Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp.

343-355, April, 1978

A TIME-DOMAIN STUDY OF T H E ATTENUATION OF 10-Hz WAVES IN


THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE

BY OTTO W. NUTTLI

ABSTRACT
From a time-domain study, the amplitude of lO-Hz P waves in the New Madrid
seismic zone was found to fall off as the inverse 1.4 power of the epicentral
distance. The amplitude of lO-Hz Lg waves was found to decay as for an Airy
phase with a coefficient of anelastic attenuation of 0.006 k m - ' . In almost all
cases the Lg motion was found to be larger than that of P, even at epicentral
distances of 5 km and less. Thus design earthquake motions need to be
concerned with Lg waves, whose coda also have a longer duration than those of
the P waves.
The apparent Q for the l O-Hz Lg waves'is 1500, identical to that found
previously by Nuttli (1973) for higher mode 1-Hz Lg waves. The attenuation of
lO-Hz Lg waves is sufficiently small that one must pay attention to their damage
potential at distances as large as a few hundred kilometers.
INTRODUCTION
Damaging ground accelerations usually are associated with relatively high-fre-
quency wave motion, in the range of I to 10 Hz. A knowledgeof the attenuation of
this wave motion is required for the specificationof the ground motion at a given
site, for the purpose of designingstructures.
Previously, Nuttli (1973) estimated the anelastic attenuation coefficientof l-Hz
Lg wavesfor the central United States to be 0.07 deg-I (0.0006 kin-l). He determined
that at frequenciesnear I Hz the Lg wave carried the maximumamplitude, at least
for distances of 25 km and greater. Data for this study came from WWSSN stations
or eastern North America stations which had short-period seismographs with
response similar to those of the WWSSN stations. Since the summer of 1974 a
microearthquake network has been operating in the New Madrid seismic zone
(Stauder et al., 1976). As the peak response of the microearthquake seismographs
occurs at frequenciesnear I0 Hz, the network provides ideal data for a time-domain
study of the attenuation of 10-Hz waves. This paper is concerned with an analysis
of the P- and Lg-waveattenuation of these high-frequencywaves.

THE DATA
Table 1 lists the hypocentral coordinates of the 77 earthquakes whose data were
used. In general, the earthquakes studied are associated with the New Madrid
faulted zone, which is about 175 km long and 25 to 50 km wide. Fourteen stations
recording on Develocorder film, with film reader gains of 8.5 × 104 to 1.4 × 106 at 10
Hz, provided the basic amplitude data. Epicentral distances varied from approxi-
mately 3 to 250 kin, although for any given earthquake the range of distances usually
was less. Only the vertical component of ground motion was recorded and measured.
Amplitude measurements were made directly from the image of the Develocorder
film as seen on the screen of the film reader. For the P-wave portion of the
seismogram the largest amplitude was measured. Occasionally the P-wave motion
consisted of a single spike, but more commonly it was composed of a train of waves
persisting in amplitude until the arrival of the S or Lg waves. To be consistent with
343
344 OTTO W. N U T T L I

TABLE 1
LIST OF EARTHQUAKESSTUDIED

No. Date OriginTime Latitude (deg.N) Longitude


W) (deg. mh

1 16 Aug 74 07-30-57.9 36.15 89.70 1.1


2 01 Feb 75 16-04-24.5 36.05 89.87 1.9
3 20 Feb 75 02-52-21.4 36.08 89.84 1.3
4 01 Sep 75 15-33-11.2 36.55 89.86 1.0
5 05 Sep 75 21-46-14.5 36.13 89.43 1.7
6 10 Sep 75 12-41-45.9 36.30 91.80 0.6
7 13 Sep 75 06-53-52.9 36.73 89.21 1.4
8 18 Sep 75 08-20-23.3 36.63 89.51 1.7
9 21 Sep 75 08-08-32.6 36.31 89.51 1.1
10 21 Sep 75 22-09-21.5 36.57 89.76 0.8
11 24 Sep 75 10-37-54.4 36.72 89.69 2.2
12 04 Oct 75 06-53-15.3 35.81 90.17 1.4
13 12 Oct 75 14-47-40.1 36.08 89.78 1.9
14 07 Dec 75 12-18-28.7 35.71 90.06 1.8
15 05 J a n 76 03-46-30.0 35.94 89.52 1.5
16 10 J a n 76 10-28-35.9 36.13 89.74 1.2
17 15 J a n 76 07-40-52.6 37.37 90.00 1.5
18 20 J a n 76 12-44-08.5 36.57 89.60 1.5
19 03 Feb 76 07-04-01.3 36.48 89.56 1.2
20 16 Feb 76 04-31-50.3 36.04 89.84 1.1
21 28 Feb 76 00-14-35.2 36.51 89.54 1.9
22 06 Mar 76 23-07-32.1 36.48 89.56 1.4
23 15 Mar 76 16-15-26.7 36.57 89.46 1.2
24 04 Apr 76 02-16-17.8 37.82 90.99 2.0
25 06 Apr 76 18-42-54.4 36.51 89.62 1.4
26 08 Apr 76 16-28-17.8 37.12 88.88 2.1
27 10 Apr 76 02-47-55.9 36.55 89.66 1.4
28 10 Apr 76 03-20-23.4 36.05 89.82 1.4
29 10 Apr 76 12-50-34.6 36.44 89.51 1.2
30 10 Apt 76 14-16-18.3 36.10 89.73 1.2
31 14 Apr 76 23-47-54.0 35.65 90.47 1.9
32 15 Apr 76 10-25-33.9 36.72 89.52 1.0
33 09 May 76 10-11-29.5 37.10 90.97 1.5
34 17 May 76 05-17-57.9 36.38 89.53 1.2
35 20 May 76 03-12-46.4 35.82 90.18 1.5
36 21 May 76 10-41-28.2 36.22 89.38 1.2
37 23 May 76 08-37-09.5 36.13 89.74 1.7
38 24 May 76 07-30-17.5 36.07 89.45 1.6
39 27 May 76 08-47-47.2 35.67 90.42 1.7
40 28 May 76 07-10-50.7 36.60 89.59 1.2
41 28 May 76 07-41-36.0 35.85 90.01 1.2
42 03 J u n 76 13-54-14.4 35.94 90.13 1.8
43 18 J u n 76 20-13-31.8 36.40 89.54 1.1
44 27 J u n 76 02-41-35.1 36.30 89.51 1.0
45 04 Jul 76 03-02-50.5 36.77 89.15 1.7
46 04 Jul 76 07-21-53.9 36.77 89.15 1.5
47 23 Jul 76 11-38-36.3 36.91 88.96 1.3
48 27 Jul 76 01-38-27.8 36.46 89.53 1.0
49 03 Aug 76 04-52-39.0 36.69 89.79 1.4
50 11 Aug 76 02-15-29.3 36.67 89.56 1.6
51 21 Aug 76 07-31-01.0 35.03 90.41 2.1
52 27 Aug 76 04-03-52.5 36.17 89.41 1.0
53 11 Sep 76 05-59-13.2 35.97 89.81 1.2
54 15 Sep 76 11-08-40.9 36.57 89.63 1.2
A TIME-DOMAIN STUDY OF THE ATTENUATION OF 10-HZ WAVES 345
TABLE 1--continued
No. Date Origin Time Latitude (deg. N) Longitude
W) (deg. rn~

55 Ol Oct 76 14-44-56.1 36.55 89.67 1.5


56 03 Oct 76 03-46-03.5 36.56 89.72 1.3
57 04 Oct 76 12-06-00.2 35.84 90.14 1.6
58 19 Oct 76 07-15-58.3 37.08 88.77 1.2
59 22 Oct 76 03-12-22.1 36.43 89.51 1.3
60 22 Oct 76 09-59-02.3 36.43 89.49 1.2
61 29 Oct 76 06-29-54.8 36.43 89.49 1.0
62 06 Nov 76 11-37-59.4 37.28 89.47 1.7
63 14 Nov 76 11-39-46.0 35.66 90.46 2.4
64 15 Nov 76 01-31-46.4 35.61 89.90 1.4
65 23 Nov 76 01-24-15.5 36.55 89.62 1.2
66 23 Nov 76 05-36-10.2 36.26 89.45 1.4
67 06 Dec 76 23-14-53.2 35.82 90.15 1.1
68 15 Dec 76 11-57-07.1 36.07 89.80 1.9
69 01 Jan 77 11-40-06.2 36.92 90.42 1.3
70 02 Jan 77 20-33-23.3 36.47 89.55 1.4
71 04 Jan 77 03-59-18.2 36.54 89.66 1.3
72 04 Jan 77 12-21-27.6 36.12 89.73 1.1
73 23 Jan 77 21-03-15.3 37.55 89.78 2.2
74 01 Feb 77 09-30-04.3 36.28 89.47 1.2
75 08 Feb 77 10-20-42.5 36.50 89.57 1.6
76 09 Feb 77 06-25-47.5 35.86 90.09 1.2
77 13 Feb 77 09-15-29.2 36.23 89.49 1.2

t h e a m p l i t u d e s t u d y o f 1-Hz w a v e s ( N u t t l i , 1973), t h e Lg a m p l i t u d e m e a s u r e d w a s
t h a t o f t h e m a x i m u m s u s t a i n e d m o t i o n , i.e., t h e l a r g e s t a m p l i t u d e e q u a l e d o r
e x c e e d e d b y a t l e a s t t h r e e c y c l e s of w a v e m o t i o n . T h e r e a s o n for u s i n g m a x i m u m
s u s t a i n e d r a t h e r t h a n p e a k m o t i o n is t h a t t h e m a x i m u m s u s t a i n e d m o t i o n is
c o n s i d e r e d a b e t t e r m e a s u r e of t h e size of t h e e a r t h q u a k e a n d of t h e d a m a g e
p o t e n t i a l o f t h e L g w a v e s t h a n t h e single p e a k a m p l i t u d e , b e c a u s e t h e single p e a k
is o f s h o r t d u r a t i o n a n d m a y r e s u l t f r o m f o r t u i t o u s c o n s t r u c t i v e i n t e r f e r e n c e .

ANALYSIS OF THE DATA


T h e P - w a v e a m p l i t u d e s w e r e p l o t t e d o n l o g - l o g p a p e r a s a f u n c t i o n of e p i c e n t r a l
d i s t a n c e A, a n d f i t t e d b y a s t r a i g h t - l i n e curve. T h e s l o p e o f t h e c u r v e is - N , w h e r e

A ~ A- g . (1)

F i g u r e 1 g i v e s a n e x a m p l e o f s u c h a plot, for e a r t h q u a k e no. 63. T h e d a s h e d l i n e s a r e


separated from the straight-line curve by one standard deviation of the logarithm of
t h e a m p l i t u d e . I t is c u s t o m a r y t o fit c l o s e - i n P - w a v e d a t a b y a n e m p i r i c a l e q u a t i o n
s u c h a s (1), e v e n t h o u g h t h a t e q u a t i o n d o e s n o t t a k e a c c o u n t o f t h e s o u r c e r a d i a t i o n
pattern, anelasticity, and constructive and destructive interference of reflected and
r e f r a c t e d waves. T h e s c a t t e r in t h e P - w a v e a m p l i t u d e d a t a , w h i c h c a n b e a s l a r g e a s
a n o r d e r o f m a g n i t u d e , c a n b e a t t r i b u t e d to t h e s e a n d o t h e r p h e n o m e n a s u c h a s
s c a t t e r i n g a n d soil a m p l i f i c a t i o n .
T a b l e 2 c o n t a i n s t h e s l o p e s (N} a n d t h e s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s o f t h e l o g a r i t h m o f
t h e a m p l i t u d e for t h e P - w a v e m o t i o n . F i g u r e 2 is a h i s t o g r a m o f t h e N v a l u e s . F r o m
it o r f r o m T a b l e 2 it c a n b e s e e n t h a t t h e m e d i a n v a l u e o f N is 1.8.
I t w a s a s s u m e d t h a t t h e L g - a m p l i t u d e d a t a s a t i s f y t h e r e l a t i o n ( E w i n g et al.,
1957)
346 OTTO W. NUTTLI

A ~ h -I/" (sin h) -½ exp ( - T h ) (2)

where ~ is epicentral distance and 7 is the coefficient of anelastic attenuation. T h e


value of n is 3 or 2, depending upon whether or not the L g wave at 10 Hz is an Airy
phase (Ewing et al., 1957). Inasmuch as it was not known if the 10-Hz Lg wave is an
Airy phase, the data were fitted by curves for b o t h n = 3 and n = 2. Figure 3 is an
example of such a curve, with n = 3, for earthquake no. 55. T h e dashed lines indicate
one standard deviation of the logarithm of the amplitude. T h e theoretical curve was
simply fitted to the data by eye. L a t e r we shall examine the consequence of this
m e t h o d of curve fitting.
Figure 4 contains histograms of the 7 values obtained from the Lg-amplitude data,
assuming t h a t the L g is a nonAiry (left) and Airy (right) phase. In b o t h cases the
median value corresponds to 7 = 0.008 km -1, although for the Airy-phase case the
scatter about the median is m u c h smaller. Figure 5 contains histograms of the

I , I ' i'' 1 , t , I

IO0
~\\ '\
\\'~\\x

E Io \\\~\\

x \\\~\\
\\~ \\

, | I i
I0 I00 000

A (KM)
FIG. 1. Maximum P-wave amplitudes versus epicentral distance, for earthquake no. 63. The solid-line
curve of slope -2.4 is fitted to the data points indicated by x's. The dashed lines are separated in the
ordinate direction by one standard deviation from the solid line.

standard deviations, for b o t h the nonAiry (left) and Airy (right) cases. Although in
each case the median lies in the same range (0.201 to 0.250 logarithmic units), the
standard deviations are somewhat smaller for the Airy case. This can also be seen
from an inspection of Table 2. T h u s we conclude t h a t the 10-Hz Lg-wave data are
better fitted by an Airy phase relationship.
T h e amplitude deviations from the P and Lg curves can also be used to estimate
station corrections and personal bias in the evaluation of N and y. T o do this, the
sum of the deviations, taking regard of their sign, was determined for each station
and for specific ranges of epicentral distance. Tables 3, 4, and 5 give the results.
Table 3 presents the average deviation of the P-amplitude data from the straight-
line curves for each station. A value of 125 per cent indicates t h a t on the average
the observed amplitude at t h a t station exceeded the value expected from the
straight-line curve by 25 per cent. F r o m the table it can be seen t h a t stations DWM,
ECD, ELC, and P G A had lower t h a n expected amplitudes, by as m u c h as a factor
of 2, and t h a t stations OKG, POW, and R M B had higher t h a n expected amplitudes,
by as m u c h as a factor of 1½.
Table 3 also presents the average deviations of the P-amplitude data from the
A T I M E - D O M A I N S T U D Y OF T H E A T T E N U A T I O N OF 10-HZ W A V E S 347
TABLE 2
ATTENUATION OF P AND Lg WAVES
P Waves Lg Waves
Earthquake No.
;,(nonAiry) ~dAiry)
a N S.D. log A n S.D. log A S.D. log A
(kin-') (kin-~)
1 3 1,7 0,367 3 0.002 0.119 0.006 0.108
2 5 2.1 0.069 4 -- -- 0.008 0.213
3 6 1.9 0.284 5 0.008 0.153 0.008 0.152
4 6 2.0 0.231 7 0,008 0,181 0.008 0.181
5 9 1.5 0.295 9 0.002 0.169 0.006 0.158
6 4 0.8 0.106 5 -- -- 0.008 0.443
7 8 2.1 0.383 8 0.008 0.283 0.008 0.262
8 11 1.6 0.407 6 0.008 0.257 0.008 0.250
9 6 1.9 0.518 5 0.008 0.095 0.010 0.118
10 2 0.9 0.000 2 0,008 0.000 0.010 0.000
11 5 1.8 0.109 7 0.008 0.214 0.008 0.187
12 8 1.2 0.110 10 0.008 0.226 0,008 0.220
13 11 2.1 0.246 11 0.008 0.188 0.008 0,181
14 9 1.8 0.306 11 0,008 0.176 0.008 0.201
15 10 2.1 0.150 10 0.006 0.171 0.008 0.161
16 9 2.1 0.242 9 0.008 0.157 0.008 0.149
17 10 1.0 0.443 10 -- -- 0.008 0.375
18 11 1.9 0.268 . . . .
19 7 1,7 0.232 7 0.008 0,215 0.008 0.200
20 9 1.6 0.179 9 0.002 0.251 0.008 0.274
21 11 1.7 0.228 . . . .
22 10 2.4 0.443 10 0.010 0.363 0.008 0.286
23 10 1.2 0.302 10 0.010 0.280 0.908 0.243
24 7 2.7 0.475 7 -- -- 0.008 0.224
25 9 1.2 0.263 9 0.008 0.233 0.006 0.197
26 6 2.2 0.502 5 0.008 0.151 0.008 0.127
27 10 1.7 0.292 10 0.006 0.203 0.006 0.185
28 8 2.0 0.606 8 0.010 0.310 0.008 0.267
29 6 2.0 0.495 7 0.008 0.241 0.008 0.219
30 6 2.8 0.625 7 0.008 0.428 0.008 0.385
31 8 1.9 0.410 8 0.008 0.193 0,008 0.180
32 9 1,3 0.349 9 0.010 0.348 0,008 0.311
33 9 2.1 0,375 9 0.002 0.248 0.008 0.283
34 8 2.2 0.408 8 0.008 0.259 0.010 0.249
35 8 2.1 0.361 9 0.006 0.268 0.008 0.266
36 10 2.6 0.638 10 0.010 0.285 0.008 0.240
37 13 1.5 0.122 13 0.008 0.194 0.008 0.166
38 12 1.9 0.366 12 0.006 0.237 0.008 0.239
39 10 2.2 0.364 10 0.006 0.266 0.008 0.277
40 11 2.2 0.360 11 0.020 0.313 0.008 0.201
41 11 1.9 0.274 I1 0.096 0.243 0.008 0.251
42 8 1.7 0.281 . . . .
43 8 2.1 0.407 8 0.010 0.221 0.008 0,223
44 7 1.7 0.291 7 0.006 0.153 0.010 0.154
45 14 1.9 0.624 6 0.002 0.273 0.008 0.290
46 11 1.3 0.378 11 0.010 0.373 0.008 0.323
47 9 1.3 0.357 9 0.008 0.418 0.006 0.349
48 7 1,5 0.292 8 0.008 0.243 0.008 0.223
49 8 2.1 0.333 8 0.010 0,183 0.008 0.140
50 9 1.8 0.256 9 0.008 0.276 0.008 0.265
51 7 2.5 0.377 7 0.010 0.266 0.008 0.241
52 8 1.7 0.576 8 0.010 0.282 0.008 0.247
348 O T T O W. N U T T L I

T A B L E 2--continued
P Waves Lg Waves
Ea~hquakeNo,
y(nonAiry) ~,(Airy)
n N S.D. log A n (km_~) S.D. log A (km ') S.D. log A

53 9 1.7 0.370 9 0.008 0,323 0.008 0.296


54 7 2.0 0.440 7 0.010 0.227 0,008 0,219
55 9 1,2 0.276 9 0.006 0.223 0.008 0.214
56 10 1.0 0.274 10 0,004 0.171 0.008 0.183
57 9 1.4 0.156 9 0.004 0.253 0.008 0.268
58 9 1.6 0.485 9 0.004 0.390 0.008 0.433
59 6 1.8 0.305 7 0.008 0.208 0.008 0,182
60 6 1.2 0.263 8 0.008 0.215 0.008 0.201
61 6 1.4 0.280 7 0,010 0.302 0.008 0.239
62 6 0.9 0.226 6 0.006 0.387 0.008 0.383
63 10 2.4 0,277 . . . .

64 9 1.7 0.527 8 0.006 0.350 0.008 0.328


65 6 1.4 0,171 7 0.008 0,217 0.008 0.213
66 8 1.0 0.363 8 0.004 0,209 0.008 0,256
67 9 2.4 0.399 9 0.008 0,268 0.008 0.253
68 11 1.2 0.274 10 0.002 0,158 0.008 0.170
69 9 2.1 0.267 8 0.008 0,324 0.008 0.302
70 6 1.7 0.304 7 0.008 0.223 0.008 0.203
71 7 1.7 0,246 7 0.006 0.224 0.008 0.227
72 8 1.9 0.273 8 0.008 0.315 0.008 0,258
73 9 1.9 0.290 9 0.006 0.310 0.008 0.266
74 8 1.7 0.446 8 0.008 0.329 0.008 0.307
75 8 1.6 0.269 8 0.008 0.222 0.008 0.212
76 6 2.3 0.265 6 0.015 0.382 0.008 0.298
77 7 1.8 0.318 7 0.006 0.241 0.008 0.244

~4
z
b-

86

C ! , L I I I l I i i i i i i i i i . i
1.0 1.5 2.0 2. 5
N
FIG, 2. Histogram of N values for the P-wave curves. The median N value is 1.8.

straight line curves for 25-km distance intervals. At small distances the log amplitude
deviations are negative, indicating lower than expected amplitudes. There is a
progression to more positive values as the distance increases. From this we can
conclude that the slope of the attenuation curve, corresponding to N -- 1.8, is too
large. Figure 6 shows the deviations, plotted as crosses, from the straight-fine curve
of slope -1.8. The dashed-line curve drawn through the crosses has a slope of -1.4,
indicating that a value of N = 1.4 in e~luation (1) will provide the best fit to the P-
wave amplitude data.
Tables 4 and 5 present the average deviation of the Lg-wave amplitude data from
the nonAiry and Airy curves, respectively, for y = 0.008 km -1. From both tables it
can be seen that DWM, ECD, ELC, and LST have significantly lower than expected
Lg amplitudes, and that CRU, GRT, OKG, POW, and RMB have significantly
higher than expected amplitudes. There is no obvious correlation between site
A TIME-DOMAIN STUDY OF THE A T T E N U A T I O N OF 10-HZ WAVES 349
, I , ,I,~ I r f I I Ill I ,

"x x"--,,
I0(

E
"""~\,~,,
"-,, \ "~,,

\\~\\ x
Io

\\x~\\
x \\\\

I ,I I I tJlll I I I I,,,,I ,
I0 I00
A (KM)
FIG. 3. Sustained maximum Lg-wave amplitudes versus epicentral distance, for earthquake no. 55.
The solid-line curve is a theoretical Airy phase attenuation curve with 7 - 0.008 km-L The dashed lines
are separated in the ordinate direction by one standard deviation from the solid line.

AIRY

60

oo
Z
9 40

>
n- NON-AIRY
bJ
co
@0
0
h
0
o20
z

(KM")
FIG. 4. Histograms of 7 values for the Lg-wave curves; left, nonAiry; r~ht, Airy. In both casesthe
median value of 7 is 0.008 kin-'.

conditions a n d a m p l i t u d e anomalies, as s o m e of the low-amplitude stations are on


thick, unconsolidated soils and others on more firm foundations. T h e same is true
of the high-amplitude stations.
From both Tables 4 and 5 it can be seen that amplitudes at the smaller epicentral
350 OTTO W. NUTTLI

AIRY

NON-AIRY

20

¢.0
z
o

to
\
m
o
LL
o
~5
E
0
I I
.100 2.100
i .300l ~,400 I---I
0 I00 200 300
I
.400

STANDARD D E V I A T I O N S
FIG. 5. Histograms of standard deviations of logarithm of Lg amplitudes; left, nonAiry; right, Airy. In
both cases the median value lies between 0.200 and 0.250 units.

TABLE 3
AVERAGE P-WAVE DEVIATIONS
AverageDeviation
Station
Logamplitudeunits Percentage
CRU +0.018 104.2
DON -0,008 98.2
DWM -0.257 55.4
ECD -0.254 55.7
ELC -0.281 52.3
GRT -0.010 97.7
LST -0,036 92.1
NKT -0.148 71.2
OKG +0.192 155,7
PGA -0.219 60,5
POW +0.107 127,9
RMB +0.198 157,8
WCK -0,057 87,6
DistanceInterval(kin)
0-25 -0,252 56.0
25.1-50 -0.235 58,2
50.1-75 --0.209 61,8
75.1-100 +0.050 112,1
100.1-125 +0.128 134.2
125.1-150 +0.099 125.7
150.1-175 +0.188 154.1
175.1-200 +0.174 149.3
>200 +0.140 138.1

distances are less t h a n expected and at the larger distances greater t h a n expected,
with respect to theoretical curves for y = 0.008 k m -1. Figure 7 shows the deviations
with respect to the Airy-phase curve. F r o m it we can conclude t h a t the dashed-line
curve, for which 7 = 0.006 k m -1, provides a b e t t e r fit to the data.
Previously, Nuttli (1973) h a d found t h a t y = 0.0006 k m -~ for 1-Hz Lg waves. T h e
a p p a r e n t quality factor (~ is given b y (~ = ~rf/Uy, where U is the group velocity and
f i s the frequency. Using 7 = 0.0006 k m -1 for 1-Hz and 7 -- 0.006 k m -1 for 10-Hz Lg
A T I M E - D O M A I N S T U D Y OF T H E A T T E N U A T I O N OF 10-HZ WAVES 351

, t v , ~ r i , i f I i ,,,| i , ~ f'
\

\X
X

A
co I 0 0
I--
.,..,.

)-
B=:

p-
.....

El
E:
'--" I0
-2

I0 I00
h (KM)

FIG. 6. Determination of slope correction for P-wave amplitudes. The solid-line curve has the median
slope, found by fitting the amplitude data by eye. The X's are the average deviations, for 25 km intervals,
from the solid-line curve. The dashed-line curve, which is the fit to the data represented by the x's, has
a slope o f - 1 . 4 .

TABLE 4
AVERAGE Lg-WAVE (NONAIRY) DEVIATIONS
Average Deviation
Station
Log amplitude units Percentage
CRU +0.071 117.8
DON +0.019 104.5
DWM -0.137 72,9
ECD -0.252 55.9
ELC -0.232 58.6
GRT +0.062 115.5
LST -0,148 71.2
NKT -0,059 87.2
OKG +0.252 178.6
PGA -0.049 89.4
POW +0,116 130.7
RMB +0.078 119.5
WCK --0.012 97.3
D i s t a n c e I n t e r v a l (kin)

0.25 -0.153 70.3


25.1-50 -0.109 77.8
50. t-75 -0.078 83.5
75.1-100 +0.009 102.1
100.1-125 +0.128 134.2
125.1-150 +0.117 130.8
150.1-175 +0.209 161.9
175.1-200 +0.138 137.5
>200 +0.113 129.7
352 OTTO W, NUTTLI

TABLE 5
AVERAGE Lg-WAvE (AIRY) DEVIATIONS
AverageDeviation
Station
Log amplitudeunits Percentage

CRU +0.082 120.8


DON +0.045 111.0
DWM -0.082 82,9
ECD -0.240 57,5
ELC -0.239 57.6
GRT +0.111 129.2
LST -0.104 78.7
NKT -0.022 95.0
OKG +0.241 174.1
PGA +0.024 105.7
POW +0.090 123.0
RMB +O.056 113.7
WCK -0.023 94.8
Distance Interval (km)
0-25 -0.084 82.5
25.1-50 -0.074 74.5
50.1-75 -0.103 78.9
75.1-100 -0.009 98.0
100.1-125 +0.125 133.4
125.1-150 +0,127 134.0
150.1-175 +0.186 153.6
175.1-200 +0.138 137.5
>2OO +0.182 152.1

i i I 'I'I I , , I I I ill I I I I

'~
I-10o

ii:

I---

n~

10

~ = . 0 0 6
X • .008

i , i I,,,,I I J I li,,,l ' I I


I0 I00
/~ ( K M )
FIG. 7. Determination of correction to 7for Lg-wave amplitudes. The solid-line curve has the median
value of y, found by fitting the amplitude data by eye. The x's are the average deviations, for 25-kin
intervals, from the solid-line curve. The dashed-line curve, which is the fit to the data represented by the
x's, has a y-value of 0.006 km -1.
A T I M E - D O M A I N S T U D Y OF T H E A T T E N U A T I O N OF 10"HZ WAVES 353

waves, and U = 3.5 km/sec for both frequency waves, we get Q = 1,500 for both 1-
and 10-Hz waves.
Espinosa (1977), from a spectral analysis of the 1971 San Fernando earthquake
accelerograms, fitted straight-line curves to the logarithm of the spectral velocity
versus the logarithm of the epicentral distance. His curves for T -- 0.1 sec and 1 sec,
for the vertical component of the spectral velocity at distances of 10 to 100 km, have
slopes which are in substantial agreement with the values found for the New Madrid
zone, i.e., his slopes correspond to 7 = 0.0006 km -1 for 1-sec waves and 0.006 km -1
for 0.1-sec waves. Espinosa also gave a curve for 0.3-sec waves, which corresponds
to 7 = 0.020 km -1, implying a low ~) value for 0.3-sec period waves. It will be
interesting to see if spectral analyses of the New Madrid microearthquake data also

TABLE 6
A(P)/A(Lg)
Kilometers

0-5 5.1-10 10.1-15 15.1-20 20.L-25 25.1-30 30.1-35


0.79 3.17" 1.29 2.78* 2.89* 5.96* 2.66*
0.78 1.20 1.05 1.66 1.94" 1.80" 2.52*
0.72 1.07 0.92 1.25" 1.29 1.33 1.10
0.60 0.96 0.75 1.00 1.16" 1.00 1.08'
0.46 0.92 0.73 0.84 1.00 0.73 1.00
0.88 0.70 0.83 0.96 0.50 1.00
0.86 0.55 0.80 0.81 0.40 1.00
0.80 0.53 0.76 0.78 0.38 0.89
0.75 0.53 0.67 0.74 0.36 0.83
0.53 0.66 0.65 0.36 0.80
0.34 0.59 0.60 0.28 0.62
0.50 0.57 0.54
0.30 0.56 0.50
0.29 0.50 0.44
0.22 0.45 0.40
0.20 0.41 0.32
0.40 0.27
0.33 0.24
0.25 0.18
0.14
0.13
0.11
0.05
* The Lg amplitude was anomalously small.

indicate a relatively high anelastic attenuation for 0.3-sec period waves or if, rather,
they indicate a constant Q between periods of 0.1 and 1 sec.
For ground-motion predictions it is important to know which of the wave types
carries the largest amplitude at a given epicentral distance. At large distances it is
observed that the amplitude of the Lg-wave motion always exceeds that of the P-
wave motion. Table 6 presents the amplitude ratio A(P )/A(Lg) for all observations
at ~ < 35 km. From the table it can be seen that of the 94 observations in this
distance range only 18 correspond to the ratio exceeding unity. Of these, 10 could be
explained by an anomalously small Lg amplitude. Of the remaining 8, the largest
value of the ratio is 1.66. Thus, in general, we can say that over the entire range of
epicentral distance the Lg (or perhaps Sg) wave has the largest amplitude. Therefore
predictions of the maximum ground motion can be based upon the behavior of the
Lg wave, such as described by equation (2).
354 OTTO W. NUTTLI

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

A time-domain study of the attenuation of 10-Hz, vertical-component P and Lg


waves in the New Madrid seismic zone indicates that the amplitude of the P waves
decreases as

A = Ao h-l4

and that of the Lg waves as

A = Ao (5) -1/3 (sin A)-1/2 exp (--0.006 h),

where 5 is in kilometers, for the distance range of 3 to 250 km. The data were
obtained from microearthquakes of m~ approximately 1 to 2 as recorded on Devel-
ocorder film. For these small magnitude earthquakes the source region is of very
small dimensions, on the order of tens of meters. For larger earthquakes with
extended source regions the attenuation relations given above may break down for
small epicentral distances.
For almost all the observation points the amplitude of the Lg-wave motion
exceeded that of the P-wave motion, even at small epicentral distances. Thus for
predicting maximum ground motion one need only be concerned with the effects of
the Lg wave. Although duration of ground motion was not studied quantitatively in
this investigation, it was observed that the Lg-wave motion and its coda are of
longer duration than the P-wave motion, making the Lg motion comparatively even
more significant.
The high apparent Q for 10-Hz Lg waves, 1,500, is identical to that found
previously for 1-Hz Lg waves (Nuttli, 1973). By contrast, the Q of fundamental-
mode surface waves of the same frequency is about one order of magnitude lower,
resulting in larger absorption and more rapid attenuation with distance. Compared
to the higher-mode waves the high-frequency fundamental-mode waves are most
strongly excited by very shallow earthquakes (Herrmann and Nutfli, 1975). The
Illinois earthquake of August 14, 1965, with a focal depth of 1 km, provides an
example of such a shallow earthquake with high epicentral intensity and rapid
attenuation of intensity with epicentral distance (Nuttli and Zollweg, 1974).
Both the 1- and 10-Hz Lg waves are higher mode waves. Their high Q value is
typical of that found for the lower half of the crust in the central United States by
Herrmann and Mitchell (1975).
Aki and Chouet {1975), from a study of coda waves, concluded that Q at 10 to 20
Hz was of the order of 1,000 for both the regions of Tsukuba, Japan and Stone
Canyon, California. They attributed this high Q value to scattering of body waves
in the lithosphere. At 1 Hz they obtained a Q of approximately 200 at Tsukuba and
70 at Stone Canyon. They concluded that these lower Q values are indicative of the
scattering of surface waves in the upper crustal layers. Perhaps their data also could
be explained by scattering of higher-mode surface waves at the high frequencies and
of fundamental-mode surface waves at frequencies near 1 Hz. Herrmann (1975)
presented a time-domain coda model, based on empirical observations of the shape
of the coda envelope with time, which did not take account of the variation of the
coda envelope with frequency and epicentral distance. In a later paper (Herrmann,
1977) he examined the dependence of the coda frequency content upon the corner
frequency of the source spectrum, and obtained good agreement between observed
A TIME-DOMAIN STUDY OF T H E ATTENUATION OF 10-HZ WAVES 355
coda and calculated ones. His results support the conclusion that Q has a high value
for frequencies in the range of 1 to 10 Hz.
Although the details of the relation of Q and of the coefficient of anelastic
attenuation in the frequency band of 1 to 10 Hz remain to be resolved, the present
study and the others cited indicate that waves of 10-Hz frequency can produce
significant ground motions at distances of as much as a few hundred kilometers.
Their absorption is not nearly as great as the author thought it would be before this
study was carried out.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to thank R. B. Herrmann and B. J. Mitchell for helpful discussions on the nature of the Q
behavior in the crust. This research was supported in part by the Waterways Experiment Station of the
Corps of Engineers (Contract DACW39-77-C-0038), the Earth Sciences Section of the National Science
Foundation (Grant DES74-22852 A01) and the Division of Advanced Environmental Research and
Technology, National Science Foundation (Grant ENV76-20875). The data came from the New Madrid
Seismic Network, which is operated under U.S. Geological Survey contract 14-08-0001-15867.

REFERENCES
Aki, K. and B. Chouet (1975). Origin of coda waves: source, attenuation, and scattering effects, J.
Geophys. Res. 80, 3322-3342.
Espinosa, A. F. (1977). Particle-velocity attenuation relationship: San Fernando earthquake of February
9, 1971, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 67, 1195-1214.
Ewing, M., W. S. Jardetzky, and F. Press (1957). Elastic Waves in Layered Media, p. 358, McGraw-Hill,
New York.
Herrmann, R. B. (1975). The use of duration as a measure of seismic moment and magnitude, Bull.
Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 899-913.
Herrmann, R. B. (1977). A method for synthesis of the seismic coda of local earthquakes, Geophys. J. 43,
341-350.
Herrmann, R. B. and B. J. Mitchell (1975). Statistical analysis and interpretation of surface-wave
anelastic attenuation for the stable interior of North America, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 1115-1128.
Herrmann, R. B. and O. W. Nuttli (1975). Ground-motion modelling at regional distances for earthquakes
in a continental interior, II. Effect of focal depth, azimuth and attenuation, Earthquake Eng. Struct.
Dyn. 4, 59-72.
Nuttli, O. W. (1973). Seismic wave attenuation and magnitude relations for eastern North America, J.
Geophys. Res. 78, 876-885.
Nuttli, O. W. and J. E. Zollweg (1974). The relation between felt area and magnitude for central United
States earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 64, 73-85.
Stauder, W., M. Kramer, G. Fischer, S. Schaefer, and S. T. Morrissey (1976). Seismic characteristics of
southeast Missouri as indicated by a regional telemetered microearthquake array, Bull. Seism. Soc.
Am. 66, 1953-1964.

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES


SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
SAINT LOUIS, MISSOURI 63103

Manuscript received October 7, 1977

You might also like