I.

The General Nature of Ethics

A B
0 10
10 0
5 0
15 + 40 - 10 = 45
Total Total General Nature of Ethics Total

Significance

After conducting the appropriate research, I determined that I am an Ethical

Relativist. Ethical relativism is the view that good and evil are defined by subjective
factors that might vary throughout time. In contrast to Ethical Universalism, which
holds that there are certain goal ethical values that everyone acknowledges around
the world, my point of view holds that everything is subjective, depending on culture
or emotional responses, and whatever aspect there may be for defining the ethical
values of such a specific company or society.

The significance of this result determines whether or not I consider in

subjectivity rules based on which criteria I analyze our ethical standards. As an
ethical relativist, you may have a subjective view of ethics. Fundamentally, I believe
that logic and reasoning should be emphasized.

II. Practical Ethics

Utilitarian Ethics Deontological Ethics Virtue Ethics

10. 10 1. 7 6. 10
14. 5 9. _10 12. 9
19. 10 15. 4 17. 10
21. 5 18. 6 20. 5
Total: 40 Total: 28 Total: 35
 Natural Law Ethics Social Contract Care Ethics
3. 7 Ethics 2. 10
5. 5 7. 10 4. 8
13. 4 11. 6 8. 10
Total: 19 16. 10 Total: 28
Total: 26

Significance
Aside from the first set of questions, which yielded two types of ethics, the
second set of questions yielded six principles of ethical perceptions,
Utilitarian Ethics, Deontology Ethics, Virtue Ethics, Natural Ethics, Social
Contract Ethics, and Care Ethics, which I assume are interrelated or even
related to the first set of questions.

I am interested in ethical principles, which argue that we should act in accordance

with a set of traits and the absence of those qualities. In contrast to the Laws of
Nature, which say that people have inherent absolute moral behaviors, I propose
that we may not only learn ethical beliefs, but also alter them. Similarly to Social
Contract Ethics. Some moral principles, according to Civil Society Ethics,