Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Complaint (Common Pleas) 2-9-22
Complaint (Common Pleas) 2-9-22
Kim Hoover :
c/o Cooper & Elliott, LLC :
305 West Nationwide Boulevard :
Columbus, Ohio 43215, :
:
Plaintiff, :
:
v. :
:
State of Ohio :
c/o Dave Yost :
Ohio Attorney General :
30 East Broad Street, 14th Floor :
Columbus, Ohio 43215, :
:
serve also: :
State of Ohio :
c/o Gary Tyack :
Franklin County Prosecutor :
373 South High Street, 14th Floor :
Columbus, Ohio 43215, :
:
Defendant. :
COMPLAINT
1. This case arises out of Kim Hoover’s wrongful conviction and imprisonment for
an alleged crime she did not commit. Kim is completely innocent of the charges against her. She
was wrongfully imprisoned for eighteen years before this court vacated her conviction after
forensic testimony used against her at trial has since proven unreliable and incorrect. Kim seeks a
declaration that she is a wrongfully imprisoned individual under Ohio R.C. § 2743.48.
3. Defendant State of Ohio is named as the defendant in this action, and the Attorney
because the underlying criminal action against Kim was initiated in Franklin County and because
R.C. § 2743.48(B)(1) directs that this action be filed in the common pleas court in the county
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5. In 2002, Kim was indicted on multiple felony charges for alleged acts that she did
not commit. The criminal action proceeded in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas,
7. In November 2003, after a trial, Kim was found guilty of the charges against her.
9. In 2021, Kim filed an amended motion for new trial in this Court.
10. Dr. Patrick Fardal, the forensic pathologist who had performed the autopsy on the
decedent, Samaisha Benson, reviewed his autopsy report, microscopic slides, special stains, and
autopsy photographs. Dr. Fardal also reviewed his criminal trial testimony, the trial testimony of
three other doctors that had testified at Kim’s criminal trial, and Samaisha’s medical records.
11. Whereas at trial Dr. Fardal testified that retinal hemorrhages observed in
Samaisha were indicative of shaken impact syndrome occurring within the two-and-a-half hour
window that Kim was caring for Samaisha, he has now acknowledged that since then, other
causes of retinal hemorrhages have been put forth (such as prolonged hypoxia, coagulation
defects, and increased intracranial pressure). Dr. Fardal now states it cannot be said with medical
1
At the time of her arrest on these charges, Kim’s last name was recorded as “Hoover-Moore,” and she was
designated as “Kim Hoover-Moore” in the underlying criminal matter. However, Kim’s legal last name is simply
“Hoover.”
2
certainty that the retinal hemorrhages occurred during the window in which Samaisha was in
Kim’s care.
12. Further, whereas at trial Dr. Fardal testified he found no evidence of any old head
injury, Dr. Fardal acknowledges that upon further review of the microscopic sections and special
stains, he found evidence of a remote subdural hemorrhage weeks to a month old. Dr. Fardal
stated that this indicates Samaisha apparently suffered an undiagnosed remote traumatic event to
her head.
13. Dr. Fardal further stated that the remote subdural hemorrhage raises a question as
to whether Samaisha may have suffered a rebleed into her subdural space resulting from the
remote subdural hemorrhage. He explained that a lesser amount of trauma could have caused a
rebleed as compared to what is necessary to cause a primary subdural hemorrhage. He stated that
the microscopic slides, including the special stains, indicate that the bleeding into Samaisha’s
14. Dr. Fardal testified at trial that a single shaking with impact caused Samaisha’s
acute subdural hemorrhage, skull fracture, brain swelling, and retinal hemorrhages. But he now
acknowledges that he cannot conclude that Samaisha’s injuries occurred within the window that
Kim was caring for her, and states that the acute changes all occurred within a four-to-five-day
15. Dr. Janice Ophoven, a pediatric forensic pathologist with over thirty years’
experience, also concluded that Samaisha’s injuries are indicative of a rebleed occurring within
17. The State even had a different neuropathologist review the case. That
neuropathologist also opined that Samaisha’s injuries did not occur while she was in Kim’s care.
3
18. On October 21, 2021, after the prosecutor did not object, this Court granted the
20. At the State’s request, the Court entered a Nolle Prosequi to the indictment,
21. The prosecutor has not brought any further criminal proceeding against Kim for
22. No criminal proceeding is pending against Kim for any act associated with her
vacated conviction.
23. The prosecuting attorney has not sought any appeal of right or upon leave of court
in Kim’s case.
24. Kim did not commit the charged offenses or any lesser-included offenses. She is
26. Kim seeks a declaration under R.C. § 2743.48 that she is a wrongfully imprisoned
individual.
4
WHEREFORE, plaintiff Kim Hoover seeks judgment in her favor declaring that she is a
wrongfully imprisoned individual, awarding her the costs of this action, and all other relief this
Respectfully submitted,