.1 DISTRICT-WISE CLASS ROOMS & STUDENT STRENGTH PER CLASS ROOM 12
UNICEF
- UNICEF, Hyderabad for funding the study in Raichur
- Dr. Aarti Saihjee, Project Officer Education Specialist,
and Dr. Piyush Antony, Social Protection Officer from
UNICEF, Hyderabad for their timely inputs on the study.
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Fieldwork Partners
- Samanvaya, Shimoga for carrying out fieldwork in
Shimoga and Bangalore Districts
- Roovari, Raichur for carrying out field work in Raichur
- The team of investigators from Gulbarga for doing the
fieldwork in Gulbarga effectively within the stipulated time
frame.
Panel members
Our special thanks to the eminent members of the panel
comprising of
a. Mr. S.K. Ghosal, I.A.S, former Additional Chief Secretary of
Karnataka, who is also the Project Advisor to PAC.
b. Dr. Vinod Vyasulu, Consulting Economist, Centre for Budget
and Policy Studies (CBPS), Bangalore.
c. Mr. Gurumurthy Kasinathan, Director, IT for Change,
Bangalore.
d. Dr. Piyush Antony, Social Pr otection Officer, UNICEF,
Hyderabad.
e. Dr. Aarti Saihjee, Project Officer Education Specialist,
UNICEF, Hyderabad.
f. Mr. M. Vivekananda, Senior Consultant, Public Affairs
Foundation.
g. Dr. Samuel Paul, Founder Chairman, PAC.
h. Dr. Gopakumar K. Thampi, Director, PAC;
Prof. V.M. Rao, professor at ISEC, Bangalore - for their
support and guidance through out the study.
Advisor
Our special thanks to Mr. S. K. Ghosal, our Project Advisor,
for his constant guidance and support throughout the
study right from the project inception to completion
At PAC
We express our gratitude to our founder Dr. Samuel Paul
and our Director, Dr. Gopakumar Thampi for their valuable
suggestions on the draft reports. We acknowledge the
contribution of our former colleague Dr. Basavaraj towards
questionnaire design & briefing of the survey team.
viii
Study of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Initiatives on Universalisation of Elementary education in Karnataka with
special reference to concerns of Quality and Equity
For a better understanding of issues that In each district two talukas (zones in the
are related to the implementation of SSA case of Bangalore Urban) were selected
programmes, preliminary scoping field based on the same above-mentioned
visits and observations were carried out in criteria. From each taluk, 5 Gram
regular as well as mainstreaming schools Panchayats (wards in Bangalore Urban)
in and around Bangalore, along with were selected using random sampling. All
discussions with relevant stakeholders. villages in the Gram Panchayat / ward
were covered in the survey. For the case
The CRC approach that had hitherto study research, two villages from two GPs
focused on user feedback was widened to were selected in both Hassan and
include feedback from implementers and Raichur.
community-level stakeholders as well.
The scope of the study also included a The sample size covered was as follows:
case study research exercise that would
Sample type Selection Sample
help understand the undercurrents and criteria covered
underlying nuances of issues related to
Observation of
the impact of the SSA programme in mainstreaming prog.
All 79
various settings. Case study research Incharge of
methods such as observation, in-depth mainstreaming prog. / All 73*
interviews were identified as tools that institution
would highlight those nuanced variations Teacher conducting
One per
mainstreaming 79
and explanations. institution
programme
Observation of regular
All 229
school
variations exist; northern districts fare have prepared the cards but have
poorer in this regard. retained them in the schools.
2. Many schools are not sensitive to the
needs of the physically challenged. c. Quality of education
Only one in two schools has ramps 5. Most children find the current
which will enable physically teaching interesting (99%); however,
challenged children to attend schools. interestingly a substantial proportion
3. Access to and usage of grants like of teachers feel that all children in the
civil works grant, school grant and class are not able to understand what
maintenance grant is quite positive. is being taught (49%).
However, separate feedback from 6. Multi-grade teaching (holding
teachers and head-teachers suggest a different grades in the same room) is
disparity in disbursement of grant for a common practice across most
Teaching Learning Materials (TLM). schools (72%)
While, 88% of teachers reported 7. The teacher pupil ratio (1:27) is found
receiving the grant, complete to be within the norms (1:30),
utilization of the grant has been however many students do feel that
reported by 94% of the head the classrooms are crowded (42%).
teachers. One needs to probe further 8. Most teachers are punctual and are
to understand the reasons for such taking keen interest in monitoring the
discrepancies. progress of children in class (98%);
4. Apart from the stipulated eight however, according to 44% of
periods per day, most teachers (94%) teachers, all children in the class are
also reported taking remedial classes not able to complete their homework.
every day. Many of them also 9. While it is interesting to note that
supervise the mid- day meals in the most parents show an interest in
school. monitoring their child s progress in
school (86%), there seems to be a
b. Retention measures lack of awareness among parents
1. The Attendance in schools has been about the remedial teaching classes
extremely good with 98% of the with lower percentage of parents
enrolled students attending the class (17%) reporting their children
on the day of observation across all attending these classes.
classes.
2. Distribution of text books (98%), d. Capacity Building
uniforms (97%) and mid day meals 1. Most of the training programmes
(95%) is found to be efficient across related to capacity building of
districts. teachers, officials and SDMC
3. Incentives like free notebooks (41%), members are well attended (70
school bags (24%) targeted towards 80%) and appreciated by the
the backward sections of the society participants. However, education
is not reaching all beneficiaries. officials in charge of oversight of
4. The issue of health card to the these training programmes feel that
children is reported differently by these interventions are not enhancing
parents (42%) and by schools (83%). the competence of teachers (25%).
Anecdotal evidences suggest that this 2. Response to innovations like action
could be a combination of a lack of research is found to be very scant
awareness among parents about the (29%).
health card and the medical check up
and the fact that the schools would
4 Teacher - Pupil ratio is well Students still find the classes crowded (42%) A review of existing norms is recommended.
within the norms and much
lower than that in other
states.
8 Problem incidence is very low Poor redress rate by officials for those who do Quick and efficient redress system to be put in
have a problem (50%) place and monitored regularly. Some incentives
to the officers can be introduced for quick and
efficient redress of complaints.
9 Corruption levels reported are - However, petty corruption is reported by all
low stakeholders (5%)
- Some cases of systemic corruption is also An expenditure tracking study could give more
seen for example corruption reported by clarity on this issue
11 Community participation - Low awareness about SDMC (49%) and CAC - Awareness programs on roles and
structures are in place (3%) responsibilities of SDMC, CAC and Parents
- Low levels of participation by parents in Council be conducted
Parents Council Meetings (50%) - Capacity building of SDMC, CAC and Parents
- Teachers find lack of constructive Council to perform better
involvement of parents in the development of
child/school (50%)
6 Training programmes SDMC Members, BRPs, CRPs, SDMC Members, BRPs, CRPs, SDMC members attend the
BRCs, CAEOs, Teachers all BRCs, CAEOs, Teachers all training name sake
attend the training. attend the training. Teachers argue that training
DIET provides training to all. DIET provides training to all. sessions often hinder their
routine work in the school
7 Corruption levels Parents have alleged that the SDMC president of Corruption reporting has been
school staff takes away the Zaheerabad school alleged more in Raichur as compared
grocery given for mid-day meal. that SSA clerks take cuts in to Hassan. However, further
sanctioned money probing needed for clarity
The SSA programme is also an attempt to education across the sections welcomed
provide an opportunity for improving the SSA-scheme with great zeal. There
human capabilities to all children, are 10 major interventions and 104
through provision of community-owned programmes or activities within these
quality education in a mission mode. interventions in Karnataka state.
High
Details Primary
School
1.3 SSA IN KARNATAKA No. of
Sanctioned
6 teachers in 193600 35732
Karnataka is one of the states that have posts
Dept.
been actively implementing SSA ever Working
180336 30459
since its inception. Dr. Nanjundappa Teachers
The research strategy for the study programmes, preliminary field visits and
comprised of the following modular steps: observations were carried out of regular
as well as mainstreaming schools in and
1.6.1.1 Preparatory activities This around Bangalore. PAC also observed the
guidance and support through the course programmes promoted by SSA among
various stages of the study to discuss and Management Committee) and CAC (Civic
finalise aspects such as sampling design Amenities Committee) members and held
and the data collection instruments. discussions with teachers, DIET (District
Institute for Education and Training)
principals, local SSA and Education
2The members were Department officials (CRPs/BRPs (Cluster
1. Mr. S.K. Ghosal, I.A.S, former Additional Chief
Secretary of Karnataka, who is also the Project Resource Persons/Block Resource
Advisor from PAC.
2. Dr. Vinod Vyasulu, Consulting Economist, Centre for Persons), BEOs (Block Education Officers),
Budget and Policy Studies (CBPS), Bangalore.
3. Mr. Gurumurthy Kasinathan, Director, IT for Change, DDPI (Deputy Director of Public
Bangalore.
4. Dr. Piyush Antony, Social Pr otection Officer, UNICEF, Instruction), etc at individual and group
Hyderabad.
5. Dr. Aarti Saihjee, Project Officer Education levels.
Specialist, UNICEF, Hyderabad.
6. Mr. M. Vivekananda, Senior Consultant, Public
Affairs Foundation.
7. Dr. Samuel Paul, Founder Chairman, PAC.
8. Dr. Gopakumar K. Thampi, Director, PAC.
The sample size thus covered is as from the concerned districts to carryout
follows:
the field work.
Sample
Sample Type
size For carrying out the case study research,
Observation of mainstreaming two Ph. D Research Scholars from
79
schools/programmes
Institute of Social and Economic
Head teachers - mainstreaming
73* Research (ISEC) in Bangalore were
schools/programmes
Teachers - mainstreaming identified and selected.
79
schools / programmes Training Programmes were carried out at
Observation of regular schools 229 two centres for the selected teams and
Head teacher - regular schools 228
investigators.
Teacher - regular schools 222
SDMC members 442** The first Training Programme was
Household interviews 4000 conducted over a period of four days for
Public Officials 90 the Raichur and Gulbarga teams at
*In 6 schools, head teachers and teachers were
the same person. Raichur at the Zilla Saksharta Building
** The number of SDMC members is not adding to
458 (2 per school) because, the schools observed (ZSS) Yarmars, from 26 th to 29th May
also include aided schools.
2008.
To carry out the case study research, in The second Training Programme was
the case of Hassan, two separate Gram conducted over a period of three days for
Panchayats from each taluka and two the Shimoga and Bangalore teams at
villages from each of the selected Gram Bangalore at the YWCA between 2nd & 5th
distance from the Gram Panchayat Fieldwork was carried out in two phases:
headquarters. However, in the case of Phase 1 consisted of observation of
Raichur, as per UNICEF s mainstreaming programmes /
recommendation, the same talukas and institutions, interviews with teachers and
Gram Panchayats were selected for in- Head teachers regarding the
depth observations and data collection. mainstreaming programme.
Details of the study areas have been Phase 2 consisted of observation of
provided in Chapter 2. regular schools / activities in regular
schools, interviews with Head teachers
1.6.1.4 Fieldwork and quality assurance and Teachers of regular schools,
Local teams with prior experience in interviews with SDMC members and CAC
conducting such surveys were selected members, interviews with public officials
9
P rofile
Quality
Availability of Basic Facilities
100
80 86 86
82
60 57 52 52 52
40 37
20
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
40
20
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
100
90
80 84 84
77 75
60
47
40
30
20 22
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
100
90
80
70 68
60 62 59
54
40
4 31
20 22 1 0 3
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
Childrens' Opinion
100
80
60 66
51
40
36 34
20 20
18
9 0
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
Teachers' Opinion
100
80
70
60 64
53 56
40 50 54
40
29
20
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
Playground Classroom
100
90 94
80 87
79
60
53
40 44
20
14 17
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
100
94 93
80 84
76
60
40 39 43
20
13 12
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
100
91
80
83
60
57
40
38
33
20 21 26
20
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
100
97
89 93
80
81
60
40 45
43
20
13 14
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
APL BPL
100 96
80 85 92
77
60
40 41
38
20
12 12
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
APL BPL
100
89 90
80
69
60
40 45
38
28 30
20 21
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
APL BPL
Responsiveness
Attendance and Drop outs in AIE Programmes
100
88
80 81 80
76
60
40 42
31
20 19
8
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
Attendance Dropouts
80
78
60 66
58
48 48
40 44
36
33
20
0
Bangalore Shimoga Gulbarga Raichur
Working towards increasing enrolment
Increasing regular attendence in schools by motivating parents
A LTERNATIVE AND I NNOVATIVE E DUCATION