Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sample Oral Presentation Marking Criteria
Sample Oral Presentation Marking Criteria
Delivery
Clearly
presented
Organised and
easy to follow
Engaged with
the audience
Obvious
enthusiasm for
topic
Visual aids
Clear and
readable slides
Visually
appealing slides
Suitable use of
figures/data/diag
rams
Content
Comprehensive
Well-researched
use of material
Answers to
questions
Thoughtful
Responsive
Drew on
knowledge of
topic beyond
presentation
2. LECTURER FEEDBACK ON ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Presentation Grading Criteria
Student name…………………………………….…………Title………………………………………………….
EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFAC BELOW FAIL
(70-100) (60-70) TORY AVERAGE (0-39)
(50-60) (40-50)
Delivery
Clear and audible
Appropriate timing
Engaged with audience
Structure
Logically organised
Clear argument with relevant
points
Appropriate training
Response to questions
Prepared for questions
Handled questions
knowledgeably
Team work
Coherent group presentation
Individual work well-
integrated into whole
3. PEER ASSESSMENT OF GROUP PRESENTATIONS BY MEMBERS OF TEAM
Use the criteria below to assess your contribution to the group presentation as well as the contribution of
each of your teammates.
0 = no contribution
1 = minor contribution
2 = some contribution, but not always effective/successful
3 = some contribution, usually effective/successful
4 = significant contribution
GRADING CRITERIA
Participation in group
meetings and
preparation of
presentation
Oral presentation
delivery
TOTAL SCORE