Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Activity: Design and Test Wind Turbine

Design 1

Location:Hills

Blade Length:45m

Blade Pitch:3° variable

Blade Twist:Yes

Tip Shape:Thin

Airfoil Shape:Super Thin

Turbine Height:120m

Resin:No Riblets:

No Filler:Yes

WPT:No

WPA:No

Watts Produced:916255

Swipe Area:6362

Air Density:1.1

Air Velocity:8.5

Efficiency Factor:0.43

Watt / Unit Cost:0.30

Homes Powered:611
Design 2

Location:Plains

Blade Length:45m

Blade Pitch:3° variable

Blade Twist:Yes

Tip Shape:Thin

Airfoil Shape:Thin

Turbine Height:120m

Resin:No

Riblets:Yes

Filler:Yes

WPT:No

WPA:Yes

Watts Produced:965653

Swipe Area:6362

Air Density:1.1

Air Velocity:8.5

Efficiency Factor:0.45

Watt / Unit Cost:0.55

Homes Powered:644
Design 3

Location:Offshore

Blade Length:37m

Blade Pitch:3° variable

Blade Twist:Yes

Tip Shape:Thin

Airfoil Shape:Thin

Turbine Height:120m

Resin:No

Riblets:Yes

Filler:Yes

WPT:No

WPA:Yes

Watts Produced:848673

Swipe Area:4301

Air Density:1.1

Air Velocity:8.5

Efficiency Factor:0.58

Watt / Unit Cost:0.32

Homes Powered:566
Table of Design Specification

Conclusion
In design 1 the location is hills and blade length is 45m.
It’s efficiency factor is 0.43, watt/ unit cost is 0.30 and homes powered is 611.
In design 2 the location is plains and blade length is 45m.
It’s efficiency factor is 0.45, watt/unit cost is 0.55 and homes powered is 644

In design 3 the location is offshore and blade length is 37m.


It’s efficiency factor is 0.58, watt/unit cost is 0.32 and homes powered is 566
Design 3 has the highest efficiency factor
Design 2 powers the most homes

Design 1 has the lowest cost


Design 1 is the maximum efficiency for the lowest cost

You might also like