See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/345416702

Assessing the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams during COVID-19 for online

learning: A students’ perceptive

Chapter · October 2020

CITATIONS READS

0 2,055

1 author:

Divyapriya Karthikeyan
VIT University
4 PUBLICATIONS   16 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Assessing the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams during COVID-19 for online learning: A students’ perceptive View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Divyapriya Karthikeyan on 07 November 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Divyapriya, Research Scholar
School of Bio Sciences & Technology, VIT, Vellore-632014, India

[1] Kwisnek, V.F., 2004. Assessing the effectiveness of e-
learning. In Instructional Technologies: Cognitive
Aspects of Online Programs (pp. 192-220). IGI Global.
[2] Maeroff, G.I., 2004. A classroom of one: How online
learning is changing our schools and colleges.
Macmillan.
[3] Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W., 1999.
Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer
conferencing in higher education. The internet and
higher education, 2(2-3), pp.87-105.
[4] Poston, J., Apostel, S. and Richardson, K., 2020. Using
Microsoft Teams to Enhance Engagement and
and Easy.
[5] Larreamendy-Joerns, J. and Leinhardt, G., 2006. Going
the distance with online education. Review of
educational research, 76(4), pp.567-605.
[6] Kim, K.J. and Bonk, C.J., 2006. The future of online
teaching and learning in higher education. Educause
quarterly, 29(4), pp.22-30.
[7] Dhir, S.K., Verma, D., Batta, M. and Mishra, D., 2017.
E-learning in medical education in India. Indian
pediatrics, 54(10), pp.871-877.
[8] Tayade, M.C. and Kulkarni, N.B., 2011. The Interface
of technology and medical education in india: current
trends and scope. Indian Journal of Basic & Applied
Medical Research, 1(1), pp.8-12.
[9] AVGERINOU, M.D. and MOROS, S.E., The 5-Phase
Process as a Balancing Act during Times of
Disruption: Transitioning to Virtual Teaching at an
International JK-5 School.
[10] Basilaia, G. and Kvavadze, D., 2020. Transition to
online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2
coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in
Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), pp.1-9.
[11] Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, J. and Jiang, F.,
2020. Mitigate the effects of home confinement on
children during the COVID-19 outbreak. The
Lancet, 395(10228), pp.945-947.
[12]
Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, pp.1-6.
[13] Singh, K., Srivastav, S., Bhardwaj, A., Dixit, A. and
Misra, S., 2020. Medical education during the covid-
19 pandemic: A single institution experience. Indian
pediatrics, 57(7), pp.678-679.
[14] Murphy, E. and Coleman, E., 2004. Graduate students'
experiences of challenges in online asynchronous
discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and
de la technologie, 30(2).
[15] Chen, R.T.H., Bennett, S. and Maton, K., 2008. The
adaptation of Chinese international students to online
flexible learning: Two case studies. Distance
Education, 29(3), pp.307-323.
[16] Thompson, R. and Lee, M.J., 2012. Talking with
students through screencasting: Experimentations with
video feedback to improve student learning. The
Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 1(1),
pp.1-16.
[17] Krishnan, I.A., De Mello, G., Kok, S.A., Sabapathy,
S.K., Munian, S., Ching, H.S., Kandasamy, P.,
Ramalingam, S., Baskaran, S. and Kanan, V.N., 2020.
Challenges Faced by Hearing Impairment Students
During COVID-19. Malaysian Journal of Social
Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(8), pp.106-116.
[18] Ellis, R.A., Marcus, G. and Taylor, R., 2005. Learning
through inquiry: student difficulties with online
course based Material. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 21(4), pp.239-252.
[19] Al-Faki, I.M. and Khamis, A.H.A., 2014. Difficulties
facing teachers in using interactive whiteboards in
their classes. American International Journal of Social
Science, 3(2), pp.136-158.
[20] Benbunan-Fich, R. and Hiltz, S.R., 2003. Mediators of
the effectiveness of online courses. IEEE Transactions
on Professional communication, 46(4), pp.298-312.
[21] Nguyen, T., 2015. The effectiveness of online
learning: Beyond no significant difference and future
horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and
Teaching, 11(2), pp.309-319.
[22] Alexander, M.W., Truell, A.D. and Zhao, J.J., 2012.
Expected advantages and disadvantages of online
learning: Perceptions from college students who have
not taken online courses. Issues in Information
Systems, 13(2), pp.193-200.
[23] Dumford, A.D. and Miller, A.L., 2018. Online learning
in higher education: exploring advantages and
disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing
in Higher Education, 30(3), pp.452-465.
[24] Francesa-Alfaro, A., Leiva-Chinchilla, P. and Chacón-
Rivas, M., 2016, October. User-friendly instructional
design tool to facilitate course planning. In 2016 XI
Latin American Conference on Learning Objects and
Technology (LACLO) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
[25] Athanaselis, T., Bakamidis, S., Dologlou, I., Argyriou,
E.N. and Symvonis, A., 2014. Making assistive
reading tools user friendly: a new platform for Greek
dyslexic students empowered by automatic speech
recognition. Multimedia tools and applications, 68(3),
pp.681-699.
[26]
engagement with communication tools. Journal of
Educational Technology Development and Exchange
(JETDE), 4(1), p.8.
[27] Mandernach, B.J., 2006. Thinking critically about
critical thinking: Integrating online tools to promote
critical thinking. Insight: A collection of faculty
scholarship, 1, pp.41-50.
[28] Atmowardoyo, H., (2010). Research methods for
language and literature studies.
[29] Atmowardoyo, H., 2018. Research methods in TEFL
studies: Descriptive research, case study, error
analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching
and Research, 9(1), pp.197-204.
[30] Draugalis, J.R. and Plaza, C.M., 2009. Best practices
for survey research reports revisited: implications of
target population, probability sampling, and response
rate. American journal of pharmaceutical
education, 73(8).
[31] Martínez-Mesa, J., González-Chica, D.A., Duquia,
R.P., Bonamigo, R.R. and Bastos, J.L., 2016.
Sampling: how to select participants in my research
study?. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 91(3),
pp.326-330.
[32] Lefever, S., Dal, M. and Matthiasdottir, A., 2007.
Online data collection in academic research:
advantages and limitations. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 38(4), pp.574-582.
[33] Hunter, L., 2012. Challenging the reported
disadvantages of e-questionnaires and addressing
methodological issues of online data collection. Nurse
researcher, 20(1).
[34] Albers, M.J., 2017. Quantitative data analysis In the
graduate curriculum. Journal of Technical Writing and
Communication, 47(2), pp.215-233.
[35] Samuels, P., 2020. A Really Simple Guide to
Quantitative Data Analysis.
View publication stats

Padmapriya Dhanasekaran, Research Scholar

School of Bio Sciences & Technology, VIT,Vellore-632014, India