Organizational Behavior: Chapter 6: Understanding Work Team

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

CHAPTER 6: UNDERSTANDING WORK TEAM

I/ WHY HAVE TEAMS BECOME SO POPULAR?


- Great way to use employee talents.
- Teams are more flexible and responsive to changes in the environment.
- Can quickly assemble, deploy, refocus, and disband.
- Facilitate employee involvement.
- Increase employee participation in decision making.
- Democratize an organization and increase motivation.
 Note: teams are not ALWAYS effective.
II/ DIFFERENT BETWEEN GROUPS AND TEAMS.
WORK GROUP WORK TEAM
- A group that interacts primarily to share - A group whose individual efforts result in
information and make decisions to help each member performance that is greater than the sum of the
perform within his or her area of responsibility. individual inputs.
- Have no need or opportunity to engage in collective - Generates positive synergy through coordinated
work that requires joint effort. effort.
- Their performance is merely the summation of each
group member’s individual contribution.

III/ TYPES OF TEAMS.


1. Problem – solving team.
- Typically composed of 5 to 12 hourly employees from the same department.
- Meet for a few hours each week to discuss ways of improving quality, efficiency, and the work
environment.
- Rarely have the authority to unilaterally implement any of their suggestions.
2. Self – managed worked team.
- Groups of employees (typically 10 to 15 in number).
- Who perform highly related or interdependent jobs and take on many of the responsibilities of their
former supervisors.
- Tasks are planning and scheduling work, assigning tasks to members, making operating decisions, taking
action on problems, and working with suppliers and customers.
3. Cross – functional team.
- Employees from about the same hierarchical level
- Different work areas
- Who come together to accomplish a task.
4. Virtual team.
- Use computer technology to unite physically dispersed members and achieve a common goal.
- Limited communication.
- Able to overcome time and space constraints.
- To be effective, they need: trust among members, close monitoring, to be publicized.
IV/ CREATING EFFECTIVE TEAM.
- The effective team model:

* Caveat:
+ This is a general guide only.
+ The model assumes that teamwork is preferable to individual work.
1. Context: What factors determine whether teams are successful.
1.1. Adequate resources.
- Need the tools to complete the jobs.
- Every work team relies on resources outside the group to sustain it. A scarcity of resources directly
reduces the ability of a team to perform its job effectively and achieve its goals.
- This support includes timely information, proper equipment, adequate staffing, encouragement, and
administrative assistance.
1.2. Leadership and structure.
- Agreeing on the specifics of work and how they fit together to integrate individual skills.
- Even “self – managed” teams need leaders.
- Leadership is especially important in multiteam systems, in which different teams coordinate their
efforts to produce a desired outcome.
1.3. Climate of trust.
- Members of teams must trust each other and leaders.
- Interpersonal trust among team members facilitates cooperation, reduces the need to monitor each other’s
behavior, and bonds members around the belief that others on the team will not take advantage of them.
- Team members are more likely to take risks and expose vulnerabilities when they believe they can trust
others on their team.
1.4. Performance evaluation and reward systems.
- Can not just be based on individual efforts.
- Group-based appraisals, profit sharing, gainsharing, small-group incentives, and other system
modifications can reinforce team effort and commitment.
2. Team composition.
2.1. Abilities of members.
- Part of a team’s performance depends on the knowledge, skills, and abilities of its individual members.
- Need technical expertise, problem-solving, decision-making, and good interpersonal skills.
- The ability of the team’s leader also matters.
2.2. Personality of members.
- Conscientiousness, openness to experience tend to perform better, and agreeableness all relate to team
performance.
+ Conscientious people are good at backing up other team members, and they are also good at sensing
when their support is truly needed.
+ Open team members communicate better with one another and throw out more ideas.
2.3. Allocating of roles.
- Teams have different needs, and members should be selected to ensure all the various roles are filled.
- Successful work teams have selected people to play all these roles based on their skills and preferences
(Exhibit 10.4).
2.4. Diversity of members.
- Organizational demography: The degree to which members of a work unit share a common
demographic attribute, such as age, sex, race, educational level, or length of service in an organization, and the
impact of this attribute on turnover.
- Diversity can often lead to lower performance.
- However, proper leadership can also improve the performance of diverse teams.
2.5. Size of teams.
- The smaller, the better: the most effective teams have five to nine members.
2.6. Member preferences.
- Managers should consider individual preferences along with abilities, personalities, and skills.
- High-performing teams are likely to be composed of people who prefer working as part of a group.
- When people who prefer to work alone are required to team up, there is a direct threat to the team’s
morale and to individual member satisfaction.
3. Team processes.
3.1. Common plan and purpose.
- Successful teams put a tremendous amount of time and effort into discussing, shaping, and agreeing on a
purpose that belongs to them both collectively and individually.  This common purpose provides direction
and guidance under any and all conditions.
- Effective teams also show reflexivity, meaning they reflect on and adjust their master plan when
necessary. A team has to have a good plan, but it also has to be willing and able to adapt when conditions call
for it.
3.2. Specific goals.
- Translate their common purpose into specific, measurable, and realistic performance goals.
- Team goals should also be challenging.
3.3. Team efficacy.
- Team efficacy: teams have confidence in themselves; they believe they can succeed.
- To improve team efficacy:
+ Helping the team achieve small successes that build confidence.
+ Providing training to improve members’ technical and interpersonal skills.
3.4. Mental models.
- Mental models: Team members’ knowledge and beliefs about how the work gets done by the team.
3.5. Conflict level.
- Disagreements about task content (called task conflicts) stimulate discussion, promote critical assessment
of problems and options, and can lead to better team decisions.
- Relationship conflicts - those based on interpersonal incompatibilities, tension, and animosity toward
others - are almost always dysfunctional.
3.6. Social loafing.
- Team holds itself accountable both individually and as a team.
4. Work design (NOT APPEAR IN THE BOOK BUT IN THE POWERPOINT).
- Freedom and autonomy: Ability to work independently.
- Skill variety: Ability to use different skills and talents.
- Task identity: Ability to complete a whole and identifiable task or product.
- Task significance: Working on a task or project that has a substantial impact on others.
V/ TURNING INDIVIDUALS INTO TEAM PLAYERS.
1. Selecting: Hiring team players.
- Make team skills one of the interpersonal skills in the hiring process.
2. Training: Creating team players.
- Individualistic people can learn.
3. Rewarding: Providing incentives to be a good team player.
- An organization’s reward system must be reworked to encourage cooperative efforts rather than
competitive ones.
- Continue to recognize individual contribution while still emphasizing the important of teamwork.
VI/ TEAMS ARE NOT ALWAYS THE ANSWER.
- Teamwork takes more time and often more resources than individual work.
- Three tests to see if a team fits the situation:
 Is the work complex and is there a need for different perspectives: Will it be better with the insights
of more than one person?
 Does the work create a common purpose or set of goals for the group that is larger than the
aggregate of the goals for individuals?
 Are members of the group involved in interdependent tasks?
VII/ GLOBAL IMPLICATIONS.
- Extent of Teamwork:
+ Other countries use teams more often than does the U.S.
- Self-Managed Teams:
+ Do not work well in countries with low tolerance for ambiguity and uncertainty and a high-power
distance.
- Team Cultural Diversity and Team Performance:
+ Diversity caused by national differences interferes with team efficiency, at least in the short run.
+ After about three months the differences between diverse and non-diverse team performance
disappear.
VIII/ IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGERS.
- Effective teams have common characteristics:
+ They have adequate resources, effective leadership, a climate of trust, appropriate evaluation and
reward systems.
+ They are composed of members with correct skills and roles.
+ They tend to be small - with fewer than 10 people, preferably of diverse backgrounds. The work
they do provides freedom, autonomy, and the chance to contribute.
+ The tasks are whole and significant.
+ They have members who believe in the team’s capabilities.
- Managers should modify the environment and select team-oriented individuals to increase the chance of
developing effective teams.

You might also like