Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effects of Nitrogen Flow Rates On The Growth Morphology of TiAlN Films Prepared by An Rf-Reactive Sputtering Technique
Effects of Nitrogen Flow Rates On The Growth Morphology of TiAlN Films Prepared by An Rf-Reactive Sputtering Technique
Received 24 January 2001; received in revised form 11 July 2001; accepted 7 December 2001
Abstract
Over the last decade titanium aluminum nitride (TiAlN) has been under active investigation as a promising alternative to binary
coating materials for cutting and forming tools because of its superior oxidation resistance and lower thermal conductivity.
However, the effects of nitrogen flow rates on the reactive sputtering of TiAlN films remain relatively untapped despite their
importance in studying the growth morphology to acquire valuable knowledge for the selection of optimum coating conditions.
In this paper we report the results of our study regarding the implications of nitrogen flow rate on the growth morphology of the
TiAlN films reactively sputtered from a stoichiometric target of TiAl. Scanning and transmission microscopy (SEM, TEM), X-
ray diffraction (XRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) have been used for film characterization, the latter of which is yet
to be fully exploited as a tool for analyzing the effects of N2 as a sputtering parameter. 䊚 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights
reserved.
0040-6090/02/$ - see front matter 䊚 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 4 0 - 6 0 9 0 Ž 0 1 . 0 1 7 9 1 - 6
160 K. Chakrabarti et al. / Thin Solid Films 406 (2002) 159–163
˚ and bearing ratio win percent (%)x for films with N2 flow rates of (a) 10 sccm, (b)
Fig. 6. Line profiles showing the height distribution (in A)
12 sccm, (c) 15 sccm and (d) 20 sccm. Ar flow rate was kept constant at 25 sccm. The maximum depth probed by the AFM tip was taken as
height zero.
equation given by: are fairly smooth with an average RMS roughness of
;2.3 nm and 1.8 nm, respectively. It may be noted here
Ds0.9ly Žbcosu. (1)
that the roughness, mentioned above, is the convolution
where D is the average particle size, l is the X-ray of the shape and local roughness. This RMS roughness
wavelength, b is the diffraction line broadening (in is mostly dominated by the shape of overlapping islands,
radians) and u is the diffraction angle. The average of which the films are composed, and not by the local
crystallite size was found to be ;5–10 nm, with a roughness of the individual islands, which was found to
discrepancy of less than 3% between the values obtained be several orders smaller compared with the roughness
by two methods. The rings of the diffraction patterns mentioned above. Fig. 5 shows a plot of surface rough-
are characteristic of a single crystal phase in a polycrys- ness vs. N2 flow rate. The decrease in roughness with
talline state. This observation is in good agreement with the increase in N2 flow rate may be attributed to the
that observed by Ikeda et al. w7x. It may also be noted
fact that the films prepared at a higher N2 flow rate
that a few very weak intensity rings indicative of the
gives a denser and finer morphology compared with
presence of very minor phases, have also been detected
from the diffraction patterns. that prepared with a lower N2 flow rate, as is evident
from the SEM micrographs.
3.3. AFM analysis We have also studied the line profile of the height
distribution and the bearing ratio (which is a measure
AFM images were obtained using a 100 mm scanner of the relative size of the bearing surface, where the
to investigate the top surface morphology of the films. bearing surface is the maximum surface area which is
The thickness and the RMS roughness of the film were exposed above a certain z-plane) as can be seen from
estimated from the average of several scans. Two Fig. 6. Fluctuations around the mean surface observed
zoomed images of 3 mm=3 mm area of TiAlN films in the line profiles are indicative of defects of different
deposited at the N2 flow rates of 10 sccm and 20 sccm sizes and heights arising out of grain domains without
are shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen that the film surfaces well-defined size. However, the bearing ratio goes to
K. Chakrabarti et al. / Thin Solid Films 406 (2002) 159–163 163