Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Communication Group Discussion
Business Communication Group Discussion
Prof. S P Bansal
Principal Investigator Vice Chancellor
Maharaja Agrasen University, Baddi
Prof YoginderVerma
Co-Principal Investigator Pro–Vice Chancellor
Central University of Himachal Pradesh. Kangra. H.P.
Prof. IpshitaBansal
Paper Coordinator Department of Management Studies
BPSMV, KhanpurKalan, Sonipat
2. Learning Outcomes:
By the end of this module, students will be able to
know the relevance of discussing in groups
know ways to conduct a group discussion
know strategies to perform better in a group discussion
3. Introduction:
A discussion represents an activity in which the subject matter is systematically examined in
order to reach at a decision. Such a discussion when carried out by a more than two
participants is generally called as a group discussion. For discussion it is important that
participants must have an agenda to discuss, a systematic way to proceed, and an active
involvement. An aimless talking is never considered as discussion. A group discussion is a
systematic oral communication activity wherein all the participants interact with each other
for exchange of ideas and thoughts to fulfil a purpose. Purpose can be to arrive at a solution,
exchange information, provide views, or create an accord. The participants can be a part of
formally created group or an informal meeting. For an effective group discussion, number of
participant can be in the range of eight to fifteen. When the numbers of participant are less,
getting diverse viewpoints on an issue becomes difficult. Similarly, when the group size is
large, participation of every member in the discussion gets compromised.
4. Advantages of Groups:
It is a common belief that two or more people can think better than one. On this belief it can
be stated that more number of people can provide a better solution to a problem as compared
to an individual. While discussing in group, a problem can be analysed from different angles.
It happens because every member of a group has its own way of looking at the issue.
Discussing in groups also encourages presentation of creative ideas and solutions to a
problem. All the decisions made under group discussion have lesser resistance in adoption
and wider acceptability. A member representation from various bodies of the organization
improves the employer – employee relations. A proper representation of all sects of the
organization also ensures protection of their interests while making decisions. Despite many
advantages of discussing in groups, it suffers from some drawbacks. It is often difficult to
come to a concrete solution after a group discussion as different viewpoint of members of a
group makes it difficult to generate consensus. Generally, group discussion is dominated by
few members while others take a back seat. It hampers the representation of views of all the
members. Many times, during a group discussion, discussion goes haywire and members start
discussing irrelevant issues and making the whole exercise futile. In absence of a designated
leader, controlling and channelizing the discussion is a daunting task. A group discussion, if
not executed properly results into wastage of time, money, and energy.
5.1. Leadership skills: Through a group discussion it can be checked that whether a
prospective candidate has the ability to lead a group or to influence the thoughts of other
members of the group. These clues can be obtained from who is initiating the discussion
or who is steering the discussion towards a right track or who is inviting submissive
members of the group to participate.
5.2. Communication skills: Under communication skills it can be assessed that whether the
candidate is having clarity of thought, speaks clearly and in correct language, uses
appropriate gestures to communicate. If all other participants of the group easily
understand the viewpoints it indicates effective communication skill. If a candidate has
to clarify the intentions after every viewpoint, it indicates ineffective communication
skills.
5.3. Interpersonal skills: If a member of group is listening patiently to the viewpoints of other
members, giving respect to their viewpoints, not responding to provocation then he or
she is displaying good interpersonal skills. Under a short span of time it can be judged
whether an individual can work in a group or not.
5.4. Knowledge base: Through group discussion topical as well as general knowledge of a
person can be checked. It can also be assessed that how much an individual is aware
about his immediate or general environment.
5.5. Analytical and problem solving skills: A group discussion also depicts a candidate’s
analytical and problem solving skills. By observing the viewpoints it can be explained
whether the candidate is able to understand the issue clearly and presents the viewpoints
supported by logics. Also, by observing the suggestions during the discussion it can be
determined that a candidate is providing solutions to the issue with strong justification.
As group discussion offers to assess many personal qualities within a short span of time it is
being used as a prominent selection instrument to check the suitability of an individual for a
job.
6.1. Single topic: In this kind of group discussion a topic is announced and the participants
have to discuss over it.
6.2. Multiple topics: In this category, more than one and generally three to four topics are
given to a group. All the members of a group have to create consensus among them
about one topic the wish to discuss in detail.
6.3. Pre-announced topic: The topic is announced to all the participating members prior to
the date of discussion. This format gives ample to the participants to come prepared for
the discussion.
6.4. On-Spot announced topic: Opposite to pre-announced type of group discussion, a topic is
announced only after all the members of the group arrive and assemble at the designated
place. They are provided five to ten minutes to jot down and organize their thoughts.
6.5. Case based: Instead of giving topic, sometimes a case or case study is provided to the
members of the group. Such cases are followed by critical questions that need
deliberation. Each member of the group is expected to go through the case and present
their views and solutions to the issues mentioned at the end of the case.
A topic for group discussion is also carefully chosen. Topics can be popular, factual, and
controversial and in many cases highly abstract.
7.1. Decide the purpose: It is very important to have a clarity regarding purpose of the group
discussion. A purpose decides the expected outcome of the whole exercise. Purpose can
be to solve a problem, select a candidate for a job, and select a candidate for an academic
program. Purpose acts as a guiding force for conducting further steps of a group
discussion. It tells about what has to be assessed.
7.2. Decide number of candidates: Total number of participating members are identified and
divided into groups. For an effective group discussion it is advisable to keep the
members of a group in a range of eight to fifteen.
7.3. Seating Arrangements: In a group discussion, a proper seating arrangement can improve
its effectiveness. The basic guideline for a proper seating arrangement is that all the
members of the group must see and communicate with each other comfortably.
Considering the criteria, a semi-circular or circular seating arrangement is most preferred
for a group discussion.
7.4. Provide Directions: The moderator also announces the rules for the discussion that
include time limit. Generally, time limit for a discussion ranges between fifteen to thirty
minutes. The limit depends upon the availability of time and number of group
discussions to be conducted. General rule of conduct are also explained to the group.
7.5. Announcement of topic: Once the members of the group are seated as per the
arrangement, a moderator announces the topic for the group. All the members are given
five to ten minutes to organize their thoughts before starting a discussion.
7.6. Starting and conclusion: After getting a go ahead from the moderator, the group starts
discussing. As there is no designated leader in such a discussion, any member of the
group can initiate the discussion. There is no particular sequence that who will speak
when. All members of the group try to present their viewpoint with supportive
viewpoints. In the end, one of the members takes initiative to sum up the discussion and
provides a conclusion.
7.7. Evaluation: Once the discussion is over the judges evaluate the performance of each
member on a pre- decided criteria. Such evaluation criteria might include group
behaviour, communication skills, leadership qualities, analytical skills, subject
knowledge etc.
Source: http://loquiz.com/blog/2015/09/team-leader-leadership-in-team-building-games/
8.1. Connector: This member tries to connect the ideas of all the members of the group.
8.2. Detailer: A detailer extends the viewpoints presented by previous speaker by adding
more information.
8.3. Booster: This member boosts all other members to discuss actively.
8.4. Critic: A critic always provides significant analysis of the presented idea.
8.5. Initiator: Starts the discussion by floating an idea. Also take initiative to sum up the
discussion.
8.6. Pacifier: This member tries to reduce the tension in case of heated exchange of
viewpoints.
8.7. Tracker: A tracker keeps the discussion on track and prevents it from going haywire.
Source: http://www.icytales.com/top-10-group-discussion-myths-busted/
It is bad to make personal remarks just to prove your point. Keep your discussion in line
with the topic.
Be polite while interrupting an ongoing discussion.
Address all the members while presenting your views and avoid indulging in one to one
discussions.
If moderator or judges are sitting in the same room, never present your viewpoints while
looking into their eyes. Remember, for a group discussion they are not the part of the
group.
Try to avoid speaking in a flat tone. Give appropriate stress while putting forward your
views. This stress on words helps to emphasize the key element of your viewpoint.
Group Number_________
Ratings
Name of
Participant__________
S. Evaluation Criteria Excellent Good Average Poor Not
No. Acceptable
1 Leadership Qualities
2 Communication
Skills
3 Analytical Skills
4 Interpersonal Skills
Signature of Evaluator
12. Summary:
A group discussion is a systematic oral communication activity wherein all the participants
interact with each other for exchange of ideas and thoughts to fulfil a purpose. Purpose can be
to arrive at a solution, exchange information, provide views, or create an accord. For an
effective group discussion, number of participant can be in the range of eight to fifteen.
Discussing in groups also encourages presentation of creative ideas and solutions to a
problem. All the decisions made under group discussion have lesser resistance in adoption
and wider acceptability. Group discussion is a popular tool amongst corporate for selecting a
suitable candidate. It helps an organization to assess the personality of an individual and
determine the fit between a candidate and the organization or job. In group discussion
different roles such as initiator, connector, booster, critic and tracker could be played by
participants. A participant has to take care about various do’s and don’ts of group discussion
in order to perform better than others. Through a group discussion more than one aspect of an
individual can be assessed at the same time. These aspects are communication skills,
leadership qualities, interpersonal skills, group behaviour and analytical skills. Evaluation of
group discussion is done on pre-determined criteria.