Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finite Element Guidelines For Simulation of Fibre-Tension Dominated Failures in Composite Materials Validated by Case Studies
Finite Element Guidelines For Simulation of Fibre-Tension Dominated Failures in Composite Materials Validated by Case Studies
Composite Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This paper presents a finite element modelling methodology to predict the initiation and damage pro-
Available online 4 March 2015 gression in notched composite laminated plates subjected to increasing in-plane tension load. An impor-
tant feature of the methodology is it does not rely on customized user-subroutines but solely on the
Keywords: analysis capabilities of the general purpose software Abaqus; thus ensuring that the numerical results
Damage mechanics can be universally reproduced. The methodology presented copes with intralaminar failure modes and
Fibre-tension failure uses the Hashin failure criterion to predict the onset of failure (cracking). To account for damage progres-
Finite element modelling
sion after crack initiation there is a fracture energy calculated for each of four failure modes. Four open-
Open-hole tension
Pultruded material
hole laminated plates taken from the literature are used for benchmark examples. The predicted ultimate
strength based on the analytically-obtained stress-displacement curve was found to be within 10% of the
experimental observations. To study the influence of the interaction of having two or three holes across
the mid-plane of a pultruded open-hole tension specimen, a parametric study was carried out. The paper
ends giving guidelines for the generalized modelling methodology using Abaqus without user-
subroutines.
Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.071
0263-8223/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
300 A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313
interface. Matrix failure can be classified as delamination failure damage will develop and propagate under loading in the presence
when it occurs between adjacent laminae. Early matrix cracks of the stress-raiser in order to assess structural integrity. There are
and delamination at free edges are mainly caused by the low trans- a variety of theories and numerical implementations with respect
verse stiffness, and the mismatch of the Poisson’s ratios between to the modelling of progressive damage and failure in advanced
layers with different fibre orientations. Matrix-dominated pro- composites. In the present research, the smeared crack approach
cesses correspond to the onset of damage in most composite will be adopted which, when properly implemented, ensures a
designs, but do necessarily lead to loss of structural integrity. large degree of objectivity with respect to finite element discretiza-
Further load can be accommodated due to stress redistribution in tion and requires little or no modification to standard commercial
the laminate. This introduces the concept of progressive failure finite element codes, such as Abaqus [2]. This latter aspect is par-
(or damage) of the composite material. In this framework, the ticularly relevant to practising engineers concerned with virtual
numerical models presented here are based on critical stress testing related to structural integrity and damage tolerance of fibre
and/or strain combinations that trigger damage initiation, and reinforced polymers for safety–critical structures.
critical energy release rates or damage mechanics considerations
that describe damage propagation. As this process progresses from 2. Failure analysis in the context of the finite element method
meso- and macroscale to a large composite structure, the result is a
continued weakening of the entire structure, up to the point where The numerical modelling of composite structures in the elastic
the structure can no longer carry additional load. This process is range is quite straightforward. However, the nature of failure
highly nonlinear as it degrades the ply and the laminate stiffness initiation and progression to rupture, involving matrix, fibre and/
and extends beyond failure initiation. or interface damage and fracture, makes full behaviour analysis
Current state-of-the-art for computational modelling of pro- rather complex. External loads are predominantly carried by axial
gressive failure of composites is based almost exclusively on com- forces in the fibres, and the failure process is driven by the energy
posite architectures found in aerospace and automotive released as these are unloaded after fracture. Matrix-dominated
applications (so-called advanced composites). This research work failure mechanisms, in the form of cracks and delaminations join-
quantifies the state-of-the-art for materials produced by the pul- ing-up to produce a fracture surface, occur without necessarily
trusion method, which are generally used in civil and infrastruc- having to break fibres.
tural applications. The intent is therefore to enable and support Typical constitutive behaviour is characterized by an initial lin-
the development of structural design guidelines. Pultruded shapes ear response followed by a second nonlinear response having
are different to thin-walled advanced composite structures in so reduced stiffness that results from the formation of micro-cracks
far as they are typically prismatic, have relatively thicker compo- in the vicinity of the crack tip. The strain energy accumulated in
nent plates, and typically have lengths in the direction of pultru- the material is released at the peak-load and a stable crack propa-
sion at least an order of magnitude greater than the section gates progressively with a reduction in strength and stiffness until
dimension. Indeed, Turvey and Wang [1] reported that methods eventual failure. This is a typical quasi-brittle behaviour, although
of analysis appropriate for aerospace composites are ‘‘not suitable’’ most polymer-based matrices can deform plastically before dam-
for pultruded plates typical of infrastructure applications. They age when subjected to shear loading. This progressive damage
appear to attribute the inappropriateness of the methods to the modelling is carried out in three steps [3]:
more variable nature of infrastructure materials.
In civil applications, the matrix typically consists of a thermoset 1. Stress analysis by finite element modelling and simulations: the
resin (e.g. polyester or vinylester) and additives (e.g., for colour, fire geometry of the structure, load history and initial boundary
resistance, etc.). E-glass unidirectional rovings and continuous fila- conditions being known, the fields of stress and strain are calcu-
ment mats are used for the reinforcement, with an overall volume lated by means of strain constitutive equations and a numerical
fraction typically between 30% and 50%. The fibres in the continu- procedure.
ous filament mats are long, swirl and are randomly oriented in the 2. Failure criterion or criteria: the most critical location(s) with
plane. It is assumed the mats represent a layer with isotropic in- regard to fracture is (are) determined and, the load correspond-
plane mechanical properties. ing to this macro-crack initiation is calculated by integration of
As the motivation increases to use pultruded shapes in con- damage constitutive equations for the history of local stress or
struction, researchers are urged to investigate the sensitivity of strain.
these materials to damage, and to characterize the various mecha- 3. Degradation of material/laminate properties based on damage
nisms that govern the onset and progression of damage, leading to progression models to calculate the evolution of the critical
ultimate failure. There are a number of sources of initial damage, macro-crack(s) up to final rupture of the whole structure.
the most relevant being delamination and notches. Through-thick-
ness holes – effectively notches – are drilled to mechanically fasten This section reviews the main features for the finite element
parts in the structure. The introduction of notches leads to stress modelling of intralaminar failure in a laminated plate. Some of
concentrations in the composite material that cannot be redis- the key concepts are considered first, including the element types
tributed by plastic flow, as would be the case if the material and the material parameters. The mechanisms by which laminates
possessed inherent ductility. Designers need to know whether may fail are then discussed. The different approaches for the
A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313 301
modelling of such mechanisms are considered. Numerical aspects 3. Fracture energy (or fracture toughness), Gc in the above
to the effective application of the progressive damage modelling directions [11,12]. Gc governs crack growth and is defined
are finally discussed. as the work needed to create a unit area of a fully developed
crack.
2.1. Key concepts
2.2. Intralaminar failure modelling
2.1.1. Element types
An efficient geometric modelling must account for the non-ho- The intralaminar failure mechanism is characterized by matrix
mogeneous and layered nature of the laminate. The finite element cracks that run parallel to the fibres and propagate through the
model must firstly represent the lamina orientation, stacking thickness of the laminate (rather than the laminae), shear in the
sequence and thickness variation, and secondly provide an ade- transverse or longitudinal directions, and fibre breaking cracks,
quate representation of the global stress field, the through-thick- as can be seen in Fig. 2a–c [13]. In these figures, mode 1 represents
ness stress variations, local stress concentrations and failure a failure mechanism in the longitudinal direction and mode 2 in
modes. The analysis must therefore be treated as being three-di- the transverse direction. T, C and S stand for tension, compression
mensional. Solid (brick) elements with one layer of bricks and shear, respectively. Matrix failure mechanisms are usually the
representing each lamina can be used although this approach is first form of damage observed with fibre fracture marking the ulti-
not practical because the analysis is computationally expensive if mate failure in a well-designed laminate. In fact, fibre fracture can
the layup has more than just a few laminae. Additionally, conven- be seen as the only desirable fracture mechanism, since the
tional solid elements show an overly stiff behaviour and effects of reinforcement is the principal load carrying constituent. In Fig. 2a
locking, especially the Poisson thickness locking effect, when used and b the fracture surfaces caused by transverse compression and
in very thin applications [4]. In practice, it is usual to employ shell transverse shear are illustrated too. The fracture angle of ±35° to
elements, particularly in the form of continuum shells, which are ±40° in a unidirectional lamina is typical for pure transverse com-
elements that have the geometry of bricks but their kinematic pression [14]. The fracture angle for pure transverse shear is
and constitutive behaviour are similar to those of conventional approximately 45°. This fracture behaviour is well-known for brit-
shell elements. Continuum shell elements are able to reliably tle materials.
reproduce results in simulations of thin-walled structures by Continuum damage mechanics models for the prediction
means of only one element over the thickness when higher-order of intralaminar failure are used in this work with a range of
displacement fields are used. First approaches of this kind assumed examples on different applications. The damage mechanics of
a constant strain field through the thickness [5–7] and were later composites is the modelling of the initiation and degradation
extended by considering an additional set of internal degrees of phenomena at a mesoscale. At this scale, the laminate is modelled
freedom to add a quadratic term to the displacement field that as a stacking of homogeneous layers that may be connected by
allowed for a linear variation of the strain field through the thick- interfaces that model delamination. Relative variations of stiffness
ness [8]. are the damage indicators. The progressive transverse matrix
cracking and the brittle fracture of fibres are included at the
2.1.2. Material parameters single lamina level. The damage state at every (1,2) point in the
A unidirectional lamina is an orthotropic material whose planes plane of the plate is assumed to be uniform within the layer
of symmetry are parallel and transverse to the fibre direction. The thickness.
material coordinate axes are conventionally designated by the
principal axes 1, 2 and 3, representing parallel- and transverse- 2.2.1. Damage initiation theories for plies
to-fibre directions and the through-thickness direction, Literature presents phenomenological and physically-based
respectively. failure initiation criteria for a lamina. Phenomenological criteria
The mechanical behaviour of a lamina in a continuum mod- have been proposed by extending and adapting failure theories
elling approach is characterized by means of a constitutive law that to account for the anisotropy in stiffness and strength, but they
includes, for damage-based material models, the following three do not reflect the level of complexity that is inherent to this type
sets of material properties: of structural material. Underlying such complexity is the fact a
lamina consists of mechanically dissimilar constituent phases: stiff
1. A law for the elastic behaviour of the lamina, which is idea- elastic brittle fibres and a compliant yielding matrix. Physically-
lized as a homogeneous material by smearing the discrete based criteria distinguish between states of stress not leading to
properties of the fibre and matrix, based on the transversely fracture and those implying fracture.
isotropic version of Hooke’s law [9]. The relevant engineering The Tsai–Wu interactive (phenomenological) criterion [15] is
constants for the unidirectional reinforcement are the moduli the most commonly adopted in research methodologies, and
of elasticity in the fibre and transverse directions, E1 and E2, essentially consists of a single relation for the interaction of the dif-
the longitudinal (major) and transverse (minor) Poisson’s ferent internal stress components, ri, in the three-dimensional
ratios, m21 and m23, and the longitudinal (in-plane) and trans- material frame. For a general anisotropic material the failure sur-
verse shear moduli, G12 and G23. face in the stress-space has the following scalar form:
2. Lamina longitudinal, transverse and shear strengths comprise
[10]: F i ri þ F ij ri rj ¼ 1 and F ii F jj F 2ij P 0 ð1Þ
in which Fi, Fij are strength tensors of the second and fourth rank,
respectively. The following contracted notation is used in the above
f1,T: axial strength in f2,C: transverse strength in
equation: i, j = 1, 2, ... 6.
tension; compression;
The first failure theory that makes a clear distinction
f1,C: axial strength in f1,S: shear strength in the axial
between the different lamina failure modes was developed by
compression; direction;
Hashin and Rottem [16], and later modified by Hashin [17] to
f2,T: transverse strength in f2,S: shear strength in the
predict the onset of damage. This theory consists of the following
tension; transverse direction.
expressions:
302 A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313
(a)
35° to 40°
(b)
≈45°
(c)
Fibre breakage
Tension (mode 1,T)
Fig. 2. Forms of failure (after Knops [13]). (a) Matrix failure, (b) shear failure, (c) fibre failure.
r1 failure load in both carbon fibre and glass composites. In most cases,
Fibre in tension ¼1
f 1;T the laminate can carry a greater load because it possesses damage
r1 tolerance prior to complete rupture. It is often the case that a
Fibre in compression ¼1
f 1;C sequence of lamina failures occurs under increasing stress before
" #12 rupture of the entire laminate at the last ply failure load.
ðr2 þ r3 Þ2 s223 r2 r3 s231 þ s212
Matrix in tension 2
þ 2
þ 2
¼1
f 2;T f 2;S f 1;S 2.2.2. Damage progression models
22 !2 3 For composite structures that can accumulate damage, the use
f 2;C r2 þ r3 of failure initiation criteria is not sufficient. The rate and direction
Matrix in compression 44 15
2f 2;S f 2;C of damage propagation defines the damage tolerance of the struc-
#12 ture and its final damage state. Consequently, once a failure initia-
ðr2 þ r3 Þ2 s223 r2 r3 s231 þ s212 tion criterion is satisfied, the associated damage variable is
þ þ þ ¼1
2
4f 2;S
2
f 2;S
2
f 1;S different from zero and further loading will cause degradation of
the material stiffness coefficients. The challenge is to choose
ð2Þ
appropriate combinations of failure criteria and degradation mod-
els. These models can be divided into two main groups:
whereby ri and sij (i, j = 1, 2, 3) are the principal stresses for the lam-
ina. The failure criterion used to predict matrix tensile and com- 1. Heuristic models based on a ply-discounting material degrada-
pressive cracking includes the shear stresses that may lead to tion approach [18,19].
matrix shear failure, as can be seen in Eqs. (2c-d). The Hashin criter- 2. Progressive failure models based on continuum damage
ion is employed herein to predict damage onset and the governing mechanics [12,20–25].
failure mode within a lamina. This criterion has been shown by
many researchers to be easily implemented in finite element analy- The classical ply discount method assumes that a failed ply can-
ses and requires lamina properties that can be fairly easily deter- not take any further load. In reality, a fractured ply can exhibit sig-
mined on an experimental basis. Furthermore, it has provided nificant residual load-carrying capacity. The approach of
numerically reliable results when applied to predict the first ply progressive failure analysis is to assume that all material
A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313 303
nonlinearity is due to damage in the form of reduced stiffness. this difficulty, the material constitutive model must be supple-
Accordingly, the majority of existing models for progressive mented with some mathematical condition that prevents localiza-
intralaminar failure analyses are based on softening constitutive tion of smeared cracking into arbitrarily small regions [31].
models that use scalar damage variables or mode-specific strain Nonlocal damage theories have emerged as an effective means for
energy release rates (fracture toughness) and total dissipated capturing size effects. These theories relate the stress at any point
strain energy [22,26–28]. Displacements due to crack opening are to the state of deformation within a finite volume about that point
smeared over a characteristic element, as described in [32–34]. The simplest, and computationally most effective nonlo-
Section 2.3. The shape of the softening law is often assumed to cal approach is the crack band model [30]. The model ensures the
be inconsequential for the prediction of fracture, provided that it correct energy dissipation in a localized damage band by rescaling
is defined as a function of the fracture toughness [29]. the energy of the post-localization part of the stress–strain
The approach used in this research work is based on the energy relationship by taking the size of the finite elements into account
requirement for the deterioration of stiffness within a characteris- [32]. The crack band model provides only a partial regularization
tic or unit volume per unit time. It also assumes that the strain of the problem; it is not a true localization limiter, as it allows
energy dissipates gradually as damage develops. Damage evolution the global response characteristics to be truly captured, but the
laws are defined for the various possible failure modes (Fig. 2). width of the numerically resolved fracture process zone is still
Each damage evolution law includes the corresponding fracture dependent on the mesh density [35]. In this context, Bažant and
toughness, representing the energy dissipated by inelastic pro- Oh [30] derived the critical size l⁄ (element characteristic length
cesses in the fracture process zone. Guidelines for the evaluation or length of the fracture process zone) by adjusting the energy dis-
of these properties are summarized in [12,24]. sipated by each failure mechanism M:
Abaqus implements both implicit (Abaqus/Standard) and expli- path are considered. Experimental and numerical results available
cit (Abaqus/Explicit) solvers. The implicit solution strategy is suit- from literature on carbon/epoxy composites are used for calibra-
able for problems involving smooth geometric and material tion and validation of the proposed models.
nonlinear analyses. The geometric nonlinearity is due to large Open-hole tension (OHT) laminates under in-plane tensile load-
strain and large rotation kinematics. The nonlinear material beha- ing are considered. The OHT for composite materials is a challeng-
viour is due to the degradation of the mechanical properties of the ing problem because failure involves complex mechanisms such as
laminae and the matrix-rich layer between laminae to simulate fibre breakage, matrix cracking and delamination (the latter is not
intralaminar and interlaminar damage mechanisms. A load step- modelled in the current work as it has not been experimentally
ping routine is used in Abaqus/Standard. There is no restriction observed in these benchmark cases). In addition, the OHT strength
on the magnitude of the load step as the procedure is uncondition- and dominant failure modes can depend on geometric parameters,
ally stable. The increment size follows from numerical accuracy such as hole diameter, stacking sequence and ply thickness, and
and convergence criteria. Within each increment, the equilibrium material properties
equations are solved by means of the Newton–Raphson method,
which is stable and converges quadratically. In this method, for 3.1. Examples
each load step, the residuals are eliminated by an iterative scheme
in which the load level remains constant and the structure is anal- Rectangular plates with a centrally placed, circular hole sub-
ysed with a redefined tangent stiffness matrix. The accuracy of the jected to in-plane tensile loading, known as OHT specimens, are
numerical solution is measured by means of appropriate conver- considered as examples of intralaminar failure. Only one half the
gence criteria. Their selection is of the utmost importance. Too specimen is modelled due to symmetry about the longitudinal axis.
tight convergence criteria may lead to an unnecessary number of The geometric data for the OHT test specimens is taken from Chang
iterations and consequent higher computational cost, while too and Chang [39], and is shown in Fig. 3. Four different stacking
loose a tolerance may result in incorrect or inaccurate solutions. sequences are considered, corresponding to layups of [0/±45/
Generally speaking, in nonlinear geometric analyses, relatively 907]s, [0/(±45)2/905]s, [0/(±45)3/903]s, and [(±45)6]s. Reported
tight tolerances specific to the problem are required, while in non- material properties are given in Table 1 [37,39]. Viscous regulariza-
linear material problems looser tolerances are admitted, since high tion was added to the constitutive model with a viscosity coeffi-
local residuals are not easy to eliminate. Abaqus/Standard cient of 1 105, which was found to be sufficiently small for
additionally provides the option of including a line search algorithm accurate modelling.
[38] to improve the robustness of the Newton–Raphson method. The laminates were modelled with reduced integration contin-
With respect to the incremental method, a load curve is uum shell elements (SC8R in Abaqus) that offer a computationally
defined. Loads should be applied to the specimen in a displace- efficient method to simulate systems that are globally three-di-
ment-control fashion thus enforcing a better conditioning of the mensional, yet locally planar, as is the case with multi-layered
tangent stiffness matrix when compared to the classical load- composite structures. One integration point per ply was used in
control procedure. the laminate mesh specification, which was divided into a coarse
Explicit schemes offer a more robust alternative for conver- mesh area away from the hole and a refined mesh around the hole
gence of quasi-static load cases but may come at an even higher and in the direction of loading. A mesh refinement study was car-
computational cost as smaller solution time steps are required. ried out to confirm that the model results converge to the experi-
Additionally, to mitigate unwanted inertial effects, the time step mental [39] and to previously reported numerical predictions [37]
must be less than a critical value based on the highest eigenvalue at the selected mesh density. The study was conducted for the four
in the model. The stable time increment Dtstable is the minimum different layups with respect to two parameters: the degree of
time that a dilatational wave takes to move across any element mesh discretization, in order to represent the tensile-dominated
in the model, and is given by: problem, and the number of elements through-the-thickness. It
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi was found that a single element through the thickness t was suffi-
Dtstable ¼ l q=E1 ð4Þ cient to capture the through-the-thickness deformation. This strat-
egy is appropriate for continuum modelling of the OHT specimen
where q is the material density. The stable time steps for quasi-sta- that is assumed to behave in a plane stress condition, because
tic explicit analyses are very small, on the order of 108 seconds or the formation and propagation of delamination zones between
less, and the entire calculation process requires hundreds of thou- the laminae, which include out-of-plane stress states, are not per-
sands of increments. Mass scaling and damping are common mitted. In this case, continuum shell elements can have large
approaches to assist in artificially reducing the computational cost. aspect ratios (on the order of hundreds-to-one).
Quality checks, such as the ratio of kinetic energy to internal energy Boundary conditions consistent with the actual plate restraints
must be carried out to ensure that the problem remains essentially are applied (Fig. 3). Displacement boundary conditions restraining
quasi-static. An acceptable rule of thumb is to set acceptance of this movement in the thickness direction at the edges of both ends were
ratio to 0.01–0.05. also added. Displacements in the transverse direction were
restrained along all surfaces on the centre line of the model to com-
3. Benchmark applications ply with geometric symmetry. The load was applied monotonically
by imposing incremental axial displacements at the unrestrained
The numerical studies presented in this section include a con- end during the analysis to achieve the required range of laminate
tinuum damage approach to modelling advanced composites. stresses. The analysis was performed using a global stabilization fac-
Continuum damage models address the failure mechanisms from tor of 2 104, which corresponds to the code default.
a global view, where individual damage mechanisms are homoge-
nized and constructed around a failure criterion. This approach is 3.2. 0°/90°/±45° based layups
the least complex and uses the composite layup modeller tool
within the Abaqus pre-processor to define the individual plies The first validation example is the [0/(±45)2/905]s laminate for
through the laminate thickness. However, this method does not which collapse is governed by a tension-failure mode. A first analy-
allow delamination between plies to be modelled; only intralami- sis is run using the default implicit Abaqus solver. The obtained
nar damage modes for calculating the progression of the damage tensile stress (i.e. the applied load averaged over the nominal gross
A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313 305
tply = 0.1308 mm
w = 25.4 mm d0 = 6.35 mm δ
L = 203.2 mm
Nodal displacements restrained
250
200
150
100
Maximum stress (experimental)
50 Numerical response - Abaqus model
Numerical response - Maimí et al. [37]
0
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50
Applied end displacement (mm)
(a) (b)
Fig. 5. Fibre breakage in ply 1 (0°) at different load levels. (a) Crack initiation (label A, Fig. 7), corresponding to the first drop in stiffness of the response. (b) Crack propagation
(label B, Fig. 7), at maximum load.
306 A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313
The region of potential damage in these OHT specimens under Finally, a mesh sensitivity study with respect to the degree of
static loading is the net-tension plane. Crack initiation and prop- laminate discretization in the region surrounding the hole was car-
agation is expected to occur along the centre of the notched ried out to determine the influence of element size on the strength
cross-section. In order to initiate this so-called localization band, prediction. In order to capture the tensile dominated problem, it
a 0.40 mm wide imperfection zone is considered. The choice of this was found that elements of 0.15 0.15 mm complied with the
width follows from a series of numerical parametric studies carried requirements for a reliable simulation and satisfied convergence
out with respect to this key modelling parameter and accounting requirements. This dimension, in the transverse direction of the
for the limitation of Eq. (3). This introduces a length scale that specimen, also ensures that the aspect ratio of the elements in
can be easily adjustable compared to other techniques and is easily the localization band (0.40/0.15 = 2.67) is kept within reasonable
implemented in any finite element code. The constitutive beha- limits. A total of 43556 continuum shell elements are then used
viour of the localization band is characterized by fracture energy in the models.
rescaling. It was found that a 90% reduction in the critical strain Comparison between finite element predictions resulting from
energy with respect to the base value G1,T,c ensured the expected the improved model and experimental data [39] and previously
fracture dissipation in the localization band. The imperfection reported predictions [37] are shown in Fig. 7. The agreement with
therefore triggers damage development in a central zone such that the experimentally observed strength is significantly improved to a
the specimen enters a softening damage mode leading to a primi- difference of 12%. The overall agreement between the current
tive localization band. Upon further loading, the strain localization results and those of [37] are very good, with the latter curve mar-
band expands. For this example, the fracture process zone elon- ginally softer than the new predictions. This agreement provides
gates to 1.71% at peak stress and further to 2.26% at tensile failure. validation for the formulation used in the present work. The differ-
In combination with the above energy-based regularization, the ence in maximum strength prediction is 4.5%, although no particu-
artificial viscosity regularization already mentioned ensures the lar importance is given to this, since the two continuum damage
mesh objectivity of the results. In addition to these refinements, approaches are slightly different.
the mesh was also stabilized by selecting stiffness hourglass con- Fig. 8 shows plots of the damage parameters for the longitudin-
trol parameters in order to solve the problem of singularities high- ally-oriented fibre failure and matrix cracking at the stress levels A
lighted in Fig. 6 [40]. and B defined in Fig. 7. Tensile failure initiates at the hole edge
(Fig. 8a) and propagates throughout the cross-section along the
localization band (Fig. 8b). Eventually, the tensile failure band
300 deviates from the plane of symmetry, after which the assumption
[0/(±45)2/905]s of symmetric response is no longer valid. Matrix cracking initiates
250 t = 2.62 mm on the hole boundary in the plies oriented at 90° (Fig. 8c). As fibre-
Tensile stress (MPa)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 8. Fibre damage in plies 1 and 20 (0°) and matrix cracking in the middle laminae (90°), at tensile strength level and subsequent collapse. (a) Fibre crack initiation (label A
in Fig. 11). (b) Fibre crack propagation to the free edge (label B in Fig. 11). (c) Matrix cracking at peak load (label A in Fig. 11). (d) Matrix cracking at collapse (label B in Fig. 11).
A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313 307
125 direction. The most commonly used fibres are E-glass because they
115 B have good mechanical properties and are economical. The matrix is
100
A C often polyester or vinylester resin and often contains additives
75 110 [42].
1.05 1.10 1.15 Ideally, when all-composite structural systems are manufac-
50 tured, the components are modular to provide rapid and simple
Maximum stress (experimental) assembly. Mechanical fastening is the typical connection method,
25 Current numerical response
Matrix crack initiation because: it is simple and flexible, is familiar to practitioners, and
Maximum load allows frames to be demountable for reuse and recycling. Thus pul-
0
0.00 0.15 0.30 0.45 0.60 0.75 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.35 truded components require holes (notches) to accept the fasteners.
It has been shown in Section 3 that the introduction of structural
Applied end displacement (mm)
discontinuities create stress concentrations that give rise to initia-
Fig. 10. Tensile stress-end displacement plots resulting from the validated finite tion and growth of material damage when stress redistribution by
element model and comparison with existing data for the case of ±45° laminate. material plasticity is limited or non-existent. This clearly reduces
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 11. Matrix shear damage in plies 1 (+45°) and 2 (45°) at tensile strength level and subsequent collapse. (a). Matrix shear damage at peak load (label B in Fig. 14), ply 1
(+45°). (b) Matrix shear damage at peak load (label B in Fig. 14), ply 2 (45°). (c) Matrix shear damage propagation to the free edge (label C in Fig. 14), ply 1 (+45°). (d) Matrix
shear damage propagation to the free edge (label C in Fig. 14), ply 2 (45°).
308 A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313
450
(a) (a)
400
Δσ = 118 MPa
t = 6.4 mm 350 (k = 0.72)
200
(b) 450
p2 = 25 mm
400
δ w = 100 mm δ
350 Δσ = 203 MPa
t = 6.4 mm 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Strain (μmm/mm)
δ w = 100 mm δ
(c) 450
350
Δσ = 221 MPa
Tensile stress (MPa)
300 (k = 0.48)
L = 200 mm
250
Fig. 12. Specimens geometry (nominal dimensions). (a) Specimen 25-1-50-0. (b) B
Specimen 25-2-50-100. (c) Specimen 25-3-50-100.
200
150 A
Fig. 13. Tensile stress–strain plot resulting from implementing the finite element
model with smeared material properties; comparison with existing experimental
data. (a) Specimen 25-1-50-0. (b) Specimen 25-2-50-100. (c) Specimen 25-3-50-
100.
Table 3
Comparison of modelling results to Cunningham et al. [45].
Completely damaged Partially damaged Undamaged Completely damaged Partially damaged Undamaged
(0.7 to 1.0) (0.3 to 0.7) less than 0.3 (0.7 to 1.0) (0.3 to 0.7) less than 0.3
Fig. 15. Specimen 25-2-50-100: plot of fibre-tension damage at 69% of maximum Fig. 17. Specimen 25-3-50-100: plot of fibre-tension damage at 70% of maximum
load (tensile strength 152 MPa, point A in Fig. 13b). load (tensile strength 142 MPa, point A in Fig. 13c).
Fig. 16. Specimen 25-2-50-100: fibre-tension damage plot of ultimate failure mechanisms (tensile strength 221 MPa, point B in Fig. 13b).
310 A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313
the efficiency of notched cross-sections and increases the complex- specimen having a width of 100 mm and free gauge length of
ity of behaviour, compared to that of the structural members with- 200 mm. One, two or three holes of diameter d0 = 13.1 mm are
out connections (notches). located symmetrically along the central transverse plane at a gauge
Previous research pertaining to the behaviour of notched com- of 25 mm (Fig. 12). All specimens failed by fibre breakage and car-
posites and the assessment of their structural integrity has mainly ried a tension stress well below that of the unnotched cross-sec-
focused on investigations with advanced composite laminates for tion area [45].
aerospace applications. Understanding cannot necessarily be Finite element simulations of the OHT tests have been per-
extrapolated to pultruded composites since typically very thin formed based on the modelling methodology developed in
(usually less than 2 mm) carbon fibre and high-quality glass com- Section 3.2. The continuum shell element had five integration
posites dominate the aerospace industry, whereas lower-quality points through their thickness and the material is modelled using
(and larger roving) E-glass fibres are conventionally used in pul- the smeared properties listed in Table 2. Using smeared properties
truded members which comprise plate thicknesses up to 25 mm the modelling does not distinguish between the unidirectional and
[43] and often utilise matrix filler to reduce cost. mat alternating layers. Unnotched material was characterized for
In this paper, pultruded rectangular plates subject to tension the properties of E1, E2, f1,T and f2,T reported in Table 2 [45]. The
with open holes are considered. The OHT strength is one limit state other properties with a grey-coloured background were not experi-
for the design of pultruded composite structures. Although mentally determined but estimated based on research expertise
mechanical fasteners are not present in the finite element analyses, and values available in literature.
the strength results for different OHT configurations can inform The finite element approach described is used to analyse the
designers on, for example, the minimum hole centre-to-centre fibre breakage dominated progressive failure process. The
spacing (gauge distance), as a function of bolt diameter, which is quantitative and qualitative accuracy of the numerical predictions
needed for a structural design standard [44]. are assessed by comparing these with experimental test results
Experimental results [45] from open-hole tests of pultruded [45], in terms of stress–strain responses and ultimate failure
glass fibre plates having thickness of 6.4 mm were selected for modes. The specimens for the three configuration illustrated in
modelling. Fig. 12a–c show three configurations for a rectangular Fig. 12a–c are labelled according to the system t-n-d-p2, in which
Fig. 18. Specimen 25-3-50-100: fibre-tension damage plot of ultimate failure mechanisms (tensile strength 203 MPa, point B in Fig. 13c).
A.M. Girão Coelho et al. / Composite Structures 126 (2015) 299–313 311
[4] Schwarze M, Reese S. A reduced integration solid-shell finite element based on [28] Ju JW. Isotropic and anisotropic damage variables in continuum damage
the EAS and the ANS concept – geometrically linear problems. Int J Numer mechanics. J Eng Mech ASCE 1990;116(12):2764–70.
Methods Eng 2009;806:1322–55. [29] Catalanotti G, Camanho PP, Xavier J, Dávila CG, Marques AT. Measurement of
[5] Parisch H. A continuum-based shell theory for non-linear applications. Int J resistance curves in the longitudinal failure of composites using digital image
Numer Methods Eng 1995;38:1833–55. correlation. Compos Sci Technol 2010;70:1986–93.
[6] Hauptmann R, Schweizerhof K. A systematic development of ‘‘solid-shell’’ [30] Bažant ZP, Oh BH. Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater Struct
element formulations for linear and non-linear analyses employing only 1983;16:155–77.
displacement degrees of freedom. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1998;42:49–69. [31] Bažant ZP, Planas J. Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasi-brittle
[7] Hauptmann R, Schweizerhof K, Doll S. Extension of the ‘‘solid-shell’’ concept materials. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press; 1998.
for application to large elastic and large elastoplastic deformations. Int J [32] Bažant ZP, Jirásek M. Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage:
Numer Methods Eng 2000;49:1121–41. survey of progress. J Eng Mech ASCE 2002;128(11):1119–49.
[8] Remmers JC, Wells GN, de Borst R. A solid-like shell element allowing for [33] Belytschko T, Bažant ZP, Hyun YW, Chang TP. Strain-softening materials and
arbitrary delaminations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2003;58:1701–36. finite-element solutions. Comput Struct 1986;23(2):163–80.
[9] Hashin Z. Analysis of composite materials. J Appl Mech 1983;50:481–505. [34] Pijaudier-Cabot G, Bažant ZP. Nonlocal damage theory. J Eng Mech ASCE
[10] Jones RM. Mechanics of composite materials. 2nd ed. USA: Taylor and Francis; 1987;113(10):1512–33.
1999. [35] Jirásek M, Patzák B. Models for quasi-brittle failure: theoretical and
[11] Kelly A, Zweben C, editors. Comprehensive composite materials, vol. 2. Elsevier computational aspects. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on
Science; 2000. computational mechanics; solids, structures and coupled problems in
[12] Pinho A, Robinson P, Iannucci I. Fracture toughness of the tensile and engineering, 2001. p. 70–71 (full paper on CD Rom).
compressive fibre failure modes in laminated composites. Compos Sci [36] Needleman A. Material rate dependence and mesh sensitivity in localization
Technol 2006;66:2069–79. problems. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 1988;67:69–85.
[13] Knops M. Analysis of failure in fiber polymer laminates – the theory of Alfred [37] Maimí P, Camanho PP, Mayugo JA, Dávila CG. A continuum damage model for
Puck. Germany: Springer; 2008. composite laminates, part II: computational implementation and validation.
[14] Puck A, Schürmann H. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically Mech Mater 2007;39:909–19.
based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol 2002;62:1633–62. [38] Crisfield M. Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures.
[15] Tsai SW, Wu EM. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Essentials, vol. 1. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1997.
Compos Mater 1971;5(1):58–80. [39] Chang FK, Chang KY. A progressive damage model for laminated composites
[16] Hashin Z, Rottem A. A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. containing stress concentrations. J Compos Mater 1987;21:834–55.
Report AFOSR-TR-73-0686, Department of Materials Engineering, Technion – [40] Belytschko T, Ong JSJ, Liu WK, Kennedy JM. Hourglass control in linear and
Israel Institute of Technology; 1973. nonlinear problems. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 1984;43:251–76.
[17] Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech [41] Starr TF, editor. Pultrusion for engineers. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing
1980;47:329–34. Ltd.; 2000.
[18] Murray YD. Theory and verification of the fiber composite damage model [42] Bank LC. Composites for construction: structural design with FRP
implemented in DYNA3D. Report DNA-TR-89-132, 1989. materials. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
[19] Barbero EJ. Introduction to composite materials design. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, [43] Wang P. Structural integrity of bolted joints for pultruded GRP profiles [Ph.D.
USA: CRC Press; 2010. thesis]. Lancaster Univ.; 2004.
[20] Ladeveze P, Le Dantec E. Damage modelling of the elementary lamina for [44] Mottram JT. Design guidance for bolted connections in structures of pultruded
laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol 1992;43:257–67. shapes: Gaps in knowledge. In: Proceedings of the17th international conference
[21] Matzenmiller A, Lubliner J, Taylor RL. A constitutive model for anisotropic on composite materials (ICCM17), 27–31 July 2009, Paper A1:6. p. 12.
damage in fiber-composites. Mech Mater 1995;20:125–52. [45] Cunningham D, Harries KA, Bell AJ. Open-hole tension capacity of pultruded
[22] Lemaitre J. A course on damage mechanics. 2nd ed. Heidelberg, GFRP having staggered hole arrangement. Comp Struct, submitted for
Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1996. publication.
[23] Lapczyk I, Hurtado JA. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced [46] Anonymous. New pre-standard for pultruded FRP composites funded through
materials. Composite Part A 2007;38:2333–41. ACMA means increased applications, American composites manufacturers
[24] Maimí P, Camanho PP, Mayugo JA, Dávila CG. A continuum damage model for association (ACMA) press release, <http://www.acmanet.org/press-releases/
composite laminates, part I: constitutive model. Mech Mater 13-communications/240-new-pre-standard-for-pultruded-frp-composites-
2007;39:897–908. funded-thru-acma-means-increased-applications>; 2014 [10.12.14].
[25] Flatscher Th, Pettermann HE. A constitutive model for fiber-reinforced [47] CEN – European Committee for Standardization. EN1993-1-8 Design of steel
polymer laminae accounting for plasticity and brittle damage including structures, Part 1–8: Design of joints. Brussels: 2005.
softening – implementation for implicit FEM. Compos Struct 2011;93:2241–9. [48] American Composites Manufactures Association. Pre-standard for load &
[26] Lemaitre J, Dufailly J. Damage measurements. Eng Fract Mech resistance factor design (LRFD) of pultruded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)
1987;28:643–61. structures, <http://www.acmanet.org/cgi-committees/pultrusion-industry-
[27] Krajcinovic D. Damage mechanics. Mech Mater 1989;8:117–97. council>; 2012 [18.12.14].