Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Suicide Risk Assessment ED
Suicide Risk Assessment ED
Suicide Risk Assessment ED
and Management
Emergency Department
NSW DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
73 Miller Street
NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2060
Tel. (02) 9391 9000
Fax. (02) 9391 9101
TTY. (02) 9391 9900
www.health.nsw.gov.au
September 2004
Contents
Framework for Suicide Risk Assessment Management ...................................................6
and Management for NSW Health Staff .........................ii
Maximising safety ..........................................................6
– Changeability ...........................................................4
Related documents
Framework for Suicide Risk Assessment and Management for NSW Health Staff – SHPN (MH) 040184
Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Protocols: General Hospital Ward – SHPN (MH) 040185
Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Protocols: General Community Health Service – SHPN (MH) 040187
Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Protocols: Community Mental Health Service – SHPN (MH) 040182
Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Protocols: Mental Health In-Patient Unit – SHPN (MH) 040183
Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Protocols: Justice Health Long Bay Hospital – SHPN (MH) 040188
Engagement Detection
Preliminary Suicide
Risk Assessment
Immediate
Management
Mental Health
Assessment
Assessment of
Suicide Risk
Corroborative
History
Determining Suicide
Risk Level
Management of
Suicide Risk
Re-assessment of
Suicide Risk
Discharge
category. The Mental Health Triage Scale developed the circumstances, for example, was there an incident,
by South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service can assist were they brought in by police, are they accompanied
in the triage of people presenting with mental health by relative or friend or is it a self-presentation?
problems. The Australasian College for Emergency ■ What collateral information is available, for example,
Medicine has developed an Australasian Triage Scale 5 medical records, family, accompanying person/s,
and guidelines for implementing the scale in emergency police, other health providers?
departments6 which include ‘behaviour/psychiatric’ ■ Is the person likely to leave before being assessed?
descriptors that may also be used to assist in triage.*
■ Is the person known to a mental health service?1
High suicide risk is suggested by:
If a person is known to the emergency department
■ high intent
and has presented before with one or more suicide
■ definite plan attempts, the clinician should refer to the person’s
■ hopelessness management plan.
■ depression
Brief psychiatric assessment
■ psychosis
■ Is the person experiencing any current psychiatric
■ past attempts symptoms (presence of depressed mood and
■ impulsivity symptoms of depression such as reduced energy,
concentration, weight loss, loss of interest, psychosis,
■ intoxication
especially command hallucinations)?
■ male gender
■ Is there a past history of psychiatric problems?
■ recent psychiatric hospitalisation (A history of a mental Illness should raise the
■ access to means. clinician’s concern that the current presentation
may be a recurrence or relapse.)
■ Mental state assessment (GFCMA: Got Four Clients
Initial assessment
Monday Afternoon):
In general, a medical assessment should be carried out
before referral to a mental health service (or other – G eneral appearance (agitation, distress,
specialty service). However, when a person who is psychomotor retardation)
known to the mental health service is showing signs of – F orm of thought (is the person’s speech logical
mental distress at triage, the mental health team can be and making sense)
contacted concurrently with the medical assessment. – C ontent of thought (hopelessness, despair,
The initial assessment should include a brief psychiatric anger, shame or guilt)
assessment and an initial suicide risk assessment. – M ood and affect (depressed, low, flat or
The purpose of the initial suicide risk assessment inappropriate)
is to determine: – A ttitude (insight, cooperation)
■ the severity and nature of the person’s problems ■ Coping skills, capacity and supports:
■ the risk of danger to self or others – Has the person been able to manage serious
■ whether a more detailed risk assessment is indicated. problems or stressful situations in the past?
– Does the person employ maladaptive coping
strategies such as substance or alcohol abuse?
*The Australasian Triage Scale can be downloaded from – Are there social or community supports?
www.acem.org.au/open/documents/triage.htm Can the person use them?
‘At risk’ Mental State Eg. Severe depression; Eg. Moderate depression; Eg. Nil or mild depression,
– depressed sadness;
Command hallucinations or Some sadness;
– psychotic
delusions about dying; No psychotic symptoms;
– hopelessness, despair Some symptoms of psychosis;
– guilt, shame, anger, Preoccupied with Feels hopeful about the
Some feelings of
agitation hopelessness, despair, future;
hopelessness;
– impulsivity feelings of worthlessness;
None/mild anger, hostility.
Moderate anger, hostility.
Severe anger, hostility.
Suicide attempt or suicidal Eg. Continual / specific Eg. Frequent thoughts; Eg. Nil or vague thoughts;
thoughts thoughts;
Multiple attempts of low No recent attempt or 1 recent
– intentionality
Evidence of clear intention; lethality; attempt of low lethality and
– lethality
low intentionality.
– access to means An attempt with high lethality Repeated threats.
– previous suicide attempt/s (ever).
Corroborative History Eg. Unable to access Eg. Access to some Eg. Able to access
– family, carers information, unable to verify information; information / verify information
– medical records information, or there is a and account of events of
Some doubts to plausibility of
– other service conflicting account of events person at risk (logic,
person’s account of events.
providers/sources to that of those of the person plausibility).
at risk.
Strengths and Supports Eg. Patient is refusing help; Eg. Patient is ambivalent; Eg. Patient is accepting help;
(coping & connectedness)
Lack of supportive Moderate connectedness; Therapeutic alliance forming;
– expressed communication
relationships / hostile few relationships;
– availability of supports Highly connected / good
relationships;
– willingness / capacity of Available but unwilling / relationships and supports;
support person/s Not available or unwilling / unable to help consistently.
Willing and able to help
– safety of person & others unable to help.
consistently.
No (foreseeable) risk: Following comprehensive suicide risk assessment, there is no evidence of current risk to the
person. No thoughts of suicide or history of attempts, has a good social support network.
■ Where the police have brought the person to – those who report or are reported to be preparing
the emergency department, they may be requested for suicide have definite plans
to stay with the person if there is concern for ■ people with probable mental illness or disorder:
others' safety, until the hospital can safely manage
– those who are depressed or have schizophrenia
the situation. Local protocols concerning the
or other psychotic illness
Memorandum of Understanding between NSW
■ people whose presentations suggest a probable
Police and NSW Health10 should be consulted.
mental health problem:
■ If possible, provide a calming support person
– those who report accidental overdoses,
to stay with the person at risk.
unexplained somatic complaints or who
■ All items that could be used for self-harm
present following repeated accidents,
(including belts, ties, shoelaces, dangerous objects)
increased risk- taking behaviour, increased
should be removed from the person and their
impulsivity, self-harming behaviours
immediate environment.
(eg superficial wrist-cutting)
If a person who is considered to be at significant risk – co-morbidity (eg with alcohol and other drugs,
absconds from the emergency department, the intellectual disability, organic brain damage)
police should be immediately contacted and provided ■ people recently discharged from an acute psychiatric
with a description of the patient and the likely areas
in-patient unit, especially within the last month
they may be located. Local protocols concerning the
■ people recently discharged from an emergency
Memorandum of Understanding between NSW Police
department following presentation of
and NSW Health* should be consulted. A copy of the
psychiatric symptoms or repeat presentations
Schedule is to be provided if relevant. The mental health
for somatic symptoms.
service should also be contacted if it is known that the
person is a client of the mental health service. Protocols must be in place for a rapid response from
*The Memorandum of Understanding between NSW Police the mental health service in responding to a referral.
and NSW Health was developed and released in 1998 to provide There may be occasions when unavoidable delays
a framework for the effective management of people with a may be experienced by the mental health service in
mental illness when the services of NSW Police and NSW Health,
responding due to another mental health crisis occurring
mental health services, and the Ambulance Service of NSW are
required. The document is being reviewed and revised by an simultaneously. However, it is important that the mental
inter-departmental working group overseeing its implementation. health service responds as rapidly as possible to referrals
from the emergency department. After contacting the ■ a verbal report at discharge or an interim summary
mental health team the emergency department staff within one day of discharge
should advise the person and/or family of the expected ■ a written report to follow within 3 days.
waiting time to see the mental health team.