Astudillo v.

Jean-Yves Duclos - Information

CANADA,
Province of QUEBEC,
Montreal Territorial Division.
This is the information of Alan de Astudillo, of Montréal, Québec,
hereinafter called the informant.
A: INFORMATION
Suspects/Accused:
1. Jean-Yves Duclos, Federal Minister of Health, Canada
600, boulevard Charest est, CP: 30014 Bur.; 201 - Québec, Québec, G1K 3J4
B: FACTUM
1. In 2+ years, since the start of the pandemic in 2019-2022:
a. I have NEVER caught COVID-19;
b. I have NEVER tested positive for COVID-19 (Asymptomatic / Otherwise);
c. I have NEVER experienced any COVID symptoms;
d. I have NEVER been hospitalized;
e. I have NEVER gotten vaccinated with Polyethylene Glycol injections,
for COVID….;
f. I have actual documented allergies to ingredients in both mRNA and the
Johnson & Johnson vaccines…;
g. I am pro-Choice at worst, not Anti-Vax, I smoke, pick your own poison,
just don’t force, extort or defraud it (consent) out of other people;
h. If lockdowns kill more people & does more economic harm than letting
the virus run around naturally & infect people does, then yea, I’ll go with
the science that says economic harm from lockdowns is worse than the
few lethal comorbidity deaths you’d get from letting the virus go around;
i. If the Virus kills 5,000,000 (5 million) people in 2 years, but the Economic
Harm combined with Supply Chain problems, combined with Adverse
Reactions from mRNA injections, and Lockdowns kills 10,000,000
(10 million), or two times more people than the virus does… then
obviously the cure has become more lethal than the virus;
j. It’s not one mistake, you’re accused of a combination of many, it leads
one to suspect it is intentional harm.

2. Polyethylene Glycol is known for its toxic effects when injected. This is
well documented in the medical literature of the 20th & 21st century.
a. A cautionary note: Toxicity of polyethylene glycol 200 injected
intraperitoneally into mice -- PMID: 31526095 -
DOI: 10.1177/0023677219873684
b. Cytotoxicity study of polyethylene glycol derivatives --
DOI: 10.1039/C7RA00861A
c. Toxicity and immunogenicity concerns related to PEGylated-micelle
carrier systems: a review -- PMID: 31068982 -
doi: 10.1080/14686996.2019.1590126

3. If the patient has been lied to about the treatment or there is other fraud in
the informed consent, then the entire consent is invalid.
a. R. v. Ashkani, 2017 ONSC 7345 (CanLII) para 48 - 50

4. Moderna Covid 19 Vaccine contains SM-102, which is a known poison

fatal to humans and animals as disclosed in Moderna’s Food and Drug
Administration’s published ingredients list. See (list of ingredients and toxicity
report for SM-102): https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download
 5. SM-102 Toxicity Report - Cayman Chemicals
https://cdn.caymanchem.com/cdn/msds/33474m.pdf

GHS06 Skull and crossbones

• Acute Tox. 3 H301 Toxic if swallowed.
• Acute Tox. 3 H331 Toxic if inhaled.

GHS08 Health hazard

• Carc. 1A H350 May cause cancer.

GHS07
• Eye irritation H319 hazard category 2

· Signal word: Danger

· Hazard-determining components of labeling:
Ethanol (classified as a known toxin)

· Hazard statements
H225 - Highly flammable liquid and vapor.
H301+H331 - Toxic if swallowed or if inhaled.
H319 - Causes serious eye irritation.
H350 - May cause cancer.

6. CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo completely avoid Johns Hopkins study finding
COVID lockdowns ineffective - ABC, CBS, NBC also ignored the anti-lockdown
study - By Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com/media/johns-hopkins-university-study-lockdowns-
media-blackout
a. “There has been a full-on media blackout of the new study outlining the
ineffectiveness of lockdowns to prevent COVID deaths.”
b. “According to a Johns Hopkins University meta-analysis of several
studies, lockdowns during the first COVID wave in the spring of 2020 only
reduced COVID mortality by .2% in the U.S. and Europe.”
c. “"While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little
to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic
and social costs where they have been adopted," the researchers
wrote. "In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and
should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument."”
d. “However, the Johns Hopkins study received no mention on any of the
five liberal networks this week. According to Grabien transcripts, CNN,
MSNBC, ABC, CBS and NBC all ignored the anti-lockdown findings after
having spent much of the pandemic shaming red states with minimal
restrictions and events deemed by critics as "superspreaders."”
e. “It wasn't just the networks avoiding the study. The New York Times, The
Washington Post, The Associated Press, Reuters, USA Today, Axios,
Politico among other outlets also turned a blind eye to the findings,
according to search results.”

7. Tras de 2 años, 0 personas della mia famiglia mea, han sido infectadas…
C: AUTHORITIES
I. Where consent was obtained by fraud, deceit, or trickery, then the consent is not valid. (R v Metcalfe
1983 CanLII 248 (BC CA), (1983), 10 CCC (3d) 114 at paras 9, 12, 11. R v Johnson, (1984), 65
NSR (2d) 54 (NSSCAD), [1985] SCCA No. 263; R v Brown (1972), 8 CCC (2d) 13 (Ont CA))

II. A person who knowingly becomes involved with the confinement of a person known to them to have
been kidnapped can be found to be a party to the offence of kidnapping. (R. v. Vu, 2012 SCC 40)

III. Confinement refers to the "physical restraint, contrary to the wishes of the person restrained,
...thereby depriving the person of his or her liberty to move from one place to another". (R v Gratton
(1985), 18 C.C.C. (3d) 462; R v Neidermier 2005 BCCA 15)

IV. There is no need for physical application of bindings. (R v Gratton (1985), 18 C.C.C. (3d) 462)
 V. The accused does not need to intend the consequences of his actions. Where he is reckless whether
the act caused bodily harm will be sufficient. (R. v AE, 2000 CanLII 16823 (ON CA), (2000), 146 CCC
(3d) 449, 35 C.R. (5th) 386 (Ont. C.A.), per Weiler JA.)

VI. The mens rea requires that there be an "objective foreseeability of risk of bodily harm" in general.
There is no need for establishing the risk of the specific type of harm that occurs. (R. v Dewey, 1999
ABCA 5 (CanLII), 1999 ABCA 5, 132 CCC (3d) 348, per McClung JA.)

VII. Sufficient intent is made out where the accused was engaged in a course of conduct that was
objectively dangerous and bodily harm results. (R. v DeSousa (1992), 1992 CanLII 80, [1992] 2 SCR
944, per Sopkina J. & R. v Van De Wiel (1997), 158 N.S.R.(2d) 368, 1997 CanLII
9923 (NSSC), per Scanlan J, at para 20.)

VIII. The harm was an "objectively foreseeable consequence of the assault”. The mere intent to apply
force is sufficient. (R. v Swenson (1994), 91 CCC (3d) 541 (Sask. C.A.), 1994 CanLII 4683 (SK CA),
per Vancise JA. & R. v Brooks (1988), 41 CCC (3d) 157 (BCCA), 1988 CanLII 3018 (BC CA), per
Macdonald JA.)
IX. The right to life is engaged where the law or state action imposes death or an increased risk of death,
either directly or indirectly (Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), [2015] 1 S.C.R. 331 at paragraph
62; Chaoulli at paragraphs 112-124 and 200).

X. Concerns about autonomy and quality of life are properly treated as liberty and security interests
(Carter at paragraph 62).

XI. Supreme Court grill Biden lawyer on OSHA vaccine requirement - Chief Justice Roberts & Justice
Gorsuch suggested that gov officials had overstepped, Roberts declaring "hard to argue" that officials
had been given the power to act by Congress.

XII. State compulsions or prohibitions affecting one's ability to move freely (R. v. Heywood, [1994] 3
S.C.R. 761 at 789).

XIII. The physical restraint can be quite minor to engage the liberty component, such that compelling a
person to give oral testimony constitutes a deprivation of liberty (Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v.
Canada, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 425 at 536; R. v. S.(R.J.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 451 at 479; Branch, supra at 26;
Re: Application under section 83.28 of the Criminal Code, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 248 at paragraph 67),

XIV. This aspect of liberty includes the right to refuse medical treatment (A.C., supra, at paragraphs 100-
102, 136) and the right to make “reasonable medical choices” without threat of criminal prosecution:
R. v. Smith, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 602 at para 18.

XV. Security of the person is generally given a broad interpretation and has both a physical and
psychological aspect.

XVI. The right encompasses freedom from the threat of physical punishment or suffering (e.g., deportation
to a substantial risk of torture) as well as freedom from such punishment itself (Singh, supra at 207;
Suresh, supra, at paragraphs 53-55).

XVII. It is also engaged where police use force to effect an arrest (Fleming, supra, at paragraph 65).

XVIII. Security of the person includes a person’s right to control his/her own bodily integrity. It will be
engaged where the state interferes with personal autonomy and a person's ability to control his or her
own physical or psychological integrity. (R. v. Morgentaler, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30 at 56; Carter, supra;
Rodriguez, supra; Blencoe,

XIX. AD NOCTIS HVIVS CALIGINEM DESTRVENDAM...

In Montréal, Québec, on __FEB 5TH__, __2022__

(Informant)

In ____MONTRÉAL, QUÉBEC_____, on __FEB 5TH__,

______________________________ ___________________________________
Judge / Justice of the Peace Judge / Justice of the Peace (in block letters)
“On ne peut pas a la fois, etre contre la vaccination, et contre le confinement.”
-Jean-Yves Duclos, dans son “Euphorie de la Stupidité”
https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2022/02/04/vaccination-et-mesures-sanitaires-
maxime-bernier-defend-ses-positions-1

Ca fait 2 ans, j’ai toujours rien attrapé, vivant dans une des villes les plus infectées du
Canada… définitivement la pire du Québec. Toujours: rien. Personne dans ma famille
proche ici au Canada a attrapé la COVID.