Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Labour Economics (BSC) - Fall 2019 Exam
Labour Economics (BSC) - Fall 2019 Exam
Labour Economics (BSC) - Fall 2019 Exam
Instructions: You have 2 hours to complete the exam. You can use the booklet of papers provided to you to derive
the solutions, but the answers need to be reported on the answer sheet. There is only one correct answer for each
question. You obtain a point of 1 for each correct answer and a penalty of -0.25 for incorrect answers. You can use
only a calculator, but your phone cannot be used as a calculator. Any attempt of cheating will result in the immediate
SHORT QUESTIONS
2. According to the model of efficiency wages (Shapiro and Stiglitz, 1984), an employer finds it optimal to pay a
Solution: In the model of efficiency wages, output depends on workers’ effort which is only imperfectly
observed by the employer and is costly to the worker. Employers might then find optimal to offer a higher
wage, such that if the worker shrinks and looses her job she can only earn a lower wage in an alternative job.
Correct answer is c.
3. Everything else being equal, individuals with a lower discount rate will:
Labour Economics (BSc) Academic year 2019-2020
Solution: The higher the discount rate, the greater the preference for immediate consumption over delayed
consumption. Given that acquiring education has immediate direct and indirect costs, individuals with a
lower discount rate will be more likely to acquire education. Correct answer is a.
(a) Always
(b) Never
Solution: Immigration reduces the employment of natives only in case immigrants are substitutes to natives.
Even in that case, the effect is not one-to-one as new jobs are anyway created. Correct answer is c.
LONG QUESTIONS
1. Consider an individual whose preferences are described by U = C 1/2 L2 , where C denotes consumption and L
corresponds to leisure. The average price of the consumption good is p = 2, the hourly wage is w = 4 and the
amount of available time is t = 24. The individual has no source of non-labour income (v = 0).
(a) What is the slope of the budget constraint faced by the individual?
(a) 4
(b) -4
(c) 2
(d) -2
Solution: The slope of the budget constraint is equal to −w/p = −2. The correct answer is d.
(b) What is the optimal amount of consumption, leisure and hours worked chosen by the individual?
constraint (-2). This leads to a relatonship between consumption and leisure of the form C = 21 L, which
we plot in the budget contraint (2C + 4L = 4 ∗ 24). Solving by L, we obtain L = 19.2, from which we
(c) How would your answer to question (b) change if the individual now receives a source of non-labour income
equal to v = 10?
Solution: The utility function and the slope of the budget constraint have not changed from the previous
1
point, hence the relationship C = 2L is still valid. We plug this into the new budget constraint
(2C + 4L = 4 ∗ 24 + 10) to obtain L = 21.2 and consequently C = 10.6 and H = 2.8. The correct
answer is a.
(d) How would you interpret the result on labour supply obtained in point (c) in terms of income and substitution
effects?
(a) The income effect leads to a reduction in labour supply, while the substitution effect has the opposite
(b) The income effect leads to a reduction in labour supply, while the substitution effect has the opposite
(c) The income effect leads to a reduction in labour supply, while there is no substitution effect as the wage
(d) The income and substitution effect perfectly compensate each other
(e) Returning to the situation initially described in point (a) (i.e. v = 0), what happens to the optimal choice
of the individual in terms of consumption, leisure and hours worked if the wage rate now rises to w = 8?
Solution: With the new wage rate, the slope of the budget constaint changes to (−w/p = 4) which is
(C = L). This is plugged in the new budget constraint (2C + 8L = 8 ∗ 24) to obtain the solutions to the
(f) How would you interpret the result on labour supply obtained in point (e) in terms of income and substitution
effects?
(a) The income effect leads the individual to work less, while the substitution effect had the opposite effect.
(b) The income effect leads the individual to work less, while the substitution effect had the opposite effect.
(d) The income and substitution effect perfectly compensate each other
Solution: The income and substitution effect perfectly compensate each other in this case, while con-
(g) Returning to the situation initially described in point (a) (i.e. v = 0 and w = 4), consider that the government
now wants to introduce a subsidy to encourage employment. The interventions consists of a subsidy equal to
2 for each hour worked up to a maximum of 4 hours worked per day (i.e. if an individual works 5 hours, the
subsidy is obtained only for the first 4 hours worked). How would the budget constraint of the individual
(a) The budget constraint will not be affected by the introduction of the subsidy
(b) The entire budget constraint will move outwards by an amount equal to the subsidy (i.e. 2) and be
(c) The budget constraint will present a kink for a level of L = 20. For levels of L < 20 it will be paralllel
(d) The budget constraint will present a kink for a level of L = 20. For levels of L > 20 it will be paralllel
(h) Derive the new optimal levels of consumption, lesiure and hours worked after the introduction of the subsidy
for an individual that before the introduction of the subsidy was working more than 4 hours (remember that
w = 4, p = 2 and v = 0)
Labour Economics (BSc) Academic year 2019-2020
Solution: For an individual that before the introduction of the subsidy was working more than four
hours (corresponding to the individual optimization choices obtained in point b), the new budget con-
straint will look like 2C + 4L = 4 ∗ 6 + 20 ∗ 4. The MRS and the slope of the budget constraint will be
unchanged, leading to a relationship between consumption and leisure of the form C = 12 L. Solving the
optimization problem leads to L = 20.8 and therefore C = 10.4 and H = 3.2. The correct answer is b.
(i) How would your answer to point (h) change if the the subsidy was to apply to the first 6 hours of work, so
that the individual was working less than the subsidised hours of work before the introduction of the subsidy?
Solution: For an individual that before the introduction of the subsidy was working less than six hours,
the new budget constraint will look like 2C + 6L = 6 ∗ 24. The MRS is unchanged, but the slope of
the busget constraunt becomes −w/p = −3, leading to a relationship between consuption and leisure of
the form of C = 43 L. Substituting this into the new budget constraint, we obtain an optimal solution
(j) How the introduction of a subsidy for the first six hours of work is going to affect the distribution of individuals
(a) There is not going to be any change in the distribution of individuals in terms of their choice of the
(b) There is going to be a change in the distribution, which however cannot be predicted from the theory
Solution: The introduction of a subsidy for the first 6 hours of work is going to change the distribution
of individuals along the number of hours they work. Individuals that were working more than 6 hours,
will only experience an income effect that will lead them to reduce labour supply. Individuals that
were working more than 6 hours will experience an income and substitution effect, with a priori unclear
effects on labour supply. Finally, some individuals that were not working before the introduction of the
Labour Economics (BSc) Academic year 2019-2020
subsidy might now decide to enter the labour market. These movements will create a mass of individuals
2. Consider a firm using only labour as input for production and producing a unique good which it sells at a price
p = 1 in a competitive market. The firm’s production function is given by Y = 25Lw − 41 L2w + 25Lb − 14 L2b with a
for black workers. The firm can hire both white and black workers, which have the same MPL. The wage rate is
(a) What is the optimal level of black (Lb ) and white (Lw ) workers that the firm would hire?
(a) Lb = 30, Lw = 30
(b) Lb = 30, Lw = 20
(c) Lb = 10, Lw = 10
(d) Lb = 20, Lw = 20
Solution: The optimal level of employment is obtained by equating the MPL with the prevailing wage
rate (25 − 21 L = 15) and solving by L. This gives an optimal level of employment for black and white
(b) What is the profit that the firm will make from the hiring of black workers?
(a) 100
(b) 200
(c) 300
(d) 400
Solution: Profit level from black workers is obtained using the profit formula π = pY − wLb = 25 ∗ 20 −
1 2
4 20 − 15 ∗ 20 = 100. The correct answer is therefore a.
(c) What happens to the optimal level of employment of black and white workers if the employer develops a
prejudice against black workers, whereby the employer will act as if the marginal product of labour for black
(a) Lb = 14, Lw = 24
(b) Lb = 16, Lw = 20
(c) Lb = 18, Lw = 20
(d) Lb = 14, Lw = 20
Labour Economics (BSc) Academic year 2019-2020
Solution: The new MPL for black workers is going to be equal to M P Lb = 25 − 12 Lb − 3. To find the
optimal level of employment for black workers, this will need to be equated to the prevailing wage rate
(always equal to 15) and will result into Lb = 14. The MPL and the prevailing wage for white workers
are instead unchanged, so the optimal level of employment will still be Lw = 20. The correct answer is
d.
(d) How much profit does the prejudiced employer now make out of black workers (i.e. with the employment
level found in point (c) for black workers and keeping wages equal to 15)?
(a) 87
(b) 91
(c) 100
(d) 106
Solution: Profit level for black workers is obtained with the formula π = pY − wLb = 25 ∗ 14 − 14 142 −
(e) How much the wage rate for black workers needs to fall in order to guarantee their initial level of employment
of black workers (obtained in point (a))? Hint: remember that they are subject to a prejudice equal to 3
(a) 11
(b) 12
(c) 13
(d) 14
Solution: The initial level of employment for black workers was equal to Lb = 20. In order to find the
wage rate that will guarantee this employment level with a prejudiced employer, we need to solve the
equation 25 − 12 Lb − 3 = W with Lb = 20. Thi leads to a wage rate equal to w = 12. The correct answer
is b
(f) What is the profit level that the employer will make out of black workers under the wage and employment
(a) 80
(b) 100
(c) 140
(d) 160
Labour Economics (BSc) Academic year 2019-2020
Solution: Applying the profit function to the new wage rate for black workers w = 12 with a resulting
level of employment Lb = 20, we obtain a profit equal to 160. The correct answer is therefore d
(g) Maintaining the wage level obtained in point (e) for black workers, immagine that the employer now removes
any prejudice against them. How many black workers would now hire?
(a) 22
(b) 24
(c) 26
(d) 28
Solution: Without prejudice, the employer will simply equate the M P Lb = 25 − 21 Lb ) to the new wage
level (w = 12). This will lead to an optimal level of employment of black workers Lb = 26. The correct
answer is c
(h) What is the profit level that the employer will now make out of black workers (under the employment and
(a) 169
(b) 171
(c) 173
(d) 175
Solution: Pluging into the profit functions the relevant levels of employment Lb = 26 and wage w = 12,
(i) Is the employer making more profits if she discriminates or does not discriminate against black workers?
(a) Discriminate
Solution: The employer can always increase profits by removing the prejudice against black workers,
no matter if the adjustment takes place via employment (point c) or wage (point e). Correct answer is
b.
(j) How does the employment level of white worker is affected by discrimination against black workers?
(a) Employment of white workers goes up when the employer discriminates against black workers
(b) Employment of white workers goes down when the employer discriminates against black workers
Labour Economics (BSc) Academic year 2019-2020
(c) Employment of white workers is not affected by discrimination against black workers
Solution: The optimal employment level for white workers is always determined by equating their MPL
with the prevailing wage. Hence, it is not affected by discrimination against black workers. Correct
answer is c.
Labour Economics (BSc) Academic year 2019-2020
Please do not turn over your sheet until all students have
Good luck!