Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 9
CH 9
(CHE F212)
Sundari R
BITS Pilani Instructor
K K Birla Goa Campus
Outline
2
8/21/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Introduction
• External flows
• Flow situation in which an object is completely surrounded by the fluid
• Flow over body immersed in an unbounded fluid
• Aerodynamics – External flows involving air as the fluid medium
4
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
External flow characteristics
• When a body moves through a fluid, due to the solid-fluid interactions, different forces
develop at the solid-fluid interface
• These forces can be expressed in terms of stresses
• Wall shear stresses on the body, 𝜏𝑤 – due to viscous effects
• Normal stresses, p - due to pressure
• Both 𝜏𝑤 and p vary in magnitude and direction along the surface
• Rather than the detailed distribution of 𝜏𝑤 and p, the resultant force distribution in a certain
direction is what is required!
5
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
External flow characteristics
6
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Drag and Lift
To compute drag and lift forces, we take a small area element, obtain the x and y component
forces over this small area and integrate
Similarly,
7
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Drag and Lift
• The net forces in the x and y directions are
• Thus, both pressure and shear stress distribution contribute to the lift and drag forces for an
arbitrary object.
• To calculate the lift and drag, we should have a knowledge of the pressure and shear stress
distributions, in addition to the shape and orientation of the body 8
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 1: Drag and Lift
Air at standard conditions flows past a flat plate as is indicated in the Figure. In case (a)
the plate is parallel to the upstream flow, and in case (b) it is perpendicular to the
upstream flow. The pressure and shear stress distributions on the surface are as
indicated. Determine the drag and lift forces for the two cases.
9
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 1: Drag and Lift
10
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 1: Drag and Lift
11
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 1: Drag and Lift
12
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 1: Drag and Lift
13
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 1: Drag and Lift- Key inferences
1. For a streamlined body, case(a), where the flat plate is parallel to the flow direction,
1. There is no lift generated
2. The drag force is due to the contribution of shear stresses alone
3. The drag force is small
2. For a blunt body, case(b), where the flat plate is perpendicular to the flow direction,
1. There is no lift generated
2. The drag force is entirely due to the pressure difference between the front and back portions
3. The drag force is high!
3. If the flat plate is oriented at an angle to the flow, then both pressure and shear stresses
contribute to the lift and drag forces
14
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Friction/ shear drag
1. It is that part of the drag that is due directly to the shear stress, 𝜏𝑤 , on the object
2. Indicated by the factor 𝜏𝑤 sin θ, friction drag depends both on the magnitude of shear
stress and the orientation of the object
3. As the viscosity of most common fluids is small, the contribution of the shear force to
the overall drag on a body is often quite small
4. This means at low Re or for highly streamlined bodies, the contribution of skin friction
drag to total drag is higher!
15
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Pressure/ form drag
1. It is that part of the drag that is due directly to the pressure, p, on an object
2. It is also called form drag because of its strong dependency on the shape or form of the
object
3. For large Re, the pressure drag coefficient is independent of Re
4. For small Re, the pressure drag coefficient is proportional to 1/Re
16
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Streamlined bodies
• Body whose surface coincides with the streamlines, when the body is placed in a flow
• Flow separation will occur only at the rear part of the body, and hence, the pressure drag
is low
• Total drag is entirely contributed by shear drag
• A body may be streamlined at low velocities, may not be so at higher velocities
Flow past an airfoil
Zero angle of attack , no flow separation 5o angle of attack, flow separation occurs 17
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Bluff/blunt bodies
• Body whose surface doesn’t coincide with the streamlines, when the body is placed in a
flow
• Flow separation occurs resulting in the formation of large wakes
• Pressure drag is very much higher than the skin friction drag
18
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Drag and Lift
1. It is very difficult to obtain the pressure and shear stress distributions for all bodies.
2. Hence, one cannot use the expressions obtained earlier to compute drag and lift
3. An alternative is to determine drag and lift for a body moving in a fluid of density ρ and
velocity U
𝜌𝑈 2
𝐹𝐷 = 𝐶𝐷 𝐴
2
𝜌𝑈 2 Frontal area
𝐹𝐿 = 𝐶𝐿 𝐴
2
21
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 2 contd.
22
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 3 – Calculation of drag
A man weighing 882.9 N descends to the ground from an airplane with the help of a parachute
against the resistance of air. The parachute is hemispherical and comes down with a velocity of 20
m/s. The drag coefficient is 0.5 and the density of air is 1.25 kg/m3. Find the diameter of the
parachute.
23
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 3 contd.
24
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
PART B - Boundary Layer Theory
25
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Origin of Boundary layer theory
D’Alembert’s Paradox:
• For incompressible and inviscid potential flow –
the drag force is zero on a body moving with
constant velocity relative to the fluid
Flow past a circular cylinder
• However, experiments always revealed a finite
drag experienced by the cylinder in a moving The drag on an object in an
inviscid fluid is zero, but the
fluid! drag on an object in a fluid
Theory suggests a symmetric
with vanishingly small (but
• There was a contradiction between experiments nonzero) viscosity is not zero!
pressure distribution as opposed
to experiments!
and theoretical prediction of forces acting on a
Symmetric pressure distribution and zero viscosity
the object
indicates zero force exerted on the object!
27
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Origin of Boundary layer theory
• The theories based on inviscid assumption did not match with experimental observation!
• In 1904, Ludwig Prandtl came up with the idea of boundary layer, after which the role of viscosity in
the steady fluid motion was understood and d’Alembert’s paradox explained
• Although the Navier-Stokes equations were developed in the 1800’s, the theoretical treatment for
viscous flows was difficult due to the mathematical difficulty in solving this equation
• Prandtl showed that many viscous flows can be analyzed by dividing the flow into two regions, one
close to solid boundaries (where visocus effects are important), the other covering the rest of the
flow (where the fluid behaves as if it were inviscid).
• The boundary-layer concept provided the link that had been missing between theory and practice
28
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Boundary layer
29
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Characteristics of flow past an object
• External flows past an object encompasses a wide variety of fluid mechanics phenomena
• The flow characteristics depend very strongly on the size and orientation of the body, speed, and fluid
properties.
𝜌𝑈𝑙
• 𝑅𝑒 = is an important dimensionless number for external flows.
𝜇
• The Re typically varies between 10-109 for external flows. If Re > 100, the flow is dominated by inertia and
Re < 1 indicates a flow dominated by viscous forces.
• Low Re flows: small dirt particles settling down in a river, an object moving through a highly viscous liquid
• To illustrate the flow characteristics past streamlined and blunt objects as a function of Re, we consider
two cases
(a) flow past a flat plate (b) flow past a cylinder
30
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Flow over a flat plate –Streamlined body
33
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 4 contd.
34
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Boundary layer theory - flow over a flat plate
u∞ u∞
u boundary layer
y
x Thin flat plate
36
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Boundary layer theory - flow over a flat plate
37
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Boundary layer theory - flow over a flat plate
38
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Boundary layer theory - flow over a flat plate
39
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Blasius solution- boundary layer thickness
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑣
• 𝐄𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐲: + =0
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑦
• 𝐁𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬: 𝑢 = 𝑣 = 0 𝑎𝑡 𝑦 = 0, 𝑢 → 𝑈 𝑎𝑠 𝑦 → ∞
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢 𝜕2 𝑢
• 𝐗 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐦 𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: 𝑢 + 𝑣 = 𝜐 2
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑦 𝜕𝑦
𝑈 1/2 1
• Defining a similarity variable 𝜂 = 𝑦 and the stream function 𝜓 = 𝑈𝜐𝑥 𝑓(𝜂) 2
𝜐𝑥
• Boundary layer displacement thickness, δ*: the distance the plate would be moved so that the loss of mass
flux (due to reduction in uniform flow area) is equivalent to the loss the boundary layer causes
• If 𝑏 is the plate width, we equate the deficit flow rate( due to the boundary layer) in the shaded region as
∞ ∞ 𝑢
𝛿 ∗ 𝑏𝜌𝑈 = 0 𝜌 𝑈 − 𝑢 𝑏 𝑑𝑦 or 𝛿 ∗ = 0 1− 𝑑𝑦
𝑈 41
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Boundary layer theory - analysis
∞ 𝑢
• Boundary layer displacement thickness, δ*: 𝛿 ∗ = 0 1− 𝑑𝑦
𝑈
• Represents the outward displacement of the streamlines caused by the viscous effects on the plate
• Boundary layer momentum thickness, 𝜣: distance the plate would be moved so that the loss of momentum
flux is equivalent to the loss the boundary layer actually causes.
• used to calculate the drag force experienced by an object.
• It represents the deficit in momentum flux for the actual boundary layer flow on a plate of width b
• We now do a momentum integral analysis to obtain the expression for drag
42
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Momentum Integral Analysis
43
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Momentum Integral Analysis
44
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Momentum Integral Analysis
45
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 5 – momentum integral analysis
For the velocity profile for a laminar boundary layer,
𝑢 3𝑦 1 𝑦 3
= −
𝑈∞ 2 𝛿 2 𝛿
Determine the boundary layer thickness, shear stress, drag force and coefficient of drag in terms of Re
46
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 5 – momentum integral analysis
47
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 6 – momentum integral analysis
48
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 6 – momentum integral analysis
49
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 6 – momentum integral analysis
50
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Momentum integral analysis
51
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Flow characteristics for a non-zero pressure gradient
• We looked at the boundary layer over a flat plate where the pressure is a constant throughout the fluid.
• When a fluid flows past any object that is curved, the pressure is not uniform
• If the Re is large, relatively thin boundary layer is formed over the object.
• In this layer, the pressure gradient along the flow direction is non-zero, however that in the direction normal to
the surface is negligibly small.
• This non-zero pressure gradient is due to the variation in the free stream velocity
• The flow characteristics within and outside the boundary layer is highly dependent on the pressure gradient!
52
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Favorable pressure gradient
𝜕2𝑢 𝜕𝑝 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢
𝜇 = ቚ − ቚ
𝜕𝑦 2 𝜕𝑥 𝑑𝑦 𝑦+∆𝑦 𝑑𝑦 𝑦 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢
Applying the finite difference formula, <0 Or, 𝑑𝑦ቚ < 𝑑𝑦ቚ
∆𝑦 𝑦+∆𝑦 𝑦 53
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Zero pressure gradient
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑝
For flows between two flat plate, 𝑑𝑥 = 0 or 𝑑𝑥 = 0
𝜕2 𝑢
This implies 𝜕𝑦 2 = 0
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢
ቚ − ቚ
𝑑𝑦 𝑦+∆𝑦 𝑑𝑦 𝑦
Applying the finite difference formula, =0
∆𝑦
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢
Or, 𝑑𝑦ቚ = 𝑑𝑦ቚ
𝑦+∆𝑦 𝑦
For uniform flow over a flat plate, the flow never separates
54
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Adverse pressure gradient
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢
𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑝 ቚ − ቚ
For flows between two flat plate, < 0 or >0 𝑑𝑦 𝑦+∆𝑦 𝑑𝑦 𝑦
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥 Applying the finite difference formula, >0
∆𝑦
𝜕2 𝑢
This implies >0
𝜕𝑦 2 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑢
Or, 𝑑𝑦ቚ > 𝑑𝑦ቚ
𝑦+∆𝑦 𝑦
55
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Flow characteristics for a non-zero pressure gradient
56
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Flow characteristics for a non-zero pressure gradient
58
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Drag and Lift- a revisit
Alternately,
𝜌𝑈 2
𝐹𝐷 = 𝐶𝐷 𝐴
2
Frontal area
𝜌𝑈 2
𝐹𝐿 = 𝐶𝐿 𝐴
2
• Where µ, D and U are the viscosity of the fluid, diameter of the sphere and fluid
velocity respectively
• Out of the total drag, 2/3rd is contributed by shear drag and 1/3rd due to form drag
• 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑔, 𝐹𝐷,𝑓 = 2𝜋𝜇𝐷𝑈
• 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑔, 𝐹𝐷,𝑝 = 𝜋𝜇𝐷𝑈
60
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Drag on a sphere - Stoke’s solution
Determination of drag coefficient
From Stoke’s derviation: 𝐹𝐷 = 3𝜋𝜇𝐷𝑈
𝜌𝑈 2
From a dimensional analysis: 𝐹𝐷 = 𝐶𝐷 𝐴
2
𝜋𝐷2
Substituting for A, the projected area as 𝐴 =
4
62
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 2 - Drag on a sphere
A metallic ball of diameter 0.002 m drops in a fluid of specific gravity 0.95 and viscosity 15 poise. The
density of the ball is 12000 kg/m3. Find
1. The drag force exerted by the fluid on the metallic ball
2. The skin friction drag and the pressure drag
3. The terminal velocity of the ball falling in the fluid
63
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Problem 2 - Drag on a sphere
64
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Flow through packed bed
65
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Flow through packed bed
• Liquid/gas flow through a bed of solids
• Present analysis: flow of a single fluid phase through a column of stationary solid particles
• Actual or real packed beds are randomly packed with irregular size particles
• The flow–path of a fluid though the packed bed is tortuous.
• For the theoretical analysis to calculate pressure–drop, actual flow channels are replaced with
parallel cylindrical conduits of constant cross–section, whose total surface area and void
volume match those of the bed
• Particles are assumed to be of the same size and shape having constant sphericity, 𝜙𝑠 .
6
ൗ𝐷𝑝 𝑠𝑝
𝜙𝑠 = 𝑠𝑝 ൗ𝑣𝑝 is the surface-volume ratio of the particle whose nominal size is Dp
ൗ𝑣𝑝
66
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Flow through packed bed
• The resistance to the flow of fluid through the voids in a bed of solid is due to the resultant of the total
drag of all particles in the bed
• Ergun equation: The empirical correlation to evaluate pressure drop in a packed bed , for the entire range
of flow rates, is obtained by assuming viscous losses and kinetic energy losses are additive
2
Δ𝑃 150𝑉ത𝑜 𝜇 1 − 𝜀 2
1.75𝜌𝑉ത𝑜 1 − 𝜀
= +
𝐿 𝜙𝑠 2 𝐷𝑝 2 𝜀 3 𝜙𝑠 𝐷𝑝 𝜀 3
Δ𝑃 150𝑉ത𝑜 𝜇 1 − 𝜀 2
=
𝐿 𝜙𝑠 2 𝐷𝑝 2 𝜀 3
• Blake Plummer equation: applicable when flow rate is higher , i.e., when 𝑅𝑒𝑝 > 1000
2
Δ𝑃 1.75𝜌𝑉ത𝑜 1 − 𝜀
=
𝐿 𝜙𝑠 𝐷𝑝 𝜀 3
• Drag force, 𝐹𝐷 = ∆𝑃 𝑆𝑜 𝜀
Where 𝑆𝑜 is the cross-sectional area of the packed bed
68
12/5/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Summary
69
8/21/2021 Sundari R BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus