Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.3.corporate Strategies Vertical Integration and Diversification - Students - v1
2.3.corporate Strategies Vertical Integration and Diversification - Students - v1
VERTICAL INTEGRATION
AND DIVERSIFICATION
12-10-2021 Prof. Francesca Di Pietro
AMAZON.COM
2
¨ Advantages J
¤ Improving the efficiency of its operations
¤ Increase diversification
¤ Reduce risk
¤ Revenues
Expanding the scope
8
¨ Risks L
¤ Strategic Issues
n Cost savings may prove smaller than expected.
n Gains in competitive capabilities take longer to realize or
never materialize at all.
¤ Organizational Issues
n Cultures, operating systems and management styles fail to
mesh
n Loss of key employees at the acquired firm.
The Boundaries of the Firm
9
¤ Bargaining/negotiation costs
When companies transact in the open market, they incur external transaction costs:
the costs of searching for a firm or an individual with whom to contract, and then negotiating,
monitoring, and enforcing the contract.
Internal transaction costs, economic exchange within a firm. The costs of recruiting and
retaining employees; providing office space and computers; and organizing, monitoring,
and supervising work. Administrative costs associated with coordinating economic activity
between different business units
Firms vs markets
16
¨ Firm Advantages:
¤ Control, coordination, retain knowledge,
¨ Firm Disadvantages
¤ Administrative Costs, innovation
¨ Market Advantages
¤ Flexibility, exploit innovation
¨ Market disadvantages
¤ Search costs
¤ Opportunism
¤ Information asymmetry
Fitness gyms
17
Transaction cost economics allows us to explain which activities a firm should pursue
in-house (“make”) versus which goods and services to obtain externally (“buy”).
When the costs of pursuing an activity in-house are less than the costs of transacting for that
activity in the market (Cin-house < Cmarket), then the firm should vertically integrate by
owning production of the needed inputs or the channels for the distribution of outputs
20
¨ The raw materials to make your cell phone, such as chemicals, ceramics, metals,
oil for plastic, and so on, are commodities. In each of these commodity businesses
are different companies, such as DuPont (U.S.), BASF (Germany), Kyocera (Japan),
and ExxonMobil (U.S.).
¨ Intermediate goods and components such as integrated circuits, displays,
touchscreens, cameras, and batteries are provided by firms such as ARM Holdings
(UK), Jabil Circuit (U.S.), Intel (U.S.), LG Display (Korea), Altek (Taiwan), and BYD
(China).
¨ Manufacturing firms, such as Flextronics (Singapore) or Foxconn (China) typically
assemble cell phones under contract for consumer electronics and telecommunications
companies such as BlackBerry (Canada), Ericsson (Sweden), Microsoft (U.S., with
its acquired Nokia business unit), Samsung (South Korea), and others.
If you look closely at an iPhone, for example, you’ll notice it says, “Designed
by Apple in California. Assembled in China.”
¨ Finally, to get wireless data and voice service, you pick a service provider such as
AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon in the United States; América Móvil in Mexico; Oi
in Brazil; Orange in France; T-Mobile or Vodafone in Germany; NTT Docomo in
Japan; Airtel in India; or China Mobile in China, among others.
Types of vertical integration strategies
6–23
Backward integration
¨ Integrating Backwards By:
¤ Achieving same scale economies as outside suppliers—
low-cost based competitive advantage.
¤ Matching or beating suppliers’ production efficiency with no
drop-off in quality—differentiation-based competitive
advantage.
¨ Reasons for Integrating Backwards:
¤ Reduction of supplier power
¤ Reduction in costs of major inputs
¤ Assurance of the supply and flow of critical inputs
¤ Protection of proprietary know-how
6–24
25
Example
26
Forward integration
¨ Reasons for Integrating Forward:
¤ To lower overall costs by increasing channel activity
efficiencies relative to competitors.
¤ To increase bargaining power through control of
channel activities.
¤ To gain better access to end users.
6–27
Vertical integration: risks
¨ Increased business risk due to large capital investment.
¨ Less flexibility in accommodating shifting buyer
preferences that require non-internally produced parts.
¨ Internal production levels may not be of sufficient
volumes to allow for economies of scale.
¨ Capacity matching problems for efficient production of
internally-produced components and parts.
¨ Requirements for different resources and capabilities.
6–28
Tapered Integration
29
¨ Ascending
¤ production of a limited number of components to obtain
knowledge about a product
¨ Descending
¤ control of a limited number of points of sale
30
Disintegration
31
6–32
The big risks of outsourcing
¨ Hollowing out resources and capabilities that the
firm needs to be a master of its own destiny.
¨ Loss of control when monitoring, controlling, and
coordinating activities of outside parties by means
of contracts and arm’s-length transactions.
¨ Lack of incentives for outside parties to make
investments specific to the needs of the outsourcing
firm’s value chain.
6–33
Diversification
34