Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Bureaucratic Nature of The Internal Revenue Service Name: Department: Course: Date
The Bureaucratic Nature of The Internal Revenue Service Name: Department: Course: Date
Name:
Department:
Course:
Lecture
Date:
THE BUREAUCRATIC NATURE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2
Introduction
work are anchored to. The management’s administrative relationships and the stream of
thoughts, pronouncement and information are formally laid out by a corporation’s organizational
structure (Hales 2000). These can be flat or tall and none is better than the other. In the United
States Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) is the biggest national bureaucracy (Merz 2011). It
collects taxes in excess of $ 2 trillion with over 230 million tax returns from individuals,
partnerships, corporate, estates, fiduciary, employment, excise etc literally affecting every
IRS oversight is by the department of Treasury and it has two selected vacancies at its
apex which are the Chief Counsel and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Both these roles
are appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate (Merz 2011). The Commissioner
heads the agency and works for five years renewable while the Chief Counsel gives an opinion to
the IRS on legal matters especially those that relate to interpretation and enforcement of tax laws
(Cummings, Longo, & Rioux 2012). IRS oversight board has nine members that ensure IRS is
serving tax payers efficiently and reviews the IRS plans (Wilson 1989).
Its head office is in Washington. D.C and it is tasked with the role of setting up broad
policies, reviewing plans and goals of the operating units plus developing of major improvement
initiatives (Hales 2000). A large amount of the tax revenue and assessment of persons and
corporate is done at the provincial administrative centers scattered across the United States.
THE BUREAUCRATIC NATURE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 3
These nine regional offices are found in Andover, Ma; Austin, Memphis, Tenn.;
Philadelphia, Pa, Calif.; Kansas City, Kan.; Texas; Cincinnati, Ohio; Fresno, Ogden, Atlanta,
Ga., and Utah. They shore up the wage and investments operating division by dispensation of tax
The four operating division are the wage and investments income (W&I), small business
and self employed (SB&SE), large and mid size business (LMSB) and Tax exempt and
Government Entities (TE&GE). IRS also has two service organizations i.e. the information
systems and agency wide shared services and a separate specialized independent channel for tax
payers i.e. the Appeals and the Tax payer advocate services (Wilson 1989). Where there is a
violation of the law, the criminal investigations unit comes in which is tasked with the sole
purpose of investigations (Cummings, Longo, & Rioux 2012). It is also involved in crimes that
are not related to taxes as the agency is the only one authorized to investigate crimes related to
the internal revenue code (Hales 2000). The communication and liaison (C&L) provides IRS
staff and external stakeholders with communications capability that promotes understanding of
the IRS’s corporate mission and goals that helps taxpayers to understand and meet their tax
The tax laws are complex and confusing and these results into numerous disagreements
involving taxpayers and the agency frequently. Hence the IRS appeals office is charged with
providing a neutral conclusion of tax disagreements without court involvement (Wilson 1989).
Furthermore, the National Tax Payer Advocates office is located within the IRS and supports
The agency has written rules summarized in its mission statement that guides the entire
organization on how it is to provide the American taxpayers a top quality service and help them
to understand and meet their tax obligations through applying the tax law with integrity and
fairness to all. These rules relate to service to each tax payers, service to all tax payers and
productivity through a quality work environment (Cummings, Longo, & Rioux 2012).
Service to each customer relates to written communications and records where filling is
made easier and the provision of first quality service to the tax payers through faster
communication and helping in with returns or accounts and giving prompt, professional and
helpful treatment to the taxpayers (Hales 2000). It should be noted that after its reorganization in
the year 2000, the new IRS is much leaner and cleaner. The agency has a much flatter hierarchy
than before with four levels of management and half the old number of employees between the
top official and the front line employee thus facility a two way communication (Cummings,
Longo, & Rioux 2012). Also the organizations staffs do retire and others recruited to ensure the
perpetuity of the organization. This form of reorganization has helped the IRS to have a
simplified structure so as to tackle the problem of slow response to tax payer’s queries and needs
so as to provide faster resolution, make faster decisions and improve the ability to deploy new
Conclusion
bureaucratic nature of its operations as tax forms are difficult to follow and answers about them
are difficult to come by (Hales 2000). Many taxpayers feel their rights are often ignored or
trampled upon by many IRS’s field personnel and in many instances the tax collection and
IRS loses billions in fraudulent payments as it lacks the ability to check many returns
accurately before refunds. It relies on tax preparers to file taxpayer’s returns many of whom are
poorly trained (Wilson 1989). The agency is short staffed and cannot answer nearly 40 percent of
phone calls and always fails to meet its 45 day deadline to respond to millions of letters from tax
payers. The loss of more than ten thousand employees has reduced its collections by $8 billion
Furthermore, IRS is increasingly unable to administer and enforce the country’s tax laws
despite increased personnel and a modest budget. Its telephone assistance program provides
incorrect answers to even basic inquiries on tax laws to approximately 9 million Americans.
Many of its correction notices are erroneous that relate to tax assessments amounting to over $4
billion (Merz 2011). Up to 40% of the agency’s penalty assessments are declined when
challenged by taxpayers in courts. Also, yearly general accounting office audit finds widespread
financial malpractice and gross negligence as it always fails to account for up to 60% of its
congressional allocations hence failing to meet the standards of financial accountability and
diligence(Wilson 1989)..
THE BUREAUCRATIC NATURE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 6
References
Cummings, R. G., Longo, P. J., & Rioux, J. W. (2012). Ethics of Tax Law Compliance: An
organisation and the work of managers. London [u.a.: Business Press Thomas Learning.
Merz, F. (2011). Max Weber's Theory of Bureaucracy and its Negative Consequences. München:
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New
Appendix one