Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2021 Sajeesh S4
2021 Sajeesh S4
2021 Sajeesh S4
Session 4
S. Sajeesh
9/8/2021 1
Agenda
Review Questions and Insights
Resource Allocation
Allocation among marketing mix variables
Allocating between acquisition and retention
Bass Model – Predicting when sales will peak
Optimal Production Planning
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
DECISIONS
3
Optimal Marketing
Problem: $1 billion to invest in Marketing across
14 product categories (476 category-region
combinations)
Solution: Reallocation
5
Allocating Resources across Marketing
Inputs
In te n tio n M a rke t S h a re
M a rke t S h a re A w a re n e s s
A w a re n e s s In te n tio n
Use market share identity model for resource
allocation
The proportion of
The proportion of The proportion of
those who intend to
the segment- those who are aware of
buy who actually
population aware of the product who intend
do so
our product to buy it
Inte ntio n M a rk e t S ha re
M a rk e t S ha re A w a re ne ss
A w a re ne ss Inte ntio n
A P
Market Share t Advertisin g t Intercept Price t
S
Salesforce t
A P S
M Sh t Adv t P rt S f t
A P S
M Sh t Adv t P rt S f t
lo g(M S h t ) lo g( ) A lo g( A d v t ) P lo g( P r t ) S lo g( S f t )
k 1
k
Like US/(US+Them)
Allocating resources across multiple
products within an SBU
Once the market response function has been estimated, the
rule for optimal allocation across products
P c e S
X i n i i ii i B
*
Pi ci eii Si
i 1
Elasticity Matrix
Effect on Sales of
Expenditure
on Regular Elite
X1 Regular e11 e21=0
X2 Elite e12=0 e22
Optimal Allocation
Case X1 (Regular) X2 (Elite)
Case I
e11=0.4
246.3 3.7
e22=0.2
Case II
e11=0.4
242.72 7.28
e22=0.4
Case III
e11=0.2
235.85 14.15
e22=0.4
13
Empirical Generalizations on Elasticities
Elasticities
9/8/2021 15
Manage Marketing by the Customer Equity Test
- Can we do better?
17
Decision Calculus
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
Acquisition rate
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Acquisition spending $ per prospect
20
Retention rate as a function of retention spending
0.7
0.6
0.5
Retention rate
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Retention spending $ per customer
21
First Year Contribution From a Prospect
r
a * m A a * (m R / r ) *
(1 r )
Where:
a - acquisition rate (this depends on A)
m – margin/customer in one year
A – acquisition dollars/prospect
r – retention rate (this depends on R)
R – retention dollars/customer
d – discount rate of future cash flows
r’ - r/(1+d)
24
Managerial Inputs
26
Optimal Acquisition Spending and Retention Spending
28
Summary
29
Practice Problem
What is the optimal acquisition and retention dollars for the following
scenario?
S. Sajeesh
Can we predict a product’s
performance?
Adoption of a product depends upon
the innovators who are influenced by the product and the
promotions
the imitators who are influenced by the total number of people
who have bought it till date.
We can predict performance if we can predict the sales through
each of these sets of people.
S (t ) pM (q p) N t 1 N (t 1)
q 2
S (t ) a bN (t 1) c( N (t 1) ) 2
q cM
Marketing Decision Making 34
Indian School of Business
Some results using Bass Model
Product Category p q
Cable TV 0.02116 0.26980
Camcorder 0.04400 0.30400
Cellular 0.00800 0.42100
CD Player 0.15700 -
Radio 0.02700 0.43500
TV (Color) 0.02126 0.58253
Home PC 0.12100 0.28100
Hybrid Corn - 0.79750
Tractors - 0.23400
Ultrasound - 0.53400
Dishwasher - 0.17900
Microwave 0.00200 0.35700
VCR 0.02500 0.60300
Personal computers 0.00306 0.25320
Mammography 0.00494 0.70393
Vacuum Cleaner 0.02114 0.20937
ATM m/c adoption by
banks 0.00810 0.19700
Average 0.0300 0.38000
Marketing Decision Making 35
Indian School of Business
More insights using Bass Model
• (p + q) controls scale
600
Sales (units)
500
Predicted
400
300
Actual
200
100
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Period
Go to
Analysis
Return
2000
Sales (units)
1500 Predicted
1000 Actual
500
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Period
Go to
Analysis
Return
900
800
Sales (units)
700
600 Predicted
500
400 Actual
300
200
100
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Period
Return to
Analysis
700
Predicted
600
500
400 Actual
300
200
100
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Period
Return to
Analysis
Session 4
Issues in Accelerating Growth
9/8/2021 47
Production Planning
Team T just found out that TONE did not sell
well. They felt that they produced too much. Did
they produce too much?
Team T also found out that they sold out on
TOPS. Did they produce too little?
48
Demand Forecast for TONE
Demand probability The team developed a sophisticated
model to arrive at the likely
120 0.05 demand. There was disagreement,
140 0.05 uncertainty; and it was duly
accounted for in the Table on the
160 0.1 left.
180 0.15 A suggestion at the team meeting
200 0.3 from a vocal member of the group:
We should produce based on our
220 0.15 best guess of what the demand will
240 0.1 be.
Our statistics professor told us that
260 0.05 our best estimate = Mean
280 0.05 Mean = 200
Therefore we should produce 200
units.
49
How much should I
produce ?
50
How much should I produce?
Uncertainty in demand
Cost of lost sales
Inventory holding costs and Obsolescence costs.
Flexibility in the Production process
Experience Effects
Effect on Competition
51
A More Careful Approach !
52
Minimize Opportunity Cost
Production
240
Demand Probability Over Under Inventory Cost Lost Sales Cost Cost
120 0.05 120 0 120 0 60
140 0.05 100 0 100 0 50
160 0.1 80 0 80 0 80
180 0.15 60 0 60 0 90
200 0.3 40 0 40 0 120
220 0.15 20 0 20 0 30
240 0.1 0 0 0 0 0
260 0.05 0 20 0 20 60
280 0.05 0 40 0 40 120
TOTAL 610
53
Qualitative Guidelines
For which segments should I be more careful in
production planning?
For which segments I am better off being optimistic?
How do I account for the fact that I can use the product
again next period and left over units do not go obsolete?
Thank you…
S_sajeesh@isb.edu