Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exercise Revision
Exercise Revision
PART 1: T/F
1. Government increases spending and it leads to flatter IS curve.
FALSE
We have IS function
−(1−MPC ) C + I+G−MPC . T
r= Y+
b b
In which:
b: measures the sensitivity of investment to a change in interest rate
C : autonomous expenditure of household
I : autonomous investment of firms
T : autonomous tax or lump sum tax
G : autonomous government spending
MPC : marginal propensity to consumption
According to the function, government spending is exogenous factor, which means the
slope of IS curve is not affected by it. Therefore, if government increases spending, IS
curve will shift rightward and the slope of it remains unchanged.
the statement is false
A B
r
IS1
IS0
YA Y
YB
B
A
r
IS1 IS0
Y
YB YA
3. According to IS-LM model, fiscal policy is neutral in the long run.
FALSE
In case of expansionary fiscal policy:
r
LM1
LM0
C
rC
B
rA A
IS1
IS0
Y
YA
(1). When expansionary policy is applied IS shifts rightward from IS0 to IS1
(2). In short-run new equilibrium moves from A to B . Compare A to B, we have: r
increases, Y increases
(3). In the long-run, as the new output in greater than potential output (Y B> YA);
therefore, price will increase, which shifts the LM to the left (LM 0 to LM1). The new
equilibrium is now point C.
Compare A to C, we have: r increases, Y remains unchanged.
Expansionary fiscal policy changes interest rate in the long-run.
In the case of contractionary fiscal policy
r
LM0
A LM1
rA
rC
C
IS0
IS1
Y
YA
(1). When contractionary policy is applied IS shifts leftward from IS0 to IS1 .
(2). In short-run, new equilibrium moves from A to B . Compare A to B, we have: r
decreases, Y decreases
(3). In the long-run, as the new output in smaller than potential output (YB< YA);
therefore, price will decrease, which shifts the LM to the right (LM0 to LM1). The new
equilibrium is now point C.
Compare A to C, we have: r decreases, Y remains unchanged.
Contractionary fiscal policy changes interest rate in the long-run.
In conclusion, fiscal policy is non-neutral in the long run as it changes the interest rate.
the statement is false.
4. According to IS-LM model, monetary policy is neutral in the long run.
TRUE
In the case of expansionary monetary policy:
r
LM0
A LM1
rA
rB B
IS0
YA YB
(1). When expansionary monetary policy is applied LM shifts rightward from LM0 to
LM1.
(2). In short-run, new equilibrium moves from A to B . Compare A to B, we have: r
decreases, Y increases
(3). In the long-run, as the new output in greater than potential output (Y B> YA);
therefore, price will increase, which shifts the LM to the left (LM 1 to LM0). The new
equilibrium is now point A. Then we have: r remains unchanged, Y remains unchanged.
Expansionary monetary policy does not change interest rate in the long-run.
In the case of contractionary monetary policy:
r
LM1
B LM0
rB
rA
A
IS0
YB YA
(1). When contractionary monetary policy is applied LM shifts leftward from LM0 to
LM1
(2). In short-run, new equilibrium moves from A to B . Compare A to B, we have: r
increases, Y decreases
(3). In the long-run, as the new output is smaller than potential output (YB< YA);
therefore, price will decrease, which shifts the LM to the right (LM1 to LM0). The new
equilibrium is now point A. Then we have: r remains unchanged, Y remains unchanged.
Contractionary monetary policy does not change interest rate in the long-run.
In conclusion, monetary policy is neutral in the long run as it does not change the interest
rate.
The statement is true
LM0
C
rC
B
rA A
IS1
IS0
Y
YA
(1). When expansionary policy is applied IS shifts rightward from IS0 to IS1.
(2). In short-run, new equilibrium moves from A to B. Compare A to B, we have: r
increases, Y increases
(3). In the long-run, as the new output in greater than potential output (Y B> YA);
therefore, price will increase, which shifts the LM to the left (LM 0 to LM1). The new
equilibrium is now point C. Compare A to C, we have: r increases, Y remains unchanged.
Therefore, expansionary fiscal policy only changes interest rate in the long run
The statement is false
A LM1
rA
rC
C
IS0
IS1
Y
YA
(1). when contractionary policy is applied IS shifts leftward from IS0 to IS1
(2). In short-run, new equilibrium moves from A to B . Compare A to B, we have:
r decreases, Y decreases
(3). In the long-run, as the new output in smaller than potential output (YB< YA);
therefore, price will decrease, which shifts the LM to the right (LM0 to LM1). The
new equilibrium is now point C. Compare A to C, we have: r decreases, Y remains
unchanged.
Contractionary fiscal policy changes interest rate in the long-run.
the statement is false
A LM1
rA
rB B
IS0
YA YB
(1). when expansionary monetary policy is applied LM shifts rightward from
LM0 to LM1
(2). In short-run, new equilibrium moves from A to B. Compare A to B, we have: r
decreases, Y increases
(3). In the long-run, as the new output in greater than potential output (Y B> YA);
therefore, price will increase, which shifts the LM to the left (LM 1 to LM0). The
new equilibrium is now point A. Then we have: r remains unchanged, Y remains
unchanged.
Expansionary monetary policy does not change interest rate and output in the long-
run.
the statement is true
LM1
B LM0
rB
rA
A
IS0
YB YA
9. Government increases spending and Central bank decreases reserve rate requirement
then output definitely rises.
Assume that the economy is initially at the potential output (Y0)
(1) When the Central Bank decreases the discount rate (expansionary monetary policy
is applied): LM curve shifts rightward (from LM0 to LM1).
The government increases spending (expansionary fiscal policy is applied): IS curve
shifts rightward (from IS0 to IS1).
(2) In the short run: after the shifts of 2 curves, the equilibrium of the economy moves
from A to B. Compare B to A: Y increases while r is ambiguous as it depends on
the magnitude of the shifts in 2 curves.
Since the new output is greater than potential one (Y1>Y0) then price level (P) increases.
IS shifts by a IS shifts by a IS shifts by the
greater distance smaller distance same distance as
than LM than LM LM
r r r LM2
LM2 LM2
LM0 LM0
C LM0
LM1
C LM1
r2 LM1
r1
C
r2
r1 B
r0 A B
A A r0
r0
B
IS1 r1
IS1
IS0 IS0 IS1
IS0
0 0 Y1 Y 0
Y0 Y1 Y Y0 Y0 Y1 Y
(3). In the long run: Since the new output is greater than potential one (Y 1>Y0) then price
level (P) increases. Increase of P shifts LM to the left from LM 1 to LM2 (as output in the
long run will come back to the potential output). The new equilibrium of the economy
moves from B to C. Compare C to A, we have r increases, Y remains unchanged.
Conclusion: In the long run, when central bank decreases discount rate and government
increases spending, r (interest rate) increases while Y (output) remains unchanged.
⇨ The statement is false in the long run
10. Government increases spending and Central bank sells government bonds then
interest rate definitely rises.
⇨ The statement is true in the long-run (Giống câu 9)
11. Government increases tax and Central bank buys government bonds then output
definitely decreases.
Assume that the economy is initially at the potential output (Y0)
(1) When the Central Bank buys government bonds (expansionary monetary policy is
applied): LM curve shifts rightward (from LM0 to LM1).
The government increases tax (contractionary fiscal policy is applied): IS curve
shifts leftward (from IS0 to IS1).
(2) In the short run: after the shifts of 2 curves, the equilibrium of the economy moves
from A to B. Compare B to A: r decreases while Y is ambiguous as it depends on
the magnitude of the shifts in 2 curves.
IS shifts by a greater IS shifts by a smaller IS shifts by the same
distance than LM distance than LM distance as LM
r r r Y1
LM0
LM1 LM0
LM0 LM1
LM1
LM2
A
r0 r0 A
r0 A
B r2 C
r1
IS0 IS0
r2 C r1 B r1 B
IS0
IS1 IS1 IS1
0 Y1 Y0 0 Y 0
Y Y0 Y1 Y0 Y
(3) Case 1: Since the new output is smaller than potential one (Y 0>Y1) then price level
(P) decreases.
In the long run: Decrease of P shifts LM to the right from LM 1 to LM2 (as output
in the long run will come back to the potential output). The new equilibrim of the
economy moves from B to C. Compare C to A, we have r decreases, Y remains
unchanged.
The same pattern is applied for case 2 and 3
Conclusion: In the long run, when central bank decreases discount rate and government
increases spending, r decreases and Y is unchanged.
The statement is false
12. Government increases tax and Central bank raises discount rate then interest rate
definitely decreases. (contrac+contrac long run)
.
Assume that the economy is initially at the potential output (Y0)
(1) When the Central Bank raises the discount rate (contractionary monetary policy is
applied): LM curve shifts leftward (from LM0 to LM1).
The government increases tax (contractionary fiscal policy is applied): IS curve shifts
leftward (from IS0 to IS1).
(2) In the short run: after the shifts of 2 curves, the equilibrium of the economy moves
from A to B. Compare B to A: Y decreases while r is ambiguous as it depends on
the magnitude of the shifts in 2 curves.
Since the new output is smaller than potential one (Y0>Y1) then price level (P) decreases.
IS shifts by a IS shifts by a IS shifts by the
greater distance smaller distance same distance as
than LM than LM LM
r r r
r2 r1 C
r2 C C
0 0 Y1 Y 0
Y1 Y0 Y Y0 Y1 Y0 Y
(3) In the long run: Decrease of P shifts LM to the right from LM 1 to LM2 (as output
in the long run will come back to the potential output). The new equilibrium of the
economy moves from B to C. Compare C to A, we have r decreases, Y remains
unchanged.
Conclusion: In the long run, when central bank raises discount rate and
government increases tax, r (interest rate) decreases while Y (output) remains
unchanged.
⇨ The statement is true in the long-run
r2 r2
r1 r1
Y1 Y2 Y Y1 Y2 Y
LM function
k M
r= Y−
h Ph
⇔ ( LM ) r=0.01Y −5 (2)
{ r 0=6( %)
Y 0=1100(units)
b) Assume that G increases by 50 units. Calculate new equilibrium r and Y of
the economy. How does the IS curve shift? Calculate the degree of crowding-
out effect in this case.
G increases by 50 units we have new IS function:
( IS 1 ) : r=−0.01 Y +19 (3)
From (2) and (3) we have new equilibrium point
{ r 1 =7(% )
Y 1=1200(units)
{r 2=5.5
Y 2=1150
{ r 3=7.25
Y 3=975
{r=−0.01Y ⇔{
+13 r =8( %)
0
r =0.04 Y −12 Y =500(units)
0
b. Find the value of G so that Y = 600. How does the IS curve shift? Calculate the
degree of crowding-out effect in this case.
Replace Y1=600 into the LM function (2) r = 12
Replace r1=12, Y=600 into (IS) function (1)
40+100+G−0.8× 100
12=−0.01× 600+
20
⇔ G= 300
we have new IS function (IS1) :r =−0.01Y + 18 (3)
The IS curve shifts upward by 5 units.
Replace r 0 into (IS1) function, we have Y1’=1000
The degree of crowding-out effect= Y1’- Y1= 1000-600=400
c. In the condition of question (b), if Government wants to keep the interest rate
remains unchanged, how should the monetary policy be implemented? How does
the LM curve shift?
Replace r 0 into (IS1) function, we have Y1’=1000
M1
Denote M1 as the nominal money supply, we have MDr =MS r ⇔ 2 Y −50=
P
⇔ M 1=3200
∆ M =M 1−M =3200−1200=2000
Central should implement expansionary monetary policy by increasing the money
supply by 2000 units so as to keep the interest rate remain unchanged.
In this case, we have new LM function (LM1): ¿ 0.04 Y −32
the LM curve will shift downward by 20 units.
d. Given money multiplier = 4, what should Central bank do in order to implement
monetary policy in question (c) by using open market operation?
We have: ∆ M =mM × ∆ B ∆ B=2000: 4=500
Central bank should buy Government bonds which worth 500 units.
e. Find the equation of AD curve.
24
- We have LM function: r =0.04 Y − (*)
P
24
- From (1) and (*), we have: 0.04 Y − =¿−0.01Y +13
P
480
AD function: (AD): Y = +260
P
Exercise 5: Consider a closed economy that is characterized by the following equations
in the short-run:
C = 100 + 0,8(Y - T); I = 200 - 10r; G = 120; T = 50 + 0,25Y
MB = 200; MD = Y – 25r; P = 1
a. Find the equations for IS and LM curve given equilibrium output of the economy
is 800.
−( 1−MPC ) C + I+G−MPC . T
We have IS function: r = Y+
b b
−( 1−0.8 ) 100+200+120−0.8(50+0.25 Y )
⇔ r= Y+
10 10
⇔ (IS): r =−0.04 Y +38 (1)
Replace Y=800 into IS function r=6
Replace r=6 into MD function M=650
We have LM function (LM): r =0.04 Y −26 (2)
b. Government increases spending by 4 units. Find the change in equilibrium income and
interest rate. Calculate the degree of crowding-out effect in this case.
Gnew = 124
−( 1−0.8 ) 100+200+124−0.8(50+0.25 Y )
New IS function: (IS1)r = Y+
10 10
⇔ (IS1): r =−0.04 Y +38.4 (3)
From (2) and (3) we have new equilibrium point
{ r 1=6.2(% )
Y 1=805(units)
'
Replace r=6 into (IS1) function, we have Y 1=810
The degree of crowding-out effect= 810-805=5
{ r 2=6.16(%)
Y 2=804 (units)
As Y 2 <Y 1 The impact of decreasing lump sum tax is smaller than increasing
government spending.
d. Given money multiplier = 2, what is the response of Central bank using open market
operation in order to keep interest rate to be stable after the policy in question (b)?
'
Replace r=6 into (IS1) function, we have Y 1=810
Denote M1 as the nominal money supply, we have MDr =MS r ⇔ M 1=660
∆ M =M 1−M =660−650=10
∆ M =mM × ∆ B ∆ B=10:2=5
Central Bank should buy government bonds which worth 5 units
CHAP 1:
Ex 1: C=200 + 0.75(Y-T); I=225 – 25r; G = 75; T = 100; M = 1000; P = 2; MD = Y-
100r
a. Find the equilibrium value of r and Y
b. G=? so that Y = 1500
−( 1−MPC ) C + I +G−MPC . T
a. IS function: r = Y+
b b
−( 1−0.75 ) 200+225+75−0.75 ×100
⇔ r= Y+
25 25
⇔(IS): r =−0.01Y + 17 (1)
k M
LM function: r = h Y − Ph
⇔ r =0.01Y −5 (2)
From (1) and (2), we have equilibrium equation:
{r=−0.01Y ⇔{
+17 r =6( %)0
r=0.01 Y −5 Y =1100(units)
0
{r=0.025 ⇔{
r=−0.01Y +39 r =24(%)
0
Y −13.5 Y =1500(units)
0
b. Find the equilibrium price in the long run if the natural level of output is 1000
Replace Y=1000 into (AD) function
500 10
1000= +850 → P=
P 3
Ex 4: C = 40 + 0.8(Y-T); T = 100; I = 100-20r; G = 200; M = 1200; P = 2; MD = 2Y –
50r
a. Find the output and interest rate at equilibrium
−( 1−MPC ) C + I +G−MPC . T
a. IS function: r = Y+
b b
−( 1−0.8 ) 40+100+ 200−0.8 × 100
⇔ r= Y+
20 20
⇔(IS): r =−0.01Y + 13 (1)
k M
LM function: r = h Y − Ph
⇔ r =0.04 Y −12 (2)
From (1) and (2), we have equilibrium equation:
{r=−0.01Y ⇔{
+13 r =8( %)
0
r =0.04 Y −12 Y =500(units)
0
{r=−0.01Y ⇔{
+18 r =12(%)
1
r =0.04 Y −12 Y =600(units)
1
LM0
r
IS1
IS0
B
A
r* BP
0 Y0 Y1 Y
6. According to Mundell-Fleming model, trade policy is ineffective in changing
output in a small, open, perfect capital mobility economy with fixed exchange system.
Like expansionary fiscal policy in fixed
LM0
r
IS1 LM1
IS0
B
A C
r* BP
LM1
r
IS1 IS0
LM0
B
r* C A BP
0 Y2 Y1 Y0 Y
(1) LM curve shifts to the left from LM0 to LM1. Equilibrium moves from A to B.
(2) B lies above BP, interest rate increase (r>r*) that leads to appreciation of domestic
currency, inducing massive capital inflows. Therefore, net export decreases.
Then, IS curve shifts leftward from IS0 to IS1 until the equilibrium is at r*.
Equilibrium of the economy moves from B to C.
(3) r remains unchanged, Y decreases, e increases, NX decreases.
⇨ In Mundell – Fleming model with flexible exchange rate system, monetary policy
is more effective than traded policy in changing output
⇨ The statement is true
LM1
r LM0
IS0
B
A
r* BP
0 Y1 Y0 Y
(1). LM curve shifts leftward from LM0 to LM1. The new equilibrium moves from A to
B
(2). B lies above BP line, interest rate increases (r>r*) that leads to domestic currency
appreciation, inducing massive capital inflow. Therefore, central bank will increase
money supply to maintain fixed exchange rate.
Then, LM curve will shifts rightward from LM1 to LM0 until it reaches r* again.
Equilibrium moves from B to A
(3). Y, r, e, nx remain unchanged.
9. In Mundell-Fleming model with floating exchange rate system, if the IS curve is
steeper than LM curve then fiscal policy is more effective than monetary policy.
10. In Mundell-Fleming model with fixed exchange rate system, if the LM curve is
steeper than IS curve then monetary policy is more effective than fiscal policy.
CHAPTER 3: AGGREGATE SUPPLY AND PHILLIPS CURVE
1. According to sticky price model, proportion of flexible price firms increases then
AS curve becomes flatter.
(1−s) . α e (1−s). α
We have AS function: P = .Y +[P − .Y ]
s s
In which:
1-s: proportion of flexible price firms
s: proportion of fixed price firm
α : measures the sensitivity of price to the difference in real income and expected
income
Y: real income
Y : expected income
Y Y
AS curve when there are many AS curve when there are many
flexible price firms in the market. fixed price firms in the market.
2. According to sticky price model, proportion of sticky price firms increases then
AS curve becomes steeper.
3. According to Phillips curve model, an increase in the oil price in the short run will
lead to the downward shift of the economy to a lower Phillips curve.
- A rise in the price of oil would lead to higher petrol prices and higher transport
costs. - All firms would see some rise in costs. As the most important commodity,
higher oil prices often lead to cost-push inflation => SRAS shifts upward or
leftward.
P SRAS1
SRAS0
P1
B 1 B
P0 A 0 A
AD SRPC1
SRPC0
Y1 Y0 Y u0 u1 u
P
SRAS0
P1 B
A
P0
AD1
AD0
Y0 Y1 y
πP SRAS1
SRAS0
P
π1 1 B
A
AD
Y0 Y1
SRAS
A
A
P0 B
P1 B
SRPC
AD0
AD1 Y
U
YA
UA UB
6. According to Phillips curve model, in the short run, expansionary fiscal policy will
lead to the upward move to the left of the economy along a Phillips curve.
7. According to Phillips curve model, a rise in expected inflation rate in the short run
will lead to the downward shift of the economy to a lower Phillips curve.
We have Phillip function
π=−βu+(π ¿ ¿ e + β . un + v)¿
e
π=π −β ( u−u n ) +v
In which :
π : real inflation rate
1. Keynes’s conjecture
- 0<MPC<1
- APC decreases as Y increase:
- Y is the primary determination of consumption
2. Stagnation
- to Keynes, Y increases APC decreases APS increases saving increases
investment increases capital increases output increases. Y increases while MPC
decreases Surplus in goods stagnation
3. 2 shortcomings
(1). Short-run : APC decreases as Y increases ( consumption curve straight line , start
from vertical intersection)
Long- run: APC remain unchanged, ( consumption curve straight line, upward sloping,
start from origin)
(2). Keynes only sees the importance of Y, other factors should be appeared
II. IRVING FISHER & INTER-TEMPORAL CHOICE
1. Assumptions
(1). A person lives in 2 period lives
1st: Y1, C1
2nd: Y2, C2
(2). Consume all Y on 2nd period
2. Budget constraint
- Period 1: S1=Y1-C1
- Period 2: C2= Y2+ S1(1+r)
* C2+ (1+r)C1=Y2+ (1+r)Y1
C2 Y2
C 1+ =Y 1 +
1+r 1+ r
budget constraint: C 2=−( 1+r ) C1 + [ Y 2 +(1+ r)Y 1 ]
1. Life cycle hypothesis of Franco Modigliani could explain the decline of APC in
the long-run when income rises.
1 R
In life cycle hypothesis: C = .W + .Y = α .W + β . Y
T T
α .W
⇨ APC = +β
Y
In which:
T: remaining years of living
R: remaining years of working
W: wealth
Y: annual income until retirement
1 R
In the long run, α ( ) and β ( )change insignificantly
T T
When income rises, wealth will also increasesby the same ratio. Therefore, APC is
constant in the long-run.
⇨ The statement is false.
2. Life cycle hypothesis of Franco Modigliani could explain why APC is stable in
the long-run when income rises.
(like ex1) the statement is true
Ex6: Given production function Y = 3K1/2L1/2. Saving rate = 20%, depreciation rate =
10%, population growth rate = 5%/year.
a) Calculate the value of k*, y*, i*, c*.
LM1
LM2
B LM0
rB
C
rC
rA
A
IS1
IS0
Y
YB YA