Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS Petitioner
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS Petitioner
RESPONDENT
Female prostitution has been legalised as per Aryadvip Sex Workers (Protection and Regulation)
Act 2021. Petitioners had obtained the license to operate brothel in Sanskruti Raksha Housing
Society. Therefore, the expulsion of petitioners from the society that too without giving them an
opportunity of being heard is arbitrary and unreasonable. Equality and arbitrariness are sworn
enemies. Thus, the act of expulsion violates the right to equality of petitioners guaranteed under
article 14. Moreover, the petitioners have complied with all the laws applicable to them thus they
have statutory right under the new act and fundamental right under article 19(1) (g) to carry out
profession and business. Petitioners have right to earn livelihood and right to life under article 21
does not mean merely animal existence, it is more than that and encompasses within it the right
to earn livelihood. Thus, the act of expulsion of petitioners from the society is manifestly illegal
As per article 15(3) of the constitution of Aryadvip state can make special laws for women and
children. Right to life guaranteed under article 21 also includes right to earn livelihood. Also, the
freedom to carry out one’s profession is protected under article 19(1) (g). The new act furthers
the purpose of the old enactment. There is always a strong presumption of the constitutionality of
an enactment and it is the party which challenges the constitutionality of a law has to prove that
the law in question is unconstitutional. Parliament of Aryadvip had the legislative competence to
enact the impugned legislation as the subject matter of the law is not covered by any of the lists
under VII schedule. Thus, parliament of Aryadvip was empowered to enact the Aryadvip Sex
Workers (Protection and Regulation) Act 2021 under entry 97 of the list 1 read with article 248.
It is constitutional morality which is inherent in the constitution which means that rights
entrenched in the constitution must be safeguarded regardless of the prevailing majority view in
the society. Thus, keeping aside the public morality prevailing in the society, the constitutional
morality should be given value and therefore, the new act is constitutional and safeguards