Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Chemosphere 57 (2004) 1213–1218

www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere
Short Communication

Cadmium accumulation in Allium schoenoprasum L. grown


in an aqueous medium
O. Barazani a, N. Dudai b, U.R. Khadka a, A. Golan-Goldhirsh a,*

a
Albert Katz Department of Dryland Biotechnologies, Desert Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, The Jacob Blaustein
Institute for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of The Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, 84990, Israel
b
Aromatic, Medicinal and Spice Crops Unit, Newe Ya’ar Research Center, Agricultural Research Organization,
Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel

Received 21 January 2004; received in revised form 14 July 2004; accepted 10 August 2004

Abstract

The ability of Allium schoenoprasum L. (chives) to accumulate and tolerate cadmium in aqueous Hoagland medium
at 50 lM and 250 lM was tested under continuous growth or several successive harvests of shoots. After 28 days of
continuous growth, chives accumulated the metal up to 0.2% and 0.5% of its dry weight, when grown in 50 lM and
250 lM, respectively. In experiments that the leaves were successively harvested every 16 days, there were no obvious
stress symptoms after six harvests during a period of 96 days at 50 lM Cd. At 250 lM, after 64 days and four harvests,
inhibition of growth occurred. In each treatment, a total of 1.2 g kg1 DW and 2.4 g kg1 DW was accumulated in the
leaves, respectively. Total SH compounds concentration in leaf was found significantly higher by 3 and 7.4 times in
plants treated with Cd at 50 lM and 250 lM in comparison to the control, respectively, while no difference in the con-
centration of glutathione (GSH + GSSG) was found. Thus, it is assumed that sulphur-containing compounds, yet
unknown, are involved in defensive mechanisms against heavy metals in chives. The results presented, point to chives
phytoremediation potential, but also on the potential risk in accumulation of heavy metals in a commonly edible plant.
Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Allium schoenoprasum L.; Cadmium; Glutathione; Phytoremediation; SH-compounds

1. Introduction and fast biomass production, and ability to translocate


the pollutants into the shoot (Cunningham and Ow,
Phytoremediation, refers to clean-up of polluted 1996). In the last few years, great efforts have been direc-
sites, terrestrial as well as aquatic environments from ted to the search of hyperaccumulator plants and the
heavy metal and organic contaminants by plants. A study of their tolerance mechanisms (for reviews see,
good phytoremediator plant should ideally have high Baker and Brooks, 1989; Salt et al., 1998).
Due to its high toxicity to animal as well as plants,
and its high solubility in water, cadmium (Cd) is consid-
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +972 8 6596753; fax: +972 8 ered to be one of the most problematic heavy metal
6596742. pollutants. Cadmium is considered biologically as a
E-mail address: avigolan@bgumail.bgu.ac.il (A. Golan- non-essential heavy metal, although at low concentra-
Goldhirsh). tion it was found to have stimulatory effect on root

0045-6535/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.037
1214 O. Barazani et al. / Chemosphere 57 (2004) 1213–1218

growth of Allium sativum (Liu et al., 2003), at high con- and were put to grow in buckets with 7 l aerated Hoa-
centration it is extremely toxic to most plants. Toxic ef- glands liquid medium. Each bucket contained 20
fects of Cd include chlorosis, growth inhibition, damage bunches of 20 seedlings each. The plants were grown
to root tips, reduction in water and nutrient uptake and in a wet-mattress cooled greenhouse at average temper-
damage to proteins (for review see Das et al., 1997). atures of 25 ± 3 °C and 16 ± 3 °C, day and night regime,
Nevertheless, a few terrestrial plant species, e.g. Thlaspi respectively. Natural light radiation was approximately
sp. (Lombi et al., 2000) and Arabidopsis halleri (Bert 1000 lmol m2 s1. The Hoagland medium was changed
et al., 2002) were reported to accumulate high concen- every seven days and the volume in each bucket was
tration of Cd, higher than the hyperaccumulation crite- checked daily throughout the experiments.
rion, 0.01% of shoot dry matter (Salt et al., 1995). It was
shown that the semi-aquatic and aquatic Phragmites 2.2. Cadmium treatments
australis, Nymphoides peltata, Nymphaeae sp., Eichhor-
nia crassipes and Lemna minor are fairly good accumula- After 7 days of growth in the liquid Hoagland med-
tors of Cd (Lavid et al., 2001; Ianneli et al., 2002; Wang ium, Cd(NO3)2 Æ 4H2O was added at 50 lM and
et al., 2002), supporting the use of plants for clean-up of 250 lM. Two treatments were tested: (1) continuous
polluted aquatic environments and water reservoirs. growth for 28 days; (2) continuous growth with succes-
One of the mechanisms involved in plant tolerance to sive harvests every 16 days and regrowth of the shoots.
Cd is the synthesis of the heavy metal binding ligand, The effect of Cd on plant growth was evaluated by meas-
phytochelatin (PC) from a reduced glutathione (GSH) urements of root and shoot length. Plant samples were
(for review see Clemens, 2001). A few genetic studies weighed after each harvest for determination of fresh
in yeast and higher plants have shown that GSH and weight, and dry weight after oven drying at 70 °C for
PCs deficient mutants are sensitive to Cd (e.g. Glaeser 72 h.
et al., 1991; Howden et al., 1995), and expression of
these genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced toler- 2.3. Heavy metal analysis
ance to Cd (Vatamaniuk et al., 1999). Cd, like other
environmental stresses, induces also antioxidant re- Plant samples were divided into roots and shoots and
sponses in plants. It was shown that the exposure to washed thoroughly in tap, distilled and double distilled
Cd increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes in water. Roots were washed also in 0.1 mM EDTA, dou-
Phragmites australis (Ianneli et al., 2002). GSH and its ble distilled water and 80% ethanol. Samples were oven
oxidized state (GSSG) form an important antioxidant/ dried as described above. The dried plant material was
chelator system (for review see Noctor et al., 1998). Thus ground to powder and samples (0.25 g) were digested
suggesting that glutathione is also involved in defence in 5 ml acid mixture of HClO4 (60%) and HNO3 (85%,
mechanisms against Cd toxicity. s.g. 1.42) (15:85 v/v) overnight. Digestion was completed
Allium schoenoprasum L. (chives), Liliaceae, is a com- by gradual increase of temperature from 60 to 195 °C
mon edible plant. The long tube-shaped leaves are (60 °C, 3 h; 100 °C, 1 h; 120 °C, 1 h; 150 °C, 30 min;
mostly used fresh for spicing salads. In Israel, chives is 175 °C, 30 min; 195 °C, 2.5 h). After cooling, HCl (20%,
cultivated mainly on artificial media in greenhouses, 2.5 ml) was added, whirl mixed and warmed to 80 °C
but observations of its growth on contaminated soil for 30 min. The final volume was brought to 10 ml with
led us to test its ability to accumulate cadmium. Chives double distilled water and re-warmed to 80 °C for an-
like most Allium species is highly rich in pungent sulphur other 30 min. Samples were filtered through cellulose fil-
containing volatile compounds, which attributes the ter (0.2 lM), and Cd concentration in the filtrate was
unique flavour and aroma. To test whether sulphur determined with an Atomic Absorption Spectrophoto-
containing compounds are involved in heavy metal meter (Perkin Elmer 110B).
detoxification, the content of glutathione and total
SH-containing compounds were measured. 2.4. Determination of total SH-containing compounds and
glutathione

2. Material and methods Plant samples, 1 g of shoot or root, were homoge-


nized in 5% meta-phosphoric acid in a ratio of 1:5
2.1. Plant material (w/v), and centrifuged at 11 000g for 10 min. The supern-
atant was eluted and total SH-containing compounds
Seedlings of A. schoenoprasum were obtained from were determined according to Ellman (1959).
Shorashim nursery (Ein HaBsor, Israel), and were Glutathione (reduced and oxidized forms) was as-
grown in the greenhouse in germination trays contain- sayed by an enzymatic recycling procedure (Anderson,
ing commercial pot soil mixture. Three to four-weeks- 1985) in which GSH is sequentially oxidized by Ellmans
old seedlings were taken out of the germination tray, reagent, 5,5 0 -dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) and
O. Barazani et al. / Chemosphere 57 (2004) 1213–1218 1215

reduced by reduced nicotine amide dinucleotide phos-


50 µM
phate (NADPH) in the presence of glutathione reduc-
tase (GR). The extent of the thio-nitrobenzoic acid 2000
thiol anion formation was monitored spectrophotomet-
rically at 412 nm for 4 min. For the assay of GSSG in
plant extract, GSH was blocked by derivatization with
2-vinylpyridine (2%) for 1 h at room temperature. For 500
determination of total glutathione (GSH + GSSG),
plant extracts, 50 ll from each sample was mixed in a

Cd (mg kg-1 DW)


250
reaction mixture containing 100 mM potassium phos-
phate buffer pH 7.4, 2.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTNB,
and 0.2 mM NADPH, in a final volume of 1 ml. The
reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.25 U GR. 250 µM
5000

2.5. Data analysis 4000

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was determined at a


level of 95% confidence using Sigma Stat software (SPSS
Inc.).
1000

3. Results and discussion


1 7 14 21 28
Time (days)
Treatment of A. schoenoprasum plants with cadmium
in the medium, either continuously or with successive Fig. 2. Cadmium accumulation in leaf and root of A. schoeno-
harvests of the shoot, led to accumulation of high metal prasum. Plants were grown continuously in Hoagland medium
concentrations in shoots and roots (Figs. 1 and 2). Un- supplemented with Cd, 50 lM and 250 lM for 28 days. Leaf—
der successive harvests, plants grown at 50 lM and black bars; root—gray bars.
250 lM Cd for 96 and 64 days, accumulated a total of
2.5 g kg1 DW and 5.4 g kg1 DW, respectively (Fig. 1).
Shoots of plants grown in 50 lM Cd, showed no stress (1.2 g kg1 DW and 2.4 g kg1 DW) and in root
symptoms. At 250 lM, chlorotic stress symptoms and (1.3 g kg1 DW, and 2.9 g kg1 DW) when grown in
growth inhibition were observed (data not shown). A 50 lM and 250 lM, respectively (Fig. 1).
high concentration of Cd was accumulated in shoot Under continuous growth of A. schoenoprasum in Cd
treatments without successive reharvesting, it was shown
that after 1 day of growth at 50 lM, plants accumulated
the heavy metal in concentration of 24 mg kg1 DW and
480 mg kg1 DW in leaf and root, respectively (Fig. 2).
2500 In 250 lM Cd treatment, plants accumulated 94 mg kg1
DW and 1480 mg kg1 DW of Cd, respectively (Fig. 2).
Cd (mg kg-1 DW)

Jiang et al. (2001) reported that after 9 days growth in


Hoagland medium with Cd at 100 M, Allium sativum
accumulated about 17.4 mg kg1 DW and 350 mg kg1
DW of the metal in shoots and roots, respectively. Sug-
gesting that Allium schoenoprasum might be a better
1000
hyperaccumulator of Cd. There was no significant in-
crease in the metal concentration in leaf and root be-
500
tween 7 and 28 days of growth in both treatments
(50 lM and 250 lM, Cd) (Fig. 2), indicating that after
1 week the rate of accumulation of the heavy metal
50 250
was proportional to the rate of growth. After 28 days
Cd concentration in the medium (µM)
of growth in both 50 lM and 250 lM, the total accumu-
Fig. 1. Total cadmium accumulation in leaf and root of A. lation of the metal in plants increased by 3.7 and 3.5
schoenoprasum. Plants were grown in Hoagland medium folds in comparison to its accumulation after the first
supplemented with Cd (50 lM and 250 lM) under successive day, respectively (Fig. 2). A. schoenoprasum hyperaccu-
harvests (see Section 2.2). Leaf—black bars; root—gray bars. mulated Cd up to 0.2% and 0.5% of dry weight in
1216 O. Barazani et al. / Chemosphere 57 (2004) 1213–1218

Table 1
Leaf and root fresh weight and dry weight of A. schoenoprasum grown in Hoagland medium containing Cd
Plant part Cd (lM) Days after treatment
7 14 21 28
Fresh weight* Leaf 0 240.1a 411.0a 950.7a 1301.0a
50 238.7a 427.1a 690.7b 772.2b
250 221.6a 288.9b 440.8c 464.4c

Root 0 38.0a 74.1a 156.1a 212.8a


50 25.4a 85.3a 137.2a 151.3b
250 47.2a 65.7a 96.6a 125.2b

Dry weight* Leaf 0 18.5a 33.9ab 77.4a 113.1a


50 21.1a 37.2a 61.2b 76.1b
250 20.8a 29.6b 42.0c 49.3c

Root 0 3.7a 6.6a 14.0a 21.5a


50 4.9b 7.9a 14.0a 16.3b
250 4.9b 7.5a 10.2b 14.2b
*
Different letters represent statistical differences (p < 0.05) among treatments in leaf and root fresh weight (mg) and dry weight (mg) at
each harvest time and in leaf and root separately.

50 lM and 250 lM treatments, respectively (Figs. 1 and


2, Table 1). It was previously suggested that hyperaccu-
mulator criterion for Cd is the ability of a plant to toler-
ate and accumulate Cd to more than 0.01% of shoot dry 35
Leaf length (cm)

weight (Salt et al., 1998). Until now only two Cd hyper-


accumulator species were characterized, both of the
Brassicaceae family, Thlaspi caerulescens and Arabidop- 30
sis halleri (Lombi et al., 2000; Bert et al., 2002). The data
presented here suggest that A. schoenoprasum could be
25
considered as a potential plant for phytoremediation
of Cd polluted water. Beside high heavy metal uptake
and translocation to the shoots, phytoremediation prac-
tice requires high biomass crops that are easily harvest-
able (Cunningham and Ow, 1996). Thus, traits as fast 20
growth rate and regrowth after many successive harvests
Root length (cm)

contribute to chives potential use for remediation. 18


During the 28 days of continuous growth of A. scho-
enoprasum, without successive harvests, some inhibitory 16
effects of Cd on plant growth were observed and meas-
ured (Table 1, Fig. 3). Significant differences (p < 0.05) 14
in fresh weight and dry weight of plants treated with
the heavy metal and that of the control were found after 12
14 days growth at 250 lM and after 21 days growth at
50 lM (Table 1). Between the 14th and 28th days of
7 14 21 28
exposure to Cd at 250 lM, fresh weight of shoots was re- Days
duced by 30–65% in comparison to the control (Table 1).
Similarly, significant differences (p < 0.05) in root and Fig. 3. Leaf and root elongation of A. schoenoprasum. Plants
leaf lengths were obtained after 14 days exposure to 
were grown in Hoagland medium ( ) supplemented with Cd at
250 lM Cd (Fig. 3). In 50 lM, fresh weight of the leaves 50 lM (s) and 250 lM (.).
was reduced by 27% and 41% after 21 and 28 days of
growth, respectively. Fresh weight of roots treated with
Cd at 50 lM was significantly reduced (29%) in compar- weight after 21 days growth at both Cd concentrations,
ison to control plants (Table 1). When comparing the and in roots after 21 and 28 days growth at 250 lM and
dry weights, significant differences were found in leaves 50 lM, respectively (Table 1). It was reported by Jiang
O. Barazani et al. / Chemosphere 57 (2004) 1213–1218 1217

et al. (2001) that Cd inhibited significantly whole plant tion indicate that chives can be considered as a potential
and root growth of A. sativum at 1 mM, while at lower candidate for phytoremediation of polluted water. How-
concentration it didnt have any effect on plant growth. ever, chives is a commonly used food plant. Therefore,
Most plant species are sensitive to very low concentra- great precaution should be given to its hyperaccumula-
tion of Cd (Pietrini et al., 2003) and toxic symptoms tion trait.
as inhibition of plant growth, browning of root tips
can be easily seen (Das et al., 1997). Exposure of A.
schoenoprasum to Cd at 50 lM did not have any effect Acknowledgment
on leaf nor root elongation (Fig. 3), thus pointing to
chives tolerance to the metal. This project was supported by a post-doctoral fellow-
The concentration of total SH-group and glutathione ship to O. Barazani from the Blaustein Center for Scien-
(GSH + GSSH) in root and leaf of A. schoenoprasum tific Cooperation and by a graduate fellowship to U.R.
were measured after 28 days of continuous growth Khadka from Albert Katz International School for De-
(Fig. 4). Total SH-group concentration in roots was sert Studies.
1.1, 5.4 and 4.5 times higher than in the shoots in the
control, 50 lM and 250 lM treatments, respectively
(Fig. 4). In roots, the concentration of SH in plants References
grown in Cd in both treatments was significantly higher
than in root of plants grown in the control treatment (15 Anderson, M.E., 1985. Determination of glutathione disulfide
and 30 times, respectively). In leaf, SH concentration in in biological samples. Methods Enzymol. 113, 548–555.
Baker, A.J.M., Brooks, R.R., 1989. Terrestrial higher plants
Cd treated plants was also significantly higher by 3 and
which hyperaccumulate metallic elements—a review of their
7.4 times, respectively, than in control treatment (Fig. 4). distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1,
Recently, it was shown that Cd induced antioxidative 81–126.
activity including accumulation of glutathione in Phrag- Bert, V., Bonnin, I., Saumitou-Laprade, P., de Laguérie, Petit,
mites australis (Pietrini et al., 2003). In phytochelatin D., 2002. Do Arabidopsis halleri from nonmetallicolous
deficient mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana low PC accu- populations accumulate zinc and cadmium more effectively
mulation was correlated with its sensitivity to Cd (How- than those from metallicolous populations. New Phytol.
den et al., 1995). In A. schoenoprasum, significant 155, 47–57.
differences in glutathione concentration were found be- Clemens, S., 2001. Molecular mechanisms of plant tolerance
tween roots of control plants and Cd treatments at and homeostasis: A review. Planta 212, 457–486.
Cunningham, S.D., Ow, D.W., 1996. Promises and prospects of
50 lM and 250 lM (Fig. 4). However, in comparison
phytoremediation. Plant Physiol. 110, 715–719.
to control there was a decline in glutathione concentra- Das, P., Samantaray, S., Rout, G.R., 1997. Studies on cadmium
tion in roots (Fig. 4). Thus, these results suggest that toxicity in plants: a review. Environ. Poll. 98, 29–36.
other SH-containing compounds, yet unknown, are in- Ellman, G.L., 1959. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. Biochem.
volved in chives defense against Cd toxicity. Biophys. 82, 70–77.
A. schoenoprasum high tolerance to Cd as well as to Glaeser, H., Coblenz, A., Kruczek, R., Ruttke, I., Ebert-Jung,
other toxic heavy metals (data not shown), fast regrowth A., Wolf, K., 1991. Glutathione metabolism and heavy
after several successive harvests and Cd hyperaccumula- metal detoxification in Schizosacchromyces pombe. Isolation
and characterization of glutathione-deficient, cadmium-
sensitive mutants. Curr. Genet. 19, 207–213.
Howden, R., Goldsbrough, P.E., Andersen, C.R., Cobbett,
SH-GROUP (nmol g-1 FW)

C.S., 1995. Cadmium-sensitive, cad1 mutant of Arabidopsis


GSH+GSSG (nmol g-1 FW)

9000
250 thaliana are phytochelatin deficient. Plant Physiol. 107,
1059–1066.
Ianneli, M.A., Pietrini, F., Fiore, L., Petrilli, L., Massacci, A.,
4000 200
2002. Antioxidant response to cadmium in Phragmites
australis plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 40, 977–982.
2000 150
Jiang, W., Liu, D., Hou, W., 2001. Hyperaccumulation of
cadmium by roots, bulbs and shoots of garlic (Allium
sativum L.). Bioresour. Technol. 76, 9–13.
Lavid, N., Schwartz, A., Lewinsohn, E., Tel-Or, E., 2001.
leaves roots leaves roots Phenols and phenol oxidases are involved in cadmium
SH-group Glutathione accumulation in the water plants Nymphoides peltata
(Menyanthaceae) and Nymphaeae (Nymphaeaceae). Planta
Fig. 4. SH-containing compounds and glutathione accumula- 241, 189–195.
tion in root and leaf of A. schoenoprasum. Plants were grown Liu, D., Jiang, W., Gao, X., 2003. Effects of cadmium on root
for 28 days in control medium (black bars) and with Cd at growth, cell division and nucleoli in root tip cells of garlic.
50 lM (white bars) and 250 lM (gray bars). Biol. Planta. 47, 79–83.
1218 O. Barazani et al. / Chemosphere 57 (2004) 1213–1218

Lombi, E., Zhao, F.J., Dunham, S.J., McGrath, S.P., 2000. Salt, D.E., Blaylock, M., Kumar, N., Dushenkov, V., Ensley,
Cadmium accumulation in populations of Thlaspi caerules- B., Chet, I., Raskin, I., 1995. Phytoremediation: a novel
cens and Thlaspi goesingense. New Phytol. 145, 11– strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environ-
20. ment using plants. Biotechnology 13, 468–474.
Noctor, G., Arisi, A., Jouanin, L., Kunert, K., Rennenberg, H., Salt, D.E., Smith, R.D., Raskin, I., 1998. Phytoremediation.
Foyer, C., 1998. Glutathione: biosynthesis, metabolism and Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 643–668.
relationship to stress tolerance explored in transformed Vatamaniuk, O.K., Mari, S., Lu, Y.P., Rea, P.A., 1999.
plants. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 623–647. AtPCS1, a phytochelatin synthase from Arabidopsis: isola-
Pietrini, F., Iannelli, M.A., Pasqualini, S., Massacci, A., 2003. tion and in vitro reconstitution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Interaction of cadmium with glutathione and photosynthe- 96, 7110–7115.
sis in developing leaves and chloroplasts of Phragmites Wang, Q., Cui, Y., Dong, Y., 2002. Phytoremediation of
australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steudel. Plant Physiol. 133, 829– polluted waters potentials and prospects of wetland plants.
837. Acta Biotechnol. 1–2, 199–208.

You might also like