Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
32
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
along with higher CD-tolerance. On the other hand, because of the overlapping of the
symbols in time domain, CP is not available for wavelets.
4.2 FAST FOURIER TRANSFORM
Fast Fourier transform is the most popular transform that is used to obtain frequency
spectrum of the signals. It is an algorithm which is used to find the Discrete Fourier
Transform in a faster way and with reduced complexity. It is best suited for signals
whose frequency components do not change with time. The data generator is used
for bit stream and it is modulated using M-ary PSK or M-ary QAM modulators to
map input data into symbols. These symbols are sent to IFFT block to generate N
parallel data streams simultaneously over the subcarriers.
For a given finite sequence of data x(n) ,
x(n) , n=0 to N-1 (4.1)
the output in frequency domain is given as ,
N−1
X(k)= ∑ x ( n ) e
− jk ( 2Nπ ) n k= 0 to N-1 (4.2)
n =0
33
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
34
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
In wavelet transform, the signal is first decomposed by low pass and high pass filter.
Half of the frequency components have been filtered out at filter outputs and can be
down sampled. Finally, approximate and detail coefficients from g(n) and h(n) filters
are gotten respectively as shown in figure 4.1, where g(n) and h(n) are the wavelet’s
half band low pass filter and high pass filter impulse response respectively, and φ lpf
and φ hpf is approximate and details coefficients respectively as can be written as ,
k=∞
φ lpf (n)= ∑ S ( k ) g (2 n−k ) (4.3)
k=−∞
k=∞
φ hpf (n) = ∑ S ( k ) h(2 n−k ) (4.4)
k=−∞
Figure 4.2 shows three level decomposition wavelet transform [Hasan M] . The
multi-level DWT is computed by successive low pass and high pass filters of the
35
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
discrete time-domain signal. At each level, the high pass filter produces detail
information denoted by d(n), while the low pass filter associated with scaling
function produces coarse approximations denoted by a(n) . At each decomposition
level, the half band filters produce signals spanning only half the frequency band.
This doubles the frequency resolution as the uncertainty in frequency is reduced by
half. The decimation by 2 halves the time resolution as the entire signal is now
represented by only half the number of samples. Thus, while the half band low pass
filtering removes half of the frequencies and thus halves the resolution, the
decimation by 2 doubles the scale. The filtering and decimation process is continued
until the desired level is reached. The DWT of the original signal is then obtained by
concatenating all the coefficients of approximation and detail starting from the last
level of decomposition.
36
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
37
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
restricts the useful data rate . By doing this, data rate and hence the efficiency can be
improved. This motivates the use of DWT based OFDM that does not use cyclic
prefix.
4.4.2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The performance of DWT and FFT OFDM has been investigated using MATLAB
tool with V. R2011b. Graphical results shows the Bit Error Rate probabilities of
both the systems. The results presented shows the BER performance as a function of
energy per bit to noise ratio.
38
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
0
BER vs SNR PLOTS
10
FFT
DWT
-1
10
-2
10
BER
-3
10
-4
10
0 5 10 15
Eb/No (dB)
Figure 4.5 Simulation Result for FFT and DWT based system for AWGN channel
39
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
0
OFDM alone BER PLOTS
10
haar
db2
db4
-1
10 db8
-2
10
BER
-3
10
-4
10
0 5 10 15
Eb/No (dB)
Figure 4.5 Simulation Results for DWT OFDM with different waveforms
In figure 4.5 Simulation results are shown of different DWT Waveforms. Results are
best achieved by haar wavelet. For each SNR , BER is calculated. The BER
performance for FFT OFDM is observed for AWGN channel in figure 4.4. BER
value is also calculated for Theoretical value. This result is compared with the
simulated result. It is observed that both the results are mostly having similarity. We
will get the sharp and accurate response for bit error rate as we increase the number
iterations. For different random data, simulated result will be different. Results of
DWT is better than Conventional FFT. In figure 4.5, Simulation parameters are taken
for Wavelet system to observe the BER performance using different wavelets. Haar,
Daubechies, Symlet and Coiflet wavelets are used to analyze the performance.
Random digital data is generated and same data is passed through different wavelet
systems. It is observed that Haar wavelet gives the better performance than other
wavelets. Random data is rotated through the system for equal number of SNR value.
40
Wavelet Packet based OFDM
For other wavelets it is observed that, the Bit error value remain constant at
particular level. For better performance of system it is expected that, BER value
should be decreased for increasing SNR value. Each wavelet has its own
characteristics and shape of signal. So, it affect on performance.
0
OFDM alone BER PLOTS
10
dwt haar
FFT
-1
10
-2
10
BER
-3
10
-4
10
0 5 10 15
Eb/No (dB)
Figure 4.6 shows that Discrete Wavelet Transform performs better than FFT in each
case, with each wavelet type. DWT is best to decrease ICI and Dispersions.
41