Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kinestetik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani: Damrah, Suci Anita, Yuni Astuti, Pitnawati, Erianti, Zulbahri
Kinestetik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani: Damrah, Suci Anita, Yuni Astuti, Pitnawati, Erianti, Zulbahri
Corresponding address : Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar Bar., Kec. ISSN 2685-6514 (Online)
Padang Utara, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25171 ISSN 2477-331X (Print)
*Corresponding email : damrah@fik.unp.ac.id
701
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
702
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
703
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
704
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
705
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
707
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
teachers at SMPN North Padang, Padang respondents as many as 45 items, and from
City related to the evaluation of learning these data, the results were:
which is categorized as poor, this can be
seen from the results of interviews Table 4. Percentage of Performance of Physical
conducted by researchers to several Education Teachers (Score
physical education teachers, sports, and Interpretation)
health of school principals and teachers of N Score Freque Percent Category
other subjects at SMPN North Padang, o Interva ncy age
l
Padang City.
1 >121 0 0,00% Very good
Physical education teachers in
evaluating the assessment have carried out 2 111- 2 28,57% Good
the assessment, but the assessment carried 120
out by physical education teachers in the 3 101- 3 42,85% Enough
new normal period is not very effective 110
because, in this period, the physical 4 91-100 1 14,29% Not good
education teachers find it difficult to 5 <90 1 14,29% Not very
provide effective scores. The physical good
education teachers have indeed carried out Total 7 100
assessments of students, but the
assessments made during the semester From the interpretation of the
exams only and the physical education performance score of physical education
teachers in making questions have not been teachers, it is seen from the interval score >
full with the material that has been taught. 121, which amounts to 0 people with a
From the results of the interviews that percentage of 0.00% in the very good
the researchers obtained, it can be seen that category, for the interval score 111-120
so far, sports and health teachers in with a total of 2 people with a percentage of
evaluating/conducting assessments can be 28.57% with good category. The 101-110
done poorly in the new normal period, this interval score, amounting to 3 people with a
can be revealed from several schools as percentage of 42.85% in the sufficient
well as information from sports and health category. For the interval score 91-100 with
teachers of school principals and subject the number of 1 person with a percentage of
teachers. at SMPN North Padang, Padang 14.29%, the category is not good. Whereas
City. in the interval score < 90 with a lot of 1
4. Performance of Physical Education person with a percentage of 14.29% in the
Teachers at North Padang Junior High very bad category. Thus it can be concluded
School, Padang City during the New that the performance of physical education
Normal period teachers in the new normal period at SMPN
Quantitative data on the performance North Padang, Padang City, when viewed
of sports and health teachers at SMPN from the learning planning in the new
North Padang, Padang City using a normal period, the implementation of
questionnaire with a total of 45 statement learning in the new normal period, and the
items. Based on data obtained from 7 evaluation/assessment of learning in the
respondents from sports and health new normal period is less good or around
education teachers of SMPN in North 28,57%.
Padang District, Padang City. In this study,
the authors distributed a questionnaire to
708
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
709
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
710
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
interviews show that the planning for learning materials that have been
physical education teachers at SMPN North given with an emphasis on the
Padang, Padang City is categorized as not materials given to students.
good. The description above explains that
a. Implementation of Learning in the New class assessments absolutely must be
Normal period carried out by physical education teachers
Implementation of learning is said to to determine the progress and learning
be effective when students are seen outcomes of students, diagnose learning
actively. A teacher must have competence difficulties, provide feedback, improve the
in learning, the main task of the teacher is learning process and form student
to condition the environment so that it competencies and determine class progress.
supports behavior change and the formation Based on the findings carried out by
of student competencies, then a physical researchers through interviews with
education teacher in the new normal period physical education teachers at SMPN North
must be able to make learning models so Padang, Padang City, the
that learning can be enjoyed by students. evaluation/assessment carried out by
Learning activities when there is physical education teachers is mostly the
educational interaction between students results of these interviews indicate that the
and teachers, this activity is a real face-to- evaluation/assessment carried out by the
face activity. The teacher carries out face- teacher sports and health education at
to-face or learning with the following SMPN North Padang, Padang City is
stages: categorized as not good.
1) Initial face-to-face activities The results of the analysis of the
2) Face to face activities performance of physical education teachers
3) The final activity face to face in the new normal era at SMPN North
b. Evaluation/Learning Assessment Padang, Padang City, provide information
Evaluation of learning outcomes is that most of the performance of physical
carried out to determine changes in education is not good. A teacher must be
behavior and the formation of student required to have a good performance. The
competencies that can be done with class teacher's performance referred to here is
assessments. For the implementation of an ability. And the efforts of teachers to carry
effective and efficient learning process, out their duties as well as possible in
each educational unit must carry out class planning learning programs, implementing
assessments, general exams, and final learning activities, and evaluating/assessing
exams(Widoyoko, 2009). learning in the new normal period. A
1. Daily test, a daily test is carried out teacher must have the academic ability and
after each learning process in a ability to develop his profession and
specific discussion unit or package the learning he does so that it can
competency. run effectively and efficiently, directed and
2. General tests, general tests carried glued. In carrying out his professional
out together for parallel classes duties, a teacher must be obliged to plan to
and generally carried out learn, carry out a quality learning process,
collectively. and evaluate or assess the results of
3. The final test is carried out at the learning.
end of the educational program. A teacher is also required to develop
The materials tested include all academic qualifications, which of course,
711
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
must be in line with the development of the good category was valued (19.09%) ),
science, technology and integrated into for the very good category, it is worth
carrying out his professional duties. A (9.52%). Thus, where the largest percentage
teacher must be obliged to plan to learn, of planning is said to be bad, it is worth
carry out a quality learning process, and (47.62%). Then from the qualitative data in
evaluate or assess the results of learning. A accordance with the results of interviews
teacher is also required to develop academic conducted with physical education teachers
qualifications, which of course must be in at SMPN North Padang, Padang City, it
line with developments in science, shows that most of the performance of
technology, and art. physical education teachers from planning
Learning management must meet the is said to be quite good. Interview
expected criteria in designing learning guidelines (attachment).
planning and implementing learning, b. Implementation of Learning in the New
namely the form of presenting positive Normal period
interactive activities between teachers and The results obtained in the research at
students both while doing learning and SMPN North Padang, Padang City about
outside learning. Then design the the implementation of learning in the new
implementation of the evaluation of student normal period were in the good category
learning outcomes where the goal is to find worth (42.86%), for the moderate category
out the results of the achievement of the it was worth (28.57%), for the bad category
subject matter delivered during the learning it was worth (23.81%), for the very bad
process. category (4.76%). Thus, it can be concluded
The description above explains that a that from each implementation of learning
teacher must be responsive to changes for for sports and health education teachers at
the sake of changes in performance; that is SMPN North Padang, Padang City is good.
what is called a creative, innovative, and Then from the qualitative data, according to
participatory teacher and is responsible for the results of interviews conducted with
educating the nation's life. Such resources education teachers sports and health at
are needed in improving the quality of SMPN North Padang, Padang City, shows
education in general and the quality of that most of the performance of physical
education in a creative way to empower the education teachers from the implementation
potential that exists in preparing teaching of new normal learning is said to be poor.
and learning activities. Interview guidelines (attachment).
1. Performance of Physical education c. Evaluation / Assessment
Teachers The results obtained in the research at
From the quantitative data and SMPN North Padang, Padang City,
interviews obtained with several indicators regarding the evaluation/assessment of
of the performance of physical education learning in the bad category were valued
teachers, information is obtained that: (42.86%), for the moderate category was
a. Learning Planning in the New Normal valued (23.81%), for the good category was
Period valued (23.81%), for the very good
The results obtained in research at category worth (9.52%). Thus it can be
SMPN North Padang about learning concluded that in terms of
planning in the new normal period were in a evaluation/assessment of the performance
bad category or worth (47.62%), for the of physical education teachers at SMPN
moderate category was worth (23.81%), for North Padang, Padang City is not good.
712
Damrah et al / Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani 5 (4) (2021)
Then from the qualitative data, according to seen from quantitative data as described
the results of interviews conducted with above shows that from lesson planning,
physical education teachers show that most implementation of learning, and
of the performance of education teachers evaluation/assessment of learning, it can be
sports and health from the concluded that the performance of physical
evaluation/assessment of learning in the education teachers is not good (28.57%).
new normal period are said to be less good.
Interview guide (attachment). REFERENCES
Thus the performance of physical
education teachers referred to in this study Alam, B. (2020, June). Sekolah Di Era New
consists of three indicators, including Normal, Guru Dituntut Ubah Konsep
learning planning in the new normal period, Pembelajaran. Merdeka.Com.
implementing learning in the new normal Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu
period, and evaluating/assessing learning in Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Barnawi, & Arifin, M. (2012). Kinerja Guru
the new normal period.
Profesional. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Budiningsih, C. A. (2015). Belajar Dan
CONCLUSION Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hamalik, O. (2006). Pendidikan Guru
Based on the findings and results of Berdasarkan Pendekatan Kompetensi.
data analysis described in the previous Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
section, the conclusions of the study are as Hendri, N., & Nasution, T. P. J. (2013). Strategi
follows: 1) The performance of sports and Pembelajaran Penjas. Padang: Fik Unp.
health education teachers at SMPN North Husdarta. (2009). Manajemen Pendidikan
Padang, Padang City in the new normal Jasmani. Bandung: Alfabeta.
period, seen in terms of learning planning, Kemendikbud. Pembelajaran Secara Daring
Dan Bekerja Dari Rumah Untuk Mencegah
is (28.57%) category not good. For the Penyebaran Covid-19. , (2020). Indonesia.
category is quite equal (28.57%). For the Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian
good category it is worth (28.57%), for the Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
very good category it is worth (0.00%). 2) Permadi, D., & Arifin, D. (2013). Panduan
The performance of the physical education Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung:
teachers at SMPN North Padang, Padang Nuansa Aulia.
City in the new normal period, in terms of Presiden Ri. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik
the implementation of learning, was Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang
(0.00%) in the bad category. For the Standar Nasional Pendidikan. , (2005).
category is quite worth (42.86%). For the Indonesia.
good category it is worth (42.86%), for the Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi
(Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
very good category, it is worth (0.00%). 3) Undang-Undang Ri. (2003). Tentang Sisdiknas &
The performance of the physical education Ppr.I. Th.2010 Tentang Penyelenggaraan
teachers at SMPN North Padang, Padang Pendidikan & Wajib Belajar. Indonesia.
City in the new normal period in terms of Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2009). Evaluasi Program
evaluation/assessment of learning (28.57%) Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
category is not good. For the category is Belajar.
quite worth (42.85%). For the good
category it is worth (14.29%), for the very
good category it is worth (0.00%). Thus the
performance of physical education teachers
713