Evaluate: Saint Louis University School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Document Code FM-STL-013

Saint Louis University Revision No. 01


School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity June 07, 2021
Page 1 of 6

EVALUATE

Submit the following to your Supervising Instructor for your evaluation after the project
implementation:
1. Final Service Learning Plan
2. Final Documentations properly labelled (before, during and after) with attached video
of the project implementation
3. Evaluation from your two witnesses for your project using the Rubrics for Performance
and Project rating (1 family member and 1 neighbor with valid ID’s attached)
4. Journal

Be guided with the following rubrics:

Rubrics for SLP ( 90 points )


Categories Exemplary=A Above Adequate=C Inadequate=D
(Far Exceeds Average=B (Meets (Below Standard)
Standard) (Exceeds Standard)
Standard)
15 13 10 7
Organization Writing shows Writing is Writing is Writing lacks logical
high degree of coherent and coherent and organization. It
attention to logically logically shows some
logic and organized with organized. coherence but ideas
reasoning of transitions used Some points lack
points. Unity between ideas remain unity. Serious errors.
clearly leads and misplaced and
the reader to paragraphs to stray from the
the conclusion create topic. Transitions
and stirs coherence. evident but not
thought Overall unity of throughout the
regarding the ideas is project report.
topic. present.
Grammar Report is free Report has few Most spelling, Spelling,
of distracting spelling, punctuation, punctuation, and
and spelling, punctuation, and grammar grammatical errors
punctuation, and correct but create distraction,
Mechanics and grammatical some errors making reading
grammatical errors allowing remain. difficult; fragments,
errors; absent reader to comma splices, run-
of fragments, follow ideas ons evident. Errors
comma clearly. Very are frequent.
splices, and few fragments
run-ons. or run-ons.

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any 1
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited.
Document Code FM-STL-013
Saint Louis University Revision No. 01
School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity June 07, 2021
Page 2 of 6

Format Meets all Meets format Meets format Fails to follow format
formal and and and assignment and assignment
assignment assignment requirements; requirements;
requirements requirements; generally incorrect margins,
and evidences margins, correct margins, spacing and
attention to spacing, and spacing, and indentation;
detail; all indentations indentations; neatness needs
margins, are correct; neat but may attention.
spacing and neat and have some
indentations correctly assembly errors.
are correct; assembled.
neat and
correctly
assembled
with
professional
look.
Completeness All necessary One part of Two parts of the Three or more parts
parts of the SLP SLP is missing SLP are missing of SLP are missing
is present

SWOT analysis Very complete Complete Incomplete No SWOT analysis


SWOT analysis SWOT analysis SWOT analysis
Appendices Very organized Organized Incomplete No appendices
content of the content of the content of the
appendices appendices appendices
Total

Documentation (100 points )

Categories Exemplary=A Above Adequate=C Inadequate=D


(Far Exceeds Average=B (Meets Standard) (Below Standard)
Standard) (Exceeds
Standard)

100 90 70 50

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any2
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited.
Document Code FM-STL-013
Saint Louis University Revision No. 01
School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity June 07, 2021
Page 3 of 6

Documentati Presence of Presence of Presence of Incomplete


on proper proper proper documentation
documentation documentatio documentation showed
(showed per n (showed per (showed per
week week week
documentation documentatio documentation
as part of the n as part of as part of the
appendix) the appendix appendix but two
but one week weeks missing in
missing in the the
documentatio documentation)
n)

Total

Rubrics for Performance and Project Rating


5 4 3 2 1
ITEM
Achievement of objective of the program or project such as:
1. Enhance and broaden the knowledge of the people about maintaining
the project (example: maintain cleanliness on their place)
2. Work with the people in making the project
Methodology used:
1. Included community people (family members) in activities like planning
and implementation.
2. Utilized community needs assessment and verified appropriate
methodology for use in activity.
3. Validated needs assessment and verified appropriated methodology for
use in activity.
4. Used varied techniques for the attainment of the project objectives.
ITEM 5 4 3 2 1
1. Changes in the physical structures or infrastructures and improvements
are visible.
2. Impact on social structures.
3. Participation of community people and local agencies. (like family
members)
4. Program is appropriate to learning objectives of the students.
5. Encouraged critical thinking to the project/ activity.
6. Sustainability of the program
ITEM 5 4 3 2 1
1. Materials used for demonstrations and other works were adequate.
2. Participation of community people and local agencies was solicited
3. Program can be maintained with minimal use of other resources
ITEM 5 4 3 2 1
1. Made use of local resources and personnel during project
implementation.

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any3
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited.
Document Code FM-STL-013
Saint Louis University Revision No. 01
School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity June 07, 2021
Page 4 of 6

2. Activities are cost-effective and well budgeted.


3. Alliance and partners were able to help in project implementation
ITEM 5 4 3 2 1
1. Communication and information are well served to the participants and
partners in the projects/ activities
2. Documentations are recorded and kept.
3. Monitoring and evaluation are continuously conducted.
Total:

Evaluated by:
___________________________________________
Name and Signature of The evaluator (Attach on this page a photocopy of valid ID, if possible)
Relationship to the implementer/student: _________________________
Date accomplished: __________________________

Rubrics for Journal Entries 50 points


Grading Criteria Excellent Acceptable Minimal Unacceptable
10-9 8-7 6-5 4-3
Content ( 15 pts) Response to Response Response Response
assigned thoughtful and adequately consists of
topic fairly well addresses unsupported
thorough and written; most some aspects opinions only
well written, opinions of the marginally
with varied supported with assigned topic; related to the
sentence facts opinions topic.
structure and sometimes
vocabulary; based on
opinions incorrect
always information.
supported
with facts.
Idea Excellent use Good reliance Incomplete Ideas not
Development of examples upon development clearly stated
15 pts and details examples and of ideas; or developed.
to explore details to details and
and develop illustrate and examples not
ideas and develop ideas always
opinions. and opinions. evident.

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any4
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited.
Document Code FM-STL-013
Saint Louis University Revision No. 01
School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity June 07, 2021
Page 5 of 6

Organization Very logically Contains Topics and Entry is


15 pts organized; introduction, ideas discussed unstructured.
contains some somewhat
introduction; development randomly;
development of ideas, and entry may lack
of main idea conclusion. clearly defined
(or ideas), introduction or
and conclusion.
conclusion.
Mechanics Flawless Few or no Several Many
5 pts spelling and spelling spelling and instances of
punctuation. errors; some punctuation incorrect
minor errors. spelling and
punctuation punctuation.
mistakes.

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any5
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited.
Document Code FM-STL-013
Saint Louis University Revision No. 01
School of Teacher Education and Liberal Arts Effectivity June 07, 2021
Page 6 of 6

WRITING JOURNAL 2: MODULE 2 EXPERIENCE (10 Points)

Instruction:
1. Writing journal can be handwritten or encoded. This will serve as your personal reflection
log of your personal experiences, concerns, and encounters in your venture of NSTP 1. The
following guide questions will help you to accomplish your weekly journal. At least two to
three questions that you will be able to answer for this first two weeks.

a. What volunteerism activities were you able to share this first two weeks?
b. How did you enhance or strengthen your faith?
c. What new learnings from NSTP activities were you able to appreciate in which it
will serve as a good application in your practical life?
d. What new ideas from NSTP activities were you able to utilize in your future
profession?
e. What challenges did you encounter that you were able to work out?
f. What activities in your community that you were able to join in which it uplifts
your Louisian values?

2. You may use the format for your weekly journal or you can modify the
format according to your creativity

3. Reflect on the salient points that you encountered in the module 1.

Name:
___________________________________________________________________________________

Class code: ________________________


Date submitted: ____________________________

Week 3 Experiences:
DATES Answer 2-3 guide questions only.

Week 4
DATES

Reflection for the mass: Homily: (striking statement/s from the homily)

Reflection for module 2:

Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any6
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited.

You might also like