Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Volume (11) Issue (4) 496-515
Volume (11) Issue (4) 496-515
Abstract
With the increasing demand for energy due to rapid industrialisation and the
environmental concerns due to the usage of fossil fuels as the main energy
source, there is a shift towards renewable energy. However, the intermittent
nature of renewable energy requires energy produced during off-peak hours to
be stored. This paper explores the use of liquefied air as an energy storage, the
plausibility and the integration of liquefied air into existing framework, the role
of liquefied air as an energy storage in addressing the Grand Challenges for
Engineering as well as its employability in Malaysia.
Keywords: Liquid air, Energy storage, Liquefaction, Renewable energy, Grand
challenges for engineering.
1. Introduction
Liquid air is air liquefied at -196°C at atmospheric pressure. Traditionally, air is
separated to its constituents and the constituents such as oxygen and nitrogen are
liquefied for industrial purposes, as well as storage and transport. However, the
liquefaction of air, without the separation process; is being studied recently for its
energy storage capabilities. Liquefying air would convert electrical energy to cold
energy, stored and transported, if required; and then the energy can be extracted
by expanding the air. This would convert the cold energy stored to kinetic energy
to move turbines and generate electricity.
Energy storage is an important aspect of energy production, especially for
renewable energy applications. Energy demand fluctuates throughout the day and
various energy sources are used to supply the demand as seen in Fig. 1.
496
Liquefied Air as an Energy Storage: A Review 497
Abbreviations
CAES Compressed Air Energy Storage
LAES Liquid Air Energy Storage
of renewable energy into the grid poses a challenge. Off-peak energy generated by
renewable sources is often wasted and energy generation on-site has to be delivered
to the end users in the cities. Energy storage can be used to store and transport
renewable energy and transport it to be used where and when required.
This review details the history of liquid air, the technologies involved in the
liquefaction of air, various studies that have been carried out on cryogenic
liquefaction, the overview of a liquid air economy and its feasibility in Malaysia,
the current studies of the liquefaction technology, and the applications of these to
the use of liquefied air as an energy storage, as well as in addressing the Grand
Challenges for Engineering.
research studied the two forms in terms of efficiency of production, storage and
transportation as well as energy extraction. The study showed that cryogens have
a better potential to be an energy carried compared to hydrogen as it has few
technical challenges to overcome and can be combined easily with renewable
energies, is environmentally friendly and sustainable [7].
Cryogenically liquefied air is a cryogen and according to the second law of
thermodynamics, the high grade cold energy stored in cryogens is a more valuable
energy source than heat [8]. Cryogens store energy in the form of sensible and
latent heat. Even though the specific heat and phase change heat of cryogens and
heat storage material is in approximately the same magnitude, cryogens have
higher exergy density, making it a better thermal energy storage medium.
3. Liquefied Air
Air consists of approximately 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen, and thus has
similar thermodynamics properties as nitrogen gas. Liquefied air is produced
cryogenically, at -196°C, which is the boiling point of nitrogen; at atmospheric
pressure. Liquefying air reduces the volume of air by 700 times. According to the
Centre for Low Carbon Futures, liquid air has the potential of being an effective
energy vector. Liquid air has been identified as a cheap, abundant and safe energy
vector to store such energy [9].
Air can be liquefied when renewable energy produced is greater than the grid
demand; this allows energy to be stored in the form of liquid air instead of being
wasted. Liquefaction of air can also be carried out when the energy demand from
the grid is low, eg. Off-peak hours (at night or at wee hours of the morning); so it
makes use of cheaper electricity tariffs to liquefy air.
Liquefied air can be stored in insulated vessels at low pressures and/or be
transported to be used when and where required [5]. The liquefied air can then be
regasified where and when excess energy is required. The expansion of liquid air can
be used to run turbines which generate electrical energy from mechanical energy; it
can also be used indirectly in Rankine or Brayton cycles as described in Section 5.
Figure 2 [10] shows the daily energy demand curve for a typical week in
Malaysia and the troughs and peaks in which liquefied air can be produced and
regasified. In Malaysia, for medium and high voltage industries, there are special
tariffs for peak and off-peak consumption of electricity. For example, the electricity
tariff for off-peak hours for medium voltage industries beginning 2014 is RM0.219
per kWh of electricity used, whereas the peak tariff is RM0.336 per kWh of
electricity used [11]. This would save the company RM0.117 per kWh or energy
used, which would translate to a large amount of savings of over a period of time.
Since liquid air vaporises at -196°C, the heat required to regasify liquid air can be
wholly attainable from the environment or using low grade waste heat from the
industry. Liquefaction plants can be located near power plants, either renewable or
conventional, or near industries, and it is not bound by geographical constraints [12].
One example of the employment of liquid air as an energy storage for power
generation is the Highview Power Storage facility. It is a fully functional pilot
plant connected to the UK power grid. It is hosted at the Slough Heat and Power
biomass plant. The liquefaction plant utilises off-peak electricity from the
biomass plant to liquefy air, the liquid air is stored and regasified during peak
electricity demand to generate power to supply to the grid [12].
Fig. 2. Malaysian daily energy demand curve for a typical week [10].
A stream of gas to be liquefied can be run parallel to the streams in the heat
exchanger co-current to the cold stream. This increases the heat transfer capacity
of the cycle. Figure 4 shows the liquefaction of natural gas using the Linde-
Hampson cycle.
used to liquefy helium. It uses two turbines unlike the Claude process which only
uses one. Fig. 4 shows the Collins liquefaction process.
Cascade cycles are used when the difference in temperature of the cold and
hot fluids is large and it is not possible to use only one pure refrigerant. Cascade
cycles are generally used in the natural gas liquefaction cycles as natural gas
consists of many different gases with different liquefaction temperatures. The
cascade cycle as shown in Fig. 5 has one common heat exchanger; the internal
cycle of the process cools the natural gas as well as the refrigerants in the external
cycle. Cascade cycle refrigerants allows for temperature profile which is similar
to the natural gas mixture, thus improving the cycle’s coefficient of performance.
The use of cascade cycles also provides better refrigerant load distribution, hence
decreasing the work required and increasing efficiency. Cascade cycles however
require more unit operations and hence higher start up and maintenance cost [16].
The use of mixed refrigerant to liquefy air could reduce the liquefaction pressure,
making the process safer and more economical.
The choice of the liquefaction cycle depends on its application; Table 2 gives
the comparison of the efficiencies of the liquefaction cycles.
A Rankine cycle converts thermal energy, either hot or cold to work. The heat
and cold sources are supplied externally to a closed-loop which utilises a phase
change material as the working fluid. When a cryogen is used as the heat sink in
the indirect Rankine cycle, it vapourises at a pressure that is at or slightly higher
than the ambient pressure. A working fluid with a liquefaction/boiling point
slightly higher than the cryogen would be an ideal working fluid to recover both
the latent cold and sensible cold released by the cryogen. The Rankine cycle is
effective method to extract the cryogenic energy if a working medium with a
slightly higher boiling point than the cryogen is used. The Rankine cycle uses
pumps to compress the working fluid, consuming a very small amount of work.
Hence overall efficiency will not be affected much by the irreversible
compression process. The recovery of cold released by the working fluid after
compression has to be addressed to increase the efficiency. The cascading cycle
can be a solution, but process optimisation is required to find a compromise
between the efficiency and the complexity.
The indirect Brayton cycle is a thermodynamic cycle for gas turbines and
engines. The Brayton cycle uses working fluid which is pressurised using a
compressor instead of a pump in the Rankine cycle. The working fluid is a gas
throughout the Brayton cycle. The heat or cold transferred to the working fluid is
in the form of sensible heat or cold. The cryogenic energy can only be used to
cool the inlet gas of the compressor. The Brayton cycle is not effective to directly
recover cryogenic energy; this is because the cooling of the gas only requires
sensible heat. Loss of cold exergy is inevitable during the heat transfer process
which involves high grade latent heat even though the working fluid, the gas, can
be cooled to a very low temperature.
The combination method is the combination of the direct expansion method
and the Rankine cycle; the direct expansion method with the Brayton cycle; the
Rankine and Brayton cycle; and the direct expansion method with the Rankine
and Brayton cycle. It is a more effective way of extracting cryogenic energy. The
thermal exergy of the cryogen is converted to high pressure exergy. The cryogen
is pumped to a pressure above the critical point of the working fluid before
vaporisation. This is followed by direct expansion to form a supercritical open
cycle with only sensible heat discharged. For high grade heat sources, direct
expansion-Brayton hybrid is the most efficient for most cryogens except
hydrogen. For ambient and/or low grade heat sources, direct expansion-Rankine
cycle hybrid is more effective due to its low power consumption in the
compression process [8].
A study was carried out by Zotter et al. to study the use of Rankine cycle
variants on the energy extracted from liquid nitrogen energy storage system [6].
The study studied the efficiency of extraction of energy from liquid nitrogen
liquefied using wind power. The first variant of the Rankine cycle is a semi-
closed cycle with a compressor, heater, turbine, cooler, separator and throttle
valve. The nitrogen which remains as a gas after passing through the throttle
valve is vented into the atmosphere. The second variant uses three turbines in
succession with a heater using ambient heat as the heat source. The second variant
is an improvement of the first variant based on the study carried out on the first
variant in which to obtain a high overall efficiency, a high turbine work is
required and that any heat input does not influence the efficiency as heat is
obtained from the surroundings. The first variant only gives an overall system
Development Authority (SEDA) in Malaysia has set a set a feed-in tariff for various
renewable energies into the grid to meet the 5.5% targeted renewable energy. 43%
of total capacity of solar energy generated, 26% of biomass and 5% of biogas is
targeted to be fed into the national grid [26]. As mentioned above, renewable energy
is intermittent in nature and restricted by location, hence, there are opportunities to
utilise liquid air as an energy storage for transport and storage of these renewable
energies to the grid. This would reduce the “wrong-time” energy wastage and make
renewable energy in Malaysia more viable.
There are many potential uses for liquefied air, but like all new technologies,
it has to “cross the chasm” so to speak from the early adopters to the mass market
for the technology to be widely accepted by the general public in the UK and in
Malaysia. To do this, industries and businesses must be well informed about the
economic potential of employing liquefied air in their various business activities,
the return on investment and the financial gains which may be expected.
The modelling and simulation of natural gas liquefaction process were carried
out by Trigilio et al. The simulation was performed using Matlab. The
thermodynamic model for vapour-liquid equilibria and the energy properties was
calculated using the Peng and Robinson equation of state for the work and heat
calculations. The study modelled liquefaction of natural gas using cascade cycles
and using a regular cycle using a mixed refrigerant to determine the variables
which affect the process the most using sensitivity analysis. The study suggested
that the variable most affecting the cascade cycle is the high pressure of the
external cycle and that most affecting the mixed refrigerant cycle is the high
pressure of the cycle [16].
Optimal designs for natural gas liquefactions plants have also been carried
out using genetic algorithm. A study carried out by Li et al. utilised a developed
genetic algorithm based optimal design method using Matlab for building a
large scale gas liquefaction system by increasing the exergy efficiency of the
process. In the study, the exergy efficiency of a liquefaction process would
increase as the number of generation cycles increase up to 40 generations of
liquefied gas. The exergy efficiency would also increase if an optimised heat
exchanger network is used, liquefaction efficiency can be increased by using a
cryoturbine instead of a throttle valve. Cryoturbines reduces cold requirement
of the process and produces addition shaft power. A genetic algorithm based
optimal design method as shown in the study can be used to increase the
efficiency of a liquefaction process by suggesting a suitable configuration and
operating conditions [28].
The use of mixed refrigerants in multi-stream heat exchanger has also been
studied. Chang et al. studied the effect of using a multi-stream heat exchanger on
the performance of natural gas liquefaction using a single-stage mixed refrigerant
process. The study focused on how the temperature profile generated by process
modelling software, HYSYS, differs from the actual temperature profile and how
it affects the thermodynamic performance of liquefaction. The study showed that
the temperature profile generated using HYSYS and a minimum temperature
approach is difficult to achieve in practical multi-stream heat exchangers,
however it is achievable if proper heat-exchanger design is employed. For an
efficient liquefaction process, no direct heat exchange between hot streams in a
three stream heat exchanger is suggested [31].
Many assumptions were made when simulating the processes. One of the
assumptions made was that the heat exchanger functions at 100% efficiency and
that the compressor is adiabatic. In reality, there is no such thing as an ideal heat
exchanger. Heat is loss to the surroundings. There may be heat leaks in the
compressors leading to non-adiabatic conditions. This will affect the simulation
results. Furthermore, the properties of the mixed refrigerants are predicted by the
fluid packages available in the software used, the accuracy of the properties may
vary from each program, hence affecting the accuracy.
cylindrical tanks which a space in between the two walls containing an insulating
material. There is a need for the design of a more efficient thermal material for
these storage tanks to improve the insulation of the tanks, especially for the use in
tropical countries such as Malaysia where the ambient temperature is 29-32°C.
Air-conditioning systems and refrigeration systems have been an integral part
of modern day life for daily living to cool indoor spaces and to store food. It also
makes up bulk of the worldwide energy demand. If liquefied air energy storage
can be integrated to the cooling needs of the world, it would reduce the energy
demand, making liquefied air energy storage a more attractive method of
supplying power. Future studies on the incorporation of liquid air as an energy
storage may be a move to make liquefied air more commercially and
economically acceptable.
Furthermore, there is a need to develop a business model for liquefied air
energy storage systems; showing the potential economic viability of liquefied air
in order for investors, business and venture capitalist to fund the research and
pilot projects to integrate liquid air into existing infrastructure. A business model
would ease the transition of liquid air technology to “cross the chasm” from
research to large scale implementation.
10. Conclusion
The review paper gives an overview of liquefied air, the potential it has as an
energy storage system, the current work that is being done in the space, the
technologies involved, the applications in Malaysia, as well as how it addresses
the Grand Challenges for Engineering. These are summarised below.
• It is seen that liquefied air has the potential of being an effective and
competitive energy storage system. The technology involved in liquefaction
has been widely employed in the industry and hence converting existing
systems to liquefy air would not pose large challenges.
• Liquefied air as an energy storage also has the potential of propelling
renewable energy usage in Malaysia as well as globally to greater heights by
utilising wrong time energy instead of letting it go to waste, thus reducing the
dependence on fossil fuels.
• However, much research still has to be conducted to make liquid air a
competitive energy storage system. The possible integration of power
recovery into air liquefaction systems and its connectivity to the grid is an
interesting prospect and a valid avenue to pursue.
• The effect of scaling large scale liquefaction plants down for more localised
used should also be given attention to.
• Liquefied air also has the potential to make a dent in addressing the Grand
Challenges for Engineering in terms of making solar energy affordable and
also to improve urban infrastructure.
References
1. BP (2013). BP Statistical Review of World Energy.
2. BP (2013). BP Energy Outlook 2030.
3. Ong, H.C.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; and Masjuki, H.H. (2010). A review on energy
scenario and sustainable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Review, 15, 639-647.
4. Hadjipaschalis, I.; Poullikkas, A.; and Efthimiou, V. (2009). Overview of
current and future energy storage technologies for electric power
applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1513-1522.
5. Chen, H.; Cong, T.N.; Yang, W.; Tan, C.; Li, Y.; and Ding, Y. (2009).
Progress in electrical energy storage system: A critical review. Journal of
Progress in Natural Science, 19, 291-312.
6. Zotter, G.; Hermeling, W.; and Sanz, W., Thermodynamic analysis of a novel
cryogenic rankine cycle for wind energy storage (2012). Proceedings of the
ASME Turbo Expo 2012. Copenhagen, June 11-15.
7. Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X.; Tan C.; and Ding Y. (2010) Renewable energy
carriers: Hydrogen or liquid air/nitrogen? Journal of Applied Thermal
Engineering, 30, 1985-1990.
8. Li, Y.; Chen, H.; and Ding, Y. (2010). Fundamentals and applications of
cryogen as a thermal energy carrier: A critical assessment. International
Journal of Thermal Sciences, 49(6), 941-949.
9. Centre for Low Carbon Futures (2013). Liquid Air in the energy and
transport systems: Opportunities for industry and innovation in the UK. Full
Report. ISBN: 978-0-9575872-1-2
10. Ismail, Z.; Yahya, A.; Mahpol, K.A. (2009). Forecasting peak load electricity
demand using statistics and rule based approach. American Journal of
Applied Sciences, 6(8), 1618-1625.
11. Tenaga Nasional Berhad (2013). Malaysian Industry Energy Tariffs.
12. IMechE (2011). Highview Power Storage: Secure, Clean Power. Retrieved
September 20, 2013 from http://www.imeche.org/docs/default-source/2011-
press-releases/Highview_2pager.pdf?sfvrsn=0
13. Venkatarathnam, G. (2008). Cryogenic Mixed Refrigerant Processes. New
York: Springer.
14. Balmer, R. (2011). Modern Engineering Thermodynamic. Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
15. Konoglu, M.; Dincer, I.; and Rosen, M.A. (2008). Performance analysis of
gas liquefaction cycles. International Journal of Energy Research, 32, 38-43.
16. Trigilio, A.; Bouza, A.; and Di Scipio, S. (2012). Modelling and Simulation
of Natural Gas Liquefaction Process. In: H. Al-Megren, ed. Advances in
Natural Gas Technology, InTech, DOI. Ch 8.
17. Venkatarathnam, G. (2008). Liquefaction of nitrogen using mixed refrigerant
processes. Refrigeration and Airconditioning Laboratory, Department of
Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras.
18. Ameel, B.; T’Joen, C.; De Kerpel, K., De Jaeger, P., Huisseune, H., Van
Belleghem, M., and De Paepe, M. (2013). Thermodynamic analysis of energy
storage with a liquid air Rankine cycle. Journal of Applied Thermal Energy,
52, 130-140.
19. Osbourne, E., 1950. Liquid Air Turbine.US Patent 2499772.
20. Schwartzman, E.H., 1969. Cryogenic Engine Systems and Methods. US
Patent 3451342.
21. Pereda, E., 1976. Liquid Air Engine. US Patent 3987632.
22. Ordonez, C.A. (2000). Liquid nitrogen fuelled, closed Brayton cycle cryogenic
engine. Journal of Energy Conversion and Management, 41, 331-341.
23. Centre for Low Carbon Futures (2013). Liquid Air Technologies – A guide to
the potential. ISBN: 978-0-9927328-0-6.
24. MSC Malaysia (2013). Malaysia: A World Class Hub for Data Centres.
25. Shafie, S.M.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Masjuki, H.H.; and Andriyana, A. (2011).
Current energy usage and sustainable energy in Malaysia: A review.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 4370-4377.
26. Webb, S. (2013). Malaysia: Renewable energy in the Asia Pacific: a Legal
Overview. DLA Piper Australia.
27. Morin, A.; Wahl, P.E.; and Molnik, M. (2011). Using evolutionary search to
optimise the energy consumption for natural gas liquefaction. Journal of
Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89, 2428-2411.
28. Li, Y.; Wang, X.; and Ding, Y. (2012). An optimal design methodology for
large-scale gas liquefaction. Journal of Applied Energy, 99, 484-490.
29. Khan, M.S. and Lee M. (2013). Design optimization of single mixed
refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process using the particle swarm
paradigm with non-linear constraints. Journal of Energy, 49, 146-155.
30. Hwang, J.-H., Roh, M.-I., and Lee, K.-Y. (2013). Determination of the
optimal operating conditions of the dual mixed refrigerant cycle for the LNG
FPSO topside liquefaction process. Journal of Computers and Chemical
Engineering. 49, 25-36.
31. Chang, H-M.; Lim H.S.; and Choe, K.H. (2012). Effect of multi-stream heat
exchanger on performance of natural gas liquefaction with mixed refrigerant.
Journal of Cryogenics, 52, 642-647.
32. Shell (2013). Prelude FLNG – An Overview.
33. National Academy of Engineering (2008). Introduction to the Grand
Challenges for Engineering.
34. Mekhilef, S.; Safari, A.; Mustaffa, W.E.S.; Saidur, R.; Omar, R.; and Younis,
M.A.A. (2012). Solar energy in Malaysia: Current state and prospects.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 386-396.
35. Karakurt, A.S.; Gunes, U.; Arda, M.; and Ust, Y., 2014. Exergetic
Performance Analyses of Natural Gas Liquefaction Processes. In 2nd
International Symposium on Naval Architecture and Maritime. Istanbul,
October 23-24.