Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study of Olmec Iconography
A Study of Olmec Iconography
A STUDY OF
OLMEC ICONOGRAPHY
© 1971
Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard
University, Washington, D.C.
ISBN 978-0-88402-034-9
Dedicated to Michael D. Coe
Contents
Introduction 5
Bibliography 92
A Study in Olmec Iconography
Iconography is that branch of the history of art which concerns itself with the subject matter or
meaning of works of art , as opposed to their form. - Erwin Panofsky
Introduction
In 1869 Jose Melgar first described an Olmec pouring into museums and private collections around
monument, the Colossal Head of Hueyapan, and the world.
opened a new chapter in the story of ancient Mexican Most archaeologists now believe that Olmec civi-
civilization (Melgar 1869). Sixty years later Marshall lization first took shape along the Mexican Gulf coast,
Saville published articles describing a group of jade perhaps in the Tuxtla mountains, sometime before
hachas or votive axes, and formulated the first defini- 1200 B.C. Three great ceremonial centers have been
tion of Olmec style (Saville 1929). Saville examined discovered in the Olmec heartland region: San Lo-
the iconography of the hachas, pointing out that they renzo, La Venta, and Tres Zapotes. San Lorenzo stands
portrayed "the conventional mask of a tiger, with near the beginning of the Olmec sequence and Tres
peculiar slanting almond-like eyes, prominent canine Zapotes marks its termination. These centers must
teeth, small nostrils and an immense flaring upper lip," have been the focal points of a far-flung empire based
and speculating that they represented Tezcatlipoca, on trade and tribute (Coe 1965a and c; 1968a). Rub-
the great Aztec jaguar god (1929: 268). Matthew Stir- ber, chocolate, bird feathers, and other tropical com-
ling's pioneer excavations in the Gulf Coast region modities were traded inland in exchange for precious
during the late 1930's and early i94o's established the jade. Colonial Olmec sites existed in the present Mexi-
archaeological context of Olmec civilization. A can states of Guerrero, Morelos, and Puebla, and in the
round-table conference was held in Tuxtla Gutierrez, Valley of Mexico; Olmec art objects have been found
Chiapas, in 1942 to discuss the so-called Olmec prob- from the Mexican highlands southward to Costa
lem (Mayas y Olmecas 1942). A small group of men Rica.1
closely involved in the growing field of Olmec studies Olmec iconography has been a controversial sub-
attended the talks and went on record in support of the ject since Melgar first announced that the Colossal
antiquity of Olmec culture. They also offered an im- Head of Hueyapan represented a portrait of a great
portant definition of the Olmec cultural tradition. Negro potentate. Major contributions to the field have
Since then our knowledge of Mexico's most ancient been made by Saville (1929), Drucker (1952), and
civilization has steadily increased. New sites have been most of all by Miguel Covarrubias (1942, 1944, 1946,
discovered and old sites re-excavated using the most
modern archaeological techniques. And all the while a 1 For general views of Olmec civilization see Bernal 1968a
steady stream of fine examples of Olmec art has been and b, and Coe 1968a.
5
I947> l9Sl)' Covarrubias in particular believed that of describing iconographic detail, is only rarely uti-
the concept of the were-jaguar - a half-man and half- lized.
jaguar creature - was at the heart of Olmec iconog- To my knowledge no one has ever attempted to
raphy. By drawing a sort of genealogical chart con- formulate a methodological approach to the study of
necting the Olmec were-jaguars with the rain gods of the Olmec symbolic system. It seems to me that there
later Mesoamerican cultures, Covarrubias was able to are three steps involved in deciphering Olmec iconog-
argue that the chief Olmec god was a rain deity. It is a raphy. By breaking down Olmec representations into
credit to his reputation and genius that his ideas have their component parts, it is possible to isolate the basic
prevailed up to the present day. In more recent times characters or elemental units of Olmec art. The first
Michael Coe has published important works dealing task of the iconographer is to compile a dictionary of
with Olmec style and iconography (Coe 1965a and c; these symbols, an alphabet of Olmec motifs. The sec-
1968a). A particularly interesting book has appeared ond step in the deciphering process is the recognition
in which Coe claims to have identified six distinct of motif combinations and character complexes which
Olmec gods (1968a: 111-15). Unfortunately, the na-frequently recur in Olmec art. Thus one learns that
ture of the publication did not permit an exhaustive flame eyebrows usually accompany L-shaped eyes,
analysis of these identifications. The material presentedthat forehead bands are associated with toothless in-
in the following pages corroborates and expands Coe's fants. In this way one can eventually identify but not
hypothesis. define the major Olmec deities. The discontinuity be-
Thousands of Olmec art works have survived the tween identification and definition is unavoidable be-
natural ravages of time and tropical climate and the cause of the virtual absence of Olmec inscriptions. It is
peculiar Olmec penchant for monument smashing, only in the third and final stage, when Olmec iconog-
and await iconographic analysis. However, major dif- raphy has been related to the symbolic systems of later
ficulties surround the availability of this material. Mesoamerican cultures and when it has been firmly
Many of the finest examples of Olmec portable art are anchored in the literature, that proper meaning and
in the hands of private collectors and can generally be definition can be given to the Olmec gods, and that the
seen only when they are lent to museums for special mythological context in which they moved can be re-
exhibitions. Since most of these objects are acquired constructed.
from professional pot-hunters who pillage sites with This paper is concerned only with the first two
total disregard for archaeological context, it is usually stages of the deciphering process and will deal with
impossible to discover the stratigraphic position or them at considerable length. A dictionary of Olmec
exact geographical provenience of any piece. Pub- motifs and symbols can be found in the second section.
lished descriptions of Olmec art works are often of The third section is devoted exclusively to the identifi-
little use to the iconographer. Photographs tend to be cation of ten gods from the Olmec pantheon. The
either dingy or uninformatively artistic, and the tech- final section contains brief speculative statements on
nique of line drawing, surely the most suitable method the meaning of Olmec mythology.
6
A Dictionary of Olmec Motifs and Symbols
The 182 motifs included in this section, each designated by an arabic numeral, are given
verbal and graphic descriptions wherever possible. Important variations are labeled with
small letters. Every occurrence of a particular motif may be found by referring to the
illustrations listed at the end of the description.
deities. Cannot be considered defini- d Brow with two rises. 101, 130, 155,
x" -v f Pinch
248, 249. 12 I Ear Spool or Plug. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11,
G Crescent-shaped eye . 34, 253. | 14, 15, 24?, 27, 29, 34, 36, 37, 61, 148,
I 172, 179, 209, 223, 245, 255, 259.
h Eye with extended back region . 127,
' 221, 229, 243, 244, 254, 263. RI
r ■■ ' | 1 Square or rectangular eye. 14, 225, 13 js. Ear Incising Consisting of Bent Rec-
V 'V' tangle , Two Squares , and Triangle.
j Reverse E eye . Appears 3 154?,
only 162,in 168.
I
representations of God I. 62, 102,
103, 137, 138.
8
14 Ear Curves Represented by S-shaped 171, 172, 175, 176, 177, 179, 180, 183, 184, 185, 186,
189, 199, 206, 207, 208, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216,
217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227,
^ Incising. 24, 26, 43, 156, 187. 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238,
239, 240, 241, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250,
251, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 259, 262, 263.
15 Nose. Wide and flattened in frontal
20 Frontal View of Wide-open Mouth . Characteristic
view and rounded in profile. 1,6,7, of God I.
8, 10, 14, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28,
c a Downturned bracket . 2, 63, 69, 120,
/ 29, 33. 34, 37. 38, 39, 43, 44, 62, 63,
C 90, 93, 94, 95, 96, 99, 100, 101, 102,
168?, 172, 183, 184, 189, 221, 228,
103, 120, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 135,
0122, 255. 168?, 123,- 172,
255. 124, 183, 128, 184, 129, 189, 221, 144, 228, 167,
137, 138, 141, 143, 145, 146, 147, 148, 132, 153, 154,
155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165,
^ ^ b Downturned E. 5?, 149, 150, 15
166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 175, 176, 177, 179,
180, 183, 184, 185, 186, 189, 199,206,207,208,211,
212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 69, 141, 148?, 168?, 190.
223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, Oc Rounded 69, 141, 148?, square 168?, or trapezoid 190. . 3, 10,
234, 235, 236, 237, 239, 240, 241, 243, 245, 246, 248,
21 nn Aerial View of Mouth . Feature only
249, 250, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 259, 262, 263. fr of God I. 142, 181.
16/ ~ Bird Beak. 4, 11, 42, 176?, 191, 192,
195, 197, 198, 202, 203, 204, 205.
22 L-shaped Upper Jaw. Feature of God
l( 1 ^ 1.93,94, 100, 101, 102, 118, 120, 121,
U u 126, 133, 137, 138.
17 f Figure-eight-shaped Element Extend-
^ ing from the Nostril down across the23 r- "7 Rectangular Jaw Markings . Feature
rtK Upper Lip. 10, 28, 33, 34, 43, 63, 126,
137, 138, 146, 174, 175, 211, 233, D1 ! 1! ;U;Un only
172.172. of God I. 120, 123, 124, 129,
^ J 234, 235, 236, 237, 239, 240, 241, ■ 1 1
249?, 256, 257.
24 J Bracket Gum Markings . Feature on
18 A. Nose Bead Decoration. 3, 4, 199, 245.^
5
103, 117, 120, 161.
9
235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 245, 246, 254, 255, 33 f Chubby Chin. 44, 234, 235, 236,
256, 257, 259- 240, 241, 242.
26
27 f
36 Paw- Wing. Feature of Gods I and
VIII. 8?, 29, 96, 98, 135, [TV^-v
156, m.159,
90, 93, 94, 98, 99, 101, 102, 104,
199?, 250, 253. I ' 105. 10 6, 107, 108, 109, no, hi,
J 112, 113, 114, 115, 129, 145, 150,
192, 194, 203.
28
-
37
^Us.CT"* II7, II8' I20' ^0, 131,
r 105, 133,
106, 107, 149,
108, 109, no, hi,
^ 150, 151, l6l, 196.
112, 113, 114, 115, 150, 161, 192,
29^y Receding Lower Jaw . Feature
Qw/J 194,203. of God
I. 29, 98, 126, 132.
38
43
/O
53 /'^ Helmet. 1, 3, 6, 7, 13.
V
54 /'S) Head Comb. 216.
fe) } )
56 Shamans Horned Head Decoration.
'f -
Li tn 11 1 nl
11
Face Masks . 3, 44?, 159, 259, 262. 70 X. Body Ornament made up of" Circlet
/V' Suspended from Band . 22, 216.
<4J
62
2 °^9 2 °^9 211 '
66 / I Pelt Worn over the Back . 15, 90. 74 C/«k 2, 3, 32, 33?, 34, 259.
n
&I/ 77 /V Flag or Pennant. 4.
69 I * ^4rm <w d Leg Bands . 2, 3 , 4, 9, 1 1 , 14,
13
97 t^J Miscellaneous Vegetation . Character- 105 f' A Bracket , (7, or Hoop. 1, 2, 18, 23, 32,
L~ istic of Gods I and II. 3, 10, 40, 82, 11 1 1 45, 52, 64, 76, 77, 90, 91, 92, 114,
I
J / I4i, 142, 143, 147?, 148, 187, 188,
F 4 190, 259, 263, 266. 167, 170, 172, 173, 179, 200, 201, 203, 205, 209, 218,
245, 249, 259, 263, 268.
&
98r^v ^,^Four-petaled Flower . 16, 62, 83, 135.
115 over
104 /TTTj Crossed Bands Superimposed Repeating Brackets as Edging. 9, 13,
-c8> Lozenge in Rounded Square. 98.
j-y f-'r-' 469 649 65, I01' 122,9 1469 l6l?> I79,
247.
14
116 Star. 18, 49, 57, 90, 101, 140, 202. 127 N. Speech Scroll or Oval. 33, 44?, 148,
120 A Dotted Lozenge. 35. 131 A Four-pointed "Compass Emblem " 95.
<e> <$£>
121 Lozenge within Circle . 40.
©
132 Cogged Half-wheel . 2, 45.
15
149 Opposed Volutes. 192.
G^c>
139 Four Dots and Bar. 2,5,85, 161?, 135, 150 Tore/?. 20, 21, 36, 214?
O r ^181,182,228.
oWo i TOT*
TOT*
140 /' Feathered Diamond. 5, 18, 19?
151 f 1 1 Bomw/ or Clasped Bundle. 19, 20, 87,
AW 183,214.
2
141 p. Two Step or Double Step. 5, 10, 11,
J '_J ^13. 20, 2i, 86, 87, 127, 148, 150, 165,
220, 254.
152 t^'^J^$ushel Basket." 143.
142 y) Gentle Step. 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52,
■© """ 58,63,64,65,95,98,110,113,114,
•jCytPC 120, 121, 122, 128, 137, 138, 139,
"jKSrV* 140, 148, 195, 205, 234, 235, 236,
•V 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 250.
161 /' Central Element Flanked by Pairs of
HHr f'('I<lentical Designs- I?4' I?7, l8°' 254-
170 AM'XW Opposing Lines. 42, 45, 101, 123,
195
3] u
Mm Bird or Homed Owl. 150.
17
178 Footprint. 4. 213? 214* 217, 219* 220, 222, 223, 224^ 225,
226, 227, 228?, 232, 244, 24$, 249, 253, 255,
259, 262, 263, 266, 268.
1 79a' ^ A Three-petal Flower . 4. b Carved Jade or Serpentine. 5, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
XJ 34. 35. 36, 37. 94. 124, 131, 136, 151?, 153,
154, 155?, 157, 158, 161, 162, 163, 164, 168,
170?, 171?, 172, 173. 174, 175. 176, 177,
178, 180?, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185?, 186?,
187, 188, 189, 196, 198, 199, 207, 208,215?,
216, 218?, 221, 229, 230, 231, 233, 246, 254,
256.
180 ^ Jaw Bones. 31. 57. 58, 59. 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 90, 91, 92,
93. 95. 96, 97. 98, xoo, 101, 102, 103, 104,
105, 106, 107, 108, 109, no, hi, 112, 113,
181 Trophy Head. 3. XI4. n5. n6, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122,
123, 128, 129, 130, 134, 135, 137, 138, 139,
140, 143, 146, 152, 179, 191, 192, 195, 200,
182 Breakdown of Media on which the Motifs Occur. 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 234, 235, 236, 237,
A Carved Stone. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 247, 250, 251, 252.
13, 14, 61, 99, 125, 126, 127, 132, 141, 142, d Wood. 156.
144. 145, 147. 148, 149, 160, 165, 166, 167,
E Wall Painting. 15, 16, 17, 133, 150, 159,
i69. 193. 194. 197. 206, 209, 210, 211, 212?, 190, 243, 248.
18
Figures are identified and assigned proveniences when possible. In addition , the sources of the illustrations are given. The
location of a photograph of each object is included in parentheses before the listing of motifs.
19
6
10
8
20
Figure 5. Mosaic pavement from La Venta. Drucker, Hei-10. Facial incising from the Las Limas figure. PDJ.
Figure
zer, and Squier 1959, Fig. 29. (Drucker, Heizer, and (Medellm
Squier Zenil 1965, Fotos 5-8.) Motifs: ia, 2, 3, 4?, 5B,
1959, PL 16.) Motifs : 3, 20B?, 137, 139, 140, 141, 182B.
6b,c,e, 8, 9, 15, 17, 19, 20c, 25, 26, 43, 97, 117, 141, 167, 182A.
Figure 6. Colossal Head 2 from San Lorenzo. Clewlow, Figure ii. Alvarado stela. Covarrubias 1957, Fig. 29. (Stir-
Cowan, O'Connell, and Benemann 1967, Fig. 17. (Clewlow ling 1965, Fig. 18-b.) Motifs: ia,c,e, 2, 10, 12, 16, 35, 52, 64,
et al. 1967, Pis. 19-21.) Motifs: ia, 6d, 10, 12, 15, 19, 53, 58, 65?, 67, 69, 99?, 117, 141, 182A.
166, 182A.
Figure 12. Monument 43 from San Lorenzo. PDJ. (Coe
Figure 7. Colossal Head 4 from San Lorenzo. Clewlow, 1967c, Fig. 7.) Motifs: 177, 182A.
Cowan, O'Connell, and Benemann 1967, Fig. 22. (Clewlow
Figure 13. Rock carvings from Las Victorias, El Salvador.
etal. 1967, Pis. 25-27.) Motifs: ia, 6d, 10, 12, 15, 19, 53, 182A.
Boggs 1950. Fig. 1. (Boggs 1950, Fig. 1.) Motifs: ia, 2, 53, 62,
Figure 8. Monument 30 from San Lorenzo. Redrawn from63, 65, 67, 76, 115, 117, 137, 141, 182A.
Coe 1967c, Fig. 9. Motifs: 3, 6e, 10, 12, 15, 19, 25, 26, 27?, 30,
51, 99, 182A.
Figure 14. Rock carvings from San Isidro Piedra Parada,
Guatemala. Covarrubias 1957, Fig. 25. Motifs: ia, 61, 10, 12,
Figure 9. Monument 2 from Potrero Nuevo. Michael D. 15, 19, 25, 26?, 35, 52, 62, 67, 69, 182E.
Coe. (Stirling 1955, PI. 23.) Motifs: ia, 2, 24?, 67, 69, 115,
182A.
21
Figure 15. Painting 1 fromjuxtlahuaca, Guerrero. Gay 1967.
(Coe 1968a, p. 101.) Motifs: ia, 2, 10, 12, 35, 46, 51, 52, 64,
66, 75, 182E.
Figure 23. Jade acrobat. PDJ. Motifs: 2, 6c, 10, 15, 19, 99,
105, 107, 114, 117, 182B.
23
Figure 24. Mask of unknown provenience. PDJ. (Handbook
of the Robert Woods Bliss Collection 1963, Pl. 31.) Motifs: 6d,
10, 12?, 14, 15, 19, 25, 31A, 182B.
Figure 31. Jade jaws from La Venta Offering 1943-g. Re- Figure 37. Celt of unknown provenience. Redrawn from
drawn from Covarrubias Notebook. (Drucker 1952, PL Covarrubias Notebook. Motifs: 6, 10, 12, 15, 19, 112, 117,
57-c.) Motifs: 26, 180, 182B. 122, 123?, 143, 182B.
24
25
26
Figure 38. Pottery vessel from Tabasco. Susan Weeks. Mo- Figure 46. Pottery vessel from Tlapacoya. Redrawn from
tifs: ib, $?, 6e, 15, 45, 51, 159, 182c. Coe 1965a, Fig. 28. (Coe 1965a, Fig. 28.) Motifs: 115, 117,
125, 142, 169, 182c.
Figure 39. Pottery bowl from Tabasco. Susan Weeks. Mo-
tifs: ib, 6a, 15, 19, 26, 40, 45, 182c. Figure 47. Sello from Gulf coast. Frederick V. Field. Motifs:
142, 182c.
Figure 40. Pottery vessel from Tabasco. Susan Weeks. Mo-
tifs: 2, 6, 19, 39, 40, 97, 117, 119, 121, 169, 172, 182c. Figure 48. Sello from Tlatilco. Frederick V. Field. Motifs:
142, 182c.
Figure 41. Pottery vessel from Tlapacoya. Susan Weeks.
Motifs: 6, 9, 124, 159, 167, 169, 172, 182c. Figure 49. Sello from Tlatilco. Frederick V. Field. Motifs:
11 6, 117, 118, 142, 182c.
Figure 42. Pottery bowl from Puebla. Redrawn from Coe
1965a, Fig. 22. (Coe 1965a, Fig. 22.) Motifs: ic, 6k, 16, 41, Figure 50. Sello from Tlatilco. Coe 1965a, Fig. 175. Motifs:
49, 123, 169, 170, 172, 182c. 142, 182c.
Figure 43. Pottery vessel from Tlapacoya (?). PDJ. (Pre- Figure 51. Sello from Remojadas. Frederick V. Field. Motifs:
Columbian Art from Middle America 19 66, Pis.) Motifs: 3, 6d, 142, 182c.
10, 14, 15, 17, 19, 25, 182c.
Figure 52. Sello from Tlatilco. Frederick V. Field. Motifs:
105, 125, 142, 182c.
Figure 44. Pottery bowl from Tlapacoya. PDJ. Motifs: 3,
6b, 15, 19, 33, 52?, 58, 61?, 117, 124, 127?, 169, 182c. Figure 53. Sello from Tlatilco. Frederick V. Field. Motifs:
142, 182c.
Figure 45. Pottery bowl from Las Bocas. Redrawn from
Coe 1965a, Fig. 24. (Coe 1965a, Fig. 24.) Motifs: 105, 132, Figure 54. Sello from Tlatilco. Frederick V. Field. Motifs:
170, 182c. 142, 182c.
47
48
49
50
52
51
53
54
55 56
57
59
58
60
62
61
Figure 55. Sello from Remojadas. Frederick V. Field. Motifs:
id?, 142, 159, 182c.
29
Miscellaneous Examples of Motifs
67
68
71
69
72
70
30
Figure 67. Crossed bands in eyes. PDJ. Motifs: 6, 99. Figure 72. Crossed bands in eye plaque. PDJ. Motifs: 4, 99.
Figure 68. Crossed bands framed in crenelations. PDJ. Mo- Figure 73. Crossed bands bundle. PDJ. Motifs: 99, 100.
tifs: 99, 159.
Figure 74. Crossed bands on pectorals. PDJ. Motifs: 62, 99.
Figure 69. Crossed bands within mouth. PDJ. Motifs: 20A,c,
Figure 75. Miscellaneous other occurrences of crossed
99-
bands motif. PDJ. Motifs: 99.
Figure 70. Crossed bands as paw substitutes. PDJ. Motifs: 99.
Figure 76. Brackets. PDJ. Motifs: 105.
Figure 71. Crossed bands of cloth material. PDJ. Motifs: 99.
31
77
79
78
32
Figure 77. Occupied brackets. PDJ. Motifs: 105, 11 1.
Figure 78. Maize over seed corn dot. PDJ. Motifs : 82.
Figure 85. Four dots and bar motif. PDJ. Motifs: 139.
Figure 86. Double step motif. PDJ. Motifs : 141.
34
The Gods of the Olmec People
Ten of the most important gods of the Olmec people are included in the following sec-
tion. Each deity is labeled with a Roman numeral; variations are designated by small
letters. A coded list of the motifs and symbols occurring in the representation appears
after each description.
GOD I. This god is a jaguar monster and the most often depicted deity in Olmec art.
His primary defining characteristic is flame eyebrows; other prominent features are L-
or trough-shaped eyes, pug nose, rectangular lip markings, gum brackets, and absent
lower jaw. The Jaguar-Dragon Paw- Wing motif complex in its various ramifications
is also associated with this divinity. The eighty-odd representations of God I are divided
into seven categories.
God I-A. Images of God I which are closely related to the Atlihuayan Figure are in-
cluded in this subgroup. Generally they are characterized by flame eyebrows, Type A or
b eyes, flattened nose, rectangular lip markings, gum brackets, and the Jaguar-Dragon
Paw-Wing motif. Many lack lower jaws.
Figure 91. bello from Las Bocas. The sello design depicts
three attributes of God I: Type A flame eyebrows, Type b
eyes, and a bracketed lozenge motif. Frederick V. Field.
Motifs: 5A, 6b, 105, no, 119, 182c.
35
36
99
100
Figure 92. Sello from Las Bocas. The carving on the sello
consists of bracketed lozenge motifs. Frederick V. Field.
Motifs: 105, no, 119, 182c.
37
101
102
103
38
Figure ioi. Designs from Tlatilco pottery. These nine ex-
amples of the jaguar-dragon-paw- wing indicate the variable
nature of this motif. Generally, the profile face of God I is
depicted with flame eyebrows, upper jaw, and bracket gum
markings. The paw- wing symbol always appears to the left
of the head. Note the absence of the lower jaw. Redrawn and
corrected from Covarrubias 1957, Fig. 9. Motifs: 5A,b,d, 6a, b,
15, 19, 22, 24, 28, 36, 37, 99, 115, 116, 162, 163, 170, 182c.
Figure 102. Designs from Las Bocas pottery. The three im-
ages of God I have flame eyebrows, bracket gum markings,
and missing lower jaws. Note the different ways of repre-
senting paw-wings. Redrawn and corrected from Coe 1965a, 104
Figs. 29-31. Motifs: 5B, 6b, j, 15, 19, 22, 24, 28, 36, 38, 99,
162, 163, 182c.
106
107
109
108
39
Figures 110-112. Designs from Las Bocas pottery. Paw- Figure 116. Sello from Las Bocas. The sello depicts the
wing motifs decorate the three bowls. Redrawn from Coe splayed body of a four-legged creature with wide layered
1965a, Figs. 26, 27, 36. (Coe 1965a, Figs. 26, 27, 36.) Motifs : tail. Frederick V. Field. Motifs: 47, 182c.
36, 37, 39, 169, 182c.
Figure 117. Sello from Tlatilco. The geometric design may
Figure 113. Design from Tlatilco pottery. These are further symbolize the profile head of God I. The four brackets in the
statements of the paw-wing motif. Covarrubias 1957, Fig. 11. upturned L stand for flame eyebrows and eye and the four
Motifs: 36, 37, 169, 182c. brackets in the downturned L for snout and gum markings.
Frederick V. Field. Motifs: 5B, 6b, 19, 24, 28, 105, 182c.
Figure 114. Designs from Tlatilco pottery. A human hand,
a jaguar paw and a hybrid hand-paw are shown in this figure. Figure 118. Sello from Las Bocas. A profile version of God I
Covarrubias 1957, Fig. 10. Motifs: 36, 37, 51, 105, 169, 182c. with Type B flame eyebrows and eye, an L-shaped upper jaw,
and rectangular gum markings appears here against a back-
Figure 115. Sello from Tlatilco. The sello impression con-
ground of billowing forms. Frederick V. Field. Motifs: 5B, 6b,
sists of a three-toed footprint with claws and a palm spiral.
19, 22, 26?, 28, 182c.
Frederick V. Field. Motifs: 36, 37, 39, 40, 182c.
Figure 119. Sello from Las Bocas. The piece is partly de-
stroyed but must have originally resembled Figure 118.
Frederick V. Field. Motifs: 182c.
113
115 114
116
117
119
118
42
12/
126
Figure 123. Pottery vessel from Las Bocas. The cleft head,
123
gaping mouth, and rectangular gum markings of God I are
flanked by crossed-bands panels, possibly symbolizing paw-
wings. PDJ. Motifs: 3, 20A, 23, 99, 170, 182c.
Figure 120. Pottery bowl from Tlapacoya. The incising on
Figure 124. Jade perforator of unknown provenience. The
the pot portrays two views of God I. The profile has Type a
deity's face has bracket-shaped mouth and rectangular Hp
flame eyebrows and eye and a large bulbous nose at the end
markings. The eyes are represented by Motif 114. Redrawn
of the snout. An L-shaped upper jaw decorated with a row of
from Covarrubias Notebook. Motifs: 20A, 23, 99, 105, 107,
rectangles frames the bracket gum markings; the lower jaw 114, 117, 124, 182B.
is entirely absent. To the left of the monster's eye is a small
cleft element. The second representation is a frontal view of Figure 125. Monument 1 from Laguna de los Cerros. The
the same deity. This time he has a deeply cleft head, Type a god is depicted with wavy hair, flattened nose, and fang-filled
flame eyebrows, Type b eyes, and two large crosshatched mouth; the eyes are indicated by Motif 114. Michael D. Coe.
nostrils. The mouth is wide open, the gullet being indicated (Pina Chan and Covarrubias 1964, Pis.) Motifs: 10?, 15, 19,
by a crosshatched square with crossed-bands motif. A U- 25, 26, 59, 99, 105, 107, 114, 117, 124, 182A.
shaped row of gum brackets and a row of rectangular lip
Figure 126. Profile B from Las Limas figure. The left shoul-
markings frame the mouth. The entire face is set off by
der of the Las Limas figure is incised with the deeply cleft
alternating bands with circular elements. PDJ. (Aveleyra Ar-
head, Type a flame eyebrows, and Type b eye of God I.
royo de Anda 1964, Pis.) Motifs: 3, 5 a, 6a, b, 15, 20A, 22, 23,
24, 28, 99, 122, 124, 162, 169, 173, 182c. From the L-shaped upper jaw extends a single cleft fang. The
lower jaw is slightly reduced in size. (This representation is
Figure 121. Potsherd from Tlapacoya. The design is a frag- identified as the fire god in Coe 1968a.) Michael D. Coe.
ment of a profile with Type A flame eyebrows and eye and (Medellfn Zenil 1965, Figs. 5-8.) Motifs: 3, 5A, 6b, 15, 17, 19,
an L-shaped jaw. The original composition was probably 22, 26, 29, 182A.
similar to Figure 120. PDJ. Motifs: 5A, 6a or b, 22, 169, 182c.
Figure 127. Stela C from Tres Zapotes. This late carving
Figure 122. Potsherds from Tlapacoya. A front view of God portrays a monster with Type h eyes, wide nose, and open
I's open mouth with crossed-bands motif decorates the sherd. mouth with upper fangs. On the creature's cheeks is a motif
Notice the were-jaguar face and the repeating edging brack- which may be related to the pendant dot symbol. Covarrubi-
ets. Weaver 1967, Fig. 3. (Weaver 1967, PI. 7.) Motifs: 3, 6k, as 1946b, p. 84. Motifs: 6h, 10, 15, 19, 25, 26, 3 IB, 105, 107,
19, 20A, 99, 115, 169, 182c. 117, 129?, 141, 182A.
43
129
128
130
131
133
44
Figure 131. Jade ear plug from La Venta Offering 1943-g.
Three profile heads, two of which are identical, are incised on
the jade ear plug. The middle profile has Type d eye and
typical nose and mouth, and may be God VI. The other two
profiles have Type c flame eyebrows, Type E eyes, rounded
134 noses, and jawless mouths; they must represent God I. Re-
drawn from Pina Chan and Covarrubias 1964, Fig. 27. Mo-
tifs: 5c, 6d,e, 7, 15, 19, 25, 26, 28, 30, 182B.
Figure 135. Sello from Tlatilco. Jose Luis Franco and David
Figure 128. Pottery bowl from Tlapacoya. The likeness of
Kelley have hypothesized that this sello is a text made up of
God I is characterized by Type A eyes and typical Olmec nose
three glyphic elements (Franco 1959 and Kelley 1966). My
and hoop-shaped mouth. Representations of God X occupy
feeling is that the three glyphs are different images of God I.
the eye plaques and surround the muzzle. The monster's
The right panel contains a cleft-headed were-jaguar profile
mouth contains seven dots arranged in a V pattern; a sequence
with Type f flame eyebrows, Type c eye, and open mouth
of nine dots flanks the deity's face. This association of particu-
with single egg-tooth. Note the three-fold occurrence of the
lar numbers with a specific god is one of the few glimpses
oval form, once near the creature's cleft and twice within
allowed us into the mysteries of Olmec numerology. Susan
brackets. A four-petaled flower, perhaps a Kin glyph with the
Weeks. Motifs: 4, 6a, 15, 20A, 154, 155, 169, 182c, God X.
symbolic value of day or sun, occupies the middle section.
Figure 129. Sello from Las Bocas. The god is shown with The left panel bears a four-dot-and-bar motif enclosed in a
Type b flame eyebrows, Type A eye, bulbous nose, and fang- cleft frame. This is surely a geometric version of the profile in
filled mouth. His body is composed of Motif 20A and two the right panel, for the rare Type f flame eyebrows are re-
paw-wing symbols. Frederick V. Field. Motifs: 5B, 6a, 15, 19, peated in both instances. Frederick V. Field. Motifs: 3, 5F, 6c,
20A, 23, 26?, 36, 182c. 15, 19, 27, 98, 105, 107, 117, 124, 139, 144, 182c.
Figure 130. Sello from Las Bocas. God I's features include Figure 136. Celt of unknown provenience. It is conceivable
Type d flame eyebrows, Type A eye, rounded nose, and that the incising represents God I with Type b flame eyebrows
mouth filled with teeth. Note the absence of the lower jaw. and a gaping mouth with crossed-bands motif. Redrawn
Frederick V. Field. Motifs: 5D, 6a, 15, 19, 26, 28, 182c. from Covarrubias 1957, Fig. 34. Motifs: 5B, 19, 99, 182B.
45
46
Figures 137 and 138. Potsherds from Tlapacoya. The four-
teen pottery fragments portray various parts of God I in-
cluding flame eyebrows, L-shaped eyes, eye plaques, and
bulbous noses. PDJ. Motifs : 4, 5A,b, 6a,b,d,j, 9, 15, 17, 22,
162, 169, 182c, God X.
Figure 139. Potsherd from Tlapacoya. The eye and eye
plaque of God I decorate the sherd. PDJ. Motifs: 4, 6b, 9, 117,
169, 182c, God X.
48
God I-B. Representations in this category have vegetation symbols sprouting either
from the mouth region or from the back.
141
142
49
50
Figure 143 . Pottery vessel from Tabasco. The hulking jaguar figure. He has a cleft head, Type D eyes, and two nostril
monster is characterized by Type a flame eyebrows and eye. openings. The third and fourth subsidiary representations are
Tusk-like fangs extend from his lower jaw, and vegetation shown back-to-back in the lower part of the main figure's
motifs sprout from his back. The god has four muscular legs, face. The left profile has a cleft head, Type b flame eyebrows
a small tail and, in his midsection, a squarish plaque contain- and eye, a rounded nose, and open toothless mouth. Note the
ing the face of God V. Just to the right of the creature is the figure-eight element in the nostril and five-dot motif on the
only known occurrence of the so-called "bushel-basket" forehead. The right profile is identical except for the three-
motif. Susan Weeks. Motifs: ib, 5 a, 6a, 10, 15, 19, 26, 46?, pronged vegetation which sprouts from the chin. To the left
87, 97, 99, 152, 182c, God V. of the main figure are various bracket and cleft motifs. PDJ.
Motifs: Main Figure , 3, 4, 5H, 6d, 15, 19, 25, 86, 88, 94;
Figure 144. Altar 4 from La Venta. The monument por- Forehead Figure, 3, 5B, 6b, 9, 15, 17, 19, 157; Nostril Figure , 3,
trays an Olmec male emerging from a niche and grasping 6d, 17; Left Profile , 3, 5B, 6b, 15, 17, 19, 25, 157, 177; Right
ropes which continue around the corners of the monument to Profile , 3, 5B, 6b, 15, 17, 19, 25, 86, 88, 94, 157, 177; Miscel-
bind prisoners. In the panel directly above the head of the laneous. , 115, 124, 157, 182c.
main figure is a frontal view of God I. He has Type c flame
eyebrows, Type d eyes, and two upper fangs which frame a Figure 147. Monument 15 from La Venta. The reconstruc-
crossed-bands motif. On either side of the face is a design tion of the monument does not seem particularly reliable, but
which seems to have Type b flame eyebrows and gum brack- we will have to work with it. Occupying the bottom panel is
ets and may be a profile view of God I. As for the niche from a frontal view of God I with Type A flame eyebrows, Type b
which the Olmec figure emerges, it must represent the deity's eyes, flaring nose, and mouth with two upper fangs. Motif 34,
open mouth. It is located below the mouth in the upper panel which is probably derived from the flame-eyebrow motif,
and has vegetation sprouting from its corners, like the mouth decorates the creature's cheeks. The upper section may depict
of God I in Figures 141 and 142. Michael D. Coe. (Stirling vegetation growing out of the body of the deity, but it
1943a, PI. 37.) Motifs : 5A,c, 6d, 20A, 25, 26, 80, 83, 88, 93, should be pointed out that what is here called vegetation is
99, 124, 182A. identical to an inverted version of Motif 113. Redrawn from
Covarrubias 1957, Fig. 19. (Drucker 1952, PL 64-a.) Motifs:
Figure 145. Monument 6 from La Venta. The entire body 5A, 6b, 15, 19, 25, 26, 34, 97?, 113?, 117, 124, 130?, 182A.
of God I is carved in this great block of stone. The face has
composite Type A-c flame eyebrows, Type A eyes, and a Figure 148. Celt from Simojovel, Chiapas. The image of an
flattened nose. A fleshy forked tongue protrudes from the Olmec ritual figure is the main component of this design.
fanged mouth. The monster has four legs, and from his back The figure's headdress, which consists of a brim with crossed-
vegetation springs. Redrawn and corrected from Covarrubias bands motif and a crown of sprouting vegetation, is of partic-
1957, Fig. 30. (Kubler 1962, Pi. 27.) Motifs: ib, 5A-C, 6a, 15, ular interest. The Type f eye of God I with crossed-bands
19, 25, 26, 31B, 36, 87, 182A. motif in the iris and Type e flame eyebrows appear in front
of the vegetation sprout. To the left of the crown is a curious
Figure 146. Pottery vessel from Tlapacoya. Certainly one of three-part motif, perhaps related to Motifs 95 or 130, which
the most complicated examples of Olmec iconographic rep- may symbolize vegetation. Finally, in front of the figure's
resentation, the incising on this vessel is a veritable hymn to open mouth is an oval speech element. The panels above and
God I. The main figure is a profile face, facing to the left and below the ritual figure are difficult to interpret; I propose
framed in a series of double-line breaks. The deity has a cleft that they represent an Olmec deity, possibly God I himself,
head, Type h flame eyebrows and a large Type d eye. The with wide-open mouth. The cleft headdress, trough-shaped
nose is directly above the long hornlike projection extending eyes and rounded nostrils of the god are shown in the top
out from the upper jaw. The fangless mouth is wide open; section. The lower panel is then the bottom part of the
from the chin grows a banded three-pronged vegetation ele- monster's mouth with St. Andrew's cross. In the center of the
ment. Decorating the face of this main figure are four sub- crossed-bands motif is a simple front-on view of a cleft-
sidiary representations. In the forehead region is a front view headed god with Type b flame eyebrows, crescent-shaped
of a monster with Type b flame eyebrows and eyes. Drooping eyes, and a double-step motif symbolizing nostrils. PDJ.
down over his typical Olmec mouth are two figure-eight (Coe 1965c, Fig. 17.) Motifs: Central Figure , 2, 5E, 6f, 12, 25,
elements which originate in the nostrils. A second divinity, 26, 52, 81?, 95?, 97, 99, 117, 127, 130?, 159, 182A; Subsidiary
probably God X, appears just below the nostril of the main Panels , 3, 5c, 6f, 15, 20c?, 124, 141, 169, 182B.
51
God I-C. The deity is portrayed here with an upper jaw in the form of a downturned E.
52
God I-D. Heads, face masks, and plaques representing God I make up this group.
Figure 152. Mask from Guerrero. The god has Type a flame
eyebrows, Type b eyes, and a stereotyped Olmec face with
fangless mouth. PDJ. (Pina Chan and Covarrubias 1964, Pis.)
Motifs: 5A, 6e, 10, 15, 19, 25, 182c.
53
Figure 159. Painting 7 from Oxtotitlan, Guerrero. The
painting represents the head of an Olmec figure in ritual
attire. The profile is typically Olmec except for the Type E
Figure 156. Wooden mask from Canon de la Mano, Guer- flame eyebrows. He wears a headdress with a brim and
rero. The miraculously preserved wooden mask has Type A pointed crown and a face mask consisting of the toothed
eyes and typical Olmec nose and toothless mouth. Designs jaws of God I. Note the speech scroll in front of the face and
derived from Type c flame eyebrows decorate the cheeks. the fringe lines above the head. Redrawn from Grove 1970,
Redrawn from Covarrubias Notebook. (Pina Chan and Fig. 19. (Grove 1970, Fig. 20.) Motifs: 2, 5E, 6d, 10, 15, 19,
Covarrubias 1964, Pis.) Motifs : 6a, 10, 14, 15, 19, 25, 26, 27, 26, 27, 59, 61, 127, 157, 182E.
34, 117, 182D.
Figure 160. Plaque 1 from La Venta. The face of the god has
Figure 157. Mask of unknown provenience. Cleft head, Type a flame eyebrows, Type b eyes, flattened nose, and
Type e flame eyebrows, and Type c eyes are features of this cheek incising. The lower portion of the plaque is too eroded
example of God I. Redrawn from Covarrubias Notebook. to reveal the details of the mouth. Drucker, Heizer, and
(Kelemen 1943, PL 245-c.) Motifs: 3, 5E, 6c, 15, 19, 25, 117, Squier 1959, Fig. 62. Motifs: 5 A, 6b, 15, 19, 31, 34, 182A.
182B?
Figure 161. Jadeite breast ornament from Oaxaca. God I is
Figure 158. Mask of unknown provenience. The deity's faceportrayed with cleft head, Type b flame eyebrows, and a
is depicted with Type G flame eyebrows, Type b eyes, widestandard Olmec face with fangless mouth. The carving on
nose and mouth with upper fangs. PDJ. (Indigenous Art of either side of the face is probably a geometric profile of the
the Americas 1947, Pi. 130.) Motifs: 5G, 6b, 10, 15, 19, 25,
same god. PDJ. Motifs: 3, 5A, 6b, 15, 19, 24, 25, 28, 117, 139?,
26, 182B. 182B.
54
55
God I-E. The five hachas in this category are anthropomorphic versions of God I. They
generally have cleft heads, flame eyebrows, flattened noses, and toothless mouths with
gum ridges. They also share conventionalized hand positions.
Figure 162. Hacha of unknown provenience. This superb Figure 165. Hacha from Oaxaca. The monster is shown here
example of Olmec craftsmanship portrays God I with Type with Type e flame eyebrows and Type b eyes. His face is
a flame eyebrows, Type b eyes, and ears decorated with fine decorated with three spots and the double-step motif, while
incising. The figure wears a breechcloth decorated with a his body is dressed in a cape or robe. PDJ. (Coe 1965c, Fig.
St. Andrew's cross. PDJ. (Coe 1965a, Fig. 5.) Motifs: 3, 5 a, 28.) Motifs: 3, 5E, 6b, 10, 15, 19, 25, 43, 65, 117, 141, 182A.
6b, 10, 13, 15, 19, 25, 43, 67, 99, 159, 182B.
Figure 166. Hacha of unknown provenience. This is a slight-
Figure 163. Hacha from the Mixteca, Oaxaca. Type a flame ly aberrant version of God I in that pairs of horizontal bars
eyebrows and Type d eyes are carved on the ax. PDJ. (Covar- substitute for flame eyebrows. The eyes are Type c. Note the
rubias 1957, Pi. xvi.) Motifs: 3, 5A, 6d, 15, 19, 25, 43, 182B. rather elaborate loincloth. PDJ. (Saville 1929, Fig. 91.) Motifs:
3, 5H, 6c, 15, 19, 25, 43, 67, 69, 182A.
Figure 164. Hacha from La Venta Offering 1943-f. God I
has Type A flame eyebrows and Type b eyes. Except for a
rounded pectoral worn around the neck, the details of the
body are not delineated. PDJ. (Stirling 1943b, Pi. iv.) Motifs:
3, 5A, 6b, 15, 19, 25, 62 or 63, 182B.
162 163
56
164
165
166
57
God I-F. These three images of God I have pairs of long cleft elements inside their
mouths. The downturned pair symbolizes fangs, while the two upturned elements
represent vegetation.
169
58
GOD II. Maize symbols grow from the cleft heads of all representations of God II. The
sprout may come from the cleft itself or it may be impressed on the forehead. The deity
sometimes has characteristics of God I such as flame eyebrows or a bracket-shaped mouth.
God II- A. Images of God II in which the maize motif sprouts from a seed-corn dot are
included in this group.
172
171
59
174
60
God II-B. The feathered or fringed seed-corn motif is shared by these two likenesses of
God II.
175
61
God II-C. Motif 95 substitutes for the more typical maize motifs in the two figures of
this division.
62
God II-D. These two examples of God II are similar enough to constitute an inde-
pendent category: both have Motif 96, standing for sprouting maize, and nearly identical
Type e flame eyebrows and cheek decorations.
Figure 179. Clay urn from Monte Alban, Oaxaca. The fea-
tures of this elaborate representation of God II include Type e
flame eyebrows, Type d eyes, typical Olmec nose, and tooth-
filled mouth. Vegetation Motif 96 is impressed on the large
downturned bracket on the forehead. The ears contain tas-
seled spools, and the cheeks are incised with designs derived
from Type d flame eyebrows. The base of the urn is covered
with a variety of decorative motifs. Redrawn from Covar-
rubias Notebook. Motifs: 5E, 6d, 10, 12, 15, 19, 25, 26, 34, 84,
96, 105, 115, 138, 156, 182c.
180
63
God II-E. Each representation in this subgroup has a maize symbol sprouting from the
head cleft.
64
185
186
183
65
God II-F. This final category contains miscellaneous representations of God II. They
have the vegetal motifs needed to include them provisionally in the God II group.
187 1
189
Figure 187. Mask of unknown provenience. God II is por-
trayed with spiral flame eyebrows, Type c eyes, rounded
nose, and snarling mouth. A pointed vegetation motif ap-
pears between the eyes and spiral incising covers the cheeks.
Covarrubias 1957, Fig. 35. (Pina Chan and Covarrubias
1964, Pis.) Motifs: 2, 5H, 10, 14, 34, 84, 91?, 97, 117, 124, 182B.
66
GOD III. Representations of God III generally combine avian characteristics with such
features of God I as flame eyebrows and paw-wings.
192
191
Figure 191. Pottery vessel from Las Bocas. God III is a bird
monster with spotted skin, conventionalized wing, tail feath-
ers, and talons. At the end of the long thin neck is the head of
the deity, large and massive, with Type A flame eyebrows,
crosshatched Type b eye, and a toothless beak. Susan Weeks.
Motifs: ic, 5A, 6b, 16, 41, 42, 49, 51, 182c.
Figure 192. Pottery duck from Las Bocas. This fine piece
shows the union of avian form with attributes of God I,
which is characteristic of God III. The general form of a duck
with upturned beak and long tail feathers is impressed with
193 the flame eyebrows and paw-wings of God I. The monster
sits on a pedestal decorated with opposed volutes. Note that
the two sides of the figure are not identical: both the type of
flame eyebrow and the design in the paw-wing's palm vary.
Redrawn from Coe 1965a, Fig. 61. (Coe 1965a, Fig. 61.)
Motifs : ic, 5B, 6b, 16, 36, 37, 49, 149, 182c.
67
68
Figure 194. Duck monument from Laguna de los Cerros.
While the head of the monument is missing, the paw-wing
motifs on either side of the carving have survived. Their
presence and positioning are sufficient justification for labeling
the sculpture God III. PDJ. (Coe 1965a, Fig. 8.) Motifs: ic,
36, 37, 182A.
199a Figure 195. Design from Tlatilco pottery bowl. The deity's
Type b flame eyebrows and eyes, and beaklike mouth with
three upper fangs are depicted here. A long neckjoins the head
to the squarish conventionalized wing. Redrawn from Covar-
rubias 1957, Fig. 11. Motifs: 5B, 6b, 16, 26, 41?, 169, 170,
182c.
Figure 198. Celt from Cerro de las Mesas jade cache. The
199c
jade carving represents a birdhead with Type d flame eye-
brows, Type E eyes, and hooked beak. PDJ. (Coe 1965c, Fig.
40.) Motifs: ic, 5D, 6a, e, 16, 182B.
Figure 200b. Bowl from Tlatilco. The two designs are pre-
sumably footprints of an avian creature, for only birds have
the necessary projection at the back of the foot to leave such
200b
an impression. Redrawn from Covarrubias Notebook. Mo-
tifs: 39, 105, 107, 117, 125, 182c.
69
202
201
203
205
Figure 201. Sello from Tlatilco. The sello portrays the Type Figure 204. Sello from Las Bocas. The god's characteristics
b flame eyebrows, short thin neck, and rectangular wing include winged, S-shaped body; long, thin neck; head with
convention of God III. Frederick V. Field. Motifs : 5B, 41, 105,
pointed beak; and clawed feet. Other designs surrounding the
182c.
main figure depict pairs of legs, a pair of talons, and a square
containing crossed bands. Frederick V. Field. Motifs: ic, 16,
Figure 202. Sello from Tlatilco. God III appears here in
41, 42, 49, 99, 123, 182c.
white with Type b flame eyebrows and a round eye. His beak
is decorated with a triangular element and a star motif isFigure
lo- 205. Design from Las Bocas baby-face figure. The
cated between the wings. The tail is three-pronged. Two
round eye and long beak of God III may be found in the
subsidiary profiles, one with short and one with long beak, developed sello impression. Note the bracket and crossed-
are formed by the positive parts of the sello impression. bands motifs and the crosshatching. PDJ. (Coe 1965a, Fig.
Frederick V. Field. Motifs : ic, 5B, 6k, 16, 41, 49, 116, 182c.
184b.) Motifs: 6k, 16, 99, 102?, 105, 117, 169, 182c.
70
GOD IV. God IV is generally represented as an anthropomorphic dwarf or infant with
Type c eyes and toothless mouth. A forehead band and wavy ear coverings are almost
always Worn by the deity.
207
206
Figure 206. Figure held in the arms of the Las Limas figure.
This cleft-headed figure of God IV with Type c eyes and
typical Olmec nose and mouth is carried in the arms of a
seated Olmec adult. He wears a forehead band with crosses
and horizontal striations, and his ears are covered with defini-
tive wavy decorations. Crossed-bands motifs appear on the
pectoral worn around the deity's neck and on his breechcloth.
(In Coe 1968a, the deity is called the rain god.) PDJ. (Medel-
linZenil 1965, Foto 9.) Motifs : ia, 3, 6c, 10, 15, 19, 25, 58, 60,
62, 67, 99, 126, 159, 182A.
Figure 207. Jade piece from San Lorenzo. The tiny image of
God IV has a cleft head, Type c eyes, flattened nose, and 208
toothless mouth. PDJ. Motifs: 3, 6c, 15, 19, 25, 58, 182B.
71
209
210b
210a
72
Figure 209. Altar 5 from La Venta. The front panel of the Figure 210. Altar 2 from La Venta and Monuments 12 and
great altar depicts a seated Olmec personage emerging from 20 from San Lorenzo. All three monuments portray a seated
a niche with an infant child in his arms. The infant figure is Olmec figure holding an infant in his arms. Michael D. Coe
severely damaged but does not seem to have the attributes of and Felipe Davalos, Mon. 20. (Stirling 1943a, PL 38; Coe
God IV. However, since we have encountered a similar theme 1968b, Pis.) Motifs : 80, 182A, God IV.
in other representations where the infant could be positively
identified (Figures 206 and 208), it seems likely that this little
fellow is the same deity. The seated figure wears an elaborate
conical hat, ear plugs, and a pectoral or mirror around his
neck. A plaque containing the face of an unidentified Olmec
god, a group of three pendant dot motifs, and two crossed-
bands symbols decorate the hatband. The sides of the altar
are carved with scenes of pairs of Olmec adults holding were-
jaguar dwarfs in their arms. The dwarfs may be gods but
cannot yet be identified. Drucker 1952, Fig. 52. (Stirling
1943a, Pis. 40 and 41.) Motifs: ia, 2, 3, 10, 12, 52, 62, 63, 65,
69, 80, 99, 105, 129, 182A.
73
213
211
214
216
215
74
212
217
218
mouth, and wavy ear decorations. Redrawn from Covar- Andrew's cross motif. The cleft ribbon elements are probably
rubias Notebook. (Lothrop 1957, PL vi.) Motifs: 6c, 10, 15, parts of an apron or skirt. Redrawn from Covarrubias 1946a,
19, 25, 58, 60, 182A? Fig. 6. (Coe 1968a, p. 45.) Motifs: 6c, 8, 10, 15, 19, 25, 26, 54,
58, 60, 67, 70, 99, 159, 182B.
Figure 213. Monument M from Tres Zapotes. Though the
sculpture is badly eroded, it is still possible to discern the Figure 217. Hacha of unknown provenience. God IV's fea-
headband and wavy ear coverings characteristic of God IV. tures include Type d eyes, Olmec nose, toothless mouth, and
Redrawn from Michael D. Coe. (Stirling 1943a, Pis. nb,c,d.) longish ears. An undecorated band extends across the fore-
Motifs: 6, 10, 15, 19, 58, 60, 182A. head. PDJ. (Saville 1929, Fig. 88.) Motifs: 6d, 10, 15, 19, 25,
43, 182A.
Figure 214. Hacha of unknown provenience. The votive ax
depicts the cleft head, forehead band, Type c eyes, typical Figure 218. Hacha of unknown provenience. The god has
nose, mouth, and wavy ear decoration of God IV. The Type c eyes, wide nose, snarling mouth, and longish ears.
lower body is simply indicated; the hands grasp a bound His headband is decorated with a bracket motif. PDJ. ( Hand-
bundle. PDJ. (Pina Chan and Covarrubias 1964, Pis.) Mo- book of the Robert Woods Bliss Collection 1963, PL 26.) Mo-
tifs: 3, 6c, 10, 15, 19, 44, 58, 60, 150?, 151, 182A. tifs: 6c, 10, 15, 19, 25, 43, 58, 105, 182B?
75
219
221
76
GOD V. All images of God V have pairs of large canines projecting from the upper
gums of the mouths. Aside from that the specimens seem to have little in common. Some
figures have features which are characteristic of God I, while others have attributes of
God IV.
224
223
77
226 /^==r 1 v
(!^sk
tab
V v - ^ '
231
229
Figure 226. Hacha of unknown provenience. The deity is
portrayed with Type a eyes, rectangular ears, and Olmec
nose and mouth. A squarish crest element, perhaps symboliz-
ing hair, appears on top of the head. PDJ. (Saville 1929, Fig.
89.) Motifs : 6a, 10, 15, 19, 25, 26, 182A.
Figure 228. Hacha from the Gulf coast. The god shown here
228 has a headband, Type I eyes, and snarling mouth with upper
fangs. A downturned bracket, symbolizing the mouth of
God I, frames the muzzle. The lower portion of the ax bears
a four-dots-and-bar motif as well as a pair of downturned
three-pronged elements. PDJ. (Kubler 1962, PI. 28a.) Motifs:
3, 61, 10, 15, 19, 20A, 25, 26, 58, 137, 139, 182A?
227
Figure 230. Jade pectoral from Yucatan Peninsula. The at-
tributes of the creature include Type c eyes, pug nose, and
mouth with upper canines. Panels decorated with lopsided
St. Andrew's crosses flank the deity's head. PDJ. (Coe 1966,
Fig. 1.) Motifs: 3, 6c, 15, 19, 25, 26, 99, 117, 182B.
78
GOD VI. God VI is generally portrayed with cleft head, Type d eyes, and an open
mouth with prominent gum ridges. A band of some kind always passes through the eye.
Figure 232. Profile A from Las Limas figure. God VI's cleft
head, Type D eye, curved nose, and mouth with single upper
fang are cut into the right shoulder of the seated Olmec fig-
ure. A band extends from the ear region through the eye and
up to the top of the head. Note the three spots along the left
edge of the band. (Coe calls this figure Xipe in 1968a.)
Michael D. Coe. (Medellin Zenil 1965, Figs. 5-8.) Motifs: 3,
6d, 7, 15, 19, 26, 117, 182A.
232
79
235
236
8o
237
240
81
GOD VII. God VII is a serpent deity who is generally portrayed with avian attributes -
feathers and wings in particular. In other words, God VII is a feathered serpent !
V 244
246 '
W
245
243
82
247 Figure 243. Painting i-c from Oxtotitlan, Guerrero. The
serpent monster has a Type h eye, bulbous nose, fang-filled
mouth, .and fleshy forked tongue. The fringe element at the
back of the creature's head represents feathers. Redrawn from
Grove 1970. Motifs : id, 6h, 15, 19, 26, 30?, 31B, 55, 99, 168,
182E.
83
249 ^
j 250
1
1
84
GOD VIII. The god has a cleft head, low rounded nose, and Type G eyes. A single large
fang extends from the fleshless upper jaw. (According to Coe 1968a, this is the death god.)
Figure 253. Profile D from Las Limas figure. This is the only
representation of God VIII that I have been able to locate.
Michael D. Coe. (Medellin Zenil 1965, Figs. 5-8.) Motifs: 3,
6g, 15, 19, 27, 32, 182A.
253
GOD IX. The deity can be distinguished by the beard he wears on the end of his chin.
Figure 254. Jade piece from the Mixteca, Oaxaca. God IX's
Type h eyes, flattened nose with bracket nostrils, and fanged
mouth with fleshy tongue are incised on the jade ornament.
The decoration of the headband consists of a central element
with double-step motif and two flanking pairs of cleft de-
signs. The vertical lines on the chin represent a beard. Re-
drawn from Covarrubias 1946a, Fig. 7. (Saville 1929, Fig.
100.) Motifs : 6h, 15, 19, 25, 26, 31A, 35, 58, 117, 124, 141, 161,
182B.
85
GOD X. God X usually appears as subsidiary or secondary incising on representations of
the major deities. The divinity is characterized by cleft head, Type d eyes, figure-eight
nostril elements, and toothless mouth.
257
//
Figure 256. Jade canoe from Cerro de las Mesas jade cache.
Coe 1965c, Fig. 25. (Bernal 1967, Fig. 193.) Motifs : 3, 6d, 19,
25, 182B.
256
Figure 257. Miscellaneous examples of God X. PDJ. Motifs :
3, 5», 6b, D, 15, 17, 19, 25, 182B.
86
Rock Carvings from Chalcatzingo, Morelos
These reliefs have been described and interpreted by Carlo Gay (1966), Carmen Cook de
Leonard (1967), and David Grove (1968a). At this time there seems little value in re-
describing them or in offering new speculations about their original meaning. Instead,
I will simply list the motifs which appear in each carving.
258
87
Figure 260. Relief m. Grove 1968a, Fig. 4. Motifs : ib, 6b, ii,
15, 19, 26, 31A, 46, 61, 124, 182A.
Figure 261. Relief iv. Grove 1968a, Fig. 5. Motifs : ia,b, 6h,I,
15, 19, 26, 40, 46, 52, 69, 83, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 105, 182A.
Figure 263. Relief vi. Grove 1968a, Fig. 2. Motifs : 97, 182A.
Figure 265. Relief vin. Grove 1968a, Fig. 2. Motifs: 105, 128,
164, 182A.
Figure 266. Relief ix. PDJ. Motifs: 5E, 6e, 15, 20c, 25,26,30,
85, 97, 99, 128?, 182A, God X. 260
261
I
263
88
262
264
266
265
89
Speculations and Conclusions
In conclusion let us review what has been ac- of the fertile earth. God II is surely the ancestor of such
complished in the preceding pages. In the first section
Aztec corn gods as Centeotl.
a model to formulate a methodology for studying the The flame features of God III indicate a close rela-
Olmec iconographic system was used. By applying
tionship between the avian monster and God I. He was
that model to a large sample of Olmec art it wasthe pos-messenger or perhaps the harbinger of the great
sible to compile a substantial dictionary of motifsfire
anddeity.
symbols and to identify ten major gods in the Olmec
God IV is the rain god once thought to be the chief
pantheon. The preceding sections have emphasized a
divinity of the Olmec culture. He is always depicted as
bare analytic approach to Olmec religion, but it isannot
infant or dwarf.
sufficient to enumerate endlessly the attributes of
Thethe
association of a human infant with rain recalls the an-
ancient ones. In this final section I am allowing myself
nual sacrifice of little children to the god Tlaloc among the
the luxury of speculating on the nature and content ofSahagun tells us that the more they cried, the more
Aztec;
the Olmec religion. Following are some tentativeauspicious
at- the sacrifice. A clearcut case of sympathetic
magic,
tributions I have made and present briefly for the the tears of the hapless children called down the
tears of the heavenly cumulus clouds. (Coe 1965a: 14)
reader's enjoyment and possible edification, with the
full understanding that such speculation is at bestItpre-
should also be pointed out that the representatives of
mature and at worst a waste of time. the Chacs and Tlalocs of later Mesoamerican cultures
The most important deity of the Olmec pantheon
were dwarfs and gnomes.
is the jaguar-dragon, God I. His flame eyebrows desig-
Images of God V combine characteristics of the rain
nate him lord of fire and heat. In one aspect he is god ofand the fire monster. He is the god of lightning
deity
and lord of thunder.
the blazing sun or perhaps a prototype of the Xiuh-
coatl who bore the sun across the sky. He is sometimes
The band passing through the eye of God VI identi-
represented with vegetation springing from his body fies the deity as the god of spring, renewal, and resur-
and thus is lord of the fiery earth, associated withrection,
vol- the gruesome Xipe Totec of Aztec times.
canoes and caves, drought and fertility. He is probably
God VII is the precious feathered serpent - lord of
also god of the household hearth which stood at life
theand wisdom, god of the wind, and the primary
center of the Olmec family. In the terms of Aztec deity of Mesoamerican ruling classes. He is Quetzal-
myth, God I is Cipactli, Xiuhcoatl, Xiuhtecuhtli,coatl.
and
Huehueteotl all in one.
The closed, crescent-shaped eye and fleshless jaw of
God VIII define him as the lord of death and ruler of
God II has corn motifs sprouting from his cleft head,
and must be the Olmec maize god. That he has attri- the underworld. The Aztecs called him Mictlante-
cuhtli.
butes of God I is not surprising since that deity is lord
90
Gods IX and X remain inscrutable. the sacrifice of infants and small children. The series of
If speculation about the nature of the Olmec gods is stone monuments which depict a seated Olmec adult
premature, attempting to reconstruct their mythology emerging from the cavelike mouth of the earth mon-
is foolhardy. Yet the corpus of monuments seems to ster with the rain god in his arms commemorates this
afford us a glimpse into the realms of ancient Mexican ritual (Figs. 142, 206, 209, 210).
myth. There is much that remains to be done before we
The Olmec apparently believed that their rain god can offer a valid reconstruction of Olmec ritual and
resided in a watery paradise deep inside the earth for mythology. The search for new examples of Olmec
certain parts of the year. On particular ceremonial art must continue, and the new information must be
occasions, probably connected with the agricultural used to refine, expand, and destroy, if necessary, the
cycle, Olmec ritual leaders descended into the bowels categories which have been established in this paper.
of the fiery earth monster to fetch the rain god and Someday, it will be possible to integrate Olmec ico-
bring him back into the world of men. Such a cere- nography into a general framework of Mesoamerican
mony may have marked the beginning of the Mexican representational systems.
rainy season and was almost certainly accompanied by
9i
Bibliography
92
Coe, Michael D., R. A. DiEHL,andM. Stuiver Enciso, Jorge
1967 Olmec Civilization, Veracruz, Mexico: Dating of Design Motifs of Ancient Mexico. New York.
1947
Field, Freder!ck V.
the San Lorenzo Phase. Science , vol. 155, no. 3768,
PP- 1399-1401. Washington. 1967 Thoughts on the Meaning and Use of Pre-Hispanic
Cook de Leonard, Carmen Mexican Sellos. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and
1952 El museo de Villahermosa. Tlatoani , vol. 1, pp. 26-
Archaeology , no. 3. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington.
31. Mexico. Flannery, Kent V.
1967 Sculptures and Rock Carvings at Chalcatzingo, 1968 The Olmec and the Valley of Oaxaca: a Model for
Morelos. Contributions of the University of California Inter-regional Interaction in Formative Times. In
Archaeological Research Facility , no. 3, pp. 57-84. Dumbarton Oaks Conference on the Olmec (Eliza-
Berkeley. beth P. Benson, ed.), pp. 79-110. Dumbarton Oaks
Co VARRUBIAS , MlGUEL Research Library and Collection, Washington.
1942 Origen y desarrollo del estilo arti'stico "Olmeca." Furst, Peter T.
In Mayas y Olmecas. Segunda reunion de Mesa 1968 The Olmec Were-Jaguar Motif in the Light of
Redonda. Sociedad Mexicana de Antropologia, pp. Ethnographic Reality. In Dumbarton Oaks Con-
46-49. Mexico. ference on the Olmec (Elizabeth P. Benson, ed.),
1943 Tlatilco, Archaic Mexican Art and Culture. DYN> pp. 143-174. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library
The Review of Modern Art , nos. 4-5. Coyoacan, and Collection, Washington.
Mexico. Gamboa, Fernando
1944 La Venta, Colossal Heads and Jaguar Gods. DYN,1963 Masterworks of Mexican Art. Los Angeles County
The Review of Modern Art , no. 6. Coyoacan, Mex- Museum of Art, Los Angeles.
ico. Gay, Carlo T. E.
1946a Mexico South; the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. New 1966 Rock Carvings at Chalcatzingo. Natural History , vol.
York. lxxv, no. 7, pp. 56-61. New York.
1946b El arte "Olmeca" o de La Venta. Cuadernos Ameri-1967 Oldest Paintings of the New World. Natural His-
canos , vol. xxvm, no. 4, pp. 153-179. Mexico. tory. vol. lxxvi, no. 4, pp. 28-35. New York.
1950 Tlatilco: el arte y la cultura preclasica del Valle Groth-Kimball,
de Irmgard and Franz
Mexico. Cuadernos Americanos , vol. li, no. 3, pp. Feuchtwanger
149-162. Mexico. 1954 The Art of Ancient Mexico. London.
1957 Indian Art of Mexico and Central America. New Grove, David C.
York. 1968a Chalcatzingo, Morelos, Mexico: a Reappraisal of
Cummin gs , Byron the Olmec Rock Carvings. American Antiquity , vol.
1938 Cuicuilco and the Archaic Culture of Mexico. Uni- 33, no. 4, pp. 486-491. Salt Lake City.
versity of Arizona Bulletint vol. iv, no. 8. Tucson. 1968b Murales olmecas en Guerrero. Boletm del Instituto
Delgado, AgustIn Nacional de Antropologia e Historiay no. 34, pp. n-14.
1965 Infantile and Jaguar Traits in Olmec Sculpture. Mexico.
1968c The Pre-Classic Olmec in Central Mexico: Site Dis-
Archaeology , vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 55-62. Brattleboro.
Digby, Adrian tributions and Inferences. In Dumbarton Oaks Con-
1953 The Olmec Jades in the Exhibition of Mexican Art. ference on the Olmec (Elizabeth P. Benson, ed.),
Burlington Magazine , vol. xcv, pp. 162-165. London. pp. 179-185. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library
Drucker, Philip and Collection, Washington.
1952 La Venta, Tabasco: a Study of Olmec Ceramics1969 and Olmec Cave Paintings: Discovery from Guerrero,
Art. Bureau of American Ethnology , Bulletin 153. Mexico. Science , vol. 164, no. 3878, pp. 421-423.
Washington. Washington.
1955 The Cerro de las Mesas Offering of Jade and Other 1970 The Olmec Paintings of Oxtotitlan Cave, Guerrero,
Materials. Bureau of American Ethnology , Bulletin 157 , Mexico. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeol-
Anthropological Papers , No. 44 , pp. 25-68. Wash- ogy , no. 6. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington.
ington. Guzman, Eulalia
1956 Gifts for the Jaguar God. National Geographic Maga- 1934 Los relieves de las rocas del Cerro de la Cantera,
zine , vol. no, pp. 366-375. Washington. Jonacatepec, Mor. Anales del Museo Nacional de Ar-
Drucker, Philip, R. F. HEizER,andR. Squier queologta , Historia y Etnografia , epoca 5, vol. 1, pp.
1959 Excavations at La Venta, Tabasco, 1955. Bureau of 237-251. Mexico.
American Ethnology , Bulletin 170. Washington. Handbook of the Robert Woods Bliss
Easby, Elizabeth K. Collection of Pre-Columbian Art
1963 Handbook of the Robert Woods Bliss Collection of
1966 Ancient Art of Latin America From the Collection
of Jay C. Leff. The Brooklyn Museum, Brooklyn.Pre-Columbian Art. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington.
93
Heizer, Robert F. Kubler, George
1967 Analysis of Two Low Relief Sculptures from 1962
La The Art and Architecture of Ancient America: the
Venta. Contributions of the University of California Mexican, Maya, and Andean Peoples. Baltimore.
Archaeological Research Facility , no. 3, pp. 25-55.
Kunz, George F.
Berkeley. 1890 Gems and Precious Stones of North America. New
1968 New Observations on La Venta. In Dumbarton York.
Oaks Conference on the Olmec (Elizabeth P. Ben-Lothrop, S. K.
son, ed.), pp. 9-36. Dumbarton Oaks Research Li- 1964 Treasures of Ancient America: the Arts of the Pre-
brary and Collection, Washington. Columbian Civilizations from Mexico to Peru.
Heizer, Robert F. and Philip Drucker Geneva.
1968 The Fluted Pyramid of the La Venta Site. Antiquity ,
Lothrop, S. K., W. F. Foshag, andj. Mahler
vol. 42, pp. 52-56. Cambridge, England. 1957 Pre-Columbian Art. Robert Woods Bliss Collec-
Heizer, Robert F., P. Drucker, and tion. New York and London.
J. A. Graham Mayas y Olmecas
1968 Investigations at La Venta, 1967. Contributions of the
1942 Segunda reunion de Mesa Redonda. Sociedad Mexi-
University of California Archaeological Research Facil-
ity , no. 5, PP. i-34-.^Berkelev.
cana de Antropologia, Mexico.
MEDELLfN ZENIL, ALFONSO
Heizer, Robert F.andTiLLiE Smith
1959 Museo Veracruzano de Antropologia. La Palabra
1965 Olmec Sculpture and Stone Working: a Bibliog-
y el Hombre , Revista de la Universidad Veracruz ana,
raphy. Contributions of the University of California
no. 11, pp. 469-500. Xalapa.
Archaeological Research Facility , no. 1, pp. 71-88.
Berkeley. 1960a Exploraciones arqueologicas en Laguna de los Cer-
Heizer, Robert F., T. Smith, and H. Williams ros, Acayuacan, Veracruz. Xalapa.
1960b Monolitos ineditos olmecas. La Palabra y el Hombre ,
1965 Notes on Colossal Head No. 2 from Tres Zapotes.
American Antiquity , vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 102-104. Salt Revista de la Universidad Veracruzana , no. 16, pp.
Lake Citv. 75-97- Xalapa.
Holmes, William H.
1965 La escultura de Las Limas. Bole tin del Instituto Na-
tional de Antropologia e Historia , no. 21, pp. 5-8.
1907 On a Nephrite Statuette from San Andres Tuxtla,
Mexico.
Vera Cruz, Mexico. American Anthropologist , vol. 9,
pp. 691-701. Menasha. Melgar, Jose M.
1916 The Oldest Dated American Monument, a 1869
Neph-Antigiiedades mexicanas, notable escultura antigua.
rite Figurine from Mexico. Art and Archaeology , Boletln de la Sociedad Mexicana de Geografta y Esta-
vol. hi, pp. 274-278. Washington. distica , epoca 2, vol. 1, pp. 292-297. Mexico.
Indigenous Art of the Americas 1871 Estudio sobre la antigiiedad y el origen de la Cabeza
Colosal de tipo etiopico existe en Hueyapan del
1947 Collection of Robert Woods Bliss. National Gallery
canton de los Tuxtlas. Boletin de la Sociedad Mexicana
of Art, Washington.
Jones, Julie de Geografta y Estadistica , epoca 2, vol. m, pp. 104-
109. Mexico.
1963 Bibliography for Olmec Sculpture. Primitive Art
Nicholson,
Bibliographies , no. 2. The Museum of Primitive Art, Irene
New York. 1967 Mexican and Central American Mythology. Lon-
don.
n.d. An Introduction to Olmec Sculpture. (Unpublished
Master's thesis, Institute of Fine Arts, New Pellicer,
York Carlos
University, 1962.) 1961 The Tabasco Museums. Official Guide. Instituto
Joyce, Thomas A. Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico.
1 912 A Short Guide to the American Antiquities inPina the Chan, Roman
British Museum. London. 1952 Tlatilco y la cultura preclasica del valle de Mexico.
Judd, Neil M. Anales del Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia ,
195 1 A New-found Votive Ax from Mexico. American vol. iv, pp. 33-43. Mexico.
Antiquity , vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 139-141. Salt Lake City. 1955 Chalcatzingo, Morelos. Informes , no. 4. Direccion
Kelemen, Pal de Monumentos Prehispanicos, Mexico.
1939 Pre-Columbian Jades. Parnassus , vol. 11, pp. 2-10. 1958 Tlatilco. 2 vols. Instituto Nacional de Antropologia
Mpw Ynrlr
e Historia, Mexico.
1943 Medieval American Art. New York. i960 Mesoamerica. Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e
Kelley, David H. Historia, Mexico.
1964 The
1966 A Cylinder Seal from Tlatilco. American Antiquity , Olmecs. Consejo Nacional de Turismo, Mex-
vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 744-746. Salt Lake City. ico.
94
Pina Chan, RomAn and Luis Covarrubias 1947 On the Trail of La Venta Man. National Geographic
1964 El Pueblo del Jaguar (Los olmecas arqueologicos). Magazine, vol. xci, pp. 137-172. Washington.
Consejo para la planeacion e instalacion del Museo
1955 btone Monuments of the Rio Chiquito, Veracruz,
Nacional de Antropologia, Mexico. Mexico. Bureau of American Ethnology , Bulletin 157 ,
Pina Chan, Roman and Valentin Lopez Anthropological Papers No. 43, pp. 1-23. Washington.
1952 Excavaciones en Atlihuayan, Morelos. Tlatoani , 1957
vol. An Archaeological Reconnaissance in Southeastern
1, no. 1, p. 12. Mexico. Mexico. Bureau of American Ethnology , Bulletin 164 ,
Pina Chan, Roman, A. Romano Pacheco, and Anthropological Papers No. 53, pp. 213-240. Wash-
E. Pareyon Moreno ington.
1952 Tlatilco, nuevo sitio preclasico de 1961la
TheCuenca de in Jade. In Essays in Pre-
Olmecs, Artists
Mexico. Tlatoani , vol. 1, nos. 3-4, pp. 9-14. Mexico.
Columbian Art and Archaeology by Samuel K.
Porter, Muriel Noe Lothrop et al., pp. 43-59. Harvard University Press,
1953 Tlatilco and the Pre-Classic Cultures of the New Cambridge.
World. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology1965 Monumental
, Sculpture of Southern Veracruz and
no. 19. New York. Tabasco. In Handbook of Middle American Indians,
Pre-Columbian Art from Middle America vol. 3, pp. 716-738. University of Texas Press,
1966 Pre-Columbian Art from Middle America. Austin.
Gift of
Mrs. Harry C. Hanszen. Museum of 1968 Fine Arts,
Early History of the Olmec Problem. In Dum-
Houston. barton Oaks Conference on the Olmec (Elizabeth
RubIn de la Borbolla, Daniel P. Benson, ed.), pp. 1-8. Dumbarton Oaks Re-
1964 Escultura precolumbina de Guerrero. Mexico. search Librarv and Collection, Washington.
Sahagun, Fray Bernardino de Stirling, Matthew W. and Marion Stirling
1942 Finding Jewels of Jade in the Mexican Swamp.
1950-63 Florentine Codex. General History of the Things
of New Spain. (Trans, by Arthur J. O. Anderson National Geographic Magazine , vol. Lxxxn, pp. 63 5-
and Charles E. Dibble.) The School of American 661. Washington.
Research and the University of Utah, Santa Sweeney,
Fe, J. J.
New Mexico. 1963 The Olmec Tradition. Museum of Fine Arts, Hous-
Saville, Marshall H. ton.
Thompson, J. Eric S.
1900 A Votive Adze of Jadeite from Mexico. Monumental
Records j vol. 1, pp. 138-140. New York. 1950 Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: Introduction. Carne-
1929 Votive Axes from Ancient Mexico, parts 1 andgie2.Institution of Washington , Publication No. 589.
Indian Notes , vol. vi, pp. 266-299, 335-342. Museum Washington.
of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, Vaillant,
New George C.
York. 1932 A Pre-Columbian Jade. Natural History , vol. 32, no.
Smith, Tillie 6, pp. 512-520, 556-558. New York.
1963 The Main Themes of the Olmec Art Tradition.
1935 Early Cultures of the Valley of Mexico. Anthropo-
Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers , vol. 28, pp. logical Papers of the American Museum of Natural His-
121-213. Berkeley. tory , vol. 35, part 3, pp. 285-328. New York.
Stirling, Matthew W. Weaver, Muriel Porter
1939 Discovering the New World's Oldest Dated 1967Work
Tlapacoya Pottery in the Museum Collection. Indian
of Man. National Geographic Magazine , vol. lxxvi, Notes and Monographs , Miscellaneous Series No. 56.
pp. 183-218. Washington. Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation,
1940a An Initial benes from I res Zapotes, Veracruz, Mex- New York.
Westheim, Paul
ico. Contributed Technical Papers , Mexican Archaeol-
ogy Series , vol. 1, no. 1. National Geographic 1965 The Art of Ancient Mexico. Garden City.
Soci-
ety, Washington. Wicke, Charles R.
1940b Great Stone Faces of the Mexican Jungle. National n.d. Olmec: an Early Art Style of Pre-Columbian Mex-
Geographic Magazine , vol. Lxxvm, pp. 309-334.ico. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department
Washington. of Anthropology, University of Arizona, 1965.)
1 94 1 Expedition Unearths Buried Masterpieces of Carved Willey, Gordon R.
Jade. National Geographic Magazine , vol. lxxx, pp. 1966 An Introduction to American Archaeology, vol. 1.
277-302. Washington. Englewood Cliffs.
1943a Stone Monuments of Southern Mexico. Bureau of Williams, Howel and Robert F. Heizer
American Ethnology , Bulletin 138. Washington. 1965 Sources of Rocks Used in Olmec Monuments. Con-
1943b La Venta's Green Stone Tigers. National Geographic tributions of the University of California Archaeological
Magazine , vol. lxxxiv, pp. 321-322. Washington. Research Facility , no. 1, pp. 1-39. Berkeley.
95