Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vegetation As An Ecological Factor For A Sustainable Campus Landscape
Vegetation As An Ecological Factor For A Sustainable Campus Landscape
Vegetation As An Ecological Factor For A Sustainable Campus Landscape
net/publication/287994530
CITATIONS READS
9 222
4 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Integrated Modeling of Complex Socio-ecological Systems: Case Study of the Mojana ecoregion View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Ahmed I. Amr on 24 December 2015.
ABSTRACT
University Campuses are large entities with huge impacts on the environment and overall urban
sustainability. The paper tackles the lack of care towards sustainability issues on contemporary Egyptian
campuses' design and management. The currently emerging initiatives are insufficient. Landscape is still
considered a complementary element; thus applied at a late stage in the urban design procedure of
campuses most often lacking guidelines for sustainability.
This research aims to define a checklist for sustainable measures regarding vegetation on university
campuses based on international cases and literature. The study examines the state of landscapes in some
of the Egyptian contemporary campuses and the application of sustainability measures. The methodology
deduces from literature review and formulates a checklist used in the empirical study. This part includes
checking landscape sustainability measures on international campuses and available ranking systems e.g.
SITES. The second part feeds the checklist inductively from the case studies and leads to some guidelines
for the contemporary Egyptian case, showing the current situation and supported by results from
comparative analysis.
The American University in Cairo (AUC), the German University in Cairo (GUC) and the British
University in Egypt (BUE) refer to new campuses that were expected to be more manageable and
innovative in applying sustainability measures. The cases are analyzed according to the checklist by
observations, questionnaires and discussions with responsible landscape units. According to the studied
cases, the ecological sustainability of landscape related to vegetation is only partly achieved. Mostly, the
main driver remains the economic benefit while the ecological benefit is mostly not considered.
Keywords: Ecological sustainability, landscape, university campus, vegetation
INTRODUCTION
Although vegetation is considered as one of the fragile items of landscape yet it happens to be among
the most important and effective ones. When the vegetation selected is suitable for the site it could help
support the ecosystem and affect sustainability. This influence appears on two levels:
1- Vegetation enhances the natural processes of different indicators for sustainability such as:
improving air quality, water resources…etc.
2- The preparation for planting and maintenance has a major effect on the input and the output of
the resources.
In order to reach the best selection of vegetation on site, there has to be a deep understanding for
the site qualities before and after construction. Greyfields and brownfields are the best choices to save
unused lands. The vegetation present on site is not definitely the most suitable choice due to the change
in environmental and climatic conditions [1], pp. 4620-4632
1
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
2
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
3
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
The same criteria that is applied for the selection of appropriate plants is applied with the selection
of the native [2], p. 154.
Xeriscaping
The concept of xeriscaping is to design the landscape to adapt to survive with the limited amount of
water on site and without any supplemental water needs, soil and nutrients.
There are seven principles to apply xeriscaping [3]:
Keep in mind the limited water resources and protect the available vegetation on site.
Limit the areas of turf grass which requires excessive water and mowing.
Select the vegetation types that are suitable for the limited amount of water on site.
Improve the soil quality in order to increase the soil moisture holding capacity.
Use mulch (inorganic) to save the properties of soil.
Efficient irrigation using dripping systems rather than spraying.
Maintaining landscape.
The use of grass -which is widely used in the case of many campuses- is not always a suitable choice
for places with shortage in water. Other ground covers or native plants could be better with saving water
and not using herbicides or pesticides. Even in the case of grass growing, relevant species of grass should
be grown according to the climate suitability and water needs [4] pp. 15-16
Santa Fe Community College: Fig. 1 is one of the examples of introducing xeriscaping concept to
the landscape which is compatible with the desert environment that it is situated in. The use of limited
patches of green, decorative paving. Even the xeriscape is creating a factor of place-making for the campus
[4] p. 16.
Invasive species
The U.S. Federal Invasive Species Advisory Committee defines invasive vegetation species as “ Are
not native to the ecosystem under consideration and that cause or are likely to cause economic or
environmental harm or harm to human, animal or plant health”. Not all non-native species are invasive, they
have to cause harm to human or other species to be invasive. Ex. Porcelain berry and kudzu are ornamental
but cause death for some living organisms. Most of our ornamental plants are nonnative and they are not
invasive at the same time. Only 10% of the non-native species in North America are invasive [2] pp. 99-
100. Invasive species grow fast in an exponential pattern, when it reaches the inflection point it becomes
hard to be resisted, that is a reason for the precautious considerations against these species. Normal
species doesn’t spread from the point of introduction for at least 25 years. If there is a suspicion towards
any of the used species it is better to reject it from the beginning.
University of Tennessee: It was proposed that non- planted areas would planted with native meadows
Fig. 2 of orange and white flowers or grass species that doesn’t require intensive mowing only semi- annual
rather than using lawn that requires continuous mowing. Removal of invasive species as kudzu Fig. 2 which
is threatening to the birds and insects population in the region [5].
4
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
Fig. 2 Native meadows used instead of lawn (left image), Kudzu as invasive species (right
image) (Carol R. Johnson Assosciates, 2012, p. 31)
The edible landscaping of the site had three benefits for the project:
5
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
The site is originally a rice field Fig. 3 and it is known for the quality of rice it can produce and at the
same time the irrigation methods of these fields are available and usable.
The availability of the fields as a ready-made landscape will decrease the budget needed for the
landscape for the project.
The time required for the construction of the project is much limited.
Fig. 3 An overview of the rice fields (left image), the process of planting the rice (middle
image), reading areas within the rice fields (right image) (Turenscape, 2014)
The presence of the campus within the rice fields, brought up the idea of sustainable development
in the educational process. Due to the high quality of the produced rice, it became an icon giving an identity
for the campus Fig. 3.
CASE STUDIES
Three recent contemporary university campuses were analyzed as case studies. The aim of this
analysis is: to highlight the sustainable methods or initiatives that are applied, to filter and fine-tune the
aggregated international checklist of sustainable landscape on university campuses and reach conclusions
and recommendations regarding future steps for a more sustainable campus landscape in the common
Egyptian context.
All three are in the new urban communities of Cairo, in the same desert environment and opened
post the year 2000. These universities’ campuses could be assumed to have applied sustainable measures
in the composition of their landscapes according to their recent operation. All three have different schools
on the same campus. The three campuses are of different sizes. Some campuses e.g. AUC have initiatives
for achieving sustainability in different fields [7]. All the cases chosen were in the new developing spots in
Cairo creating new communities and providing the expansion in the desert.
The three campuses were studied through observations, transect walk, filling a checklist and online
questionnaires for different users to fill. The following analysis are based on all the previous methods used.
6
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
over the year. Most of the used fertilizers are synthetic. Only a small amount of compost is used. None of
the plants on site are salvaged from the pre-constructed site. The used grass is Brisbane 10 which is from
America but it is accommodated to the site. Some parts are having the same grass, although it should be
Tifway to overcome the intense pedestrian movement Fig. 4.
Fig. 4 On the right, Brisbane with high pedestrian movement and on the left side without
movement (The researcher)
7
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
Most of users notice the growth of edible vegetation on campus and the efficient methods of irrigation
as measures of ecological sustainability of landscape.
As a sustainability measure, compost is produced locally onsite. Plants pruning remains, dead
vegetation and unused fruits are used in the production of local compost for AUC. Chemical tests were
performed to ensure the high quality of the resulting compost. Productivity of landscape was one of the
measures to be applied. Different fruits are grown on campus e.g. Oranges, Grapefruit, Apricots, lemons,
dates from palms…etc. These fruits are of high quality according to chemical tests performed. They are not
used neither as food products for campus nor as resource to be sold on campus. These products are
intended to be directly used by campus users to create a sense of territoriality on campus. The available
nursery on campus covers more than 50% of the vegetative needs onsite, but it misses a green house.
Green roofs are only applied on RISE building as a model, providing edible vegetables on a very
small scale that don’t need deep medium for growth Fig. 5. Over the faculty lounge, the roof is also planted
but not edible species. No considerable vegetation were salvaged only limited amount of bushes are kept
onsite.
Applied
Partially applied
Not applicable
8
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
Applied in all
High partially applied (i.e.2 full cases &1partial case OR 2 applied & 1 not applied case)
Medium partially applied (i.e.1 full case & 2partial cases OR 1full case & 2 not applied cases OR
1full case & 1 not applied case & 1 partial case)
Low partially applied (3 partial cases OR 2 partial & 1 not applied case)
Not applicable
CONCLUSION
Table 3 Final Checklist and its application and aggregation according to studied cases
Total
GUC
AUC
BUE
Vegetation
The used vegetation types have an ecological benefit and supports the
ecosystem. (air quality- water consumption and quality- biodiversity- soil
quality)
The vegetation types are checked to be not of the invasive types for the site
and won't turn into one by time.
Some vegetation types are used to reduce the heat island effect in parking.
9
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
Keeping enough distances from hardscapes, structures that could affect the
vegetation.
Use of relevant native plants on site fulfilling the required design intentions
Abandoning the use of invasive vegetative species (spread very fast- produces
large amount of seeds- cause harm to other living organisms)
Reduce use of peat and use planting media and pots from renewable energy.
Using species that could tolerate dry climates and low maintenance for green
roofs (succulents and sedums)
The provision of vegetation types that support wildlife habitat: (open canopy-
flowers or fruits-branches near the ground- diversity of species- disturbance)
SITES rating system added point [8]: Plant at the optimal season for your
region to reduce or eliminate the need for watering for establishment.
SITES rating system added point [8]: If turf grasses are to be used, they
should be regionally appropriate and minimize post-establishment
requirements for irrigation.
SITES rating system added point [8]: Provision of VSPZ to protect healthy
and special vegetation and soil onsite
SITES rating system added point [8]: Vegetation types are used to provide
shade to east, west, and southern facades to decrease the cooling loads of the
building
10
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
SITES rating system added point [8]: Recycle excess vegetation generated
during land-clearing to produce compost, mulch, erosion-protection measures,
or other site amenities.
SITES rating system added point [8]: Minimize the use of synthetic fertilizers
and pesticides that have a dangerous impact on human health or environment
SITES rating system added point [8]: Identify and select plants from
nurseries that actively implement better business practices to reduce damage
to the environment and conserve resources
Availability of variety of vegetation with different age ranges which reduces the
impact of diseases and facilitates the tracking of defects.
Keeping enough distances from hardscapes, structures that could affect the
vegetation.
In all the studied cases, the introduction of vegetation on site takes place during the construction
phase to avoid the presumed extra costs. Such trend has a negative impact on many species
(sometimes deadly), and hence causing both: environmental and economic losses. Accordingly,
strict regulations should be set, prohibiting growing plants during the constructions phase.
Chemicals are still widely used for fertilizers and pest management. Limited use of bio-enemies are
used in AUC to defeat some pests.
The absence of the documented information regarding invasive species in Egypt.
In all studied cases, phytoremediation concept wasn’t applied due to the absence of large water
features that could make use of the filtering properties by plants.
The revival of limited wildlife or species on campus is not taken into consideration. However, good
and healthy environment may haphazardly support biodiversity.
11
Ecocity World Summit 2015 Proceedings
FURTHER RESEARCH
Further research could be applied to highlight and define list of invasive species for Egypt. This
prevents the hazardous effect on the ecosystem.
Research need to be performed on people perception and awareness regarding sustainable
measures of landscape.
Detailed research and accurate calculations is needed to adapt the “SITES” rating system to the
Egyptian case and develop the resulting checklist for more defined results.
REFERENCES
[1] Calkins, M. (2012 kindle version). The Sustainable Sites Handbook: A Complete Guide to the
Principles, Strategies, and Best Practices for Sustainable Landscapes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Hoboken,
New Jersey.
[2] Thompson, J. W., & Sorvig, K. (2007). Sustainable Landscape Construction : A Guide to Green
Building Outdoors (2nd Edition). Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
[3] Manske, L. L., & Larson, J. C. (2000). Xeriscape Ornamental Perennial Grass Trial for Low Water Use
Landscaping. North Dakota: Dickinson Research Extension Center.
[4] Dober, R. P. (2000). Campus landscape functions, forms, features. John Wiley & Sons.
[5] Carol R. Johnson Assosciates. (2012). Campus Landscape Vision and Site Standards. Tennesse,
Knoxville: The University of Tennesse Knoxville.
[6] Turenscape. (2014, July 19). Turenscape. Retrieved from A Chinese landscape firm:
http://www.turenscape.com/english/projects/project.php?id=324
[7] American University in Cairo. (2013, November). Our Carbon Footprint 2.0. Cairo: American University
in Cairo.
[8] The Sustainable SITES Initiative. (2014). SITES v2 Rating System for Sustainable land design and
development.
12