Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amber - Enterprises - IC - 17mar21 - JMFL
Amber - Enterprises - IC - 17mar21 - JMFL
AMBER ENTERPRISES
THE LINCHPIN OF INDIA'S AC INDUSTRY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 3
Key charts 4
Investment thesis 6
Financials 16
Valuations & Peer Comparison 19
Business Overview 21
Company Background 24
Key Risks 26
Financial Tables 27
RECENT REPORTS
COVERAGE INITIATION COVERAGE INITIATION SECTOR UPDATE THE COVID-19 FILES SECTOR REPORT
DIXON TECHNOLOGIES GMM PFAUDLER INDIA PSUs MARCH 2021 INDIA ACs
Amber Enterprises
The linchpin of India’s AC industry
Amber Enterprises (Amber) is a dominant EMS player in the Structural trends to drive room AC growth in India: India’s RAC
underpenetrated Indian RAC industry with c.24% market share. segment continues to remain the most underpenetrated category
This has been led by a combination of intense backward with penetration of 7% vs. 14% for washing machines and 32%
integration through acquisitions in motors and PCBA, increasing for refrigerators; this offers a multi-decade growth opportunity to
ODM product range (which offers higher margins/RoICs) and EMS manufacturers. Increasing power availability, rising
sticky client relationships with its top 10 customers holding a temperatures, improving affordability and better credit availability
75%+ market share (15 plants, located close to customers). are key enablers that could push the RAC industry market size up
from 7 million units at end-FY21 to 12 million units by FY25.
Over the past 5 years, Amber has delivered 26%/25% CAGR in Dominant market share of 24% and sticky customer relationships:
sales/EBITDA, led by increased outsourcing by brands and Amber has upped its market share over the past 5 years from
improving market share in the EMS space. We believe it is 15% to 24%, led by increased outsourcing by brands (40% vs.
poised for exponential growth over the next 5 years on a) its 34% in the past 2 years) and higher wallet share from key
dominant market share of 24% in the underpenetrated RAC customers. Amber caters to the top 10 AC brands that command
market; b) its strong customer base (catering to the top 10 AC a more than 75% market share. It also has sticky relationships
brands) and wide ODM range of products; c) favourable with these customers as the ‘on boarding to ramp up’ cycle takes
government policies such as production linked incentives (PLIs), 3-4 years, which increases switch-out costs for customers.
phased manufacturing programme and import substitution
Favourable government policies and consistent import
initiatives; d) addressing product gaps through acquisitions
substitution: Import content in RACs remains high at 55-60% and
(PICL, Ever and IL Jin); and e) expansion of product offerings in
this offers vast scope for indigenisation. These schemes
mobile ACs and consumer electronics. Effective implementation
announced include PLI (INR 5.1bn outlay), phased manufacturing
of the PLI scheme is likely to increase domestic value addition
programme in RACs and components (roadmap for BCD increase)
and creation of an export base, which could improve asset turns.
and restriction on imports (from FTA countries). Industry bodies
estimate that domestic value addition would increase from 25%
Over FY20-23E, we forecast sales and EPS to clock 17% and to 75% on successful implementation of the PLI scheme.
26% CAGR, respectively. Upon addressing issues of lower asset
turns and reduced import dependence, we anticipate that RoICs Addressing product gaps through acquisitions and expansion in non-
can expand to 17% by FY23E. RAC space: With focus on cooling, Amber has addressed product
gaps in RACs through acquisitions of PICL (BLDC motors), IL Jin
We initiate coverage on Amber with a BUY rating and TP of INR and Ever (PCB manufacturing). Further, the company is
4,000 (40x FY23E EPS), implying 16% upside. Key risks: Seasonal expanding its TAM by a) the acquisition of Sidwal in mobile ACs,
nature of sales, insourcing by brands and forex/tax uncertainty now commands a 51% market share, b) the extension of sheet
on high import content. metal and PCB capabilities to WMs, refrigerators and microwave
ovens and c) entry in the commercial HVAC space (by Mar’21).
Price Performance JM Financial Research is also available on: Bloomberg - JMFR <GO>, Thomson Publisher & Reuters, S&P Capital IQ,
FactSet & Visible Alpha. You can also access our portal: www.jmflresearch.com
% 1M 6M 12M
Please see Appendix I at the end of this report for Important Disclosures and Disclaimers and Research Analyst
Absolute 6.8 70.2 180.5 Certification.
Relative* 10.5 32.8 74.8
*To the BSE Sensex Sandeep Tulsiyan We acknowledge the support services of
sandeep.tulsiyan@jmfl.com Harses Kampani in the preparation of this report.
Tel: (91 22) 66303085
Consumer Durables Industry Pentration - India RACs - India Penetration vs Asian countries
70%
60.0% 100%
90% 91%
60%
90%
80%
50%
70%
40% 60% 54% 53%
31.5% 50%
30% 40%
30% 30%
30%
20% 17.0%
14.1% 17%
20%
7%
10% 7.4% 10%
0%
India
Indoneesia
Thailand
Taiwan
Japan
Malaysia
Global
China
0%
Room AC Washing Air cooler Refrigerator FPD TV
Machine
Break-down of RAC sourcing (%) RAC industry volume growth is likely to accelerate
OEM/ODM
In-house brands 8.0
38% 6.8
40% 10% CAGR
6.0
4.0
2.6
2.0
Imports
22%
0.0
FY10 FY20 FY25E
Outsourcing share in RAC industry to reach 52-53% over FY23E Amber has a dominant share of c.71% in the outsourcing industry
RAC Industry (mn units) Outsourcing Share (%) Other Outsourced AC players Amber's share
10 60.0% 100.0%
53.4%
51.5% 51.5% 90.0%
9
29.3%
50.0% 80.0%
8 44.6%
41.0% 41.2% 52.7%
7 70.0%
40.0%
34.0% 34.5%
6 60.0%
29.4% 30.8%
5 30.0% 50.0%
4 40.0%
20.0% 70.7%
3 30.0%
55.4%
47.3%
2 20.0%
10.0%
1 10.0%
3.4 3.9 4.7 5.5 6.1 6.8 6.8 8.5 9.5
0 0.0% 0.0%
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY15 FY17 FY20
Exhibit 2. Amber appears favourably placed to capitalise on this decadal growth trend
Amber has a 24% market share in the Indian RAC Industry India’s share in global AC market to significantly rise
Amber's Market share in RAC Industry Global AC market - mn units India's share
160 18.0%
30.0% 16%
140 16.0%
25.0% 24%
14.0%
120
19.1%
20.0% 12.0%
100
14.7% 10.0%
15.0% 80
140 8.0%
10.0% 60
6.0%
90
40
5.0% 4.0%
20 2.0%
0.3%
0.0%
FY15 FY17 FY20 0 0.0%
2019 2029
Revenue and EBITDA to report 17% and 21% CAGR over FY20-23E PAT to report 29% CAGR over FY20-23E
INR mn
69% 64%
6.0% 2,000
30,000 50%
50%
4.0%
1,500
20,000
1,000 -8%
2.0% 0%
10,000 -33%
500
10,890 16,519 21,176 27,520 39,628 34,691 49,698 63,668 221 623 937 1,584 1,068 2,055 3,370
0 0.0%
0 -50%
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Companies INR INR bn FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20-23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Amber Enterprises 3,435 116 44.4 57.7 37.4 25.7 68.2 108.4 56.3 34.3 26% 14.2 7.4 11.5 16.5
Voltas 1,031 341 51.9 59.3 38.8 30.1 61.8 63.3 44.9 35.7 20% 13.2 12.0 15.2 16.8
Blue Star 896 86 31.1 32.7 20.2 16.7 58.6 79.0 35.4 27.7 28% 17.8 13.8 27.7 29.6
Johnson Controls Hitachi 2,709 74 33.0 49.6 31.7 23.9 88.2 128.1 59.1 39.9 30% 12.8 8.0 15.2 19.0
Whirlpool India 2,398 304 31.7 52.3 34.7 29.2 62.1 83.3 50.1 41.3 15% 20.8 12.9 18.9 19.8
Havells India 1,088 681 28.5 45.9 41.0 34.7 92.6 69.4 60.8 50.4 23% 17.3 21.4 21.1 22.1
Dixon Technologies 20,725 240 107.4 79.3 43.1 33.0 199.0 139.9 69.7 53.2 55% 25.4 27.0 38.9 35.1
Average ex- Amber (x) 47.3 53.2 34.9 27.9 93.7 93.8 53.3 41.4 29% 17.9 15.8 22.8 23.7
Source: Bloomberg, JM Financial
Investment Thesis
Underpenetrated RAC market provides a high growth opportunity
India’s RAC secondary market accounted for 6.8 million units in FY20 and was valued at
INR 198bn. Over the last decade, the RAC industry has reported a 15% CAGR. While
growth in FY21E would be stunted, it clouds the fact that long-term growth drivers
remain intact. This is because category penetration for room ACs remains substantially
lower than other consumer durables in India. In fact, we would like to highlight that RAC
companies clocked 25% YoY growth in 3QFY21. We expect the RAC industry to touch
INR 424bn in by FY25, posting a 13% CAGR and volumes are expected to reach c.12
million units, led by a) improved power availability in Tier2/3 cities, b) rising disposable
incomes, c) ease in availability of credit financing, d) lifestyle changes as a wider younger
earning class population emerges and e) increase in the number of nuclear families.
Given conflicting data from various sources, we analysed the room AC penetration rates
using our own framework. We estimate India’s room AC penetration at 7%, which is
significantly lower than 14% for washing machines and 32% for refrigerators, as per our
proprietary framework. Various factors such as frequent power cuts, low disposable
income and emergence of competing electronic items (eg. smartphones) contributed to
this low penetration rate, as room ACs are still perceived as a luxury item, while washing
machines and refrigerators are perceived as utility products. Even compared with other
Asian countries with similar demographics, RAC penetration in India is rather low at just
6%, compared with 91% in Malaysia, 53% in China, 30% in Thailand and 8% in
Indonesia. Thus, we believe the penetration story in room air conditioners is likely to
remain intact over a long period, sustaining double-digit volume growth over the next
decade.
Consumer Durables Industry Pentration - India RACs - India Penetration vs Asian countries
70%
60.0% 100%
90% 91%
60%
90%
80%
50%
70%
40% 60% 54% 53%
31.5% 50%
30% 40%
30% 30%
30%
20% 17.0%
14.1% 17%
20%
7%
10% 7.4% 10%
0%
India
Indoneesia
Thailand
Taiwan
Japan
Malaysia
Global
China
0%
Room AC Washing Air cooler Refrigerator FPD TV
Machine
RAC industry volume growth is likely to accelerate Realisations to witness a faster increase due to cost inflation
0
0.0
FY10 FY20 FY25E FY10 FY20 FY25E
The OEM/ODM industry comprises c.5.2 million units, 38-40% of the overall RAC industry
size (outdoor + indoor units); this is likely to increase to 52-53% by FY23E. Amber is the
market leader in the outsourced RAC market with a 70% share. We note that Amber
dominates the ODM market as it increased its market share from 55% to 70% in the last
3 years, while the second largest player only holds a meagre 10% market share.
Amber caters to c.70% of the total cost of manufacturing a RAC. The remaining 30%
mainly comes from compressors (20%) and other smaller items, which are imported from
primarily from China as capital costs of setting up a plant are prohibitive due to low
volumes. China’s annual AC production stood at 45 million in 2019 vs. 7 million in India.
However, favourable government policies are driving indigenisation as global majors are
setting up plants for compressors and other components in India.
Being a one-stop shop solutions provider and offering wide range of components to RAC
brands, with 15 manufacturing units across 6 states, gives Amber an edge over its peers.
By setting up manufacturing facilities close to its clients, Amber has been able to reduce
logistic and operating costs as well as minimise delivery time. Also, its large-scale flexible
production units help it compete with Chinese imports in terms of cost. We note that
despite a sharp 35% decline in volumes in 2QFY21, Amber reported operating margins of
5.3%, merely 60 bps lower YoY.
RAC Industry (mn units) Outsourcing Share (%) Other Outsourced AC players Amber's share
10 60.0% 100.0%
53.4%
51.5% 51.5% 90.0%
9
29.3%
50.0% 80.0%
8 44.6%
41.0% 41.2% 52.7%
7 70.0%
40.0%
34.0% 34.5% 60.0%
6
29.4% 30.8%
5 30.0% 50.0%
4 40.0%
70.7%
20.0% 30.0%
3 55.4%
47.3%
2 20.0%
10.0%
1 10.0%
3.4 3.9 4.7 5.5 6.1 6.8 6.8 8.5 9.5
0.0%
0 0.0%
FY15 FY17 FY20
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Break-down of RAC sourcing (%) Amber has a 24% market share in the Indian RAC Industry
30.0%
25.0% 24%
19.1%
20.0%
OEM/ODM
38% In-house brands 14.7%
40% 15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
Imports
22% 0.0%
FY15 FY17 FY20
The company has purchased 10 acres of land in Pune, adjoining to Toshiba and Carrier
Midea’s manufacturing plants. It plans to develop 250,000 sq ft in Phase-1 and start
production by 4QFY22. The plant is slated to commence with initial manufacturing
capacity of 1 million units and this would be ramped up at a later stage.
Amber also has proven qualities of increasing its wallet-share with its existing customers.
For instance, it LG reduced share of ODM purchases from Amber since 2013, but overall
business from LG has more than doubled in past 7 years, due to ramp up in component
supplies. Also, it helps the company to cross sell its components across other product
categories of umbrella brands.
Samsung
5% Others
7%
Voltas
24%
Hitachi
8%
Blue Star
10%
Daikin
Lloyd 18%
11%
LG
17%
We believe the Oct’20 DGFT notification opens up a significant immediate opportunity for
the outsourcing industry. Imports of CBUs are estimated at c.2 million units (INR 40bn),
representing 30% of industry volumes of c.7 million units (INR 140bn). Of this, 75-80%
comprises CBUs pre-filled with refrigerants, forming a near-term opportunity of INR 30bn-
32bn. Mitsubishi, O General, Toshiba are some key players with high CBU imports; they
have a combined market share of just under 15%.
While all import business may not immediately shift to local players, the move is well
thought out. Some AC manufacturers have increased in-house manufacturing capacity,
but many fringe players do not have local manufacturing facilities. Outsourced players like
Amber could help them set up an assembly line to meet near-term demand, as they
progress to set up local production units over 18-24 months. We believe this would
increase the share of outsourcing of ACs from 40% to 50-53%. Management
highlighted in recent interactions that it has acquired 7-8 new ODMs due to this policy
change.
INR mn
21%
18% 15,000
20,000 20%
10,000 10%
5,000
5,000 5%
- 0% -
2016-17
2017-18
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2018-19
2019-20
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
8,000 25.5%
7,000 25.0%
24.1% 24.5%
6,000
24.0%
5,000
INR mn
23.5%
4,000 7,961
22.7% 23.0%
3,000
5,240 22.5%
4,489
2,000 22.0%
1,000 21.5%
0 21.0%
FY18 FY19 FY20
The total value of imports of RACs and RAC components is INR 110bn, of which INR
40bn comes from CBUs, while the remaining comprises aluminium, copper, motors, PCB
and compressors.
Exhibit 10. Import duty increase and other non-trade barriers timeline
Timeline Events
Import duty on AC was increased from 10% to 20%; Import duty on RAC compressor was increased from
Sep-18
7.5% to 10%
Jul-19 Import duty on AC (outdoor unit and indoor unit) was increased from 10% to 20%
Jan-20 Import duty on RAC compressor was increased from 10% to 12.5%
Oct-20 GoI has banned the import of completely built units of air-conditioners with refrigerants
Source: Industry, JM Financial
25.0%
20.0% 20% 20%
20.0%
15.0% 12.5%
10.0% 10%
10.0% 7.5%
5.0%
0%
0.0%
Import Duty on RACs Import Duty on AC Import Duty on other
compressor AC components
The incentive amount proposed for room ACs under the PLI scheme stands at c.INR 50bn,
of which INR 30bn is for RACs and INR 20bn is for AC components. Assuming the
incentive rate is 4-6%, the planned output over the FY23-28 (5 years) could be almost
INR 1.25tn (INR 750bn in ACs and INR 500bn in AC components). At the end of 10 years,
industry bodies such as CEAMA and RAMA expect annual sales to reach INR 1tn vs. INR
198bn currently.
The scheme is likely to be launched in Apr’21 and is expected to increase domestic value
addition from 25% to 75%. This is also likely to open up opportunities for exports from
India, which are currently negligible. As per CEAMA, India’s AC industry can be ramped
up to INR 1tn in value over the next 10 years; of this, exports would form 35%. This could
JM Financial Institutional Securities Limited Page 10
Amber Enterprises 17 March 2021
help India compete in export markets with countries such as China, which - along with
Thailand - controls 75% of the global export market.
We compare the PLI scheme for ACs with the PLI for mobile phones, which was launched
in Apr’20 and provided 4-6% incentives on incremental sales (over the base year) of
goods manufactured. Mobile phones priced <USD 200 (70% of the Indian market) can be
catered to only by domestic companies who can avail the PLI Scheme. Under the domestic
phone manufacturing segment, the government approved Lava, Bhagwati (Micromax),
Padget Electronics (Dixon), UTL Neolyncs and Optiemus Electronics. These domestic
companies have proposed a production output of INR 1,250bn over the next 5 years.
While cumulative sales over FY23-28 are expected to reach INR 1.25tn, both brands and
ODM players such as Amber are likely to compete for PLIs. Of the 16 popular AC brands
in India, the majority market share is controlled by 11 large brands. If Amber loses the PLI,
it would still continue to supply components to these brands, keeping its wallet share
relevant.
Design ODM undertakes the design and leads to faster product development along with manufacturing
RAC brands avoid manufacturing challenges and save on cost and time. ODM player invests in
RM procurement
RM procurement.
ODM is an attractive option since it allows faster market penetration along with option to have
New entrants
multiple SKUs (higher number of model launches)
R&D Lower investments by brand due to reliance on ODM
ODM can command higher pricing and increase wallet share in the long run since association
Pricing
with ODM is strategic and not transactional
Source: Company, JM Financial
We believe Amber has scope to increase localisation for its key components where the
import content is high. Motors, PCBs and cross-flow fans have import content of c.70%,
c.65% and 50-60%, respectively. Increasing localised content of these components
should drive margin expansion for the company.
Amber has undertaken various initiatives to reduce costs and aid its margin expansion.
These initiatives include implementation of SLE 50 (Safety Improvement and Loss
Elimination by 50%) and COI (Cost of inefficiency), to bring efficiency in its processes
with objectives such as reduction of cost of input material, optimisation of tool
consumption by using designated tools for designated processes, reduction of waste,
reduction of power and utilities costs and loss elimination.
70%
65%
60%
55%
50%
45%
55% 65% 70%
40%
Cross Flow-fan PCBs Motors
Revenue from AC components stands at INR 5bn (14% of sales) and is expected to grow
faster than Amber’s RAC revenues, in our view.
Amber acquired PICL in 2010. PICL is the largest induction motor manufacturer for the
HVAC industry in India, with 200+ models; it caters to both RAC and non-RAC
customers. It has a capacity to manufacture 4 million motors per annum with 7 lines of
manufacturing. In FY20, PICL clocked revenues of INR 1.85bn with margins of 5.6%.
Amber acquired a 70% stake in both IL JIN (2017) and Ever Electronics (2018) to
strengthen its PCB manufacturing base. Both companies possess 2 decades of experience
and have a cumulative capacity to manufacture 10.5 million PCBs per annum. As these
companies scale up operations, we expect both IL JIN and Ever to sustain 5-6% EBITDA
margins going forward vs. 2-5% currently.
China produces c.70% of the world’s RACs while India continues to import 20-25% of its
domestic demand. We believe that government initiatives to boost manufacturing in India
and the global China+1 strategy can lead to various MNC and domestic companies
setting up export-oriented plants in India. This would drive robust growth in outsourcing
as companies may outsource a wide range of products from components to CBUs since
each component cannot be manufactured cost-effectively by every OEM. Also, Amber can
directly target global customers with its in-house SKUs and supply components directly.
This creates an ocean of opportunities for Amber. We exclude Asia volumes from the
opportunity as we believe existing facilities in China, Indonesia and Japan would be able
to cater to this demand. Barring Asia, the opportunity stands at 26-28 million units per
annum, almost 15x-18x Amber’s current annual volumes.
Source: JRAIA
160 18.0%
16%
140 16.0%
14.0%
120
12.0%
100
10.0%
80
140 8.0%
60
6.0%
90
40
4.0%
20 2.0%
0.3%
0 0.0%
2019 2029
Amber is an early entrant in the ODM market for central air conditioners (CAC). The
company has ventured in the category with offerings of 5.5 ton and 8.5 ton models and
will also be launching cassette ACs soon. While the overall CAC industry size is much
smaller at INR60-70bn vs INR200bn for RACs, absence of ODM players in this space will
provide an early mover advantage to Amber.
This acquisition gives Amber entry into high-entry barrier and long-approval-cycle
industries such as Railways, Defence, Buses and Commercial ACs. Amber has secured
mandatory pre-qualifications with leading entities of the Indian Railways such as ICF, RCF,
DLW, CLW, BEML, Rotem, CRRC, etc. Other OEMs with which Amber would be
empanelled are Tata Motors, Swaraj Mazda, BEL, etc. Sidwal also bags annual
maintenance contracts from clients and hence O&M makes a healthy contribution to
revenues.
We believe this acquisition is a step in the right direction as it a) provides entry in a new
vertical of the HVAC industry (with high entry barriers and long product approval cycles),
b) allows for existing pre-qualifications with leading entities, c) reduces seasonality with
margins almost 2.5x the core business and d) is margin accretive.
In FY20, Sidwal clocked revenue of INR 2.4bn with EBITDA and PAT of INR 526mn and
INR 347mn, respectively. We expect Sidwal to report revenue CAGR of 16% over the next
3 years with margins of c.22%.
Exhibit 21. Sidwal Revenue share and key end-user industries market share
Sidwal revenue share – FY18 Sidwal market share in end-user segments (%)
Telecom 90%
80%
4% 80%
Others
6% 70%
Bus 60%
9% 50%
50%
Defence 40%
9%
30%
0%
Metro Segment Defence segment
Financials
Unabated growth to continue: Amber reported sales CAGR of 48% during FY15-20
driven by robust growth in both its segments i.e. RACs (28% CAGR) and components
and mobile applications (24% CAGR); this was led by increasing wallet share with clients
and adding more to its range of components. Over FY20-23E, we forecast 18% and 15%
CAGR in RAC and components, respectively. Overall, we forecast revenues to report 17%
CAGR over FY20-23E.
40%
50,000 30%
28% 28%
30%
40,000
INR mn
20%
30,000
10%
20,000
0%
-11% -12%
10,000 -10%
10,890 16,519 21,176 27,520 39,628 34,691 49,698 63,668
0 -20%
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Scale benefits to accelerate Amber’s earnings: Amber clocked strong revenue growth in
past 5 years, led by continued penetration in room AC segment, increased share of
outsourcing and market share gains. However, margins have declined over the same
period by 50bps to 7.8% as worsening scale benefits were offset by weakening currency
and faster growth in component sales vs. complete RAC units. We forecast a strong
17%/26% CAGR in sales/EPS over FY20-23E, as we believe margins are likely to rise on
scale benefits vs. peers (Amber’s sales are 4 times its next competitor), incremental
domestic sourcing and new categories are likely to accelerate Amber’s earnings trajectory.
5,000 10.0%
8.7% 8.7%
7.9% 7.7% 7.8% 7.8%
4,000 7.2% 8.0%
INR mn
3,000 6.0%
2,000 4.0%
1,000 2.0%
Robust PAT growth expected: We estimate adjusted net profit CAGR of 29% during
FY20-23E (vs. 41% CAGR during FY15-20) on the back of improvement in operating
margins to 8.7% in FY23 and benefits of increased indigenisation.
3,500
150%
3,000
2,500 92%
100%
INR mn
69% 64%
2,000
50%
50%
1,500
1,000 -8%
0%
500 -33%
221 623 937 1,584 1,068 2,055 3,370
0 -50%
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Healthy return ratios to continue: Amber’s RoIC profile over the past 5 years hovered at
10-11% since its operations in a seasonal industry keep fixed asset turns low at 2.3x-2.6x.
However, management’s strategy to target export customers and category extension to
non-seasonal products such as refrigerators, HVAC and mobile refrigeration should help
improve the fixed asset turnover ratio. We expect Amber’s RoIC to improve to 15-17%
range, as we expect fixed asset turns to increase from average of 2.3x during FY16-20 to
2.9x during FY22-23E. Net margins are also expected to improve from 4% to 5% due to
economies of scale benefits; reduced debt (through utilisation of QIP funds) and lower tax
rate (25% vs. 31%). High RoE/RoCE in FY20 are outliers due to substantially lower tax
rate of 14%, as PICL had benefits of carried forward losses.
RoE (%) RoIC (%) Capex (INR mn) Fixed Asset Turns (x)
18.0 20.0 3500 3.5
17.4 3.1
16.0 18.0 2.9
16.5 3000 2.8 3.0
14.0 14.5 16.0 2.6
14.2 12.9 14.0 2500 2.3 2.5
12.0 2.2
11.3
12.0
10.0 9.8 9.8 11.5 2000 2.0
INR mn
INR mn
10.0
8.0 8.0 9.6 7.9
9.3
8.0 1500 1.5
6.0 8.6 7.4
6.0
6.2 1000 1.0
4.0 4.0
2.0 2.0 500 0.5
Fund raising completed for future planned capital expenditure: Amber completed its QIP
in Sep’21, issuing 2.25mn shares, at a price of INR1,780 per share. The company raised
INR4bn through the QIP issue, which will help achieve twin objectives of meeting its
working capital requirement for future growth as well as provide funds to opportunistic
acquisitions in allied segments. We foresee capital expenditure of 6-7bn and working
capital requirement of INR2-2.5bn over FY21-23E, while current fund raise of INR4bn and
internal accruals of INR9-10bn, is likely to keep the balance sheet healthy.
ODM revenues lead to higher NWC; OCF generation strong: While cash flow generation
at Amber was healthy over the past 8 years, the balance sheet continued to remain
levered until end-FY20, as the bulk of cash generation was deployed in expansion of
manufacturing capacities through greenfield investments and acquisition of PCIL, IL Jin,
Ever and Sidwal. The operating cash flow-to-EBIT ratio was healthy at an average of 54%
during FY16-20, but is likely to accelerate to 80% over FY21-23E, in our view. As we
forecast more than a 50% jump over FY20-23E, we expect continued investments in the
company’s fixed asset base. The recent QIP issue, where Amber raised INR 4bn, is likely to
ease out funding requirements.
Amber has managed to maintain an average working capital cycle of 35 days, despite
sales posting a 48% CAGR over FY15-20. We understand that Amber’s NWC days are
higher than Dixon’s since 94% of Amber’s revenue comes through ODM, where NWC
investment is required.
Its cumulative OCF/EBIT has remained strong at 67% over the last 5 years while FCF
generation remains negative since the company continues to invest in organic expansion
and acquisitions.
5,000 50 100%
62%
4,000 35 40 50%
33 33 17% 18%
29 30 30 111% 88% 124% 2%
95% 75% 71%
INR mn
INR mn
3,000 26 30 0%
-3% -15% -39% -5%
2,000 20 -50%
1,000 10 -100%
-98%
992 1,504 1,536 3,918 3,137 3,327 4,085 5,233 -114%
0 0 -150%
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Valuations
Relative valuations underestimate intrinsic value and growth potential; Reverse DCF
pricing in 15% CAGR in FCF over FY25-35E
Amber’s stock is currently trading at PE of 56x/34x FY22E/FY23E earnings. Valuations are
fairly similar to its peer group’s average multiple of 53x/42x EPS. Headline valuations,
however, ignore the underlying growth potential, in our view.
We evaluate the reverse DCF to understand underlying growth being priced in over the
next decade. We used explicit forecasts until FY25 and then analysed the growth rate
being factored at the CMP. After FY25, CMP factors in CAGR of 6.6% in revenue, 6.6%
in EBIT and 15% in FCF over FY25-35E; this, in our view, looks comfortably achievable
given the long runway for growth in an underpenetrated market. Keeping aside the
domestic prospects, we also note that the export opportunity can be 30 million units per
annum, which is almost 20x Amber’s current volumes. In this context, relative valuation
multiples based on near-term earnings probably underestimate the intrinsic value and
growth potential of the business. Hence, we do not expect any significant de-rating for
the stock, notwithstanding the steep headline multiples that the stock is currently trading
at.
Thus, we value the stock at 40x FY23E EPS, arriving at TP of INR4,000. Our target
multiple is in-line with median multiple of peer group companies.
a) Revenue, EBIT and FCF CAGR of 19%, 25% and 40% respectively over the explicit
forecast period covering FY20-25E, followed by Revenue, EBIT and FCF CAGR of 9%, 9%
and 18% respectively during the fading out phase (FY25-35E).
c) Terminal growth rate of 5%, which we believe is reasonable for the business,
considering the growth opportunity that the AC outsourcing space presents in India.
Exhibit 27. What is the implied growth at CMP and our TP?
Implied growth at CMP of INR 3,400 Implied growth at our TP of INR 4,000
45.0% 45.0%
40.0% 40.0%
40.0% 40.0%
35.0% 35.0%
30.0% 30.0%
25.4% 24.7% 25.4%
25.0% 22.9% 25.0%
18.9% 18.9%
20.0% 20.0% 17.7%
15.2% 14.1%
15.0% 12.5% 15.0% 12.1%
10.5%
8.9% 8.9%
10.0% 10.0%
6.6% 6.6%
5.0% 5.0%
0.0% 0.0%
FY20-35 CAGR FY20-25 CAGR FY25-35 CAGR FY20-35 CAGR FY20-25 CAGR FY25-35 CAGR
Peer Comparison
Exhibit 28. Global peer comps
Mcap EV/E (x) P/E (x) EPS CAGR % RoE (%)
Companies USD bn CY19 CY20E CY21E CY22E CY19 CY20E CY21E CY22E CY19-22E CY19 CY20E CY21E CY22E
Midea 89.1 13.6 18.6 16.1 14.3 22.8 22.5 19.5 17.2 12% 23.6 22.5 22.8 22.9
Haier 39.6 10.0 19.0 15.4 13.3 28.3 26.4 21.3 17.3 11% 14.1 15.0 17.3 18.0
Gree 53.5 9.9 11.0 8.5 7.5 21.3 18.0 13.8 12.1 7% 15.1 16.3 19.0 19.2
Whirlpool 13.0 6.2 6.7 6.8 6.6 11.2 10.4 10.4 9.7 8% 30.9 27.3 NM NM
Electrolux 8.6 5.1 6.6 5.9 5.6 17.1 16.2 13.8 13.0 12% 31.9 22.5 23.3 22.9
Carrier 34.4 28.4 14.5 13.0 12.1 45.3 20.7 17.8 15.9 3% NM 24.4 24.4 26.5
Average (x) 12.2 12.7 10.9 9.9 24.3 19.0 16.1 14.2 9% 23.1 21.3 21.4 21.9
Source: Company, JM Financial
Companies INR INR bn FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20-23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Amber Enterprises 3,435 116 44.4 57.7 37.4 25.7 68.2 108.4 56.3 34.3 26% 14.2 7.4 11.5 16.5
Voltas 1,031 341 51.9 59.3 38.8 30.1 61.8 63.3 44.9 35.7 20% 13.2 12.0 15.2 16.8
Blue Star 896 86 31.1 32.7 20.2 16.7 58.6 79.0 35.4 27.7 28% 17.8 13.8 27.7 29.6
Johnson Controls Hitachi 2,709 74 33.0 49.6 31.7 23.9 88.2 128.1 59.1 39.9 30% 12.8 8.0 15.2 19.0
Whirlpool India 2,398 304 31.7 52.3 34.7 29.2 62.1 83.3 50.1 41.3 15% 20.8 12.9 18.9 19.8
Havells India 1,088 681 28.5 45.9 41.0 34.7 92.6 69.4 60.8 50.4 23% 17.3 21.4 21.1 22.1
Dixon Technologies 20,725 240 107.4 79.3 43.1 33.0 199.0 139.9 69.7 53.2 55% 25.4 27.0 38.9 35.1
Average ex- Amber (x) 47.3 53.2 34.9 27.9 93.7 93.8 53.3 41.4 29% 17.9 15.8 22.8 23.7
Source: Bloomberg, JM Financial
40,000 79.0%
80.0%
35,000
25,000 39.3%
INR mn
30.0% 40.0%
20,000 23.1%
15,000 13.0% 20.0%
10,000 0.0%
0.0%
5,000 -15.0%
6,995 12,518 15,404 17,408 24,250 20,613 30,919 40,194
0 -20.0%
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
This segment has clocked 24% revenue CAGR over FY15-20 including inorganic
acquisitions and is expected to report 15% CAGR over FY20-23.
52.1% 60.0%
20,000 46.9%
33.4% 40.0%
15,000 25.0%
INR mn
20.0%
10,000 2.7%
-8.5% 0.0%
Company Background
Amber, incorporated in 1994 by Mr. Jasbir Singh, has now evolved into a complete RAC
solution provider with products ranging from CBU units to basket of components for
RACs and HVAC industry. The company has 15 state-of-the-art manufacturing units
across 6 states in India, equipped with latest and advanced technologies and 4 R&D
facilities. It caters to all the top-10 AC brands in the country. It currently has 24% share in
the overall RAC industry and 70% share in the AC outsourcing market.
Amber has increased its back-end capabilities over the last decade. It successfully acquired
PICL, an electric motors company in 2010, followed by IL JIN in 2017 and Ever Electronics
in 2018, which manufacture PCBs in India.
It acquired Sidwal in Apr’19, giving Amber access to the mobility-HVAC industry such as
railways, defence, buses, metros, telecom and commercial ACs. Sidwal was founded in
1975 and currently is the market leader with c.50% market share in the railway and
metro segments and c.80% share in the Defence Segment. It is headquartered in NCR
and operates 3 fully integrated facilities in Northern India with the capability to undertake
the entire HVAC manufacturing process in-house.
It has 2 sub-segments a) RACs – 61% of revenues – where revenue from sale of complete
CBUs is booked b) Components and Mobile applications – 39% of revenues – where it
supplies all RAC, Non-RAC components and Industrials ACs (Sidwal). Amber has
consolidated revenues of INR 39bn with operating margin of 7.8% and net profit margin
of 4%.
Source: Company
Source: Company
Key risks
Seasonality and general slowdown: Amber’s sales are directly co-related to the
performance of the RAC industry. Any slowdown in the industry because of general
economic conditions, seasonal trends, evolving regulatory requirements, government
initiatives, trade agreements and other factors can impact top-line for Amber.
In-house sourcing by large brands: Top 5 brands continue to dominate the RAC industry
with c.70% market share. If RAC brands discontinue outsourcing of manufacturing of
their products or reduce the number of components outsourced by them or if customers
decide to perform these functions internally, then Amber’s future growth will be limited
thereby impacting sales and profitability.
Pricing pressure from customers, commodity and currency fluctuations: Clients often
pursue price reduction negotiations with suppliers as their volumes increase. Hence, if
continuous market share gains and wide spread client base is essential to improve
profitability. Also, sharp fluctuations in commodity prices and currency can impact gross
margins for Amber.
APPENDIX I
Definition of ratings
Rating Meaning
Buy Total expected returns of more than 10% for large-cap stocks* and REITs and more than 15% for all other stocks, over the next twelve
months. Total expected return includes dividend yields.
Hold Price expected to move in the range of 10% downside to 10% upside from the current market price for large-cap* stocks and REITs and
in the range of 10% downside to 15% upside from the current market price for all other stocks, over the next twelve months.
Sell Price expected to move downwards by more than 10% from the current market price over the next twelve months.
* Large-cap stocks refer to securities with market capitalisation in excess of INR200bn. REIT refers to Real Estate Investment Trusts.
Research Analyst(s) Certification
The Research Analyst(s), with respect to each issuer and its securities covered by them in this research report, certify that:
All of the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect his or her or their personal views about all of the issuers and their securities; and
No part of his or her or their compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this research
report.
Important Disclosures
This research report has been prepared by JM Financial Institutional Securities Limited (JM Financial Institutional Securities) to provide information about the
company(ies) and sector(s), if any, covered in the report and may be distributed by it and/or its associates solely for the purpose of information of the select
recipient of this report. This report and/or any part thereof, may not be duplicated in any form and/or reproduced or redistributed without the prior written
consent of JM Financial Institutional Securities. This report has been prepared independent of the companies covered herein.
JM Financial Institutional Securities is registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as a Research Analyst and a Stock Broker having trading
memberships of the BSE Ltd. (BSE), National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) and Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (MSEI). No material disciplinary
action has been taken by SEBI against JM Financial Institutional Securities in the past two financial years which may impact the investment decision making of the
investor.
JM Financial Institutional Securities renders stock broking services primarily to institutional investors and provides the research services to its institutional
clients/investors. JM Financial Institutional Securities and its associates are part of a multi-service, integrated investment banking, investment management,
brokerage and financing group. JM Financial Institutional Securities and/or its associates might have provided or may provide services in respect of managing
offerings of securities, corporate finance, investment banking, mergers & acquisitions, broking, financing or any other advisory services to the company(ies)
covered herein. JM Financial Institutional Securities and/or its associates might have received during the past twelve months or may receive compensation from
the company(ies) mentioned in this report for rendering any of the above services.
JM Financial Institutional Securities and/or its associates, their directors and employees may; (a) from time to time, have a long or short position in, and buy or sell
the securities of the company(ies) mentioned herein or (b) be engaged in any other transaction involving such securities and earn brokerage or other
compensation or act as a market maker in the financial instruments of the company(ies) covered under this report or (c) act as an advisor or lender/borrower to,
or may have any financial interest in, such company(ies) or (d) considering the nature of business/activities that JM Financial Institutional Securities is engaged in,
it may have potential conflict of interest at the time of publication of this report on the subject company(ies).
Neither JM Financial Institutional Securities nor its associates or the Research Analyst(s) named in this report or his/her relatives individually own one per cent or
more securities of the company(ies) covered under this report, at the relevant date as specified in the SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014.
The Research Analyst(s) principally responsible for the preparation of this research report and members of their household are prohibited from buying or selling
debt or equity securities, including but not limited to any option, right, warrant, future, long or short position issued by company(ies) covered under this report.
The Research Analyst(s) principally responsible for the preparation of this research report or their relatives (as defined under SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations,
2014); (a) do not have any financial interest in the company(ies) covered under this report or (b) did not receive any compensation from the company(ies) covered
under this report, or from any third party, in connection with this report or (c) do not have any other material conflict of interest at the time of publication of this
report. Research Analyst(s) are not serving as an officer, director or employee of the company(ies) covered under this report.
While reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this report, it does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets or
developments referred to herein, and JM Financial Institutional Securities does not warrant its accuracy or completeness. JM Financial Institutional Securities may
not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. This
report is provided for information only and is not an investment advice and must not alone be taken as the basis for an investment decision.
The investment discussed or views expressed or recommendations/opinions given herein may not be suitable for all investors. The user assumes the entire risk of
any use made of this information. The information contained herein may be changed without notice and JM Financial Institutional Securities reserves the right to
make modifications and alterations to this statement as they may deem fit from time to time.
This report is neither an offer nor solicitation of an offer to buy and/or sell any securities mentioned herein and/or not an official confirmation of any transaction.
This report is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or
other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject JM Financial Institutional
Securities and/or its affiliated company(ies) to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities described herein may or may not be
eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to a certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this report may come, are required to inform themselves of
and to observe such restrictions.
Persons who receive this report from JM Financial Singapore Pte Ltd may contact Mr. Ruchir Jhunjhunwala (ruchir.jhunjhunwala@jmfl.com) on +65 6422 1888 in
respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this report.
Additional disclosure only for U.S. persons: JM Financial Institutional Securities has entered into an agreement with JM Financial Securities, Inc. ("JM Financial
Securities"), a U.S. registered broker-dealer and member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") in order to conduct certain business in the
United States in reliance on the exemption from U.S. broker-dealer registration provided by Rule 15a-6, promulgated under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"), as amended, and as interpreted by the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") (together "Rule 15a-6").
This research report is distributed in the United States by JM Financial Securities in compliance with Rule 15a-6, and as a "third party research report" for
purposes of FINRA Rule 2241. In compliance with Rule 15a-6(a)(3) this research report is distributed only to "major U.S. institutional investors" as defined in Rule
15a-6 and is not intended for use by any person or entity that is not a major U.S. institutional investor. If you have received a copy of this research report and are
not a major U.S. institutional investor, you are instructed not to read, rely on, or reproduce the contents hereof, and to destroy this research or return it to JM
Financial Institutional Securities or to JM Financial Securities.
This research report is a product of JM Financial Institutional Securities, which is the employer of the research analyst(s) solely responsible for its content. The
research analyst(s) preparing this research report is/are resident outside the United States and are not associated persons or employees of any U.S. registered
broker-dealer. Therefore, the analyst(s) are not subject to supervision by a U.S. broker-dealer, or otherwise required to satisfy the regulatory licensing
requirements of FINRA and may not be subject to the Rule 2241 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading
securities held by a research analyst account.
JM Financial Institutional Securities only accepts orders from major U.S. institutional investors. Pursuant to its agreement with JM Financial Institutional Securities,
JM Financial Securities effects the transactions for major U.S. institutional investors. Major U.S. institutional investors may place orders with JM Financial
Institutional Securities directly, or through JM Financial Securities, in the securities discussed in this research report.
Additional disclosure only for U.K. persons: Neither JM Financial Institutional Securities nor any of its affiliates is authorised in the United Kingdom (U.K.) by the
Financial Conduct Authority. As a result, this report is for distribution only to persons who (i) have professional experience in matters relating to investments
falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (as amended, the "Financial Promotion Order"), (ii)
are persons falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) ("high net worth companies, unincorporated associations etc.") of the Financial Promotion Order, (iii) are outside
the United Kingdom, or (iv) are persons to whom an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000) in connection with the matters to which this report relates may otherwise lawfully be communicated or caused to be
communicated (all such persons together being referred to as "relevant persons"). This report is directed only at relevant persons and must not be acted on or
relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this report relates is available only to relevant persons and will
be engaged in only with relevant persons.
Additional disclosure only for Canadian persons: This report is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or a public offering of the
securities described herein in Canada or any province or territory thereof. Under no circumstances is this report to be construed as an offer to sell securities or as
a solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction of Canada. Any offer or sale of the securities described herein in Canada will be made only under an
exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian securities regulators and only by a dealer properly registered under applicable
securities laws or, alternatively, pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirement in the relevant province or territory of Canada in which such offer or
sale is made. This report is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, a prospectus or an offering memorandum. No securities commission or
similar regulatory authority in Canada has reviewed or in any way passed upon these materials, the information contained herein or the merits of the securities
described herein and any representation to the contrary is an offence. If you are located in Canada, this report has been made available to you based on your
representation that you are an “accredited investor” as such term is defined in National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions and a “permitted client” as
such term is defined in National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations. Under no circumstances is the
information contained herein to be construed as investment advice in any province or territory of Canada nor should it be construed as being tailored to the
needs of the recipient. Canadian recipients are advised that JM Financial Securities, Inc., JM Financial Institutional Securities Limited, their affiliates and authorized
agents are not responsible for, nor do they accept, any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this research report or the
information contained herein.