Professional Documents
Culture Documents
India Market Strategy: FY23 Budget: The Struggle To Spend Productively
India Market Strategy: FY23 Budget: The Struggle To Spend Productively
Research Analysts
Neelkanth Mishra, Neelkanth.Mishra@credit-suisse.com /
Abhay Khaitan, Abhay.Khaitan@credit-suisse.com /
Prateek Ancha, Prateek.Ancha@credit-suisse.com
February 2022
DISCLOSURE APPENDIX AT THE BACK OF THIS REPORT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST
CERTIFICATIONS, LEGAL ENTITY DISCLOSURE AND THE STATUS OF NON-US ANALYSTS. US Disclosure:
Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result,
investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this
report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
Key Takeaways
Much fiscal space to spend, but productive and efficient spending needs time
– Room to spend: Tax to GDP 1% higher, market fiscal deficit expectations 3pp higher
– Higher interest costs and GDP 5-10% below pre-pandemic path boost expenditure to GDP by 1.5pp
– Centre using this to clear arrears and move off-budget spending to on-budget. The rest accruing as cash
– Using some of these resources to spur state spending is a good idea, but execution a bigger issue for states
Deficits 40bps above expectation but consolidation continues Central government expenditure as % of GDP falling
16% 20%
As % of GDP Revenue Expenditure Capital Expenditure
14% 18%
16%
12%
14%
10%
12%
8%
10%
6%
8%
4%
6%
2%
4%
0% 2%
1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023b
0%
Union Fiscal Deficit (% of GDP) State Fiscal Deficit UDAY
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
FY23 growth consensus estimates have been rising since Oct, and likely to rise further
Government forecasts nominal GDP growth at 12% inline with consensus, CS >13%
FY23 deficit budgeted at 6.4% despite higher nominal GDP: 40bps higher than consensus
Centre and state debt to GDP Glide path for union fiscal deficit
100% 10.0%
9.0%
90% Fiscal Glide Path
8.0%
7.0%
80%
6.0%
5.0%
70%
4.0%
60% 3.0%
2.0%
50% 1.0%
0.0%
40% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023
Centre (Last year) State (Last year)
India Debt to GDP (%) Centre (This year) State (This year)
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
India’s debt to GDP ratio had jumped to 90% in FY21, fell to 86% in FY22; FY23 target 86%
FY22 could be even 84% if one adjusts for lower than targeted deficits for states in FY21 & 22
FY23 could be lower as growth likely to surprise on the upside
Much of this is cleaning up; high debt to GDP likely to remain an overhang till at least 2030
Debt to GDP going forward FY22-32 Interest cost as % of GDP, and forward, if yields are at 6.5%
90%
Sensitivity of India's Debt to GDP at 7.0% Estimate
different interest cost
85% 6.5%
80% 6.0%
5.5%
75%
Assuming, 5.0%
Primary deficit = 0.4%
70%
Nominal GDP Growth: 11%
4.5%
65%
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 4.0%
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
6.0% 6.5% 7.0% 7.5% 8.0%
Interest cost as % of GDP
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
10Y bond yields have risen to 6.7% for the centre, 7.5%-plus for states
Higher debt to GDP has meant an increase in interest costs; higher rates pressure that further
As rates in the stock are fixed, consolidation path in early years does not change much, but can
mean 1-2pp higher debt to GDP in 5Y, and 7-8pp in 10Y
Fall in FY22’s deficit mainly from higher taxes FY23 Budgeted deficits funded mainly from borrowings
41 Rs. Tn
40.0 Rs. Tn
40
39 39.0
38
38.0
37
36 37.0
35
36.0
34
33 35.0
32
Deficit 34.0
FY22R
FY21
Direct taxes
Indirect Taxes
Non-Tax
Non-Debt Capital Receipts
Transfer to States
FY22R
FY23B
Deficit
Cash Drawdown
Indirect Taxes
Non-Tax
Direct taxes
Transfer to States
Non-Debt Capital Receipts
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Expenditure remained unchanged YoY in FY22RE, with higher taxes offsetting a lower deficit
FY23 deficit is mostly unchanged again in absolute terms
Expected use of cash in FY22RE shows the surpluses the government has to handle
Gross Tax as % of GDP (Centre+ states own) Significant change in FY23 tax growth estimates
20% 60%
As % of GDP Growth YoY
18%
50%
16%
40%
14%
30%
12%
10% 20%
8% 10%
6% 0%
4%
-10%
2%
-20%
0% Income Tax Corporate Custom Excise GST Non Tax
1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022r Tax
Source: CGA, Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: CGA, Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
9M tax collection was materially above FY22BE, with central tax to GDP at record high
FY22RE growth assumed in taxes 24%, vs 17% FY22BE; 9M is up 44% YoY
FY23BE assumes just 10% growth: a drop in tax to GDP; conservative, despite the decline in
excise, but prudent
Direct tax growth assumptions vs. history Indirect tax growth assumptions vs. history
50% 50%
40% 40%
30%
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
0%
-10%
-20% -10%
1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013 2017 2021 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013 2017 2021
Direct Tax YoY Nominal GDP growth Indirect Tax YoY Nominal GDP growth
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Direct tax and GDP growth not highly correlated Neither are indirect tax (less excise) and GDP growth
60% 50%
50%
40%
40% FY23BE
30%
20%
10%
10%
0% 0%
-10% -10%
Income Tax Corporate Tax
Linear (Income Tax) Linear (Corporate Tax)
-20% -20%
5% 10% 15% 20% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Nominal GDP Growth Nominal GDP Growth
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
“Tax buoyancy” has not been consistent in the past, for both direct and indirect taxes
Even excluding the excise on fuel, which has risen to 2% of GDP over 6 years, no pattern visible
Occasionally rate changes have a role to play (e.g. corporate tax cut in 2019, excise cuts in 2009)
High informality in the economy may be contributing to the lack of a direct link
Receipts Expenditure
120% 90%
100% 80%
70%
80%
60%
60%
50%
40% 40%
20% 30%
20%
0%
10%
-20%
0%
-40% -10%
-60% -20%
Direct Tax Indirect tax Non-Tax Revenue Expenditure Capital Expenditure
9MFY22 Growth 3MFY22 Growth Reqd 9MFY22 Growth 3MFY22 Growth Reqd
Source: CGA, Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: CGA, Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
In prior years the last three months’ receipt assumptions appeared ambitious; this year they
appear overly conservative
FY profit/income assumptions continue to rise: should boost taxes
Higher capex targets though appear stretched
30% 19%
18%
25%
17%
20%
16%
15%
15%
10%
14%
5%
13%
0% 12%
1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022r 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022r
Net Centre Expenditure (exc. Grants to states) States
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Expenditure (centre + state) as % of GDP spiked in FY21 due to pandemic and lower GDP
The budgeted increase has been substantial for the states, but miss on targets is very large
For FY23, the challenge for centre was how to deal with expenditure rolling off
States spending intentions likely to remain elevated when they present their FY23 budgets
State government expenditure saw sharp revision in FY21 Much of the increase in FY22 to come from health, social
Changes as % of GDP (FY22 over FY15-19 avg)
0.5% Growth CAGR (FY22 vs FY19)
16%
21%
0.5% 14%
20%
0.4%
19% 12%
0.4%
18% 10%
0.3%
17% 0.3% 8%
16% 0.2% 6%
15% 0.2%
4%
14% 0.1%
0.1% 2%
13%
0.0% 0%
12%
Pension
Health
Others
Rural Dev
Education
Agri
Transport
Social Welfare
Interest
FY15-19 FY20BE FY20RE FY20A FY21BE FY21RE FY21 FY22BE
Average
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
FY21BE looks high because GDP base of FY21 at the time of budget was higher
The actual increase in spending by states was much lower than budgeted in FY21, and is likely
to be similar in FY22 as well. Excluding salaries, pensions and interest, the rise may not be much
The challenge has been in execution, not availability of fiscal space
Much increase in FY22 spending were pandemic/one-off This has been partially reversed in FY23
40 40
Central expenditure (Rs Tn) Central expenditure (Rs Tn) One time/pandemic cost
38 40
36 39
34 39
32 38
30 38
28 37
26 One time/pandemic cost 37
24 36
22 36
20 35
Vaccines
Transport
Others
NREGA
FY19
Food
Finance
FY22
Defence
Fertiliser
Transfer to States
Finance
Vaccines
Others
Transport
NREGA
FY22
Food
FY23
Defence
Fertiliser
Transfer to States
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Much of the rise in FY22 spending was from spending induced by the pandemic: Food subsidy,
NREGA spending and Vaccines. Some, like higher fertilizer subsidy, should also roll off
Government also cleared arrears in various subsidies and incentives (e.g., for exports)
Where is the new spending?
Non-discretionary items like interest costs continue to dominate central government spending
The sharp rebound in nominal GDP and market allowing a higher deficit opens up space
The government has capacity issues in spending: cannot quickly raise spending in size
41 Rs. Tn
Others
41 Warehousing 9%
Defence
Urban1%
Dev
40 3%
20%
40
39
39
38 State Loans
18%
38
37
37
Railways
36 18%
FY22R
FY23B
Others
Home Affairs
Subsidies
Salaries (ex-Defense)
Transport
Agri
Rural Development
Interest
Defence
Pension
Transfer to States
GST Comp.
Telecom
7%
Roads
24%
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Incremental spending in FY23 to come from Interest, transfer to states and transport
Changes in FY21A came from Subsidies
FY22 spending revised up for Subsidies and transport (Air India transfer)
Centre + State spend on salaries and pensions Central spending on salaries and pensions YoY
Fiscal space of 1.1% of 60%
25 10.0% 6th Pay
5th Pay Commission GDP released
Forecast Commission
9.5% 50%
5th Pay Commission
20 7th Pay
6th Pay 9.0% 40% Commission
Commission
7th Pay 8.5% 30%
15 Commission
8.0%
20%
10 7.5%
10%
7.0%
5
0%
6.5%
0 6.0% -10%
1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021
Aggregate Salary and Pension % of GDP (RHS) Central Salary + Pension YoY
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Salaries and pensions are a large 6.5% of GDP, can vary by 2-3pp; next pay commission in 2026
As expected, growth in salaries & pensions in FY23BE was weak; to lag nominal GDP growth again
This releases fiscal space
Dearness Allowance (DA: inflation adjustment in compensation) was cancelled in FY21, but
increases did occur in FY22
CREDIT SUISSE, Equity Research, Asia Pacific February 1, 2022 17
Non-tax: disinvestment targets lowered meaningfully
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: CMIE, Credit Suisse research
Execution on disinvestment has lagged political intent so far: the latter has been pro-disinvestment
LIC disinvestment may be possible in FY22, but a challenge still: if so, Rs780bn a realistic estimate
Privatization of 2 PSU Banks, one GIC in addition to IDBI: the consolidation of financial assets into
overall target a marginal negative
200 0 0.0%
1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022r
0
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Non Tax (Rs bn) As % of GDP
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
RBI dividends likely to be lower, given VRRR and large reverse repo costs: liquidity surpluses are a
drag on its income
Other receipts lower too
Government borrowing over the past few years Non-market sources of financing deficit have risen
12000 Financing of fiscal deficit (INR tn)
Net government borrowings (INR bn) 20
10000
15
8000
10
6000
5
4000
0
2000
-5
0 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023BE
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Net market borrowings Small savings + state PF
Other receipts(public account) Others
BE RE Actual
Cash drawdown
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Government cash at RBI is currently unseasonally high Monthly cumulative accrual/disposal of cash with RBI
6 4
Government cash balance with RBI States cash balance with RBI (Rs Tn)
5
(Rs Tn)
3
4
3 2
2
1
1
0 0
-1
*Extracted from charts in RBI Annual Report *Estimated from total cash balance and
-1
-2 monthly CAG reports
-3 -2
Apr-14 Apr-15 Apr-16 Apr-17 Apr-18 Apr-19 Apr-20 Apr-21 Apr-14 Apr-15 Apr-16 Apr-17 Apr-18 Apr-19 Apr-20 Apr-21
Source: RBI, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
Cash balance with the RBI used to smoothen timing mismatches between receipts & expenditure
A large part of current cash balance is for the state governments (who buy T-bills to park cash)
Taxes are doing better than expected six months back and spending cannot catch up
Higher than normal cash at end of FY will have implications for FY23 borrowing
0 6% 0%
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research
State government borrowing is also running behind the calendar: they may also be better fiscally
Financial savings have risen substantially in FY21, and funding deficit unlikely to be a challenge
Credit growth is still weak, but should pick up during FY22
Both deposits and insurance and pension flows have continued to grow
Change in central GSec ownership share Excess SLR elevated as SLR threshold still falling
6 SLR (%) SLR Required (%) Excess SLR (%, RHS)
4 45% 18%
2 16%
40%
0 14%
-2 35% 12%
-4 10%
30%
-6 Percent point change in share of ownership 8%
-8
25% 6%
-10
4%
-12 20%
Banks Insurance PF RBI FPIs MFs Others 2%
1Y 5Y 10Y 15% 0%
Jun-01 Jun-03 Jun-05 Jun-07 Jun-09 Jun-11 Jun-13 Jun-15 Jun-17 Jun-19 Jun-21
Source: RBI, Credit Suisse research Source: RBI, Credit Suisse research
The increase in HTM limits encouraged banks with surplus funds to buy 3-5 year bonds.
Over the past 1, 5 and 10 years, rise in RBI's share has offset banks: this is desirable
Government needs to find new sources of demand for government bonds
FPI holding limits were to offset SLR limit cuts FPI holdings now significantly below the permitted limits
25% 6% 6
SLR and FPI Limits in GSecs
(%)
24% 5% 5
23%
4% 4
22%
3% 3
21%
2% 2
20%
1% 1
19%
18% 0% 0
Jun-08 Jun-10 Jun-12 Jun-14 Jun-16 Jun-18 Jun-20 Jun-08 Dec-09 Jun-11 Dec-12 Jun-14 Dec-15 Jun-17 Dec-18 Jun-20
Source: Budget documents, Credit Suisse research Source: RBI, Credit Suisse research
Higher FPI limits were to offset SLR cuts, but without bond index inclusion this may not work
FPI holdings of government bonds have now gone much below the permitted limits
Market expects inclusion in bond indices in 1HFY23.
Changes in import duties over the years Most sectors have seen increase in import duties in past 2Y
60%
% of products (HS code 6 digits) Import Duty 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
seeing change in import duties Electrical and
40%
Electronics Sector 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.6 7.9 12.5 15.0
20% Auto Parts 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 15.0
Gems and
0% Jewellery Sector 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 15
Chemicals (Carbon
Black) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 7.5
-20% Plastic
items(Builder's
-40% Ware) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 15
Electric Motors and
Generators 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 15.0
-60% Capital Goods and
Machinery 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 0.0 7.5
-80%
Textiles (Nylon) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 7.5 5.0
1996-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 2010-2014 2014-2019 2019-20
Textiles (Silk) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 25.0 25.0 10.0 15.0
Increase Decrease
Metals 5.0 7.5 10.0 10.0 15.0 15.0 10.0 7.5
Source: WTO, Credit Suisse estimates Source: WTO, Credit Suisse estimates
40% of tariff lines saw increases in import duties in the past five years. In every five year period up
until 2010, 60-70% of tariff lines used to see cuts: this has reversed since then.
2020 saw fall in import duties, mainly for Agri, textiles, metals and autos
Several sectors have been on the government radar for a while, as seen in the imposition or hiking of
import duties over the past few years.
20%
No recap of PSU Bank budgeted, first in the last decade 15%
– FY22 recap was Rs150bn vs BE of Rs 200bn
10%
– Capital levels at PSU Banks above regulatory thresholds
5%
-5%
Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21
Introduction of Central Bank Digital Currency, (Digital Rupee) will be issued in
SME refers to Micro, Small and Medium as per RBI monthly data, 6.5% of overall
2022-23.
No capital infusion for FY23, reduction in FY22 planned infusion … … however, PSU Bank capital levels are healthy, with CET at 10-14%
1,600 15%
Govt Infusion LIC Infusion in IDBI CET-1 Ratio (%) FY20 2Q22
1,400 14%
13%
1,200
12%
FY21 - CET1 requirement
1,000 11%
800 10%
9%
600
8%
400 7%
200 6%
5%
-
Rs bn FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
LEGAL ENTITY, department or author (Click Insert | Header & Footer) Month Day, Year 27
Modest increase versus large spurt in FY22
Defence budget up 13% in 22BE
Defense capital budget up 13% over
14.0
Capex (Rs tn) 12.2
11.4 11.1
12.0
FY22BE: Strong growth in naval fleet, 10.0
9.8
9.0
LEGAL ENTITY, department or author (Click Insert | Header & Footer) Month Day, Year 28
Healthcare: National Digital Health Ecosystem launched
Overall allocation to MoHFW remains nearly constant at Rs 830bn in FY23 [BE] (Rs
829bn in FY22 [RE]). Key announcements:
Allocation towards COVID-19 vaccine reduced to Rs50bn in FY23 (from Rs350bn in FY22)
– The reduced procurement is owing to high vaccination coverage achieved already [95% of adult population has
received at least one dose, and 75% is fully vaccinated]
– The budget allocation corresponds to ~250mn vaccine doses, which would be used mainly for booster doses
and kids’ immunization (vs. 1.6bn+ vaccines to be procured in FY22, as per target)
– The implied procurement target denotes coverage of one-fourth of adult population (with single booster dose)
– Implication: Negative for Cadila, as its vaccine program is yet to kick off
LEGAL ENTITY, department or author (Click Insert | Header & Footer) Month Day, Year 29
Oil & Gas sector
Divestment target is low: Divestment target for FY23 is low at Rs650bn and BPCL divestment
would atleast be Rs450-500bn. Other candidates for divestment would be Concor, BEML, SCI,
IDBI Bank etc.
Low LPG subsidy provision: LPG subsidy for FY22 has been reduced from budget of Rs125bn
to just Rs34bn whereas Oil marketing companies in just 3Q22 have incurred a large loss on LPG
(RS 60bn+). LPG subsidy (direct benefit transfer) for FY23 is budgeted at Rs 40bn.
Excise duty on unblended fuel: Unblended fuel to attract additional excise duty of Rs 2/ltr from
1-Oct-2022 but OMCs should be able to comply with this
No further excise duty cut built in: Excise duty estimate for 2022-23 reduced by Rs561 bn YoY,
which is almost entirely explained by the recent reduction in petrol and diesel excise duties. This
suggests no further cut in duty built in for FY22-23 and no material collection built in from the
additional duty on non-blended fuel.
Road to EV: Battery Swapping policy will be brought soon and inter-operability standards to be
formulated. This will help in OMCs to start offering EV charging facilities at their fuel stations
Reliance
Telecom: 5G auctions to happen next year
Renewables: Additional allocation of Rs195bn for production linked incentives for manufacture of
fully integrated Solar modules from polysilicon to solar PV modules
Energy storage: Energy Storage Systems like grid-scale battery systems are now included in the
harmonized list of infrastructure. This will facilitate better credit availability
Min of rural developm ent overall 1,221 1,964 1,315 1,536 1,359
Feb, 2022 31
Telecom
Budgeted spectrum receipts look more reasonable factoring 700MHz and 3.5GHz bands
800 FY22 Revised ests (Rs bn) 600 FY23 Budget ests (Rs bn)
700
720 704 500
600
308 234
500 400
540
400
155 300
294 528
300
200
200 241
100 100
-
FY22 BE FY22 RE License & Airtel Jio CS ests of -
Spectrum prepayment prepayment telecom License & Spectrum fees 5G auction upfront FY23 BE
fees receipts payment
LEGAL ENTITY, department or author (Click Insert | Header & Footer) Month Day, Year 32
Any information relating to the tax status of financial instruments discussed herein is not intended to provide tax advice or to be used by anyone to
provide tax advice. Investors are urged to seek tax advice based on their particular circumstances from an independent tax professional.
Credit Suisse has decided not to enter into business relationships with companies that Credit Suisse has determined to be involved in the development,
Disclosure Appendix manufacture, or acquisition of anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions. For Credit Suisse's position on the issue, please see https://www.credit-
suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/responsibility/banking/policy-summaries-en.pdf .
Analyst Certification The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received compensation that is based upon various factors including Credit Suisse's total
Neelkanth Mishra and Abhay Khaitan each certify, with respect to the companies or securities that the individual analyzes, that (1) the views expressed revenues, a portion of which are generated by Credit Suisse's investment banking activities
in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about all of the subject companies and securities and (2) no part of his or her compensation
was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. For date and time of production, dissemination and history of recommendation for the subject company(ies) featured in this report, disseminated within
the past 12 months, please refer to the link: https://rave.credit-suisse.com/disclosures/view/report?i=682810&v=1okluisz9k7ocmlxgh7mxb2mm .
As of December 10, 2012 Analysts’ stock rating are defined as follows:
Important Regional Disclosures
Outperform (O) : The stock’s total return is expected to outperform the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.
Singapore recipients should contact Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch for any matters arising from, or in connection with, this research report.
Neutral (N) : The stock’s total return is expected to be in line with the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.
Analysts who conduct site visits of covered issuers are not permitted to accept payment or reimbursement for travel expenses from the issuer for the
Underperform (U) : The stock’s total return is expected to underperform the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.
site visit.
*Relevant benchmark by region: As of 10th December 2012, Japanese ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which
consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector, with Outperforms representing the most attractive, Neutrals t he less attractive, and For Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.'s policies and procedures regarding the dissemination of equity research, please visit https://www.credit-
Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. As of 2nd October 2012, U.S. and Canadian as w ell as European (excluding Turkey) ratings are based on a suisse.com/sites/disclaimers-ib/en/canada-research-policy.html.
stock’s total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which consists of all companies covered by the analyst withi n the relevant sector, with Outperforms
representing the most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. For Latin America, Turkey and Asia
Investors should note that income from such securities and other financial instruments, if any, may fluctuate and that price or value of such securities
(excluding Japan and Australia), stock ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the average total return of th e relevant country or regional benchmark (India and instruments may rise or fall and, in some cases, investors may lose their entire principal investment.
- S&P BSE Sensex Index); for China A share the relevant index is the Shanghai Shenzhen CSI 300 (CSI300); prior to 2nd October 2 012 U.S. and Canadian ratings were To the extent any Credit Suisse equity research analyst employed by Credit Suisse International (a "UK Analyst") has interactions with a Spanish
based on (1) a stock’s absolute total return potential to its current share price and (2) the relative attractiveness of a stock’s total return potential within an analyst ’s
coverage universe. For Australian and New Zealand stocks, the expected total return (ETR) calculation includes 12 -month rolling dividend yield. An Outperform rating is
domiciled client of Credit Suisse AG or its affiliates, such UK Analyst will be acting for and on behalf of Credit Suisse Bank (Europe), S.A., with respect
assigned where an ETR is greater than or equal to 7.5%; Underperform where an ETR less than or equal to 5%. A Neutral may be assigned where the ETR is between - only to the provision of equity research services to Spanish domiciled clients of Credit Suisse AG or its affiliates.
5% and 15%. The overlapping rating range allows analysts to assign a rating that puts ETR in the context of associated risks. Prior to 18 May 2015, ETR ranges for Pursuant to CVM Resolution No. 20/2021, of February 25, 2021, the author(s) of the report hereby certify(ies) that the views expressed in this report
Outperform and Underperform ratings did not overlap with Neutral thresholds between 15% and 7.5%, which was in operation from 7 July 2011.
solely and exclusively reflect the personal opinions of the author(s) and have been prepared independently, including with respect to Credit Suisse. Part
Restricted (R) : In certain circumstances, Credit Suisse policy and/or applicable law and regulations preclude certain types of communications, of the author(s)´s compensation is based on various factors, including the total revenues of Credit Suisse, but no part of the compensation has been, is,
including an investment recommendation, during the course of Credit Suisse's engagement in an investment banking transaction and in certain other or will be related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. In addition, Credit Suisse declares that: Credit Suisse has provided,
circumstances. and/or may in the future provide investment banking, brokerage, asset management, commercial banking and other financial services to the subject
Not Rated (NR) : Credit Suisse Equity Research does not have an investment rating or view on the stock or any other securities related to the company company/companies or its affiliates, for which they have received or may receive customary fees and commissions, and which constituted or may
at this time. constitute relevant financial or commercial interests in relation to the subject company/companies or the subject securities.
Not Covered (NC) : Credit Suisse Equity Research does not provide ongoing coverage of the company or offer an investment rating or investment view Please visit https://www.credit-suisse.com/in/en/legal/research-disclosure.html for additional disclosures required under the Securities And Exchange
on the equity security of the company or related products. Board of India (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014
Neelkanth Mishra is a part-time member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister of India.
Volatility Indicator [V] : A stock is defined as volatile if the stock price has moved up or down by 20% or more in a month in at least 8 of the past 24
months or the analyst expects significant volatility going forward. This research report is authored by:
Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited...................................................................... Neelkanth Mishra ; Abhay Khaitan ; Prateek Ancha
Analysts’ sector weightings are distinct from analysts’ stock ratings and are based on the analyst’s expectations for the fundamentals and/or valuation of
the sector* relative to the group’s historic fundamentals and/or valuation: To the extent this is a report authored in whole or in part by a non-U.S. analyst and is made available in the U.S., the following are important disclosures
regarding any non-U.S. analyst contributors: The non-U.S. research analysts listed below (if any) are not registered/qualified as research analysts with
Overweight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is favorable over the next 12 months. FINRA. The non-U.S. research analysts listed below may not be associated persons of CSSU and therefore may not be subject to the FINRA 2241
Market Weight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is neutral over the next 12 months. restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
Underweight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is cautious over the next 12 months. Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited...................................................................... Neelkanth Mishra ; Abhay Khaitan ; Prateek Ancha
*An analyst’s coverage sector consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector. An analyst may cover multiple sectors.
Important disclosures regarding companies that are the subject of this report are available by calling +1 (877) 291-2683. The same important
Credit Suisse's distribution of stock ratings (and banking clients) is: disclosures, with the exception of valuation methodology and risk discussions, are also available on Credit Suisse’s disclosure website at
https://rave.credit-suisse.com/disclosures . For valuation methodology and risks associated with any recommendation, price target, or rating referenced
Global Ratings Distribution in this report, please refer to the disclosures section of the most recent report regarding the subject company.