NEAP/ RO STANDARD TRAINING PROPOSAL MATRIX

(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020)
Revision: August 2021

NOTE: Incomplete attachments shall not be accepted.

HTN:___________________
To be filled out by HRD
Proponent: _____________________________________
Email Address: __________________________________

A. PROFILE OF THE PROGRAM 

Title of the Program or

1.
Course

2. Rationale

Program or Course
3.
Description

4. Professional
Development Priorities
 Professional Strands
Covered (PPST, PPSSH
5. or PPSS domain/s,
strand/s, indicator/s)
**Click the link to know more
Target participants
profile
6. (Career Stage, Grade
level, Learning Area)
**Indicate the No. of Proficient
and Highly Proficient

Number of hours (face-

to-face instruction and/or
7. online learning, and
classroom application, if
applicable)

List of Resource
Persons/learning
8.
facilitators supported
by Curriculum Vitae

Modality
(Formal Learning, possibly
with Job-Embedded
9. Learning, Learning Action
Cell, Relationship and
Discussion Learning,
among other modalities)

Delivery Platform
10. (online, face-to-face and
blended delivery)

Indicative date of
11.
implementation

12. Professional
Regulation
NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix
Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
2
 Commission (PRC)
Program Accreditation
Number (if applicable)

B. PROGRAM OR COURSE DESIGN

The activity aims to:

Objective/s or
1.
outcome/s

Detailed program or
2.
course matrix

Modules and learning

3.
resources to be used

4. Assessment Plan

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
3
 C. PROGRAM OR COURSE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

1. Schedule of Activities

2. Budget Requirements

3. Funding Source

Monitoring and
4. Evaluation
**Click the link to know more

Prepared by: 

_______________________________________
TRAINING PROPONENT
Designation

Contact Number:

 NOTED: 

_______________________________________
CHIE/ UNIT HEAD/ SCHOOL HEAD
Designation
 

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
4
Recommending Approval: 

VANESSA R. BARCARSE, Ed.D.

Senior Education Program Specialist
Human Resource Development

 
 Approved: 

RAYMUNDO M. CANTONJOS, CESO VI

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Officer-In-Charge
Office of the Schools Division Superintendent

Attachment No. 1

BUDGET PROPOSAL
Title of the Training/ Activity: __________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

Quantity Unit Particulars Unit Cost Source of Total Cost

Fund

TOTAL
**Insert more rows if necessary

Prepared by:

____________________________________
Proponent

Recommending Approval:

MYRNA C. REFORMADO
Administrative Officer V
Budget and Finance

Approved:

RAYMUNDO M. CANTONJOS, CESO VI

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix
Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
5
Officer-In-Charge
Office of the Schools Division Superintendent

Attachment No. 2
PROGRAMME/ SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITY

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
6
 DIVISION OR SCHOOL HEADER

INSERT HERE
DRAFT MEMO TO BE POSTED
IN DO/ SCHOOL

DIVISION OR SCHOOL FOOTER

Attachment No. 4

QAME Form A: Training Design Evaluation

(For School Level- To be accomplished by the L&D coordinator)
(For Division Level- To be accomplished by the HRD unit)
**To be validated by school/ division M&E

TRAINING PROGRAM DESIGN EVALUATION

Title of the Training: ___________________(To be filled out by the Proponent)_________________
Proponent: _______________________________(To be filled out by the Proponent)________________
Target Participants: __________________(To be filled out by the Proponent)___________________

Number of Participants: ____(To be filled out by the Proponent)____

Directions: Rate the Training Design along the following standards by ticking/checking the column
that corresponds to your rating with 4 as the highest rate. Also write your comments and
suggestions below to further improve the Training Design.

Standard 1 2 3 4

1. The training program is aligned to the agency's

strategic direction and priorities (IPPD, SPPD, MPPD,
RPMS, DEDP)

2. The training program is based on competency-based

needs assessment (e.g. NCBTS, NCBSSH, RPMS)

3. The training design builds on quality design

concepts and follows acceptable standard format and/or
template.

4. Identification of participants promotes inclusiveness

and equity.

5. Rationale, objectives, competencies being addressed

are aligned and relevant to DepEd goals and objectives.

6. Topics cover all competencies to be developed.

7. Content sequence is logical.

8. The resource package/s ( session guide, presentation

materials, manuals, etc) is /are complete, comprehensive and
consistent.

9. Schedule of activities is appropriately sequenced

and timed.

10. Expected outputs are clear and may be accomplished

within a reasonable time.

11. Support materials and equipment identified adequately

support the program.

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
8
 12. The training design shows how the participants can
apply the KSAs learned from the program.

13. Training methodologies employ adult learning

principles.

14. The training program is ICT-supported.

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS (To improve the Program/Training Design):

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluated by:

VANESSA R. BARCARSE, Ed.D.

Senior Education Program Specialist
Human Resource Development
(For Division/Cluster Training ONLY, remove if not)

________________________________________
School L&D Coordinator
(For School Training ONLY, remove if not)

Validated by:

CRIZEL ANN L. VILLANUEVA

Education Program Specialist II
School Management, Monitoring, and Evaluation
(For Division/Cluster Training ONLY, remove if not)

________________________________________
School Monitoring and Evaluation
(For School Training ONLY, remove if not)

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
9
Attachment No. 5
QAME Form B: Session Guide Evaluation
(For School Level- To be accomplished by the L&D coordinator )
(For Division Level- To be accomplished by the HRD unit)
**To be validated by school/ division M&E

SESSION GUIDE EVALUATION

Title of Session Guide: ______________(To be filled out by the Proponent)___________________

Subject Area: ___(To be filled out by the Proponent) Target User: (To be filled out by the
Proponent)

Directions: Rate the Session Guide along the following standards by ticking/checking the column that
corresponds to your rating with 4 as the highest rating. Also write your comments and
suggestions below to further improve the Session Guide.

COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS 1 2 3 4

DESIGN

1. The Session Guide design is based on

contemporary/standard principles.*

2. The SG contains the important elements of objectives,

duration of session, resource materials needed, activities, etc.

CONTENT

3. Content is relevant to the objectives and competencies

that the session aims to develop.

4. Information is up-to-date and accurate.

5. Terminologies and expressions are within the learning

area domain.

6. Graphs, illustrations, pictures, if any are accurate, relevant

to and supports the content presented.

PROCESS

7. Process adopts adult pedagogy such as 4As, Experiential

Learning Cycle, etc and is learner-focused.

8. Activities are aligned to the objectives and doable within

the time bound.

9. Expected outputs are doable within the time allotment.

LANGUAGE

10. Sentences and paragraphs are grammatically correct.

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
10
 11. Ideas are clearly expressed (simple words, expressions, simple
and easy-to-follow structure)

12. Language avoids bias along the line of gender, religion,

culture, etc.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

13. General layout/format is visually pleasing.

14. Choice of font (type style) and font size are adopted to the
requirements of the user.
*adult pedagogy, constructivist, understanding by design, etc.

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluated by:

VANESSA R. BARCARSE, Ed.D.

Senior Education Program Specialist
Human Resource Development
(For Division/Cluster Training ONLY, remove if not)

________________________________________
School L&D Coordinator
(For School Training ONLY, remove if not)

Validated by:

CRIZEL ANN L. VILLANUEVA

Education Program Specialist II
School Management, Monitoring, and Evaluation
(For Division/Cluster Training ONLY, remove if not)

________________________________________
School Monitoring and Evaluation
(For School Training ONLY, remove if not)

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
11
Attachment No. 6
QAME Form C: Standards for Program Management (Based on STRIVE-Developed Tool)
(To be filled out by the proponent)
**To be validated by school/ division M&E

PROGRAM PRE-IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION

Name of Service Provider:

______________________________________________________________ Target User:
_________________________________________________________________________
Learning Areas Covered: ______________________________________________________________

Directions: Rate to what extent the following standards have been met by the learning service provider by
checking the column corresponding to your response with 4 as the highest rating.

STANDARDS 1 2 3 4

A. Training Program Management

1. Program Management

· Management structure with TOR is clear.

· Orientation for the staff dealing who will do what,

when, and of what quality was done effectively.

· Inventory of training materials to check adequacy and

appropriateness was properly done

· Inventory of support materials and equipment to check

adequacy and appropriateness was properly done.

· Logistical arrangements and responsiveness to the

needs of the program was ensured.

2. Trainers

· Have professional experience

· Possess expertise in the training program content area

· Have attended the TOT

· Are physically fit

· Have very strong personal/interpersonal qualities

· Have very good communication and analytical skills

· Ideas are clearly expressed (simple words,

expressions, simple and easy-to-follow structure)

· Are ICT literate

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
12
 3. Documentation Staff

· Have very good written communication skills

· Are ICT literate

· Have good personal/interpersonal; skills

· Have positive attribute toward work

B. Program Operations

1. Participation and Class Organization

· Participation is set on based on set criteria

· Participation maximizes representation from target

group

· Process of registration is clear.

· Standard procedure for substitution present

· Standard number of participants is observed in the

organization of sessions and classes.

2. Venue

· Venue has adequate illumination.

· Venue has adequate ventilation/cooling system

· Venue is clean and hygienic.

· Venue has enough facilities and space for needed

activities such as workshops.

3. Accommodation

· Accommodation can take in all participants

· Participants are comfortably accommodated.

· Accommodation has clean, hygienic and adequate

number of comfort rooms.

· Accommodation is close to the venue of the training

· Accommodation is safe and secure.

· Accommodation has provisions for emergencies

(medical, earthquake, fire)

4. Food

· Proposed menu offers generally healthy food and with

variety

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
13
 · Proposed menu considers diet restrictions/
requirements.

5. Training Materials

· Training materials follow standard guidelines,

readability, quality of paper, etc.

· Training materials are adequate for all the participants

and are ready for the training

6. Support materials and equipment has been

conducted

· Inventory of support materials and equipment has

been conducted.

· Provision for emergencies (medical, etc) is provided.

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Validated by:

CRIZEL ANN L. VILLANUEVA

Education Program Specialist II
School Management, Monitoring, and Evaluation
(For Division/Cluster Training ONLY, remove if not)

________________________________________
School Monitoring and Evaluation
(For School Training ONLY, remove if not)

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
14
Attachment No. 7 (if applicable)
PICTURES OF THE VENUE
(To be filled out by the Proponent)

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
15
Attachment No. 8
MINUTES OF THE MEETING
(To be filled out by the Proponent)

Title: _______________________________________________________________________________
Date: ________________________
Venue: ______________________________________________________________________________

Present:
________________________ ________________________ ________________________

________________________ ________________________ ________________________

________________________ ________________________ ________________________

________________________ ________________________ ________________________

________________________ ________________________ ________________________

Proceedings:
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Agenda Discussion Decision

Overview/Rationale of
the Training

Date and Venue Planning

Determining Facilitators

Technical Working
Group Assignment

Adjourned ______________________

Prepared by:
(Program Proponent)

Noted:

(School Principal)

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
16
Attachment No. 9
RESOURCE SPEAKER’S PROFILE
(from RS Database)(To be filled out by the Proponent)

Topic Assigned: __________________________________________

Name: ___________________________________________________

Age: ______________ Sex:

______________

Contact Number: __________________________________________

Civil Status: _______________________ Religion: _________________________________

Complete Present Address: ______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

School (College): _______________________________________________________________

Year Graduated : ______________________________________________________________

Degree Received: ______________________________________________________________

Special Skills: _________________________________________________________________

School (Post Graduate): ________________________________________________________

Year Graduated : ______________________________________________________________

Degree Received: ______________________________________________________________

EMPLOYMENT RECORD

Company: ____________________________________________________________________

Position: _____________________________________________________________________

Years in Service:
_______________________________________________________________

Specialization: ________________________________________________________________

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
17
TRAINING(S)/ SEMINAR(S) ATTENDED RELATED TO THE TOPIC TO BE
DISCUSSED

(For the past 3 years)

Title of the Training(s)/ Seminar(s) Year

________________________________________________ __________________

________________________________________________ __________________

________________________________________________ __________________

________________________________________________ __________________

________________________________________________ __________________

________________________________________________ __________________

________________________________________________ __________________

________________________________________________ __________________

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
18
Attachment No. 10
(School Year/Fiscal Year: ____________)
SUMMARY OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT OF

PROFICIENT TEACHERS

HIGHLY PROFICIENT TEACHERS

**Tick the appropriate box of the applicable career stage

A. PRIORITY LEVELS

RANK 1

INDICATOR NO. DESCRIPTION

RANK 2

INDICATOR NO. DESCRIPTION

RANK 3

INDICATOR NO. DESCRIPTION

B. SUMMARY OF CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCY

Competencies Rank

Self- Management

Professionalism and Ethics

Result Focus

Teamwork

Service Orientation

Innovation

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
19
Attachment No. 11
(Samples are in red)
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Raymundo M. Cantonjos
Schools Division Superintendent

Bernadette T. Luna
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Emmanuel L. Resurreccion, Ed.D.

Chief Education Supervisor, SGOD

Gemma G. Cortez, Ed.D.

Chief Education Supervisor, CID

PLANNING COMMITTEE

Leticia T. Lopez, Ph.D.

Education Program Supervisor, SGOD

Vanessa R. Barcarse, Ed.D.

Senior Education Program Specialist, HRD

Renante O. Salimbao
Education Program Specialist, HRD

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE

Registration/ Accommodation
___________________________________

Attendance, Evaluation and Certification

___________________________________

Registration
___________________________________

Secretariat
___________________________________

Documentation
___________________________________

Welfare and Benefits

___________________________________

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
20
NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix
Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
21
Attachment No. 12
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AND TECHNICAL WORKING COMMITTEE

PARTICIPANTS
NO. NAME SCHOOL DESIGNATION SEX GENDER RELIGION DIFFERENTLY
ABLED? (Y/N)

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
22
TECHNICAL WORKING COMMITTEE
NO. NAME SCHOOL DESIGNATION SEX GENDER RELIGION DIFFERENTLY
ABLED? (Y/N)

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
23
Attachment No. 13
POST IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

TRAINING IMPACT EVALUATION

MONTHS TARGET DATE

12

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
24
Attachment No. 14 SESSION GUIDE
(Samples are in red)
Course Title: My Life, My Say: Enhancing Teachers’ Knowledge on GAD Basic Concepts

I. TITLE OF THE SESSION Basic GAD Concepts

II. NO. OF PARTICIPANTS Proficient and Highly Proficient Teachers

PARTICIPANTS’ PROFILE

Domain 1, Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

Strand 1 : Content knowledge and its application within and across curriculum areas
Strand 1. 2: Modeling effective applications of content knowledge within and across
III. PROFESSIONAL
STANDARD/S COVERED curriculum teaching areas"
Domain 3: Diversity of learners
Strand 1: Learners' gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences.
IV.DURATION 60 minutes
V. OBJECTIVE/S Terminal Objective: At the end of the session, the participants shall be able to craft
lesson plans to integrate GAD concepts in the delivery of lessons.

Enabling Objectives: Specifically, participants shall enable themselves to:

Differentiate between sex and gender;

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
25
 1. Explain the primary and secondary sex characteristics;
2. Compare and contrast sex roles and gender roles;
3. Craft lesson plan to integrate the GAD concepts discussed

VI. EXPECTED OUTPUTS lesson plan with integration of GAD basic concepts.

GAD BASIC CONCEPTS:

● Sex is biological characteristics of being a female or a male and it is universal
Gender is sociologically constructed.
● Primary sexual characteristics are present at birth and comprise the external and
internal genitalia (e.g., the penis and testes in males and the vagina and ovaries in
females).
VII. KEY CONTENT
● Secondary sexual characteristics are those that emerge during the prepubescent
through post
● pubescent phases (e.g., breasts in females

● The primary and secondary sexual characteristics will determine the sex and
gender roles.

REFERENCES DM 50 s 2020- DepEd Professional Development Priorities for Teachers and School
Leaders for School Year 2020-2023

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
26
 DO 32, s. 2017 – Gender-Responsive Basic Education Policy
DO 42, s. 2017 -National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine
Professional Standards for Teachers

VIII. SESSION FLOWS

OBJECTIVE
(The MATERIALS DAY /
participants KEY LEARNING POINTS METHODOLOGY / ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS (Slide TIME /
should be able Number) DURATION
to…)
DAY , Session
Day 1 Administration of Pre Test pre-test 10 mins.
result Slide no. 3

Activity
Ahha Ahhi Ahhum Activity (using
Kahoot, Mentimeter, Pear Deck) Slide nos.
5-8

The previous activity will help us 5 mins.

Analysis
analyze if the participants are

NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix

Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
27
 aware of the the differences
between sex and gender
concepts and roles

abstraction ● Sex and Gender Discussion of the concepts Slide nos. 30 mins
● Gender Roles 9-14

● primary and secondary

sexual characteristics

Application Craft lesson plan to integrate the Lesson Slide no. 14 mins.
plan 15
GAD concepts discussed.

Closure Closing statement : Slide no. 1 min.

16

Prepared by:

_________________________
Proponent
NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix
Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
28
NEAP/ RO Standard Training Proposal Matrix
Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 1, s. 2020, DepEd Memorandum No. 48, s. 2020,
and DepEd Memorandum No. 50, s. 2020
29