David sm13 PPT 01

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 68

Chapter 1

The Nature of Strategic Management

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
13th Edition
Fred David

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -1


What is Strategy?

As there is always an element of


uncertainty about future, strategy
is more about a set of options
("strategic choices") than a fixed
plan. It derives from the Greek
"στρατηγία" (strategia), "office of
general, command, generalship"

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -2


Strategic Management –Defined

Art & science of formulating,


implementing, and evaluating,
cross-functional decisions that
enable an organization to achieve its
objectives

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -3


Purpose of Strategic Management

To exploit and create new and different


opportunities for tomorrow

A long-range planning tries to optimize for


tomorrow the trends of today.

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -4


Purpose of Strategic Management

Market based-opportunities

Resource based-core competencies

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -5


WHAT MAKES A DECISION
STRATEGIC
Unlike many other decisions, strategic decisions deal
with the long-run future of an entire organization and
have three characteristics:
1. Rare: Strategic decisions are unusual and typically have
no precedent (emsal) to follow.
2. Consequential (önemli ve sonucu olan): Strategic
decisions commit substantial resources and demand a
great deal of commitment from people at all levels.
3. Directive (yol gösterici): Strategic decisions set
precedents for lesser decisions and future actions
throughout an organization.
Tomorrow's world is not going to
be the same.....
So, how could you plan your future if tomorrow
doesn't even resemble to today?
- Strategic planning originated in the 1950s and
became popular between mid-1960s-mid-
1970s.
- Casted aside in 1980s due to not yielding
high returns.

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -8


Strategic Management

- In essence, the strategic plan is a company’s


game plan.
- Profit margins have become very slim; no
room for errors in strategy...
- Long term competitive advantage

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -9


3 Stages of the Strategic
Management Process
Strategy formulation (sometimes
strategic planning)

◼ Strategy implementation

◼ Strategy evaluation

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -10


Strategy Formulation

Vision & Mission

External Opportunities & Threats

Internal Strengths & Weaknesses

Long-Term Objectives

Alternative Strategies

Strategy Selection

Multifuncfional consequences and enduring effects


Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -11
Issues in Strategy
Formulation

✓Businesses to enter
✓Businesses to abandon
✓Allocation of resources
✓Expansion (büyüme) or
diversification(çeşitlendir
me)
✓International markets
✓Mergers (birleşme) or
joint ventures (ortaklık)
✓Avoidance of hostile
takeover

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -12


Strategy Implementation

Annual Objectives

Devising Policies

Employee Motivation

Resource Allocation

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -13


Strategy Implementation Steps

◼ Developing a strategy-supportive culture


◼ Creating an effective organizational structure
◼ Redirecting marketing efforts
◼ Preparing budgets
◼ Developing and utilizing information systems
◼ Linking employee compensation to
organizational performance

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -14


Issues in Strategy
Implementation It is the Action Stage of
Strategic Management

✓Mobilization of
employees & managers

✓Most difficult stage

✓Interpersonal skills
critical

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -15


Strategy Implementation

Research indicates that the ability to implement


a strategy is viewed as considerably more
important than strategy formulation, and that
strategy implementation, rather than strategy
formulation, is he key to superior
organisational performance.
** “In the majority of cases – we estimate 70
percent - the real problem isn’t bad strategy but
bad execution” (Fortune 1999).
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -16
Strategy Implementation

http://hbr.org/2005/10/the-office-of-strategy-management/ar/1

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -18


Strategy Implementation

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -19


Strategy Implementation
All the firms are heading by strategic decisions.
The number of those strategic decisions
determines their future targets and performances.
The average decisions taken by firms all around
the world is 2.5 per firm. For the routine decisions
this rate goes even higher, to 6.1. The best
performance companies in Turkey are taking an
average of 5 decisions annually; that doesn’t
distinguishes them from their competitors only.
What matters most is the speed of implementing
those decisions in a lucrative way.
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -20
Which strategy does not work well?
Strategy Evaluation

Internal Review

External Review

Performance Measurement

Corrective Action

Modify
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -21
Prime Task of
Strategic Management

Peter Drucker: Think through the


overall mission of a business. Ask
the key question:
“What is our Business?”

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -22


2
3

Managers
Managers as
as
An
An optimal
optimal decision
decision
isis possible
decision
decision makers
makers
possible
Assumptions
Assumptions of
of the
the
All
Rational
Rational Model
Model
All relevant
relevant information
information
isis available
available

All
All relevant
relevant information
information isis
Rational
Rational
understandable
understandable decision
decision
All
All alternatives
alternatives are
are known
known
making
making

All
All possible
possible outcomes
outcomes known
known
9 BARTOL, MANAGEMENT: A PACIFIC RIM FOCUS 3E © McGraw-Hill Australia 2001
2
4

Managers
Managers as
as
Time
Time constraints
constraints
decision
decision makers
makers
Satisficing
Satisficing
Limited
Limited ability
ability to
to
understand
understand all
all factors
factors

Inadequate
Inadequate base
base ‘Satisficing’
‘Satisficing’
of
of information
information
decision
decision
Limited
Limited memory
memory of
of making
making
decision-makers
decision-makers

Poor
Poor perception
perception of
of factors
factors
to
to be
be considered
considered
in
in decision
decision process
process
10 BARTOL, MANAGEMENT: A PACIFIC RIM FOCUS 3E © McGraw-Hill Australia 2001
Integrating Intuition (önsezi) & Analysis

- The strategic management process


attempts to organize quantitative and
qualitative information under conditions of
uncertainty.
- An objective, logical, systematic approach
for making decisions in an organization. But;

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -25


Integrating Intuition & Analysis

Intuition is based on:


❑ Past experiences

❑ Judgment

❑ Feelings

Intuition is useful for decision making in


conditions of:
❑ Great uncertainty

❑ Little precedent

❑ Highly interrelated variables

❑ Several plausible alternatives

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -26


Einstein once said:

Imagination is more important


than knowledge, because
knowledge is limited, whereas
imagination embraces the entire
world.....

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -27


Adapting to Change

Organizations should continually


monitor internal and external
events and trends so that timely
changes can be made as needed

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -28


Adapting to Change

* What kind of business should we


become?
* Are we in the right field?
* Should we reshape our business?
* What new competitors are entering
our industry?

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -29


WHY NOKIA FAILED? A concise timeline of Nokia’s important moments:
•In October 1998, Nokia became the best-selling mobile
phone brand in the world;
•Nokia’s operating profit went from $1 billion in 1995 to
almost $4 billion by 1999;
•The best-selling mobile phone of all time, the Nokia 1100,
was created in 2003;
•In 2007, Apple introduced the iPhone;
•By the end of 2007, half of all smartphones sold in the
world were Nokias, while Apple’s iPhone had a mere 5 per
cent share of the global market;
•In 2010 Nokia launched the “iPhone killer” but failed to
match the competition;
•The quality of Nokia’s high-end phones continues to
decline;
•In just six years, the market value of Nokia declined by
about 90%;
•Nokia’s decline accelerates by 2011 and is acquired by
Microsoft in 2013.
Nokia’s demise from being the world’s best mobile phone
company to losing it all by 2013 has become a case study
discussed by teachers and students in business
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall management classes.
Ch 1 -30
WHY NOKIA FAILED?
When explaining Nokia’s fall many observers found
three reasons:

-Nokia’s technology was inferior to Apple’s;

-The arrogance among top-level managers (Fear was


widespread and communication was lacking)

-Lack of vision.

-Top managers lacked technical competence which


influenced how they could assess technological
limitations during goal setting; by comparison, the
top engineers at Apple were all engineers;

-Instead of allocating resources to the achievement


of long-term goals such as developing a new
operating system, Nokia management decided to
develop new phone devices for short-term market
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall demands.
https://medium.com/multiplier-magazine/why-did-nokia-fail-81110d981787
Ch 1 -31
Strategic Management is
Gaining and Maintaining
Competitive Advantage

Anything that a firm does especially


well compared to rival firms

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -32


Achieving Sustained Competitive
Advantage

1. Continually adapting to changes in


external trends and events and internal
capabilities, competencies, and resources

2. Effectively formulating, implementing, and


evaluating strategies that capitalize on those
factors

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -33


Who are strategists?

Strategists hold various job titles, such as chief


executive officers, president, owner, chair of
the board, executive director, chancellor, dean,
or entrepreneur.
Strategists

Gather Information

Analyze Information

Organize Information

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -35


Strategy Formulation

Vision & Mission

External Opportunities & Threats

Internal Strengths & Weaknesses

Long-Term Objectives

Alternative Strategies

Strategy Selection

Multifuncfional consequences and enduring effects


Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -36
Vision and Mission Statements

Vision Statement –
What do we want to become?

Mission Statement –
What is our business?

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -37


External Opportunities and Threats

Analysis of Trends
❑ Economic
❑ Social
❑ Cultural
❑ Demographic/Environmental
❑ Political, Legal, Governmental
❑ Technological
❑ Competitors

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -38


External Opportunities and Threats

Basic Tenet(ilke-prensip) of Strategic


Management Environmental
Beyond control scanning/industry analysis

Take advantage of
External Opportunities

Strategy Formulation

Avoid/minimize impact of
External Threats
Controllable

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -39


Internal Strengths and Weaknesses

❑ Controllable activities performed


especially well or poorly

❑ Determined relative to competitors


and maybe determined by both
performance and elements of
being

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -40


Internal Strengths and Weaknesses

◼ Typically located in functional areas of the firm

❑ Management
❑ Marketing

❑ Finance/Accounting

❑ Production/Operations

❑ Research & Development

❑ Management Information Systems

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -41


Internal Strengths and Weaknesses

Assessing the Internal Environment

Ratios

Performance Measures
Internal Factors
Industry Averages

Survey Data

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -42


Long-Term Objectives

❑ Specific results that an organization


seeks to achieve in pursuing its basic
mission

❑ Long-term means more than one year

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -43


Long-Term Objectives

◼ Essential for ensuring the firm’s success


❑ Provide direction

❑ Aid in evaluation

❑ Create synergy

❑ Reveal priorities

❑ Focus coordination

❑ Provide basis for planning, organizing,


motivating, and controlling

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -44


Long-Term Objectives

Objectives should be challenging,


measurable, consistent, reasonable, and
clear.

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -45


Strategies

Means by which long-term objectives


are achieved

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -46


Strategies
◼ Examples
❑ Geographic expansion

❑ Diversification

❑ Acquisition

❑ Product development

❑ Market penetration

❑ Retrenchment(tasarruf-kemer sıkma)

❑ Divestiture(elden çıkarma)

❑ Liquidation(tasfiye-nakte çevirme)

❑ Joint venture

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -47


Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -48
Annual Objectives

• Short-term milestones that firms must


achieve to reach long-term objectives.

• Like long-term objectives, annual


objectives should be measurable,
quantitative, challenging, realistic,
consistent, and prioritized.

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -49


Policies

• Means by which annual objectives will


be achieved.

• Policies include guidelines, rules, and


procedures established to support
efforts to achieve stated objectives.
• Values vs policies
• Policies vs strategies

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -56


Where are we
now?
Where do we want to
go?
How are we going to get
there?

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -57


Strategic Management Model

❑ Strategic Management Process


❑ Dynamic & continuous

❑ More formal in larger


organizations

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -58


Strategic Management

◼ Communication is a key to
successful strategic management

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -59


Benefits of Strategic Management

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -60


Benefits of Strategic Management

◼ Nonfinancial Benefits
❑ Enhanced awareness of threats
❑ Improved understanding of competitors’ strategies
❑ Increased employee productivity
❑ Reduced resistance to change
❑ Clearer understanding of performance-reward
relationship
❑ Enhanced problem-prevention capabilities

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -61


Why Some Firms Do No Strategic
Planning
◼ Lack of knowledge of strategic planning
◼ Poor reward structures
◼ Fire fighting
◼ Waste of time
◼ Too expensive
◼ Laziness
◼ Content with success

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -62


Why Some Firms Do No Strategic
Planning (continued)
◼ Fear of failure
◼ Overconfidence
◼ Prior bad experience
◼ Self-interest
◼ Fear of the unknown
◼ Honest difference of opinion
◼ Suspicion

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -63


Pitfalls (tuzak-tehlike)in Strategic
Planning

Strategic planning is an involved,


intricate(çetrefilli), and complex process
that takes an organization into uncharted
territory

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -64


Effective Strategic Planning is:

◼ A people process more than a paper process


◼ A learning process
◼ Words supported by numbers
◼ Simple and nonroutine
◼ Varying assignments, team membership,
meeting formats, and planning calendars
◼ Challenging assumptions underlying
corporate strategy
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -65
Effective Strategic Planning
continued
◼ Welcomes bad news
◼ Requires open-mindedness and a spirit of
inquiry
◼ Is not a bureaucratic mechanism
◼ Is not ritualistic or stilted(tantanalı)
◼ Is not too formal, predictable, or rigid
◼ Does not contain jargon or arcane(sır dolu)
language

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -66


Effective Strategic Planning
continued
◼ Is not a formal system for control
◼ Does not disregard qualitative information
◼ Is not controlled by “technicians”
◼ Does not pursue too many strategies at once
◼ Continually strengthens the “good ethics is
good business” policy

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -67


Comparing Business and Military
Strategy
◼ Strategic planning started in the military
◼ Similarity
❑ Both business and military organizations must
adapt to change and constantly improve
◼ Difference
❑ Business strategy assumes competition
❑ Military strategy assumes conflict

Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 1 -68

You might also like